Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-0859-0826
Influence of Maternal Age on Selected Obstetric Parameters
Article in several languages: English | deutsch- Abstract
- Introduction
- Aim and Research Questions
- Material and Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- Conclusion for Clinical Practice
- References/Literatur
Abstract
Introduction In recent decades, there has been a continuous rise in the average age at which women give birth. A maternal age of 35 years and above is considered an independent risk factor in pregnancy and birth, due to higher rates of intervention. This study investigates the influence of maternal age on birth procedure, gestational age, and rate of interventions during delivery. The influence of maternal parity is also analyzed.
Material and Methods Data from the Austrian Register of Births was retrospectively collected and evaluated. The collected data was the data of all singleton live births in Austria between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2016 (n = 686 272). Multiple births and stillbirths were excluded from the study. Maternal age and parity were analyzed in relation to predefined variables (birth procedure, gestational age, episiotomy in cases of vaginal delivery, epidural anesthesia in both vaginal and cesarean deliveries, and intrapartum micro-blood gas analysis). Statistical data was evaluated using (1) descriptive univariate analysis, (2) bivariate analysis, and (3) multinomial regression models.
Results The cesarean section rate and the rate of surgically-assisted vaginal deliveries increased with advancing maternal age, especially in primiparous women, while the rate of spontaneous deliveries decreased with increasing maternal age. A parity of ≥ 2 had a protective effect on the cesarean section rate. The rate of premature births also increased with increasing maternal age, particularly among primiparous women.
Discussion Although higher maternal age has a negative effect on various obstetric parameters, it was nevertheless not possible to identify a causal connection. Maternal age should not be assessed as an independent risk factor; other factors such as lifestyle or prior chronic disease and parity must be taken into consideration.
#
Introduction
In recent decades, the age at which women give birth has continually increased. In Austria, the average age of primiparous women in 2016 was 29.4 years. By comparison, in 1984 the average age of primiparous women in Austria was 23.8 years [1] ([Fig. 1]).
Factors which have contributed to the higher maternal age at the birth of the first child include increased life expectancy, higher levels of education and better career opportunities for women, more birth control options, the availability of reproductive medicine, changed attitudes to sexuality and partnership, and late marriage as well as higher rates of divorce [2], [3]. The percentage of women who only start trying for a baby at the age of 35 years or above has increased, especially in the last three decades. The trend to delay having children is particularly evident in countries with high per-capita incomes [4], [5].
The obstetrically relevant definition of advanced maternal age varies in the literature. On the one hand, a maternal age of ≥ 35 years is recognized as an independent risk factor for various obstetric interventions and complications [3], [6]; on the other hand, a cut-off age of ≥ 40 years has been reported to be the threshold for significantly higher risks [4], [5], [7]. Given this context, the 1958 definition of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, which defined advanced maternal age as ≥ 35 years [2], should be reconsidered.


The number of chromosomal abnormalities increase with increasing maternal age. This is especially relevant for Downʼs syndrome but also has an impact on Patauʼs syndrome and Edwards syndrome [4]. The risk of having a child with trisomy is 1 : 1250 for women aged 25, 1 : 800 for women aged 30, 1 : 340 for women aged 35, 1 : 100 for women aged 40 and 1 : 25 for women aged 45 years. As the overall number of aneuploid infants increases with increasing maternal age, in the 1970s a maternal age of 35 years was identified as the threshold which justified prenatal investigation due to an increased risk of aneuploidy [8]. There is no known association between advanced maternal age and non-chromosomal abnormalities [9].
The rate of miscarriages due to embryonic chromosomal abnormalities also increases with advanced maternal age [2], [4].
The risk of premature delivery is significantly higher for young women aged ≤ 19 years and for women aged ≥ 40 years [10], [11]. It is not yet clear whether maternal age is in itself an independent risk factor for higher rates of premature deliveries or whether age-dependent factors are primarily responsible for triggering preterm births [4].
The duration of the birth, particularly the duration of the expulsion period, and the risk of operative vaginal delivery increase with increasing maternal age. The C-section rate, particularly the rate of primary caesarean sections, increases significantly with higher maternal age [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18].
In addition to the parameters listed above, advanced maternal age also has an effect on the rate of multiple pregnancies, the rate of placenta previa [19], the placental abruption rate [3], the episiotomy rate [20] and the incidence of women with pregnancy-related hypertension or gestational diabetes [21]. Age-related reduced placental perfusion is considered one of the reasons for the higher percentage of low birthweight neonates and neonates with intrauterine growth retardation [3]. Overall, studies which have investigated the impact of maternal age on relevant obstetric parameters have presented varying results; the evidence for obstetric pathophysiology due to biological aging processes and for the role of parity is limited [22].
#
Aim and Research Questions
The aim of this study was to present the impact of advanced maternal age on selected obstetric parameters such as mode of delivery, duration of pregnancy and obstetric interventions, using basic epidemiological data. The study additionally aimed to investigate whether parity, when combined with maternal age, has an impact on selected obstetric parameters, and if so, to what extent. This gave rise to the following research questions: What effect does the maternal age of primiparous women have on the mode of delivery, the duration of pregnancy and the rate of interventions during delivery? What impact does parity have in this context?
#
Material and Methods
Publication of this article was approved by the Ethics Committee of Upper Austria, permission was obtained from the Austrian Register of Births, and the advisory board of the Institute for Clinical Epidemiology of Tyrolean Hospitals approved the data analysis.
The Austrian Register of Births records the data of all in-hospital births which occur in Austria on an epidemiological basis. The method used in this study was retrospective data collection and evaluation.
Sample and variables
This retrospective study is based on the data of all singleton births which occurred in Austria between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2016 (n = 686 272).
The total study population was grouped into seven age cohorts (< 20 years, 20 – 24 years, 25 – 29 years, 30 – 34 years, 35 – 39 years, 40 – 44 years, ≥ 45 years) and according to parity (primiparae n = 336 967, secundiparae n = 236 103, multiparae n = 113 202). Maternal age and parity were compared for the following predefined variables: mode of delivery (spontaneous birth, vacuum extraction, forceps delivery, primary and secondary C-section), week of gestation, obstetric interventions (episiotomy, epidural and spinal anesthesia during vaginal delivery, primary and secondary C-section) and micro-blood gas analysis during the first stage of labor.
Multiple births and stillbirths were excluded.
Data were first evaluated by descriptive analysis, which calculated the frequencies for the various maternal age cohorts. The impact of maternal age on selected variables was evaluated using column and row percentages of contingency tables, with the χ2 statistic as the measure of association for row and column variables.
Multinomial models [23] were used to further evaluate the datasets, with maternal age taken as the explanatory variable and the different obstetrically relevant parameters as the dependent variables. The estimated coefficients can be interpreted as odds ratios for the selected categories compared to the reference category. If the dependent variables were found to be based on only two categories, the statistical model resulted in the special case of logistic regression.
The reference category used to calculate the odds ratio was based on women aged 20 – 24 years of age and of varying parity who had a physiological birth (depending on the investigated variable: spontaneous delivery, delivery at term or no obstetric intervention).
#
#
Results
Mode of delivery
In primiparous women, the rate of spontaneous deliveries decreased continuously with increasing maternal age. The percentage of spontaneous births for the total group of primaparae was 58.3%; the figure was 70.9% for the group of primiparous women aged less than 20 years and 18.9% for the group of women aged more than 45 years.
The reverse was found for the rate of primary C-sections: in this case, the average rate rose from 7.3% (OR: 0.87) for primiparae under the age of 20 to 49.6% (OR: 22.12) for primiparous women above the age of 45.
Similarly, the rate of secondary C-sections in the group of primiparous women increased from 13.5% (OR: 0.79) for mothers aged less than 20 years to 25.1% (OR: 5.52) for mothers aged more than 45 years.
When the study evaluated the rates of surgically assisted vaginal deliveries using vacuum extraction, the risk in the group of primiparous women also increased with increasing maternal age; the rate for primiparous women aged < 20 years was 8.1% (OR: 0.75), and 6.23% in the group of primiparous women aged ≥ 45 years (OR: 2.19).


With regard to spontaneous deliveries, the results were similar for the group of women giving birth for the second time. Here too, the rate dropped from 79.9% for the group aged < 20 years to 38.8% for the group aged ≥ 45 years. In contrast, the risk of primary cesarean section increased in these respective age cohorts from 12.27% (OR: 0.89) to 39.95% (OR: 5.99); the risk of secondary C-section increased from 6.7% (OR: 0.81) to 16.36% (OR: 4.07), and the risk of vacuum extraction rose from 1.13% (OR: 0.66) to 4.67% (OR: 5.63).
The cohort of women who were giving birth for the third time or more had the highest rates of spontaneous births in all age groups aged > 20 years and the lowest rate of surgically assisted vaginal and abdominal deliveries.
In the group of women aged 35 or above, the risk of primary cesarean section decreased with increasing parity. While the OR for primiparae in the group of women aged 35 – 39 years was still 3.04, the risk dropped to OR 1.33 for the women in this age cohort who were giving birth for the third time. In the group aged 40 – 44 years, the risk decreased from OR 5.646 to OR 1.58 and in the group aged ≥ 45 years from OR 22.12 to OR 2.32.
The results were similar for secondary C-sections. Here too, the risk in all age groups aged 35 and above decreased with increasing parity. In the group aged 35 – 39 years, the risk dropped from OR 2.16 for primiparous women to OR 1.33 for women giving birth for the third time or more, from OR 2.98 to OR 1.815 in the group of women aged 40 – 44 years and from OR 5.52 to OR 2.82 for women aged ≥ 45 years ([Fig. 2] and [Table 1]).
Maternal age |
Vacuum extraction |
Forceps delivery |
Assisted vaginal breech delivery |
Primary C-section |
Secondary C-section |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR |
OR |
OR |
OR |
OR |
||
Reference category: women aged 20 – 24 years who gave birth spontaneously. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05 |
||||||
1 para |
< 20 |
0.75*** |
0.69 |
1.19 |
0.87*** |
0.79*** |
25 – 29 |
1.23*** |
1.25 |
2.23*** |
1.29*** |
1.21*** |
|
30 – 34 |
1.45*** |
1.08 |
3.76*** |
1.8*** |
1.54*** |
|
35 – 39 |
1.72*** |
1.8*** |
3.5*** |
3.04*** |
2.16*** |
|
40 – 44 |
1.89*** |
1.44 |
3.84*** |
5.65*** |
2.98*** |
|
≥ 45 |
2.19*** |
3.74 |
0 |
22.12*** |
5.52*** |
|
2 para |
< 20 |
0.67 |
0 |
0 |
0.89 |
0.81 |
25 – 29 |
1.53*** |
0.93 |
1.15 |
1.12*** |
1.12*** |
|
30 – 34 |
1.86*** |
1.06 |
1.8** |
1.34*** |
1.34*** |
|
35 – 39 |
2.35*** |
1.08 |
2.12*** |
1.85*** |
1.76*** |
|
40 – 44 |
3.07*** |
2.6 |
1.91* |
2.83*** |
2.36*** |
|
≥ 45 |
5.63*** |
12.1* |
0 |
5.99*** |
4.07*** |
|
3+ para |
< 20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1.34 |
1.66 |
25 – 29 |
1.32 |
0.41 |
1.52 |
1.11* |
0.96 |
|
30 – 34 |
1.9** |
0.54 |
2.08 |
1.2*** |
1.1 |
|
35 – 39 |
2.55*** |
0.67 |
2.18 |
1.33*** |
1.33*** |
|
40 – 44 |
3.08*** |
1.42 |
2.37 |
1.58*** |
1.81*** |
|
≥ 45 |
5.41*** |
4.06 |
4.87* |
2.32*** |
2.82*** |
#
Duration of pregnancy
During the period surveyed, a total of 91.8% of primiparous women gave birth at term, i.e., between the end of the 37th and the 41st week of gestation. On average, 0.7% of primiparous women gave birth after the end of the 42nd week of gestation.
The risk of premature delivery was higher for primiparous women aged < 20 years and subsequently decreased in all age cohorts up to the age of 35 years. From the age of 35, the risk of preterm delivery increased continuously with increasing maternal age; this also applied to the risk of delivering extremely preterm infants, very preterm infants, und late preterm infants.
There were similar trends for the cohort of women giving birth for the second time and for women giving birth for the third time or more.
The impact of parity on the risk of preterm delivery was also investigated. Primiparous women had a higher risk in all age groups of delivering extremely preterm infants, very preterm infants and late preterm infants compared to women giving birth for the second or third time and multiparous women. The most significant results were for primiparous women.
Women giving birth for the second or third time and multiparous women between the ages of 25 and 44 years had a lower risk of prolonged pregnancy and post-term delivery (after GW 42 + 0) than primiparous women ([Table 2]).
Maternal age |
GW < 27 + 6 |
GW 28 – 31 |
GW 32 – 36 |
GW > 42 + 0 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR |
OR |
OR |
OR |
||
Reference category: women aged 20 – 24 years who gave birth having completed the 37th–41st week of gestation; *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 * p < 0.05 |
|||||
1 para |
< 20 |
1.26 |
1.27* |
1.22*** |
1.13 |
25 – 29 |
0.91 |
1.15* |
1.15*** |
1.01 |
|
30 – 34 |
1.04 |
1.40*** |
1.31*** |
1.15* |
|
35 – 39 |
1.61*** |
1.78*** |
1.40*** |
1.36*** |
|
40 – 44 |
2.37*** |
2.36*** |
1.68*** |
1.24 |
|
≥ 45 |
3.29** |
3.83*** |
2.75*** |
0.88 |
|
2 para |
< 20 |
1.19 |
0.44 |
2.09*** |
1.62 |
25 – 29 |
0.55*** |
0.8 |
0.92* |
1 |
|
30 – 34 |
0.63** |
0.89 |
0.99 |
1.06 |
|
35 – 39 |
0.87 |
1.08 |
1.24*** |
1.07 |
|
40 – 44 |
1.13 |
1.62** |
1.50*** |
1 |
|
≥ 45 |
0 |
4.23*** |
2.50*** |
0.74 |
|
3+ para |
< 20 |
4.13 |
0 |
0.95 |
0 |
25 – 29 |
0.85 |
1.05 |
0.67*** |
0.9 |
|
30 – 34 |
0.8 |
1.06 |
0.68*** |
0.97 |
|
35 – 39 |
1.08 |
1.25 |
0.81** |
1.04 |
|
40 – 44 |
1.33 |
1.64* |
1.07 |
1.08 |
|
≥ 45 |
2.57 |
3.37** |
1.52** |
1.84 |
#
Interventions
The mean episiotomy rate for all primiparous women who delivered vaginally was 28.88%; it was 9.3% for women giving birth the second time and 3% for women giving birth the third time and multiparous women. The episiotomy rate increased with increasing maternal age, irrespective of parity.
A total of 20.71% primiparous women who delivered vaginally had epidural or spinal anesthesia; the rate for women giving birth the second time was 8.22% and the rate for women giving birth the third time and multiparae was 4.76%. When evaluated with regard to maternal age, the rate of women who had epidural or spinal anesthesia during vaginal delivery increased with increasing maternal age, irrespective of parity.
In the group of women who had a C-section, epidural or spinal anesthesia was administered to 84.52% of primiparous women, to 84.81% of women giving birth for the second time and to 79.33% of women giving birth the third time and multiparous women. Again, the rate increased with increasing maternal age and irrespective of parity.
Micro-blood gas analysis to evaluate fetal oxygenation intrapartum was carried out irrespective of maternal age in 3.45% of primiparous women, in 10.50% of women giving birth for the second time, and in 0.92% of women giving birth for the third time and multiparae. While the intervention rate among primiparous and secundiparous women decreased with increasing maternal age, the odds ratio for women giving birth for the third time increased with increasing maternal age from OR 1.02 for the cohort aged 25 – 29 years to OR 2.64 for the cohort aged ≥ 45 years ([Table 3]).
Maternal age |
Episiotomy |
Epidural + spinal anesthesia during vaginal delivery |
Epidural + spinal anesthesia during C-section delivery |
Micro-blood gas analysis |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR |
OR |
OR |
OR |
||
Reference category: women giving birth aged 20 – 24 years (1: without episiotomy during spontaneous birth; 2: without epidural and spinal anesthesia during vaginal delivery; 3: without epidural and spinal anesthesia during C-section, 4: without micro-blood gas analysis); *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05 |
|||||
1 para |
< 20 |
0.84*** |
1.06*** |
0.84 |
0.94 |
25 – 29 |
1.15*** |
0.96** |
1.23*** |
0.94* |
|
30 – 34 |
1.17*** |
1.05** |
1.49*** |
0.91** |
|
35 – 39 |
1.24*** |
1.24*** |
1.66*** |
0.97 |
|
40 – 44 |
1.22*** |
1.30*** |
1.78*** |
0.91 |
|
≥ 45 |
1.45* |
2.01*** |
2.26*** |
0.33** |
|
2 para |
< 20 |
0.68* |
0.95 |
0.87 |
1.01 |
25 – 29 |
1.47*** |
1.09* |
1.18*** |
1.02 |
|
30 – 34 |
1.82*** |
1.30*** |
1.44*** |
0.99 |
|
35 – 39 |
2.15*** |
1.77*** |
1.53*** |
1.04 |
|
40 – 44 |
2.36*** |
2.11*** |
1.51*** |
1.16 |
|
≥ 45 |
2.89*** |
2.26*** |
1.69* |
0.83 |
|
3+ para |
< 20 |
1.18 |
1.93 |
0.54 |
0.00 |
25 – 29 |
1.29 |
1.25* |
1.34** |
1.02 |
|
30 – 34 |
1.89*** |
1.51*** |
1.41*** |
1.15 |
|
35 – 39 |
2.45*** |
2.01*** |
1.45*** |
1.28 |
|
40 – 44 |
2.77*** |
2.12*** |
1.41*** |
1.67** |
|
≥ 45 |
3.34*** |
2.62*** |
1.67** |
2.64** |
#
#
Discussion
Our analysis of the data obtained from the Austrian Register of Births showed that the cesarean section rate increased with increasing maternal age. Although this increase was most obvious in the group of primiparous women, the rate of cesarean sections also increased with advanced maternal age in the group of women who have birth for the second time and in the group of multiparous women giving birth for the third time or more.
When the mode of delivery was analyzed with regard to parity and maternal age, the evaluation suggested that higher parity rates may function as a protective factor despite increasing maternal age: on average, the rate of Austrian primiparous women aged 25 – 29 years who gave birth by spontaneous vaginal delivery was almost the same (61.13%) as that of the group of multiparae giving birth for the third time or more who were aged 45 years and above (59.16%).
In the literature, a maternal age of 40 years and above is considered an independent risk factor for delivering by cesarean section [4]. In their study, Smith et al. assumed that 37.6% of C-sections carried out between 1980 and 2005 would not have been necessary if the average maternal age of primiparous women had not increased over the years [24].
Reduced uterine activity has been cited as one possible reason for the increase in the rate of C-sections with increasing maternal age [12]. Other proposed causes discussed in the literature are a reduced myometrial function and a lower number of oxytocin receptors [3]. In their publication, Ritzinger et al. noted that primary cesarean section was often carried out in older women even if there were no medically justified indications, primarily out of concerns for the health of the infant [4].
As reported in a study by Kalogiannidis et al. [6], analysis of the datasets from the Austrian Register of Births showed that previous births have a beneficial effect on the rate of cesarean sections.
Similarly, the results from the Austrian Register of Births point to a higher rate of preterm births in mothers aged 35 and above, particularly primiparous women. Even though other studies have also reported such results [22], no causal connection has yet been identified. However, a medium to high level of education is discussed in the literature as a possible protective factor [3], [4], [22].
Similar to the results reported in the study on Singapore by Wu et al., the analysis of the Austrian Register of Births also showed an increase in the rate of episiotomies among primiparous women. Wu et al. suggested that one of the reasons for the increased risk of episiotomy could be a decrease in tissue elasticity with increasing maternal age [20].
As the data from the Austrian Register do not permit any conclusions to be drawn about the diagnosis, the decreasing number of micro-blood gas analyses combined with a simultaneous increase in the rate of C-sections in primiparous and secundiparous women suggests that either the indications for C-section are predominantly based on maternal factors or that there is some truth behind the frequently expressed conjuncture whereby surgical abdominal delivery is often carried out without a valid risk assessment [25].
It has also been suggested that the demonstrably higher rates of intervention during pregnancy and birth which occur with advanced maternal age may be due to the increase in age-related vulnerability of the female physiology. As the incidence of chronic diseases increases with age and this can affect the course of pregnancy and delivery, it cannot be conclusively stated whether increased maternal age as such should be categorized as an independent risk factor. The normal hemodynamic changes of pregnancy run contrary to developments which occur as part of the natural ageing process. This fact makes it more difficult for older pregnant women to adapt to hemodynamic situations in pregnancy [3]. The consequence is an increased incidence of gestational hypertension among women of advanced maternal age [7]. Chronic hypertension is also found more often in older pregnant women compared to younger pregnant women. Older multiparous women appear to be affected by this even more often than older primiparae [3]. After the age of 40, the risk of developing preeclampsia increases exponentially [5]. As pancreatic beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity decrease with age, the risk of developing gestational diabetes increases from the age of about 35 years. Poorly treated diabetes can lead to numerous problems for the mother and infant, including polyhydramnios, macrosomia, placental insufficiency, IUFD and fetal hypoglycemia post partum [4].
Individual, patient-specific risk factors also play a decisive role in addition to maternal age [4]. The dataset obtained from the Register does not provide information on the existence of pre-existing conditions such as hypertension or diabetes nor does it provide information about any peripartum abnormalities or complications. This means that important information about the indications for interventions is lacking, which limits the interpretation of the results.
#
Conclusion
This study aimed to show the impact of advanced maternal age on selected obstetric parameters such as mode of delivery, duration of pregnancy, obstetric interventions and parity. C-sections and surgically assisted vaginal deliveries increased with increasing maternal age, particularly among primiparous women. In contrast, the mean rate of spontaneous births decreased with advanced maternal age. However, a parity of ≥ 2 appears to have a protective effect.
Similarly, the rate of preterm births was also higher with advanced maternal age, especially in primiparous women.
Because data on the indications for intervention and the planning of interventions and their association with maternal age is limited, future research must focus on investigating the effect of maternal age and parity on obstetric outcomes while taking the underlying indications into account.
#
Conclusion for Clinical Practice
The existing studies appear to show that advanced maternal age should not continue to be defined as a risk factor per se during pregnancy, delivery and in the postpartum period [4]. Although the data suggests that the 1958 definition of advanced maternal age of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics remains relevant, additional influencing factors such as chronic prior conditions, lifestyle aspects and parity in particular must be included in the planning of interventions and care, particularly since maternal age affects obstetric outcomes most in primiparous women. Accordingly, it would be useful to provide information about the risks associated with advanced maternal age to ensure that adequate management of risks does not just start during pregnancy and delivery [3] but is already taken into account when planning a family and choosing when to start a family.
#
#
-
References/Literatur
- 1 Statistik Austria. Durchschnittliches Gebär- bzw. Fertilitätsalter der Mutter nach Lebendgeburtenfolge seit 1984. Online: http://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/menschen_und_gesellschaft/bevoelkerung/geborene/022903.html last access: 25.07.2018
- 2 Koo YJ, Ryu HM, Yang JH. et al. Pregnancy outcomes according to increasing maternal age. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 51: 60-65 doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2012.01.012
- 3 Nassar AH, Usta IM. Advanced maternal age. Part II: long-term consequences. Am J Perinatol 2009; 26: 107-112 doi:10.1055/s-0028-1090593
- 4 Ritzinger P, Dudenhausen JW, Holzgreve W. Späte Mutterschaft und deren Risiken. J Reproduktionsmed Endokrinol 2011; 8: 112-122
- 5 Khalil A, Syngelaki A, Maiz N. et al. Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 634-643 doi:10.1002/uog.12494
- 6 Kalogiannidis I, Margioula-Siarkou C, Petousis S. et al. Parity affects pregnancy outcomes in women 35 and older. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 146-149
- 7 Tometten-Iseke A. Familienplanung. In: Mändle C, Opitz-Kreuter S. Hrsg. Das Hebammenbuch: Lehrbuch der praktischen Geburtshilfe. 6. Aufl.. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2015: 1117-1153
- 8 Zimmermann R. Fehlbildungsdiagnostik und Ultraschalluntersuchung im 1. Trimenon. In: Schneider H, Husslein P, Schneider K-T. Hrsg. Die Geburtshilfe. 5. Aufl.. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2016: 129-143
- 9 Balasch J, Gratacós E. Delayed childbearing: effects on fertility and the outcome of pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther 2011; 29: 263-273 doi:10.1159/000323142
- 10 Fuchs F, Monet B, Ducruet T. et al. Effect of maternal age on the risk of preterm birth: A large cohort study. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0191002 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191002
- 11 Kirbas A, Gulerman HC, Daglar K. Pregnancy in Adolescence: Is It an Obstetrical Risk?. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2016; 29: 367-371 doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2015.12.010
- 12 Jahromi BN, Husseini Z. Pregnancy Outcome at Maternal Age 40 and Older. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 47: 318-321 doi:10.1016/S1028-4559(08)60131-X
- 13 Wang Y, Tanbo T, Abyholm T. et al. The impact of advanced maternal age and parity on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 284: 31-37 doi:10.1007/s00404-010-1587-x
- 14 Delbaere I, Verstraelen H, Goetgeluk S. et al. Pregnancy outcome in primiparae of advanced maternal age. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 135: 41-46 doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.10.030
- 15 Carolan M. Maternal age ≥45 years and maternal and perinatal outcomes: a review of the evidence. Midwifery 2013; 29: 479-489 doi:10.1016/j.midw.2012.04.001
- 16 Mills TA, Lavender T. Advanced maternal age. Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine 2014; 24: 85-90 doi:10.1016/j.ogrm.2014.01.004
- 17 Dietl A, Cupisti S, Beckmann MW. et al. Pregnancy and Obstetrical Outcomes in Women Over 40 Years of Age. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2015; 75: 827-832 doi:10.1055/s-0035-1546109
- 18 Hsieh TT, Liou JD, Hsu JJ. et al. Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcomes in an Asian population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 148: 21-26 doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.08.022
- 19 Martinelli KG, Garcia ÉM, Santos Neto ETD. et al. Advanced maternal age and its association with placenta praevia and placental abruption: a meta-analysis. Cad Saude Publica 2018; 34: e00206116 doi:10.1590/0102-311X00206116
- 20 Wu LC, Malhotra R, Allen jr. JC. et al. Risk factors and midwife-reported reasons for episiotomy in women undergoing normal vaginal delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 288: 1249-1256 doi:10.1007/s00404-013-2897-6
- 21 Schoen C, Rosen T. Maternal and perinatal risks for women over 44–a review. Maturitas 2009; 64: 109-113 doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.08.012
- 22 Peters F. SOEPpaper 342: Späte Mutterschaft als medizinischer Risikofaktor? Der Einfluss des Alters der Mutter auf das Risiko der Frühgeburt. Online: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.364485.de/diw_sp0342.pdf last access: 20.12.2018
- 23 Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. 3rd ed.. ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience; 2013
- 24 Smith GCS, Cordeaux Y, White IR. et al. The effect of delaying childbirth on primary cesarean section rates. PLoS Med 2008; 5: e144 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050144
- 25 Weiss PAM. Sectio Caesarea und assoziierte Fragen. Wien: Springer; 1994. / 2013
Correspondence/Korrespondenzadresse
-
References/Literatur
- 1 Statistik Austria. Durchschnittliches Gebär- bzw. Fertilitätsalter der Mutter nach Lebendgeburtenfolge seit 1984. Online: http://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/menschen_und_gesellschaft/bevoelkerung/geborene/022903.html last access: 25.07.2018
- 2 Koo YJ, Ryu HM, Yang JH. et al. Pregnancy outcomes according to increasing maternal age. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 51: 60-65 doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2012.01.012
- 3 Nassar AH, Usta IM. Advanced maternal age. Part II: long-term consequences. Am J Perinatol 2009; 26: 107-112 doi:10.1055/s-0028-1090593
- 4 Ritzinger P, Dudenhausen JW, Holzgreve W. Späte Mutterschaft und deren Risiken. J Reproduktionsmed Endokrinol 2011; 8: 112-122
- 5 Khalil A, Syngelaki A, Maiz N. et al. Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 634-643 doi:10.1002/uog.12494
- 6 Kalogiannidis I, Margioula-Siarkou C, Petousis S. et al. Parity affects pregnancy outcomes in women 35 and older. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 146-149
- 7 Tometten-Iseke A. Familienplanung. In: Mändle C, Opitz-Kreuter S. Hrsg. Das Hebammenbuch: Lehrbuch der praktischen Geburtshilfe. 6. Aufl.. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2015: 1117-1153
- 8 Zimmermann R. Fehlbildungsdiagnostik und Ultraschalluntersuchung im 1. Trimenon. In: Schneider H, Husslein P, Schneider K-T. Hrsg. Die Geburtshilfe. 5. Aufl.. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2016: 129-143
- 9 Balasch J, Gratacós E. Delayed childbearing: effects on fertility and the outcome of pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther 2011; 29: 263-273 doi:10.1159/000323142
- 10 Fuchs F, Monet B, Ducruet T. et al. Effect of maternal age on the risk of preterm birth: A large cohort study. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0191002 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191002
- 11 Kirbas A, Gulerman HC, Daglar K. Pregnancy in Adolescence: Is It an Obstetrical Risk?. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2016; 29: 367-371 doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2015.12.010
- 12 Jahromi BN, Husseini Z. Pregnancy Outcome at Maternal Age 40 and Older. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 47: 318-321 doi:10.1016/S1028-4559(08)60131-X
- 13 Wang Y, Tanbo T, Abyholm T. et al. The impact of advanced maternal age and parity on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 284: 31-37 doi:10.1007/s00404-010-1587-x
- 14 Delbaere I, Verstraelen H, Goetgeluk S. et al. Pregnancy outcome in primiparae of advanced maternal age. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 135: 41-46 doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.10.030
- 15 Carolan M. Maternal age ≥45 years and maternal and perinatal outcomes: a review of the evidence. Midwifery 2013; 29: 479-489 doi:10.1016/j.midw.2012.04.001
- 16 Mills TA, Lavender T. Advanced maternal age. Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine 2014; 24: 85-90 doi:10.1016/j.ogrm.2014.01.004
- 17 Dietl A, Cupisti S, Beckmann MW. et al. Pregnancy and Obstetrical Outcomes in Women Over 40 Years of Age. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2015; 75: 827-832 doi:10.1055/s-0035-1546109
- 18 Hsieh TT, Liou JD, Hsu JJ. et al. Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcomes in an Asian population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 148: 21-26 doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.08.022
- 19 Martinelli KG, Garcia ÉM, Santos Neto ETD. et al. Advanced maternal age and its association with placenta praevia and placental abruption: a meta-analysis. Cad Saude Publica 2018; 34: e00206116 doi:10.1590/0102-311X00206116
- 20 Wu LC, Malhotra R, Allen jr. JC. et al. Risk factors and midwife-reported reasons for episiotomy in women undergoing normal vaginal delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 288: 1249-1256 doi:10.1007/s00404-013-2897-6
- 21 Schoen C, Rosen T. Maternal and perinatal risks for women over 44–a review. Maturitas 2009; 64: 109-113 doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.08.012
- 22 Peters F. SOEPpaper 342: Späte Mutterschaft als medizinischer Risikofaktor? Der Einfluss des Alters der Mutter auf das Risiko der Frühgeburt. Online: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.364485.de/diw_sp0342.pdf last access: 20.12.2018
- 23 Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. 3rd ed.. ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience; 2013
- 24 Smith GCS, Cordeaux Y, White IR. et al. The effect of delaying childbirth on primary cesarean section rates. PLoS Med 2008; 5: e144 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050144
- 25 Weiss PAM. Sectio Caesarea und assoziierte Fragen. Wien: Springer; 1994. / 2013







