Starling principle of fluid exchange
Starling principle of fluid exchange
Interstitial fluid is formed from plasma ultrafiltration across the capillary wall.
The filter is the endocapillary coating known as the glycocalyx. The glycocalyx is
a semi-permeable membrane which covers the intercellular cleft of the capillary wall
through which the plasma ultrafiltrate flows [1]. The primary force encouraging filtration from blood into the interstitium is the
capillary hydrostatic pressure, whereas the dominant force in ‘sucking’ fluid into
the capillary, and so opposing filtration, is the plasma osmotic pressure.
In his classic equation for fluid filtration Starling considered both plasma and interstitial
hydrostatic and osmotic pressures [2]. However, the interstitial pressures were considered generally negligible so subsequently
largely ignored. Venous capillary pressure (~15 mmHg) is less than plasma osmotic
pressure (~25 mmHg) at heart level so if only these two Starling forces are considered
then venous reabsorption would occur. This resulted in the traditional view that venous
capillaries continuously reabsorb the filtrate generated by arterial capillaries leaving
the lymphatic drainage as largely redundant.
The revised Starling Principle indicates no venous reabsorption in peripheral tissues
The revised Starling Principle indicates no venous reabsorption in peripheral tissues
In recent years it has been possible to measure interstitial hydrostatic and osmotic
pressures and they are not negligible. Measurements in human skin, muscle and mesentery
indicate that the sum of the forces opposing filtration (essentially the difference
between interstitial and plasma osmotic pressures plus interstitial hydrostatic pressure)
is ~12.5 mmHg which is lower than venous capillary pressure (~15 mmHg). From all experimental
data, without exception, the venous capillary and even venular pressure exceeds the
force that would create reabsorption. This indicates that a well perfused capillary
is in a state of filtration along its entire length although with dwindling filtration
from arterial to venular end [3].
One factor that ensures this process of filtration in the steady state is the glycocalyx
within the capillary wall. There is a low protein concentration within the subglycocalyx
providing filtration occurs. If filtration declines or ceases, plasma proteins accumulate
in the interstitium and raise the interstitial protein concentration. This enables
plasma proteins to diffuse into the subglycocalyx space, so reducing the venous reabsorption
force and encourage restoration of fluid filtration into the interstitium. The subglycocalyx
therefore acts as a regulator or stabilizer for filtration [4].
Transient venous reabsorption
Transient venous reabsorption
Venous reabsorption can occur but only transiently if the Starling forces change.
The default position is always to return to a state of filtration. If a bandage is
applied to a leg, then this would raise interstitial fluid pressure and encourage
fluid reabsorption but within minutes subglycocalyx plasma protein concentration would
rise to restore filtration despite the bandage staying in place.
Interstitial fluid drains via the lymphatic vessels
Interstitial fluid drains via the lymphatic vessels
Traditionalists maintain that 90 % of the plasma ultrafiltrate is reabsorbed with
the remaining 10 % drained via the lymphatics. Calculations with the revised Starling
pressures and consideration of the subglycocalyx, indicate that If there is no sustained
venous reabsorption, then the responsibility for draining interstitial fluid must
rest with the lymphatic system. The physiology can then be considered as very simple:
capillaries filter to produce interstitial fluid and lymphatics largely drain it.
Capillary filtration equates with lymph flow in the steady state. The rate of lymph
formation depends on interstitial fluid pressure and volume. Lymph drainage is therefore
the rate limiting step for tissue volume homeostasis. Tissue fluid balance thus depends
critically on lymphatic function in all tissues except specialized regions e. g. kidney,
intestinal mucosa.
All chronic oedema is a lymph drainage problem
All chronic oedema is a lymph drainage problem
These fundamental physiological principles relating to capillary fluid dynamics mean
that an excess of interstitial fluid (oedema) must indicate a failure of lymph drainage.
For interstitial fluid to accumulate sufficiently to produce oedema capillary fluid
filtration must exceed lymph drainage for a sufficient period of time. Therefore,
all peripheral oedema results either from too much capillary filtration (increased
lymph load) or not enough lymph drainage, or a combination of the two. Put another
way, either the lymph drainage is impaired and so fails to drain normal amounts of
capillary filtrate (this is lymphoedema) or the lymph drainage cannot compensate for
the high lymph load e. g. venous oedema.
Venous oedema
The diagnosis of venous oedema is made frequently in clinical practice whether chronic
venous disease exists or not. If we analyze the physiology in chronic venous disease,
we will still find that it is the capacity of the lymph drainage that mainly determines
if oedema occurs or not. When venous hypertension exists then increased capillary
pressure will result in increased capillary filtration (increased lymph load). If
the lymph drainage is robust and responsive, then lymph drainage should compensate
for the higher fluid filtration by increasing lymph flow in which case no oedema will
occur. If the lymph drainage is not robust or not sufficiently stimulated through
movement and exercise to cope with the level of lymph load, then oedema will occur.
Therefore, venous oedema is still mainly determined by the capacity of the lymph drainage.
Varicose veins
Given the ever-changing dynamic balance between capillary filtration and lymph drainage
to maintain tissue volume (homeostasis), it can be difficult to determine clinically
which is more at fault in the genesis of peripheral oedema; is it the capillary filtration
or the lymph drainage?
An example of this is with varicose veins.
Patients with varicose veins may or may not have associated peripheral oedema in that
leg. If they do, the varicose veins are not unreasonably blamed. Varicose veins usually
indicate venous reflux. This means that in the erect posture venous pressure remains
high for longer (venous hypertension) and so capillary filtration increases (higher
lymph load). This requires higher lymph drainage to compensate. If the lymph flow
cannot keep pace with capillary filtration then oedema occurs. Resolution of the venous
reflux through Endovenous Ablation (EVA) should resolve the oedema, but sometimes
the oedema does not improve after EVA.
Why?
The answer has to be that the dominant cause of the oedema in the first place was
impaired lymph drainage and a reduction in the capillary filtration (lymph load) through
treatment by EVA has not reduced lymph load sufficiently to enable the lymph drainage
to cope.
As lymph vessels are formed from veins embryologically (see below) it is likely that
if veins are constitutionally weak (to produce primary varicose veins) so may be the
lymphatic vessels.
Phlebolymphoedema
If high levels of capillary filtration exceed lymph flow over a long period of time
in venous disease, then eventually the lymphatic vessels become permanently damaged
from this chronic overload. A state of true lymphoedema then supervenes. This is called
phlebolymphoedema and can arise with venous hypertension from severe varicose veins
and post thrombotic syndrome. Phlebolymphoedema is analogous to high output heart
failure from a large A-V fistula where the heart does not recover even if the fistula
is closed.
Deep venous obstruction from May-Thurner Syndrome
Deep venous obstruction from May-Thurner Syndrome
May-Thurner syndrome (Iliac vein compression syndrome) can present with left leg oedema.
There have been very few studies looking at lymph drainage in non-thrombotic
May-Thurner Syndrome but from first principles, venous hypertension caused by iliac
vein compression would cause oedema if the resulting high capillary (venous) filtration
exceeds the lymph drainage. If the non-thrombotic deep venous obstruction was the
sole explanation, then release of the iliac vein compression should solve the problem
and it often doesn’t. Given the fact that a high incidence of iliac vein occlusion
can be found in healthy volunteers, perhaps the fault is also with the lymphatics
[5].
Venous reflux in inherited forms of primary lymphoedema
Venous reflux in inherited forms of primary lymphoedema
There is not only a close relationship between veins and lymphatics physiologically
but embryologically as well. It has been established that lymphatic vessels are mainly
derived from the cardinal vein [6]. As causal genes for primary lymphoedema have been discovered, and the genotype
investigated to establish the full phenotype, so a strong association between venous
reflux and primary lymphoedema has been identified. In Milroy disease 90 % of patients
with a proven VEGFR3 mutation have superficial venous reflux on venous duplex ultrasound
examination, although it may have no physiological impact as the lymphoedema develops
at birth before the child is erect [7]. In Lymphoedema-Distichiasis Syndrome due to mutations in the FOXC2 gene 100 % of
those affected have superficial venous reflux and approximately a third have deep
venous reflux, Mutations in FOXC2 are strongly associated with primary valve failure
in veins of the lower limb [8]. Venous reflux should, in theory, increase oedema by increasing lymph load but anecdotal
reports indicate that vein ablation in FOXC2 patients does not help with the swelling.
Venous malformations and Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome
Venous malformations and Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome
Klippel Trenaunay syndrome (KTS) remains a classically described vascular disorder
in which venous abnormalities coexist with port wine stains accompanied by bone overgrowth
[9]. Limb swelling related to lymphatic abnormalities is usually present. Identification
of causal genes indicates that KTS may not be a specific entity and may be part of
a more heterogenous phenotypic spectrum with somatic mutations in PIK3CA being responsible
in at least some cases. The PIK3CA related overgrowth spectrum (PROS) encompasses
a range of venous and lymphatic malformations associated with soft tissue overgrowth
and KTS falls within that spectrum [10]. Unlike the inherited Milroy and lymphoedema Distichiasis forms of primary lymphoedema
where the causal gene is germline and therefore found in the blood, PROS is a somatic
mosaic disorder where the gene fault is confined to the tissue affected.
Sporadic vascular and lymphatic malformations can also be caused by somatic mutations
in the RAS/MAPK pathway [11]. Mutations in this pathway are well described in cancer as well as in germline RASOpathies
such as Noonan syndrome and Neurofibromatosis. Somatic mutations can cause Arterio-venous
malformations but also slow flow malformations including lymphatic malformations and
lymphoedema.
The identification of causal genes for these somatic mosaic vascular disorders helps
understanding of the development of vascular and lymphatic malformations, and once
again indicates the close relationship between lymphatics and veins.
Genotyping of affected tissue in vascular malformations should be a key element of
management across the diverse medical subspecialties to which affected patients present.
Genetic stratification of these disorders may help diagnostically and prognostically
but may also serve to guide new therapies given the range of drugs, developed for
cancer, which are known to affect these pathways.
Should lymphatic investigations always be performed in cases of peripheral oedema
associated with venous disease?
Should lymphatic investigations always be performed in cases of peripheral oedema
associated with venous disease?
The answer, in an ideal world, is yes. The problem is that lymphoscintigraphy can
often appear normal in the presence of venous disease. High capillary filtration causes
high ‘flush through’ of injected tracer to make lymph flow look normal when it may
not be. Quantitative lymphoscintigraphy is necessary to investigate venous oedema.
If lymph drainage is measured over the period of the scan e. g. 2 hours, by drawing
a region of interest over the ilio-inguinal nodes and calculating the accumulation
of tracer in the nodes relative to the injection site then a crude estimate of lymph
flow can be made. If nodal uptake of tracer remains low e. g. < 3 % of injection dose
at 2 hours, then lymph drainage is abnormal irrespective of the degree of venous disease.
On the other hand, values of > 15 % ilio-inguinal uptake at 2 hours would suggest
high capillary filtration from the veins is the dominant factor in the development
of the oedema [12].
Multifactorial lymphoedema from co-morbidities
Multifactorial lymphoedema from co-morbidities
In modern clinical practice patients often have multiple morbidities and each can
contribute to lower limb oedema particularly in the elderly when chronic oedema is
very common [13]. The morbidly obese patient can develop lower limb oedema for several reasons: firstly,
obesity in itself impairs lymphatic function [14]; secondly, obesity leads to immobility and little stimulation of lymph drainage
from movement and exercise; thirdly, long periods spent with the legs dependent results
in venous hypertension and increased capillary filtration; fourthly, a large abdominal
girth resting on the thighs when sitting (particularly leaning forward to a computer)
obstructs venous drainage (and probably lymph drainage as well) [15]. This takes no account of other co-morbidities such as heart failure and sleep apnoea
syndrome both of which increase right sided heart pressures and so venous pressures.
Conclusion
The traditional dogma of venous reabsorption being the dominant route by which tissue
fluid drains must be abandoned given the overwhelming scientific evidence that the
Starling pressures add up to a filtration force. Oedema is always caused by capillary
filtration exceeding lymph drainage. Therefore, lymph drainage is the rate limiting
step either because the lymph drainage is impaired or, because it is overwhelmed by
excessive capillary filtration e. g. venous hypertension (from venous disease, venous
obstruction or heart failure) or reduced plasma osmotic pressure (from protein loss-nephrotic
syndrome, or malnutrition), or altered vascular permeability e. g. inflammation. In
circumstances of sustained capillary filtration, the lymph drainage can be permanently
damaged so that reversal of the high filtration does not resolve the oedema (now lymphoedema).
This can happen in chronic venous disease (Phelbolymphoedema).
There is an argument for calling all forms of chronic oedema as lymphoedema in order
to make clinicians think of the importance of the lymph drainage. Furthermore, oedema
is a build-up of interstitial fluid and interstitial fluid is little different in
composition from pre-nodal lymph. Also, management is the same for chronic oedema
(such as venous oedema) and lymphoedema. The principle is to stimulate lymph drainage
through exercise and compression, and to return to normal any excess capillary filtration
whatever the cause.
Because of the inescapable close relationship between veins and lymphatics both physiologically
and genetically, vascular specialists should always consider the lymph drainage. Don’t
‘go with the flow’ (the prevailing attitude) by thinking most oedema is venous in
origin, go with the lymph flow.