Z Gastroenterol 2020; 58(08): 778-784
DOI: 10.1055/a-1190-5735
Übersicht

Behandlung der leichten Clostridioides-difficile-Infektion – hat Metronidazol noch einen Stellenwert?

Non-severe Clostridioides difficile Infection: Are the data adequate to give up metronidazole?
Andreas Stallmach
Klinik für Innere Medizin IV (Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie), Universitätsklinikum Jena, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Deutschland
,
Katrin Katzer
Klinik für Innere Medizin IV (Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie), Universitätsklinikum Jena, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Deutschland
,
Philipp Reuken
Klinik für Innere Medizin IV (Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie), Universitätsklinikum Jena, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations

Zusammenfassung

Clostridioides-difficile-Infektionen (CDI) sind typische Komplikationen einer Antibiotikatherapie. Wenn auch die durch C. diff. verursachten Krankheitsbilder bis zum toxischen Megakolon mit letalen Verläufen reichen können, sind leichte Verlaufsformen mit unkomplizierter Diarrhoe bei Weitem am häufigsten. Auch die Behandlung dieser Krankheitsbilder sollte leitliniengerecht erfolgen. Die zurzeit gültigen internationalen Leitlinien sind bezüglich der Therapie der leichten Infektion mit Metronidazol aber widersprüchlich. Vor diesem Hintergrund erfolgte eine selektive Literaturrecherche zu Leitlinien und Behandlungsstudien zum Einsatz von Metronidazol bei leichter CDI. Die Auswertung randomisierter kontrollierter Studien zeigt eine statistische Überlegenheit von Vancomycin gegenüber Metronidazol (NNT 16). Unter Einbeziehung großer Kohortenstudien reduziert sich dieser Unterschied in der Effektivität auf 2,5 % (NNT 40). Inkonsistente Kriterien zur Definition einer leichten CDI, unterschiedliche Dosierungen, Applikationen und Zeitintervalle (z. B. zusätzliche Gabe von Metronidazol i. v.) sowie der retrospektive Charakter mancher Studien verhindern das Erkennen möglicher Einflüsse von Störgrößen bei dieser Bewertung. Dennoch kann eine leichte CDI erfolgreich mit Metronidazol behandelt werden; andere Empfehlungen insbesondere amerikanischer Gesellschaften sollten deshalb kritisch bewertet werden. Wichtig ist, dass diese Therapieempfehlung nicht für Patienten mit chronisch entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen oder andere Patienten mit relevanten Komorbiditäten gilt.

Abstract

Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) are typical antibiotic therapy associated complications. Notwithstanding the fact that the clinical picture of CDI may extend to the development of a toxic megacolon with potentially life-threatening sequelae, mild infectious forms associated with uncomplicated diarrhoea are by far the most prevalent and should also be treated according to clear clinical practice guidelines. However, there are currently conflicting international guidelines governing metronidazole-based treatment of mild infections. In light of this shortcoming, we performed a selective literature search of guidelines and clinical studies relating to the use of metronidazole for mild CDIs. The evaluation of randomised controlled trials demonstrates that, in statistical terms, vancomycin is significantly superior to metronidazole (NNT 16). When large cohort studies are included, this difference in effectiveness is reduced to 2,5 % (NNT 40). Inconsistent criteria for defining a mild CDI, different doses, applications and time intervals (e. g. additional IV administration of metronidazole) and the retrospective nature of some studies make it difficult to identify the influence of possible interference variables in this evaluation. Nevertheless, a mild CDI can be successfully treated with metronidazole; other recommendations, particularly those of American associations, should be evaluated critically. It is important to note that this therapy recommendation does not apply to patients with chronic inflammatory bowel diseases or other patients with pertinent comorbidities.



Publication History

Received: 11 March 2020

Accepted: 22 May 2020

Article published online:
12 August 2020

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Oren A, Garrity GM. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67: 4291-4293
  • 2 Bartlett JG. Narrative review: the new epidemic of Clostridium difficile-associated enteric disease. Annals of internal medicine 2006; 145: 758-764
  • 3 Stallmach A. Clostridium Difficile Infection: What Is Currently Available for Treatment?. Der Internist 2016; 57: 1182-1190
  • 4 Holstiege J, Schulz M, Akmatov MK. et al. Update: Die ambulante Anwendung systemischer Antibiotika in Deutschland im Zeitraum 2010 bis 2018 – Eine populationsbasierte Studie. Zentralinstitut für die kassenärztliche Versorgung in Deutschland (Zi). In, Versorgungsatlas-Bericht Nr. 19/07. Berlin: 2019
  • 5 Khanafer N, Barbut F, Eckert C. et al. Factors predictive of severe Clostridium difficile infection depend on the definition used. Anaerobe 2016; 37: 43-48
  • 6 Zar FA, Bakkanagari SR, Moorthi KM. et al. A comparison of vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2007; 45: 302-307
  • 7 Louie TJ, Miller MA, Mullane KM. et al. Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection. The New England journal of medicine 2011; 364: 422-431
  • 8 Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA). Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2010; 31: 431-455
  • 9 Surawicz CM, Brandt LJ, Binion DG. et al Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections. The American journal of gastroenterology 2013; 108: 478-498 ; quiz 499
  • 10 Institut RK. Clostridioides (früher Clostridium) difficile – RKI-Ratgeber. Berlin: 2019 https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/EpidBull/Merkblaetter/Ratgeber_Clostridium.html
  • 11 Debast SB, Bauer MP, Kuijper EJ. et al. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clinical microbiology and infection: the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 2014; 20 (Suppl. 02) 1-26
  • 12 Hagel S, Epple HJ, Feurle GE. et al. S2k-guideline gastrointestinal infectious diseases and Whipple’s disease. Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie 2015; 53: 418-459
  • 13 Ooijevaar RE, van Beurden YH, Terveer EM. et al. Update of treatment algorithms for Clostridium difficile infection. Clinical microbiology and infection: the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 2018; 24: 452-462
  • 14 Nelson RL, Suda KJ, Evans CT. Antibiotic treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in adults. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2017; 3: CD004610
  • 15 von Braun A, Lübbert C. Treatment of Acute and Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infections: What Is New?. Der Internist 2018; 59: 505-513
  • 16 Lübbert C. Neue Leitlinien und Daten zu Clostridium difficile – Was ändert sich?. Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift 2018; 143: 787-792
  • 17 Cornely OA, Nathwani D, Ivanescu C. et al. Clinical efficacy of fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin and metronidazole in Clostridium difficile infections: a meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2014; 69: 2892-2900
  • 18 Goldenberg SD, Brown S, Edwards L. et al. The impact of the introduction of fidaxomicin on the management of Clostridium difficile infection in seven NHS secondary care hospitals in England: a series of local service evaluations. European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases: official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology 2016; 35: 251-259
  • 19 Al Momani LA, Abughanimeh O, Boonpheng B. et al. Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin for the Treatment of a First Episode of Clostridium Difficile Infection: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Cureus 2018; 10: e2778
  • 20 Teasley DG, Gerding DN, Olson MM. et al. Prospective randomised trial of metronidazole versus vancomycin for Clostridium-difficile-associated diarrhoea and colitis. Lancet 1983; 2: 1043-1046
  • 21 Wenisch C, Parschalk B, Hasenhundl M. et al. Comparison of vancomycin, teicoplanin, metronidazole, and fusidic acid for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 1996; 22: 813-818
  • 22 Johnson S, Louie TJ, Gerding DN. et al. Vancomycin, metronidazole, or tolevamer for Clostridium difficile infection: results from two multinational, randomized, controlled trials. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2014; 59: 345-354
  • 23 Le F, Arora V, Shah DN. et al. A real-world evaluation of oral vancomycin for severe Clostridium difficile infection: implications for antibiotic stewardship programs. Pharmacotherapy 2012; 32: 129-134
  • 24 Siegfried J, Dubrovskaya Y, Flagiello T. et al. Initial therapy for mild to moderate clostridium difficile infection. Exploring the role of oral metronidazole versus vancomycin in 168 hospitalized patients. Infect Dis Clin Pract 2016; 24: 210-2016
  • 25 Dubberke ER, Gerding D, Kelly C. et al. Efficacy of bezlotoxumab in patients receiving metronidazole, vancomycin, or fidaxomicin for treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Open forum infectious diseases 2016; 3 (Suppl. 01) 2016
  • 26 Stevens VW, Nelson RE, Schwab-Daugherty EM. et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Vancomycin and Metronidazole for the Prevention of Recurrence and Death in Patients With Clostridium difficile Infection. JAMA internal medicine 2017; 177: 546-553
  • 27 Nguyen CT, Li J, Anders S. et al. Comparison of outcomes with vancomycin or metronidazole for mild-to-moderate Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea among solid organ transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort study. Transplant infectious disease: an official journal of the Transplantation Society 2018; 20: e12867
  • 28 Yin J, Kociolek LK, Same RG. et al. Oral Vancomycin May Be Associated With Earlier Symptom Resolution Than Metronidazole for Hospitalized Children With Nonsevere Clostridioides difficile Infections. Open forum infectious diseases 2019; 6: ofz492
  • 29 Allegretti JR, Marcus J, Storm M. et al. Clinical Predictors of Recurrence After Primary Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Prospective Cohort Study. Digestive diseases and sciences 2019; DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05900-3.
  • 30 Appaneal HJ, Caffrey AR, Beganovic M. et al. Predictors of Clostridioides difficile recurrence across a national cohort of veterans in outpatient, acute, and long-term care settings. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2019; 76: 581-590
  • 31 Horton HA, Dezfoli S, Berel D. et al. Antibiotics for Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection in Hospitalized Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 2014; 58: 5054-5059
  • 32 Kucharzik T, Dignass AU, Atreya R. et al. August 2019 – AWMF-Registriernummer: 021-009. Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie 2019; 57: 1321-1405
  • 33 Shah S, Ereshefsky B, Pontiggia L. et al. Impact of Delayed Oral Vancomycin for Severe Clostridium difficile Infection. Hosp Pharm 2019; 54: 294-299