Key words
MRI - phase contrast MRI - 4D flow MRI - flow imaging - abdominal hemodynamics
Introduction
Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging (4D flow MRI) is a three-dimensional
and time-resolved phase contrast imaging technique allowing characterization of blood
flows within the entire vasculature [1]
[2]
[3]. 4D flow MRI enables the visualization of physiological and pathological flow patterns
by registration of both morphology and velocity data [3]
[4]
[5].
4D flow MRI represents a development from the clinically established two-dimensional
cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (2D PCMRI). 2D PCMRI provides only
single direction measurement of flow velocities on predefined 2D planes [6]
[7]. The 2D plane has to be placed manually perpendicular to the vessel of interest
during the MRI examination, which represents a major limitation of this technique.
In contrast, 4D flow MRI enables off-line placement of analysis planes during post-processing
for retrospective evaluation of blood flow parameters like flow rates and velocities
in multiple vessels [8].
4D flow MRI also has several advantages over Doppler ultrasound, another clinically
established and radiation-free imaging modality. Doppler ultrasound enables the measurement
of flow velocities, whereby the calculation of flow rates is often based on assumptions
resulting in possibly inaccurate quantification [4]. The main disadvantages of ultrasound examinations include the missing possibility
to comprehensively image the complex abdominal vascular anatomy due to a limited acoustic
window [4], reduced image quality e. g. in obesity or meteorism [9] and operator dependency [10]. In contrast, 4D flow MRI has shown strong repeatability [11] and reproducible results regarding the inter- and intra-reader agreement of blood
flow quantification in the abdomen [12].
This review gives a brief introduction to the technique of 4D flow MRI and provides
an overview regarding possible applications of 4D flow MRI for assessment of abdominal
hemodynamics.
Technical considerations
4D flow MRI is a phase contrast MR imaging technique allowing for the three-dimensional
visualization of time-dependent blood flow patterns. During the 4D flow MRI acquisition,
a volumetric time-resolved velocity vector field is obtained by recording velocity
data of the scanned volume in three spatial directions over the entire cardiac cycle
[8].
Before the 4D flow MRI acquisition, several technical parameters have to be defined
depending on the scientific or clinical question.
The velocity encoding sensitivity (venc) is a critical parameter and has to be adjusted
correctly. The adjusted venc represents the highest measurable blood flow velocity.
Velocities above the venc cause aliasing and velocities far below the venc lead to
inaccurate measurements [13]. The venc should be set 10 % higher than maximum expected blood flow velocity [4]. Specific venc settings according to the targeted vasculature are shown in [Table 1]. Regarding the abdominal vasculature, we generally recommend venc settings of at
least 100 cm/s for arterial vessels or 30–100 cm/s for (portal) venous vessels. Dual-venc
4D flow MRI strategies have recently been developed for an improved assessment of
slow and high flow velocities within a single MRI acquisition [14].
Table 1
Acquisition parameters of 4D flow MRI in different abdominal regions. Ao = abdominal
aorta, CT = celiac trunk, HA = hepatic artery, SA = splenic artery, SMA = superior
mesenteric artery, RA = renal artery, PV = portal vein, SV = splenic vein, SMV = superior
mesenteric vein, TIPS = transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, AV = azygos
vein (AV), n. s. = not specified, ind. opt. = individually optimized from preceding
2D PCMRI.
Tab. 1 4D-Fluss-MRT-Akquisitionsparameter entsprechend der untersuchten abdominellen Regionen.
Ao = Aorta abdominalis; CT = Truncus coeliacus; HA = Arteria hepatica; SA = Arteria
splenica; SMA = Arteria mesenterica superior; RA = Arteria renalis; PV = Vena portae;
SV = Vena splenica; SMV = Vena mesenterica superior; TIPS = transjugulärer intrahepatischer
portosystemischer Shunt; AV = Vena azygos; n. s. = nicht spezifiziert; ind. opt. = individuell
angepasst mittels vorheriger 2D-PC-MRT.
|
author
|
structure of interest
|
venc
(cm/s)
|
spatial resolution
(mm3)
|
temporal resolution
|
scan duration
(min)
|
|
liver and portal venous system
|
|
Stankovic et al.
2010 [33]
|
PV, SV, SMV
|
50
|
1.6 × 2.1 × 2.4
|
44.8 ms
|
16–23
|
|
Stankovic et al.
2013 [39]
|
SV, SMV, PV, CT, SA, HA, SMA
|
100
|
1.7 × 2.1 × 2.4
|
62.4 ms
|
~13
|
|
Roldàn-Alzate et al.
2013 [32]
|
PV, SV, SMV, Ao, HA
|
60/100
|
1.4 × 1.4 × 1.4
|
14 timeframes per heart cycle
|
10–12
|
|
Roldàn-Alzate et al.
2015 [40]
|
Ao, AV, HA, PV, SMA, SMV, SV
|
100/120
|
1.25 × 1.25 × 1.25
|
14 timeframes per heart cycle
|
12
|
|
Stankovic et al.
2015 [46]
|
SV, SMV, PV, CT, HA, SA, SMA, TIPS
|
100
|
2.4 × 2.1 × 2.6
|
80 ms
|
~9
|
|
Bannas et al.
2016 [25]
|
SMV, SV, PV, TIPS
|
60/80/120
|
1.25 × 1.25 × 1.25
|
14 timeframes per heart cycle
|
~12
|
|
Owen et al.
2018 [45]
|
TIPS
|
225
|
2.38 × 1.33 × 3.00
|
10 timeframes per heart cycle
|
10–20
|
|
Motosugi et al.
2019 [42]
|
PV, SV, SMV, AV
|
30
|
1.25 × 1.25 × 1.25
|
14 timeframes per heart cycle
|
~10
|
|
kidneys and renal arteries
|
|
Wentland et al.
2013 [11]
|
Ao, RA
|
150
|
1.32 × 1.32 × 1.32
|
16 timeframes per heart cycle
|
~11
|
|
Motoyama et al.
2017 [55]
|
Transplant RA
|
ind. opt.
|
1.25 × 1.25 × 1.25
|
20 timeframes per heart cycle
|
~9.5
|
|
abdominal aorta and mesenteric arteries
|
|
Sughimoto et al.
2016 [63]
|
Ao
|
n. s.
|
0.55 × 0.55 × 5.0
|
20 timeframes per heart cycle
|
15–20
|
|
Siedek et al.
2018 [66]
|
Ao, CT, SMA
|
≤ 300 (ind. opt.)
|
1.5 × 1.5 × 1.5
|
24 timeframes per heart cycle
|
5–15
|
Cardiac triggering is necessary to obtain a time-resolved flow signal, which is particularly
important in arterial vessels due to the pulsatile blood flow. The temporal resolution
has to be sufficient for an accurate characterization of changes in flow velocity
over time, thus allowing for the correct assessment of peak velocities [4]. However, the temporal resolution should not be too fine in order to avoid an unnecessary
increase of scan time. Regarding abdominal arteries, we generally recommend a temporal
resolution of < 40 ms per timestep [4].
The spatial resolution should ideally amount to at least 5–6 isotropic voxels per
vessel diameter [4]. However, in the case of a large field of view (e. g. entire abdomen), this recommendation
might not be achievable for smaller vessels (e. g. hepatic artery) of only a few millimeters
diameter within a reasonable scan duration.
The reproducibility using different temporal and spatial resolutions for the assessment
of liver hemodynamics has been recently investigated in more detail [15]. The 4D flow MRI acquisition protocols included spatial resolutions with voxel sizes
ranging from 2.4 × 2.0 × 2.4 mm³ to 2.6 × 2.5 × 2.6 mm³ and temporal resolutions ranging
from ~60 ms to ~80 ms (approximately 12–9 timeframes per heart cycle). A lower resolution
in space and time resulted in lower blood flow velocities, most notably in arterial
vessels but also in the portal venous system [15].
Respiratory motion during the 4D flow MRI acquisition causes artifacts like blurring
and/or ghosting, resulting in reduced image quality and inaccurate flow measurements.
Respiratory gating is required to reduce breathing artifacts. Gating strategies include
self-gating techniques, respiratory bellows, and navigator gating [16]
[17]
[18]. In the case of navigator gating, we recommend placement of the navigator window
on the diaphragm/liver interface with a gating window of ~6 mm. This results in acquisition
efficiencies of usually ~50 % for regular breathing patterns [4]. However, for irregular breathing patterns, the efficiency can drop below 20 %,
resulting in up to five times longer scan durations [19]
[20]. The long acquisition time hampers the implementation of this technique in the clinical
setting. Recently, respiratory motion corrected 4D flow MRI sequences with predictable
scan times and large geometrical coverage were proposed, which may help to integrate
4D flow MRI into the clinical routine [21].
4D flow MRI enables the assessment of blood flows without the need of contrast media.
This advantage allows the investigation of patients with renal insufficiency without
the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Of note, the administration of contrast
media means higher flip angles can be used to increase signal-to-noise ratio [4]. A steady-state blood pool can be achieved with the gadolinium-based intravascular
contrast agent gadofosveset trisodium [22]
[23]
[24]
[25]. Other gadolinium-based contrast media with faster blood pool clearance result in
varying blood signal intensities over time and the possible effects on accuracy of
flow measurements are not yet fully explored [4].
4D flow MRI data analysis
4D flow MRI data analysis
4D flow MRI offers the possibility to evaluate blood flow off-line retrospectively
during post-processing. A three-dimensional angiogram can be segmented from the 4D
flow MRI data for visual analyses of the vascular anatomy ([Fig. 1A], [Video 1A]). Velocity-coded angiograms can be obtained for each timeframe and are visualized
as pathlines or streamlines within the vessel lumen [1] ([Fig. 1B], [Video 1B]).
Fig. 1 4D flow MRI-based visualization of hemodynamics in the upper abdomen of a 75-year-old
man with a spontaneous portosystemic shunt in the left liver lobe. A Segmented 4D flow MR angiograms. Veins are indicated in blue, arteries in red, and
the portal circulation in yellow. The shunt is indicated in purple. B Velocity-weighted 4D flow MRI shows velocity distribution in the portal circulation,
which is indicated by color-coded pathlines. Note that no flow is observed in the
right portal vein due to the steal phenomenon of the shunt in the left liver lobe.
Red and blue pathlines indicate flow in the arterial and venous system, respectively.
Ao = abdominal aorta, HA = hepatic artery, SA = splenic artery, SMA = superior mesenteric
artery, PV = portal vein, SV = splenic vein, SMV = superior mesenteric vein, RHV/MHV/LHV = right/middle/left
hepatic vein.
Abb. 1 4D-Fluss-MRT zur Visualisierung der Hämodynamik im Oberbauch eines 75-jährigen Mannes
mit spontanem portosystemischem Shunt im linken Leberlappen. A Segmentiertes 4D-Fluss-MR-Angiogramm. Venen und Arterien sind blau bzw. rot dargestellt,
das portalvenöse System ist gelb dargestellt. Der Shunt ist in lila dargestellt. B 4D-Fluss-MRT-basierte Pathlines zur farbkodierten Darstellung der Flussgeschwindigkeiten
im portalvenösen System. Man beachte den fehlenden Fluss in der rechten Pfortader,
bedingt durch das Steal-Phänomen des Shunts im linken Leberlappen. Rote und blaue
Pathlines zeigen den Fluss im arteriellen bzw. venösen System. Ao = Aorta abdominalis;
HA = Arteria hepatica; SA = Arteria splenica; SMA = Arteria mesenterica superior;
PV = Vena portae; SV = Vena splenica; SMV = Vena mesenterica superior; RHV/MHV/LHV = rechte/mittlere/linke
Vena hepatica.
Pathlines allow time-resolved visualization of the temporal evolution of blood flow
over the cardiac cycle by illustrating the trace that fluid particles would follow
from their origin [26]. Streamlines represent the velocity vector field in a given moment, thus enabling
us to identify specific flow patterns like helices and vortices [26].
Quantitative flow analyses are obtained by placing arbitrary analysis planes using
the 4D flow MRI-derived angiograms for correct orientation. 4D flow MRI-derived analyses
of time-resolved flow velocities and flow rates are made equivalent to 2D phase contrast
flow measurements: a local acceleration of flow velocity indicates a stenosis and
a reduced flow rate indicates a reduced blood supply of the downstream organ [1]. If spatial resolution suffices to visualize a reliable flow profile within the
vessel lumen, helical and vortical flows, flow eccentricity, and wall shear stress
(WSS) can be evaluated [13]. The evaluation of these 4D flow MRI-derived parameters is being performed using
different commercially available or custom-built analysis tools. However, standardized
analysis procedures have not been established yet. Standardization of algorithms and
comparison of different analysis tools is still needed and requires further comparative
studies.
4D flow MRI provides a comprehensive assessment of blood flows within reasonable scan
times ([Table 1]). Shortening of the acquisition time might be achieved e. g. using acceleration
techniques such as compressed sensing [27]. Multi-venc techniques might enable the flow evaluation of slow and fast flow velocities
in a single MRI acquisition [28]. However, since 4D flow MRI is not integrated into clinical routine workflow yet,
the analysis of 4D flow MRI data is still time-consuming due to the large amount of
acquired data and the lack of standardization in post-processing.
Validation of 4D flow MRI
Validation of 4D flow MRI
The validity of 4D flow MRI measurements has been investigated in several studies
[11]
[12]
[15]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]. In vivo reference methods include Doppler ultrasound, 2D PCMRI and computational
fluid dynamics [33]
[35]. In vitro, additional methods like laser Doppler anemometry or particle image velocimetry
can serve as a reference [4].
A recent phantom study using a pulsatile flow phantom assessed the accuracy of 4D
flow MRI in terms of flow rate and velocity using a flowmeter and 2D PCMRI as the
standard of reference [29]. The study demonstrated that 4D flow MRI is accurate for the quantification of the
mean flow rate. However, the maximal velocity is slightly lower in 4D flow MRI than
that derived by 2D PCMRI. Of note, a variation of the venc up to three times greater
than the maximal flow velocity did not influence the results [29]. Similar conclusions were drawn in a 4D flow MRI phantom study evaluating blood
flows across a stenosis [30]. A flowmeter and computational fluid dynamics served as standard of reference for
flow rate and flow velocity, respectively. The flow rate was measured accurately in
the proximal and distal regions of the stenosis. However, there was also an underestimation
of post-stenotic peak velocities [30].
Experimental in vivo blood flow measurements of the ascending aorta obtained simultaneously
by 4D flow MRI and by an invasive flow probe were compared in a swine study. 4D flow
MRI enabled accurate measurement of aortic flow rates [31]. In another porcine model, 4D flow MRI was compared in vivo to invasive flow measurements
obtained by perivascular ultrasound in the abdominal vasculature (portal vein, splenic
vein, hepatic artery, renal arteries) [12]. Perivascular ultrasound and 4D flow MRI showed good agreement regarding the abdominal
blood flow rates. Furthermore, intra- and inter-reader comparison revealed excellent
correlation [12].
Regarding abdominal imaging in humans, the internal consistency based on the conservation
of mass and the repeatability of 4D Flow MRI was investigated [11]. The abdominal aorta and renal arteries were imaged two times in healthy volunteers.
Repeatability was investigated by comparison of 4D flow MRI-derived measurements from
both examinations. Internal consistency was tested by the comparison of in-flow (suprarenal
aorta) and out-flow (sum of infrarenal aorta, left renal artery and right renal artery).
Both repeated measurements and in-flow vs. out-flow measurements did not demonstrate
significant differences [11].
Similar results were obtained for 4D flow MRI-derived flow rates in the portal venous
system [15]
[32]. Excellent correlations were observed between the sum of flow rates in the superior
mesenteric vein (SMV) and splenic vein vs. the portal vein, as well as between the
flow rates in the portal vein vs. the sum of the left and right portal vein branch
[32]. Only small errors were observed in the arterial system when comparing flow rates
in the celiac trunk with the sum of the flow rates in the splenic and hepatic artery
(left gastric artery was neglected) [15]. Direct comparison of 4D flow MRI with 2D PCMRI and Doppler ultrasound as standard
of reference was performed in the portal vein. Mean and peak velocities did not differ
significantly. 4D flow MRI-derived velocities revealed moderate correlation compared
to 2D PCMRI [33].
However, a recent 4D flow MRI study comparing flow volumes derived from different
MR scanners found significant differences regarding accuracy and precision in humans
[34]. Therefore, further large-scale studies addressing the reproducibility of 4D flow
MRI in the abdomen using different MRI scanners and/or different acquisition techniques
(e. g. Cartesian or radial imaging) are needed.
Abdominal applications of 4D flow MRI
Abdominal applications of 4D flow MRI
4D flow MRI provides a non-invasive visualization and quantification of flows in the
entire abdominal vasculature with a single examination. We expect that the implementation
of 4D flow MRI in the clinical routine and larger clinical studies will further improve
the understanding of abdominal pathologies. Several 4D flow MRI studies in different
disease settings have been performed to date ([Table 1]). Below, we present an overview regarding possible applications of 4D flow MRI for
non-invasive assessment of abdominal hemodynamics in different diseases.
Liver and portal venous system
Different quantitative MRI methods have been used to evaluate chronic liver pathologies,
such as steatosis [36], fibrosis, or cirrhosis [37]
[38]. In patients with liver cirrhosis, 4D flow MRI allows to evaluate splanchnic blood
flows in the arterial, venous, and portal venous system [32]
[33]
[39]. Mesenteric and portal hemodynamics depend on the ingestion of food due to physiological
postprandial vasodilation, which results in increased mesenteric blood flow [40]. Therefore, we recommend performing 4D flow MRI acquisitions of the abdominal vasculature
after the patient has fasted for ≥ 3 hours.
A recent 4D flow MRI study compared splanchnic blood flow directly after a standardized
meal and after fasting for five hours in healthy individuals as well as in cirrhotic
patients with portal hypertension [40]. Postprandially, significant increases in blood flow were observed in both groups
in the portal vein, SMV, superior mesenteric artery, and supraceliac aorta. However,
in contrast to healthy subjects, blood flow significantly decreased in patients with
portal hypertension in the splenic vein and the hepatic artery, while flow rate increased
in the azygos vein. [40]. The flow in the azygos vein is correlated with gastro-esophageal varices [41]. Therefore, the feasibility of 4D flow MRI to measure blood flow alterations in
these vessels holds promise for the evaluation of portal hypertension, especially
regarding the treatment of gastroesophageal varices [40].
Portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis is associated with the development of gastroesophageal
varices [8]. Recently, the stratification of variceal bleeding risk using 4D flow MRI has been
investigated in 23 patients with liver cirrhosis [42]. Endoscopy was performed as standard of reference to grade the bleeding risk of
those varices. In four of the 15 patients with endoscopy-confirmed varices, 4D flow
MRI was able to visualize these vessels directly. Since the varices were not measurable
in each 4D flow visualization, indirect measures of portosystemic collateral blood
flow were evaluated. In this small study cohort, patients with high bleeding risk
varices had a portal venous flow lower than the sum of the flow in the SMV and the
splenic vein (sensitivity 100 %, specificity 94 %) and an increased flow rate in the
azygos vein (sensitivity 100 %, specificity 62 %) [42].
The implantation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) represents
a therapeutic option in these patients. The TIPS stent represents a bypass from the
portal system to the systemic circulation, with the aim to lower portal pressure and
consecutively to reduce the risk for variceal hemorrhage and to resolve ascites [43]
[44]. 4D flow MRI enables the non-invasive monitoring of hepatic blood flow before and
after TIPS implantation [25] ([Fig. 2], [Video 2]). Portal venous flow increased significantly after TIPS implantation and ascites
resolved in most patients. In one individual, 4D flow MRI helped to identify arterioportal
shunting, explaining the patient’s refractory ascites despite TIPS implantation [25].
Fig. 2 A Coronal T1-weighted MRI of a 57-year-old woman after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic
shunt (TIPS) placement. Note the not yet resolved ascites (asterisk). B 4D flow MRI-derived velocity-weighted pathline visualization of blood flow in the
portal vein (PV) and TIPS stent. Flow in the inferior vena cava (IVC), aorta (Ao)
and celiac trunk (CT) is also visualized by velocity-weighted pathlines. Note the
accelerated flow in the TIPS stent.
Abb. 2 A Koronare T1-gewichtete MRT der Leber einer 57-jährigen Patientin nach Implantation
eines transjugulären intrahepatischen portosystemischen Shunts (TIPS). Der Aszites
ist noch nicht vollständig regredient (Asterisk). B Die 4D-Fluss-MRT-basierte Flussvisualisierung mittels geschwindigkeitskodierter Pathlines
zeigt den Blutfluss in der Pfortader (PV) und eine Flussbeschleunigung im TIPS. Der Blutfluss
in der Vena cava inferior (IVC), der Aorta (Ao) und im Truncus coeliacus (CT) ist
ebenfalls mittels geschwindigkeitskodierter Pathlines dargestellt.
4D flow MRI may also be used to assess TIPS dysfunction (i. e. stenosis) by detection
of focal turbulence and abnormal velocities [45]
[46]. A recent feasibility study aiming to detect TIPS dysfunction included 16 patients
with a successfully performed 4D flow MRI [45]. Qualitative and quantitative flow properties (i. e. flow abnormalities like focal
turbulence and peak velocities, respectively) were separately evaluated in each patient.
Clinical follow-up or, when available, venography served as reference standard. Three
patients with TIPS dysfunction were correctly detected by 4D flow MRI due to focal
turbulence and abnormal velocities. 4D flow MRI correctly excluded flow abnormalities
in seven patients without TIPS dysfunction. However, six patients without TIPS dysfunction
had discordant 4D flow results demonstrating flow alterations [45]. These results indicate that further studies are needed to establish more specific
4D flow MRI criteria for monitoring TIPS function. These 4D flow MRI-derived criteria
might then help guiding TIPS revision strategies in non-responding TIPS-patients with
persistent ascites.
4D flow MRI may also be useful in patients with severe complications of portal hypertension
where TIPS implantation is not possible. We treated a patient with portal hypertension
and refractory ascites due to portal vein thrombosis. Surgical implantation of a mesocaval
stent graft between the SMV and the inferior vena cava (IVC) was performed to lower
the portal pressure. Postoperative 4D flow MRI revealed a large spontaneous portosystemic
mesorenal collateral between the SMV and the right renal vein (RV). 4D flow MRI not
only allowed to confirm the patency of both the spontaneous mesorenal collateral (SMV-RV)
and the implanted mesorenal shunt (SMV-IVC) but also quantification of flow rates
([Fig. 3], [Video 3A, B]).
Fig. 3 4D flow MRI of the entire abdominal vasculature in a 54-year-old man with thrombosis
of the portal vein and both portosystemic spontaneous collateral and surgical shunt.
A Note the missing portal vein in the segmented 4D flow MRI-derived angiogram due to
complete portal vein thrombosis. Begin of the thrombosis is indicated by the dotted
line, which begins at the venous confluence of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV)
and splenic vein (SV). Note the large spontaneous mesorenal collateral (Col), originating
from the SMV and draining into the right renal vein (RV). Since portal vein thrombosis
precluded placement of a TIPS stent, a mesocaval shunt was surgically implanted, draining
blood from the SMV into the inferior vena cava (IVC) in order to lower portal hypertension.
Aorta (Ao), celiac trunk (CT), and right and left common iliac arteries (CIA) are
also shown. B Velocity-weighted 4D flow MRI reveals reversed blood flow within the SMV draining
into the spontaneous mesorenal collateral and surgical mesocaval shunt.
Abb. 3 4D-Fluss-MRT bei einem 54-jährigen Patienten mit Pfortaderthrombose und portosystemischer
spontaner mesorenaler Kollaterale sowie einem implantierten mesocavalen Shunt. A Die Pfortader ist im Angiogramm aufgrund der Thrombose nicht abgrenzbar. Die Thrombose
beginnt unmittelbar an der Konfluenz von Vena mesenterica superior (SMV) und Vena
splenica (SV) und ist durch die weiße Linie gekennzeichnet. Eine spontane mesorenale
Kollaterale (Col) besteht zwischen der SMV und der rechten Nierenvene (RV). Zur Senkung
des portalvenösen Drucks wurde operativ ein mesocavaler Shunt von der SMV in die Vena
cava inferior angelegt (IVC). Aorta (Ao), Truncus coeliacus (CT) sowie rechte und
linke Arteria iliaca communis (CIA) sind ebenfalls dargestellt. B Die 4D-Fluss-MRT-basierten geschwindigkeitskodierten Pathlines zeigen eine Flussumkehr
in der SMV mit Abfluss in die spontane mesorenale Kollaterale und den operativ angelegten
mesocavalen Shunt.
In liver transplantation, 4D flow MRI may improve surgical planning through visualization
of patient-specific hemodynamics. A recent study in living liver donors demonstrated
that 4D flow MRI can support predicting the patient-specific response to altered post-surgery
flow in the remaining liver lobe induced by resection of the donated liver lobe [47].
The usefulness of 4D flow MRI for blood flow assessment in complex postsurgical vascular
anatomy has been recently highlighted in a patient with renoportal anastomosis after
liver transplantation [48]. In the case of portal vein thrombosis renoportal anastomosis is a surgical technique
to preserve blood flow to the liver graft [49]. This patient suffered from variceal bleeding after renoportal anastomosis. 4D flow
MRI enabled the measurement of splanchnic blood flows, which was not accessible by
other imaging techniques. An orthograde flow was observed in the renoportal anastomosis,
thus considering the risk for recurrent variceal bleeding to be low and avoiding secondary
surgery ([Fig. 4], [Video 4]) [48].
Fig. 4 4D flow MRI-based visualization of portal hemodynamics after liver transplantation
with renoportal anastomosis in a 49-year-old woman. Velocity-encoded 4D flow MRI reveals
patency of the renoportal anastomosis (arrow) between the left renal vein (RV) and
the portal vein (PV) that secures blood flow to the liver graft. A Oblique anterior view shows velocity distribution also in the inferior vena cava
(IVC), aorta (Ao), celiac trunk (CT), superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and splenic
artery (SA). B Isolated visualization of orthograde helical flow in a large esophageal varix that
drains via a collateral (C1) into the renal vein. C Left view with perpendicular cut-planes for flow quantification in collaterals (C1, C2),
renal vein (RV) and portal vein (PV). Taken with permission from Lenz et al. (DOI:10.1055/a-0862-0778)
[48].
Abb. 4 4D-Fluss-MRT-basierte Darstellung der portalen Hämodynamik nach Lebertransplantation
mit renoportaler Anastomose einer 49-jährigen Patientin. Geschwindigkeitskodierte
4D-Fluss-MRT-Bilder zeigen die Durchgängigkeit der renoportalen Anastomose (Pfeil)
zwischen der linken Nierenvene (RV) und der Pfortader (PV), welche die Blutzufuhr
der Transplantatleber sicherstellt. A Die schräg-anteriore Sicht zeigt die Geschwindigkeitsverteilung in der Vena cava
inferior (IVC), Aorta (Ao), Truncus coeliacus (CT), Arteria mesenterica superior (SMA)
und Arteria splenica (SA). B Isolierte Darstellung des orthograden helikalen Blutflusses in einer großen Ösophagusvarizen,
welche über eine Kollaterale (C1) in die Nierenvene (RV) drainiert. C Ansicht von links mit orthogonalen, zum Gefäß liegenden Ebenen zur Quantifizierung
des Blutflusses in den Kollateralen (C1, C2), der Nierenvene (RV) und der Pfortader
(PV). Mit Genehmigung von Lenz et al. (doi:10.1055/a-0862-0778) [48].
Spleen
4D flow MRI-derived blood flow analyses may improve the diagnostic assessment of hypersplenism.
Hypersplenism, as a complication of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension, might
lead to severe consequences such as thrombocytopenia [50]. Anatomic imaging combined with 4D flow MRI-based assessment of splenic blood flow
and portosystemic shunts enabled the non-invasive determination of the clinical relevance
of splenomegaly in patients with cirrhosis and suspected thrombocytopenia [51].
Kidneys and renal arteries
4D flow MRI enables the evaluation of renal perfusion with strong repeatability of
flow measurements [11]. Stenoses of renal arteries may cause hypertension and renal failure [52]. However, the hemodynamic significance of a moderate renal artery stenosis might
not be determined from anatomical imaging of the vessel diameter alone [2]
[52]. In a porcine model, 4D flow MRI was successfully performed for the assessment of
the hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenoses [53]. In humans, renal perfusion has been evaluated by this technique in a pediatric
case of left renal artery stenosis with renovascular hypertension. Flow measurements
before and after percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty confirmed an increased
blood flow after angiography [54].
A recent study assessed renal perfusion after kidney transplantation and compared
intrarenal artery blood flow obtained by 4D flow MRI and Doppler ultrasound. The authors
observed a significant correlation between ultrasound- and 4D flow MRI-derived flow
velocities. They concluded that hemodynamic and morphological data obtained by 4D
flow MRI for evaluation of transplant intrarenal arteries is useful in this setting
[55].
Abdominal aorta and mesenteric arteries
Progressive dilatation and aneurysm formation of the aorta is a risk factor for potentially
life-threatening aortic dissection and rupture [56]. Although the formation of abdominal aneurysms is typically associated with atherosclerosis
[57], the mechanism of the development of an aortic aneurysm is not yet clearly understood
[58]. In order to identify predictors for aneurysm formation and dissection, recent research
has investigated hemodynamic parameters such as 4D flow MRI-derived secondary flow
patterns (e. g. vortices and helices) and WSS [13].
WSS represents mechanical stress on the vessel wall, which is a known stimulus for
endothelial cell function [59], and may be associated with arterial remodeling and plaque formation [60]
[61]. A standardized algorithm for 4D flow MRI-derived WSS evaluation has not been established.
WSS estimates are influenced by the exact placement of the region of interest and
by the chosen spatial resolution [62]. However, the relative intra- and interindividual distribution of WSS estimates
might be reasonably accurate [5]
[35]. In the abdominal aorta, elevated WSS was described adjacent to the ostia of the
renal arteries in healthy volunteers [63]. Of note, this is the segment of the aorta where abdominal aneurysms commonly develop. However,
future longitudinal studies need to investigate the predictive value of these altered
4D flow MRI-derived measurements in the abdominal aorta for formation of aneurysms
and prediction of dissection.
4D flow MRI of the abdominal aorta may also be useful in patients after aortic dissection
for determining blood flow changes. A recent study has shown that the assessment of
flow alterations in the false and true lumen may be useful for the identification
of patients with increased rates of aortic expansion [64]. Again, future longitudinal studies are needed to determine the significance of
these 4D flow MRI-derived alterations and their potential for risk stratification
of patients with aortic dissections.
After endovascular aneurysm repair, 4D flow MRI may help to detect and visualize endoleaks.
The feasibility of this method to visualize flow into the aneurysm was recently demonstrated,
thereby aiding in the differentiation of the specific types of endoleaks [65]. However, it should be kept in mind that the detection of small endoleaks may be
difficult, particularly if susceptibility artifacts are present due to the metallic
struts in the stent graft.
4D flow MRI has shown promising results addressing the assessment of smaller abdominal
vessels such as the superior mesenteric artery and celiac trunk. In a recent feasibility
study, 22 healthy volunteers were compared to ten patients with confirmed low-grade
and mid-grade stenosis of the superior mesenteric artery or celiac trunk. Contrast-enhanced
computed tomography served as standard of reference [66]. The peak and average velocities, the peak flow rate, stroke volume, and WSS were
evaluated in both arteries using 4D flow MRI. Patients with a low-grade or mid-grade
stenosis revealed significantly higher peak and average blood flow velocities in comparison
to healthy individuals. Mid-grade stenoses were associated with a significantly higher
WSS magnitude. Limitations of this study include the lack of a reference standard
for 4D flow MRI-derived flow parameters and potential negative effects on image quality
caused by high acceleration factors [66].
Fetal and uteroplacental hemodynamics
4D flow MRI might be used for prenatal cardiovascular angiography. In research, 4D
flow MRI has already been used in animal studies to evaluate hemodynamics during pregnancy.
While respiratory gating can be used to compensate for motion due to maternal breathing,
compensation for fetal motion and cardiac triggering remains difficult [67]. In pregnant sheep, invasive triggering of the blood pressure enabled the visualization
of arterial and venous blood flow patterns in the major fetal vessels [68]. In pregnant monkeys, 4D flow MRI allowed measurements in fetal and uteroplacental
vessels [67]. Future studies with improved cardiac gating strategies such as recently developed
MR-compatible Doppler ultrasound sensors [7] are needed for 4D flow MRI-based assessment of fetal hemodynamics.
Summary
4D flow MRI offers the possibility of functional evaluation of flow parameters in
the complex abdominal vasculature beyond morphological assessment. A major advantage
is the possibility to retrospectively evaluate arbitrary vessels of interest within
the acquired three-dimensional volume off-line after acquisition. The ability of 4D
flow MRI to perform qualitative and quantitative analyses offers the possibility of
a comprehensive assessment of the abdominal blood flows in different vascular territories
and organ systems. Results of recent studies indicate that 4D flow MRI improves understanding
of altered hemodynamics in patients with abdominal disease and may be useful for monitoring
therapeutic response. Future studies with larger cohorts aiming to integrate 4D flow
MRI in the clinical routine setting are needed.
Funding
Deutsche Stiftung für Herzforschung (F/35/17), Forschungszentrum Medizintechnik Hamburg
(04fmthh2019)
Video 1A Three-dimensional angiogram of the abdominal vasculature segmented from the 4D flow
MRI data for visual analyses of the anatomy.
Video 1A Die Erstellung eines 3-dimensionalen Angiogramms mithilfe der 4D-Fluss-MRT erlaubt
die anatomische Darstellung der abdominellen Gefäßstrukturen.
Video 1B 4D flow MRI-derived angiograms with velocity-weighted pathlines within the vessel
lumen visualize the blood flow.
Video 1B 4D-Fluss-MRT-basierte geschwindigkeitskodierte Angiogramme mit Pathlines innerhalb
der Gefäßlumina visualisieren den Blutfluss.
Video 2 4D flow MRI for non-invasive monitoring of hepatic blood flow after TIPS implantation.
Video 2 Die 4D-Fluss-MRT ermöglicht die Darstellung der hepatischen Hämodynamik nach TIPS-Implantation.
Video 3A 4D flow MRI-derived angiogram in a 54-year-old man with complete thrombosis of the
portal vein and both portosystemic spontaneous mesorenal collateral and surgical mesocaval
shunt.
Video 3A 4D-Fluss-Angiogramm eines 54-jährigen Patienten mit vollständiger Pfortaderthrombose
und portosystemischer spontaner mesorenaler Kollaterale sowie implantiertem mesorenalem
Shunt.
Video 3B Velocity-weighted 4D flow MRI reveals reversed blood flow within the SMV draining
into the spontaneous mesorenal collateral and surgical mesocaval shunt.
Video 3B Die Flussvisualisierung mittels 4D-Fluss-MRT zeigt eine Flussumkehr in der SMV und
Abfluss über die spontane mesorenale Kollaterale und den operativ angelegten mesocavalen
Shunt.
Video 4 Orthograde blood flow in varix and collaterals, indicating low risk for recurrence
of variceal bleeding. Taken with permission from Lenz et al. (DOI:10.1055/a-0862-0778)
[48].
Video 4 Orthograder Blutfluss in den Varizen und Kollateralen als Hinweis für ein geringes
Risiko einer erneuten Varizenblutung. Mit Genehmigung von Lenz et al. (doi:10.1055/a-0862-0778)
[48].
