Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2020; 129(12): 614-625
DOI: 10.1055/a-1290-2980
Fortbildung | Prothetik

Digitale Abformung und Funktion – ein sicherer Weg für die volldigitale Umsetzung aufwendiger Restaurationen

Martin Butz
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Trotz der fortschreitenden Entwicklung und Verbreitung der digitalen Abformung und der damit verbundenen Möglichkeiten für die digitale Interaktion mit dem zahntechnischen Labor wird der Großteil der komplexen Restaurationen noch in analoger Arbeitsweise gefertigt. Den Möglichkeiten der digitalen Technik stehen die Herausforderungen im Umgang mit Hard- und Software sowohl auf Zahnarzt- als auch auf Laborseite entgegen.

Publication History

Article published online:
11 December 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int J Comput Dent 2019; 22: 11-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ahlholm P, Sipila K, Vallittu P. et al. Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review. Int J Prosthodont 2014; 27: 433-438
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Schmidt A, Klussmann L, Wöstmann B. et al. Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impressions in Patients: An Update. J Clin Med 2020; 9: 688
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Weise T, Wismer T, Leibe B. et al. Online loop closure for real-time interactive 3D scanning. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 2011; 115: 635-648
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F. et al. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 853-862
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Jin SJ, Jeong ID, Kim JH. et al. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of dental models fabricated using additive manufacturing methods. Int J Comput Dent 2018; 21: 107-113
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Schaefer O, Schmidt M, Goebel R. et al. Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 108: 165-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: Deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 2009; 140: 1301-1304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rungrojwittayakul O, Kan JY, Shiozaki K. et al. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base. J Prosthodont 2020; 29: 124-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Choi JW, Ahn JJ, Son K. et al. Three-Dimensional Evaluation on Accuracy of Conventional and Milled Gypsum Models and 3D Printed Photopolymer Models. Materials (Basel) 2019; 12: 3499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ahlers MO. Determination of vertical dimension when using repositioning onlays for second stage restorative treatment after functional therapy. J CranioMand Func 2014; 6: 131-148
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Edelhoff D, Schweiger J, Prandtner O. et al. CAD/CAM splints for the functional and esthetic evaluation of newly defined occlusal dimensions. Quintessence Int 2017; 48: 181-191
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Behr M, Fanghänel J, Rauch A. Changing the bite position in a patient with tooth hard substance loss. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z Int 2020; 2: 003-007
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Edelhoff D, Probst F, Ehrenfeld M. et al. Interdisciplinary full-mouth rehabilitation for redefining esthetics, function, and orofacial harmony. J Esthet Restor Dent 2019; 31: 179-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar