Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2021; 130(04): 160-167
DOI: 10.1055/a-1424-7856
Fortbildung
Implantologie

Navigation in der dentalen Implantologie

Cornelia Edelmann
,
Sigmar Schnutenhaus
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Durch Navigationsverfahren können dentale Implantate vor dem chirurgischen Eingriff virtuell 3-dimensional geplant werden und deren Position anschließend auf die klinische Situation am Patienten übertragen werden. Verschiedene Verfahren stehen hierzu zur Verfügung. Wie zuverlässig diese Verfahren sind und ob sie sich für die Praxis lohnen, zeigen die Autoren dieses Beitrags.

Publication History

Article published online:
19 April 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 DʼHaese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D. et al. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000 2017; 73: 121-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Garber DA, Belser UC. Restoration-driven implant placement with restoration-generated site development. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1995; 16: 796 798–802, 804
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Albrektsson T, Chrcanovic B, Ostman PO. et al. Initial and long-term crestal bone responses to modern dental implants. Periodontol 2000 2017; 73: 41-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Romanos GE, Delgado-Ruiz R, Sculean A. Concepts for prevention of complications in implant therapy. Periodontol 2000 2019; 81: 7-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Al Amri MD. Influence of interimplant distance on the crestal bone height around dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 115: 278-282.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Staubli N, Walter C, Schmidt JC. et al. Excess cement and the risk of peri-implant disease – a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28: 1278-1290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bosshardt DD, Chappuis V, Buser D. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions. Periodontol 2000 2017; 73: 22-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wismeijer D, Joda T, Flugge T. et al. Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Digital technologies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29 (Suppl. 16) 436-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Al Yafi F, Camenisch B, Al-Sabbagh M. Is Digital Guided Implant Surgery Accurate and Reliable?. Dent Clin North Am 2019; 63: 381-397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Tahmaseb A, Wu V, Wismeijer D. et al. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29 (Suppl. 16) 416-435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gargallo-Albiol J, Barootchi S, Salomo-Coll O. et al. Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review. Ann Anat 2019; 225: 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cassetta M, Altieri F, Giansanti M. et al. Is there a learning curve in static computer-assisted implant surgery? A prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020; 49: 1335-1342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Giansanti M. et al. How does an error in positioning the template affect the accuracy of implants inserted using a single fixed mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide?. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 43: 85-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W. et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29 (Suppl) 25-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Schnutenhaus S, Edelmann C, Rudolph H. et al. Retrospective study to determine the accuracy of template-guided implant placement using a novel nonradiologic evaluation method. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016; 121: e72-e79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Zhou W, Liu Z, Song L. et al. Clinical Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2018; 18: 28-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Li J, Chen Z, Chan HL. et al. Does flap opening or not influence the accuracy of semi-guided implant placement in partially edentulous sites?. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019; 21: 1253-1261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Du Y, Wangrao K, Liu L. et al. Quantification of image artifacts from navigation markers in dynamic guided implant surgery and the effect on registration performance in different clinical scenarios. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019; 34: 726-736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Vercruyssen M, Fortin T, Widmann G. et al. Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: modalities and indications. Periodontol 2000 2014; 66: 214-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Brief J, Edinger D, Hassfeld S. et al. Accuracy of image-guided implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 495-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hoffmann J, Westendorff C, Gomez-Roman G. et al. Accuracy of navigation-guided socket drilling before implant installation compared to the conventional free-hand method in a synthetic edentulous lower jaw model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 609-614
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kramer FJ, Baethge C, Swennen G. et al. Navigated vs. conventional implant insertion for maxillary single tooth replacement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 60-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Schnutenhaus S, Edelmann C, Knipper A. et al. Accuracy of dynamic computer-assited implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and in vitro studies. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Liu SH, Cao CR, Lin WC. et al. Experimental and numerical simulation study of the thermal hazards of four azo compounds. J Hazard Mater 2019; 365: 164-177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chen JT. A Novel Application of Dynamic Navigation System in Socket Shield Technique. J Oral Implantol 2019; 45: 409-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Block MS, Emery RW. Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74: 269-277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ayoub A, Pulijala Y. The application of virtual reality and augmented reality in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19: 238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Schnitman PA, Hayashi C, Han RK. Why guided when freehand is easier, quicker, and less costly?. J Oral Implantol 2014; 40: 670-678
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Greenstein G, Tarnow D. The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: a literature review. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 1933-1943
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Joda T, Derksen W, Wittneben JG. et al. Static computer-aided implant surgery (s-CAIS) analysing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), economics and surgical complications: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29 (Suppl. 16) 359-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Tatakis DN, Chien HH, Parashis AO. Guided implant surgery risks and their prevention. Periodontol 2000 2019; 81: 194-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Choi W, Nguyen BC, Doan A. et al. Freehand Versus Guided Surgery: Factors Influencing Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement. Implant Dent 2017; 26: 500-509
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Behneke A, Burwinkel M, Behneke N. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 416-423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Hamel J. et al. Evaluation of the difference in accuracy between implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates versus the conventional free-hand method – a combined in vivo – in vitro technique using cone-beam CT (Part II). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2010; 38: 488-493
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Naert I. et al. Depth and lateral deviations in guided implant surgery: an RCT comparing guided surgery with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 1315-1320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Vercruyssen M, Cox C, Coucke W. et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. J Clin Periodontol 2014; 41: 717-723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Varga jr. E, Antal M, Major L. et al. Guidance means accuracy: A randomized clinical trial on freehand versus guided dental implantation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2020; 31: 417-430
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schneider D, Sancho-Puchades M, Mir-Mari J. et al. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional and Computer-Assisted Implant Planning and Placement in Partially Edentulous Patients. Part 4: Accuracy of Implant Placement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2019; 39: e111-e122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Sun TM, Lee HE, Lan TH. Comparing Accuracy of Implant Installation with a Navigation System (NS), a Laboratory Guide (LG), NS with LG, and Freehand Drilling. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 2107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Aydemir CA, Arisan V. Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2020; 31: 255-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Jacobs R. Preoperative radiologic planning of implant surgery in compromised patients. Periodontol 2000 2003; 33: 12-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Rosenfeld AL, Mandelaris GA, Tardieu PB. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 2: rapid-prototype medical modeling and stereolithographic drilling guides requiring bone exposure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 347-353
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Rosenfeld AL, Mandelaris GA, Tardieu PB. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 1: diagnostics, imaging, and collaborative accountability. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 215-221
    PubMedGoogle Scholar