Tolerance to Intermittent vs. Continuous Blood Flow Restriction Training: A meta-Analysis

Abstract

The proven beneficial effects of low-load blood flow restriction training on strength gain has led to further exploration into its application during rehabilitation, where the traditional use of heavy loads may not be feasible. With current evidence showing that low-load blood flow restriction training may be less well tolerated than heavy-load resistance training, this review was conducted to decipher whether intermittently deflating the pressure cuff during rest intervals of a training session improves tolerance to exercise, without compromising strength. Four databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared the effect of intermittent versus continuous blood flow restriction training on outcomes of exercise tolerance or strength in adults. Nine studies were identified, with six included in the meta-analysis. No significant difference in rate of perceived exertion was found (SMD-0.06, 95% CI-0.41 to 0.29, p=0.73, I ²=80%). Subgroup analysis excluding studies that introduced bias showed a shift towards favoring the use of intermittent blood flow restriction training (SMD-0.42, 95% CI-0.87 to 0.03, p=0.07, I ²=0%). There was no significant difference in strength gain. Intermittent cuff deflations during training intervals does not improve tolerance to exercise during blood flow restriction training.

Key words

BFR - blood flow restriction - rehabilitation - intermittent - exercise tolerance - perceived exertion

Publication History

Received: 10 November 2020
Received: 02 June 2021

Accepted: 07 June 2021

Article published online:
17 September 2021

• References

• 1 American College of Sports M.. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 687-708
• 2 Moore AJ, Holden MA, Foster NE. et al. Therapeutic alliance facilitates adherence to physiotherapy-led exercise and physical activity for older adults with knee pain: a longitudinal qualitative study. J Physiother 2020; 66: 45-53
• 3 Hughes L, Patterson SD, Haddad F. et al. Examination of the comfort and pain experienced with blood flow restriction training during post-surgery rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients: A UK National Health Service trial. Phys Ther Sport 2019; 39: 90-98
• 4 Hughes L, Rosenblatt B, Haddad F. et al. Comparing the effectiveness of blood flow restriction and traditional heavy load resistance training in the post-surgery rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients: A UK National Health Service Randomised Controlled Trial. Sports Med 2019; 49: 1787-1805
• 5 Pearson SJ, Hussain SR. A review on the mechanisms of blood-flow restriction resistance training-induced muscle hypertrophy. Sports Med 2015; 45: 187-200
• 6 Laurentino GC, Ugrinowitsch C, Roschel H. et al. Strength training with blood flow restriction diminishes myostatin gene expression. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 406-412
• 7 Segal N, Davis MD, Mikesky AE. Efficacy of blood flow-restricted low-load resistance training for quadriceps strengthening in men at risk of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2015; 6: 160-167
• 8 Segal NA, Williams GN, Davis MC. et al. Efficacy of blood flow-restricted, low-load resistance training in women with risk factors for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. PM R 2015; 7: 376-384
• 9 Takarada Y, Sato Y, Ishii N. Effects of resistance exercise combined with vascular occlusion on muscle function in athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 2002; 86: 308-314
• 10 de Freitas MC, Gerosa-Neto J, Zanchi NE. et al. Role of metabolic stress for enhancing muscle adaptations: Practical applications. World J Methodol 2017; 7: 46-54
• 11 Manini TM, Clark BC. Blood flow restricted exercise and skeletal muscle health. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2009; 37: 78-85
• 12 Ganesan G, Cotter JA, Reuland W. et al. Effect of blood flow restriction on tissue oxygenation during knee extension. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2015; 47: 185-193
• 13 Suga T, Okita K, Takada S. et al. Effect of multiple set on intramuscular metabolic stress during low-intensity resistance exercise with blood flow restriction. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012; 112: 3915-3920
• 14 Luger A, Watschinger B, Deuster P. et al. Plasma growth hormone and prolactin responses to graded levels of acute exercise and to a lactate infusion. Neuroendocrinology 1992; 56: 112-117
• 15 Manini TM, Yarrow JF, Buford TW. et al. Growth hormone responses to acute resistance exercise with vascular restriction in young and old men. Growth Horm IGF Res 2012; 22: 167-172
• 16 Doessing S, Heinemeier KM, Holm L. et al. Growth hormone stimulates the collagen synthesis in human tendon and skeletal muscle without affecting myofibrillar protein synthesis. J Physiol 2010; 588: 341-351
• 17 Hughes L, Paton B, Haddad F. et al. Comparison of the acute perceptual and blood pressure response to heavy load and light load blood flow restriction resistance exercise in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients and non-injured populations. Phys Ther Sport 2018; 33: 54-61
• 18 Soligon SD, Lixandrao ME, Biazon T. et al. Lower occlusion pressure during resistance exercise with blood-flow restriction promotes lower pain and perception of exercise compared to higher occlusion pressure when the total training volume is equalized. Physiol Int 2018; 105: 276-284
• 19 Dankel SJ, Jessee MB, Mattocks KT. et al. Perceptual and arterial occlusion responses to very low load blood flow restricted exercise performed to volitional failure. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2019; 39: 29-34
• 20 Bell ZW, Buckner SL, Jessee MB. et al. Moderately heavy exercise produces lower cardiovascular, RPE, and discomfort compared to lower load exercise with and without blood flow restriction. Eur J Appl Physiol 2018; 118: 1473-1480
• 21 Corvino RB, Rossiter HB, Loch T. et al. Physiological responses to interval endurance exercise at different levels of blood flow restriction. Eur J Appl Physiol 2017; 117: 39-52
• 22 Frey Law LA, Sluka KA, McMullen T. et al. Acidic buffer induced muscle pain evokes referred pain and mechanical hyperalgesia in humans. Pain 2008; 140: 254-264
• 23 Harriss DJ, MacSween A, Atkinson G. Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research: 2020 Update. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 813-817
• 24 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009; 339: b2535
• 25 Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC. et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d5928
• 26 Herman L, Foster C, Maher MA. et al. Validity and reliability of the session RPE method for monitoring exercise training intensity. S Afr J Sports Med 2006; 18: 14-17
• 27 Ekblom B, Golobarg AN. The influence of physical training and other factors on the subjective rating of perceived exertion. Acta Physiol Scand 1971; 83: 399-406
• 28 Borg G. Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1998
• 29 Yasuda T, Loenneke JP, Ogasawara R. et al. Influence of continuous or intermittent blood flow restriction on muscle activation during low-intensity multiple sets of resistance exercise. Acta Physiol Hung 2013; 100: 419-426
• 30 Fitschen PJ, Kistler BM, Jeong JH. et al. Perceptual effects and efficacy of intermittent or continuous blood flow restriction resistance training. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2014; 34: 356-363
• 31 Brandner CR, Warmington SA. Delayed onset muscle soreness and perceived exertion after blood flow restriction exercise. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31: 3101-3108
• 32 Neto GR, Novaes JS, Salerno VP. et al. Acute effects of resistance exercise with continuous and intermittent blood flow restriction on hemodynamic measurements and perceived exertion. Percept Mot Skills 2017; 124: 277-292
• 33 Freitas EDS, Miller RM, Heishman AD. et al. Perceptual responses to continuous versus intermittent blood flow restriction exercise: A randomized controlled trial. Physiol Behav 2019; 212: 112717
• 34 Okita K, Takada S, Morita N. et al. Resistance training with interval blood flow restriction effectively enhances intramuscular metabolic stress with less ischemic duration and discomfort. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2019; 44: 759-764
• 35 Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Higgins JPT. et al. Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues. Int J Epidemiol 2002; 31: 140-149
• 36 Cleophas TJM. Crossover trials are only useful when there is a positive correlation between the response to different treatment modalities. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1996; 41: 235-239
• 37 Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539-1558
• 38 Neto GR, Silva HG, Vieira LF. et al. Efeito agudo e crônico do treinamento de força com restrição de fluxo sanguíneo contínua ou intermitente sobre as medidas hemodinâmicas e percepção subjetiva de esforço em homens saudáveis. Motricidade 2018; 14: 71-82
• 39 Rodrigues Neto G, Silva JCGd, Freitas L. et al. Effects of strength training with continuous or intermittent blood flow restriction on the hypertrophy, muscular strength and endurance of men. Acta Scientiarum Health Sciences 2019; 41: e42273
• 40 Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ. et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. BMJ 2003; 327: 557-560
• 41 Cook DB, O’connor PJ, Eubanks SA. et al. Naturally occurring muscle pain during exercise: assessment and experimental evidence. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29: 999-1012
• 42 Guimaraes-Ferreira L. Role of the phosphocreatine system on energetic homeostasis in skeletal and cardiac muscles. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 2014; 12: 126-131
• 43 Patterson SD, Hughes L, Warmington S. et al. Blood flow restriction exercise: Considerations of methodology, application, and safety. Front Physiol 2019; 10: 533
• 44 Younger AS, McEwen JA, Inkpen K. Wide contoured thigh cuffs and automated limb occlusion measurement allow lower tourniquet pressures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 428: 286-293
• 45 McEwen JA, Owens JG, Jeyasurya J. Why is it crucial to use personalized occlusion pressures in blood flow restriction (BFR) rehabilitation?. J Med Biol Eng 2018; 39: 173-177
• 46 Mattocks KT, Jessee MB, Counts BR. et al. The effects of upper body exercise across different levels of blood flow restriction on arterial occlusion pressure and perceptual responses. Physiol Behav 2017; 171: 181-186
• 47 Counts BR, Dankel SJ, Barnett BE. et al. Influence of relative blood flow restriction pressure on muscle activation and muscle adaptation. Muscle Nerve 2016; 53: 438-445
• 48 Loenneke JP, Kim D, Fahs CA. et al. The effects of resistance exercise with and without different degrees of blood-flow restriction on perceptual responses. J Sports Sci 2015; 33: 1472-1479
• 49 Jessee MB, Dankel SJ, Buckner SL. et al. The cardiovascular and perceptual response to very low load blood flow restricted exercise. Int J Sports Med 2017; 38: 597-603
• 50 Brandner CR, Kidgell DJ, Warmington SA. Unilateral bicep curl hemodynamics: Low-pressure continuous vs high-pressure intermittent blood flow restriction. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2015; 25: 770-777
• 51 Loenneke JP, Kim D, Mouser JG. et al. Are there perceptual differences to varying levels of blood flow restriction?. Physiol Behav 2016; 157: 277-280
• 52 Noyes J, Booth A, Cargo M. et al. Qualitative evidence. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J et al. (Eds.). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane, 2019
• 53 Carroll C. Qualitative evidence synthesis to improve implementation of clinical guidelines. BMJ 2017; 356: j80
• 54 Booth A, Noyes J, Flemming K. et al. Formulating questions to explore complex interventions within qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 4: e001107
• 55 Kasper K. Sports training principles. Curr Sports Med Rep 2019; 18: 95-96
• 56 Ladlow P, Coppack RJ, Dharm-Datta S. et al. Low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction improves clinical outcomes in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: A single-blind randomized controlled trial. Front Physiol 2018; 9: 1269