Key words Leguminosae -
Rhynchosia volubilis
- CatSper - prenylated isoflavonoids - rhynchones A – E
Introduction
The genus Rhynchosia , belonging to the family Leguminosae, is composed of about 200 species, distributed
in tropical and subtropical regions, but most of them are in Asia and Africa. There
are 13 species in China, mainly distributed in the southern provinces of the Yangtze
River [1 ]. The dry roots of Rhynchosia volubilis Lour. has shown diverse activities, including dispelling wind and dehumidification,
promoting blood circulation, detoxification, detumescence, and relieving pain. It
is also known as the king drug of a contraceptive prescription in folk medicine in
clinics and has been used by natives in the northwest of Hubei Province, China, for
female birth control for a long time [2 ]. The phytochemical investigations on this genus revealed the presence of flavonoids
[3 ], isoflavonoids [4 ], [5 ], favan-3-ols, xanthones
[6 ], biphenyls, simple polyphenols, and sterols [7 ]. Some of these exhibited antifertility [8 ], antimicrobial [9 ], antitumor [10 ], anti-inflammatory [11 ], antiproliferative [12 ], and antihyperlipidemic activities [13 ], [14 ].
Calcium signaling in spermatozoa is essential for successful fertilization, which
regulates the sperm capacitation, hyperactivation, and acrosome reaction [15 ], [16 ]. The vital source of sperm intracellular free Ca2+ ([Ca2+ ]i ) is the Ca2+ influx, predominantly mediated by the cation channel of sperm (CatSper), a pH-dependent
voltage-gated Ca2+ -selective channel [17 ], [18 ]. CatSper is a highly complex multisubunit channel composed of at least ten subunits
[19 ]: four separate pore-forming α subunits (CatSper 1 – 4) and six auxiliary subunits (CatSper β, γ, δ, ε, ζ , and EFCAB9). Mouse knockout models and genetic screening in infertile men demonstrated
that CatSper is essential for male fertility in mice and humans [19 ]. In human sperm,
the steroid hormones, progesterone (P4), prostaglandin (PG) E1, and PGE2, have
been noted as potent CatSper agonists [20 ]. Moreover, structurally diverse endocrine-disrupting chemicals activate the sperm-specific
CatSper channel and desensitize sperm for physiological CatSper ligands [21 ]. Therefore, the CatSper channel is a polymodal chemosensor in human sperm. All these
results suggest that the CatSper channel is an ideal target for contraceptive. In
order to define whether the compounds from R. volubilis disturb the physiological activation of the CatSper channel, we investigated the
effects of the phytochemical constituents in the whole plant of R. volubilis on the regulation of CatSper.
Results and Discussion
Firstly, given that the CatSper channel mainly dominates Ca2+ influx in human sperm, the effect of different extracts from R. volubilis on intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+ ]i ) signals were evaluated. The results showed that the petroleum ether (PE) extracts
gave rise to a rapid [Ca2+ ]i elevation, while EtOAc and n -BuOH extracts failed to reproduce this effect (Fig. 44S , Supporting Information).
The PE and EtOAc fraction from the crude EtOH extract from the whole herb of R. volubilis was subjected to repeated chromatography procedures (silica gel, Toyopearl HW-40C,
Sephadex LH-20, and semipreparative HPLC), leading to the isolation of five new prenylated
isoflavonoids, rhynchones A – E (1 – 5 ), the structures of which were characterized by interpretation of their HRMS, 1D
and 2D NMR, and electronic circular dichroism (ECD) data. Besides the five new compounds
(1 – 5 ), a new natural product, 5′-O -methylphaseolinisoflavan (6 ) [22 ], together with twelve known compounds (7 – 18 ) were obtained and identified as tonkinensisol (7 ) [23 ], lupinifolinol (8 ) [24 ], cathayanon H (9 ) [25 ], cajanone (10 ) [5 ], prunetin (11 ) [26 ], isowighteone (12 ) [27 ], erythrinin B (13 ) [28 ], semilicoisoflavone B (14 ) [29 ], eriosemaone D (15 ) [30 ], formononetin (16 ) [31 ], puerarone (17 ) [32 ], and bidwillon C (18 ) [33 ] by comparison with literature values ([Fig. 1 ]). Herein, the isolation, structure elucidation, and potential CatSper regulation
activities of these isolated compounds are described in detail.
Fig. 1 Structures of compounds 1 – 18 isolated from R. volubilis .
To further explore which kind of compound regulated the homeostasis of [Ca2+ ]i , 18 compounds (1 – 18 ) from R. volubilis on [Ca2+ ]i of human sperm were assessed. Interestingly, only rhynchone A (1 ) from the PE extracts evoked a transient amplitude of a [Ca2+ ]i signal (Figs. 44S and 45S , Supporting Information). The results of patch-clamp recordings also manifested that
rhynchone A amplified the monovalent current of human sperm, indicating that the elevation
of the [Ca2+ ]i signal caused by rhynchone A resulted from the activation of CatSper ([Fig. 2 ]). More importantly, subsequent studies found that the elevation of [Ca2+ ]i caused by P4 was suppressed by rhynchone A. The results of patch-clamp recordings
on human sperm also manifested that rhynchone A compromised the activation of the
CatSper
channel elicited by P4 ([Fig. 3 ]). Therefore, these findings suggested that rhynchone A attenuated the physiological
activities of P4 on the CatSper channel, and as a result, affected the function of
human sperm. Compared to compound 10 , we speculated that the configuration of the B-ring and the substitution of a methoxyl
group at C-4′ played a vital role in activating CatSper.
Fig. 2 The effect of different concentrations of rhynchone A (1 ) on the activation of the CatSper channel of human sperm. a The typical fluorescence traces of [Ca2+ ]i signals before and after exposure to different concentrations of rhynchone A (1 ). Arrow indicates the time point of additives in human sperm. b Average amplitudes of Ca2+ response in the presence of different concentrations of rhynchone A (1 ) are shown. c Representative monovalent current of human CatSper was potentiated by different concentrations
of rhynchone A (1 ). The monovalent CatSper current was recorded in the presence of sodium-based divalent-free
solution (NaDVF) by a voltage-clamp ramp protocol (from − 100 mV to + 100 mV, 1 s).
Holding potential (HP) was set to 0 mV. d Average currents of the CatSper channel at − 100 mV (negative) and + 100 mV (positive)
after injecting different concentrations of
rhynchone A (1 ) are shown. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM; n = 4, *p < 0.05.
Fig. 3 Rhynchone A (1 ) inhibited the activation of human CatSper induced by P4. a The typical fluorescence traces of [Ca2+ ]i signals after exposure to rhynchone A (1 ), P4, and their mixture. Arrow indicates the time point of additives in human sperm.
b Average amplitudes of the Ca2+ response related to a are shown. c Representative monovalent current of human CatSper after injecting rhynchone A (1 ), P4, and their mixture. The monovalent CatSper current was recorded in the presence
of sodium-based divalent-free solution (NaDVF) by a voltage-clamp ramp protocol (from
− 100 mV to + 100 mV, 1 s). Holding potential (HP) was set to 0 mV. d Average currents of the CatSper channel at − 100 mV (negative) and + 100 mV (positive)
as related to c are shown. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM; n = 4, *p < 0.05.
Structure elucidation
Rhynchone A (1 ), a pale-yellow solid, has a molecular formula of C26 H28 O6 based on HR-ESI-TOF-MS data (Fig. 1S , Supporting Information) with an m/z ion of 435.1794 for [M – H]− (calcd. 435.1807). The presence of 1 H resonances at H-2a (δ
H 4.68, 1H, dd, J = 4.8, 11.7 Hz), H-2b (δ
H 4.84, 1H, dd, J = 4.1, 11.9 Hz), and H-3 (δ
H 3.93, 1H, br t, J = 4.4 Hz), and corresponding oxymethylene and methine signals at δ
C 69.3, 44.9 in its 1 H and 13 C NMR spectra ([Tables 1 ] and [2 ], Figs. 2S and 3S , Supporting Information), respectively, suggested the presence of an isoflavanone
skeleton. Signals at δ
H 11.94 (1H, s ) and 5.93 (1H, s ) corresponded to the C-5 hydroxy group and H-8, respectively,
which showed an ortho-substitution in the A-ring. The 1 H NMR spectrum of 1 exhibited four methyl groups at δ 1.42, 1.44 (3H, s, C-2″), 1.66, and 1.71 (3H, s, C-3‴), one methoxyl proton at δ 3.77 (3H, s ), and three olefinic protons at δ 5.48 (1H, d, J = 10.1 Hz), 6.56 (1H, d, J = 10.1 Hz), and 5.23 (1H, m ), which indicated the presence of two isopropenyl groups. 1 H-1 H COSY (Fig. 6S , Supporting Information) correlations were observed for H-3″/H-4″ and H-2‴/H-3‴,
indicating the connectivity of C-3″ to C-4″ and C-2‴ to C-3‴. The HMBC correlations
(Fig. 4S , Supporting Information) H-3″ to C-2″ and C-6; H-4″ to C-6, C-7, C- 2″, and C-3″;
H3 -2″ to C-2″, C-3″, and C-10 indicated that C-4″ was attached to C-6, and C-2″ was
linked with C-7 by an ether bond. The aromatic proton signals at δ 6.48 (1H, s, H-3′) and 7.17 (1H, s, H-6′) indicated that
the B-ring was 1′, 2′, 4′, 6′- tetrasubstituted. The HMBC correlations from H-3
to C-1′, C-2′; H-2 to C-1′; H3 -4′-OMe to C-4′; H-3′ to an oxidized aromatic quaternary C-2′; and H2 -1‴ to C-4′ demonstrated the group substitution model in the B-ring ([Fig. 4 ]). In order to determine the absolute configuration of 1 , a computational study using the time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT)
method of ECD spectra at the B3LYP/6-31g (d, p) level was performed with Gaussian
16 B.01 [34 ]. Additionally, the solvent effects of methanol were taken into consideration with
the integral equation formalism polarizable continuum model (IEFPCM) [35 ] during the calculations. The Boltzmann averaged spectra for all the possible conformers
of 1 and their experimental ECD spectra are shown in [Fig. 5 a ]. The experimental ECD spectrum of
1 displayed high similarity to the calculated ECD pattern of 3S -1 , which exhibited a calculated ECD spectrum with a distinct positive Cotton effect
at 202 nm and a negative Cotton effect at 272 nm ([Fig. 5 a ]). Furthermore, a negative Cotton effect at 326 nm (Fig. 8S , Supporting Information) in the ECD spectrum of 1 also suggested the 3S configuration [36 ]. Thus, the structure of rhynchone A (1 ) was determined as 3S -5, 2′, 4′-trihydroxy-2″, 2″-dimethylpyrano [6,7 : 5″,6″]-5′-prenyl-isoflavone.
Table 1 1 H NMR (600 MHz, δ in ppm, J in Hz, CDCl3 ) data for compounds 1 – 5 .
Position
1
2
3
4
5
δ
H (J in Hz)
δ
H (J in Hz)
δ
H (J in Hz)
δ
H (J in Hz)
δ
H (J in Hz)
2a
4.68 (1H, dd, J = 4.8, 11.7 Hz)
4.62 (1H, dd, J = 4.9, 11.7 Hz)
4.70 (1H, dd, J = 4.6, 11.9 Hz)
4.72 (1H, d, J = 11.1 Hz)
4.52 (2H, s )
2b
4.84 (1H, dd, J = 4.1, 11.9 Hz)
4.78 (1H, dd, J = 5.9, 11.6 Hz)
4.85 (1H, dd, J = 5.7, 11.3 Hz)
3
3.93 (1H, t, J = 4.4 Hz)
4.03 (1H, t, J = 5.3 Hz)
3.92 (1H, m )
4.32 (1H, d, J = 11.4 Hz)
4
5
6
5.98 (1H, s )
7
8
5.93 (1H, s )
5.93 (1H, s )
5.95 (1H, s )
5.91 (1H, s )
9
10
1′
2′
3′
6.48 (1H, s )
6.48 (1H, s )
6.52 (1H, s )
6.42 (1H, s )
6.42 (1H, s )
4′
5′
6′
7.17 (1H, s )
7.00 (1H, s )
7.22 (1H, s )
6.64 (1H, s )
6.51 (1H, s )
2″
3″
5.48 (1H, d, J = 10.1 Hz)
5.49 (1H, d, J = 10.1 Hz)
5.48 (1H, d, J = 10.1 Hz)
5.53 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz)
5.52 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz)
4″
6.56 (1H, d, J = 10.1 Hz)
6.58 (1H, d, J = 10.1 Hz)
6.56 (1H, d, J = 10.1 Hz)
6.62 (1H, d, J = 10.1 Hz)
6.59 (1H, d, J = 10.1 Hz)
1‴
3.20 (2H, m )
3.13 (2H, d, J = 7.2 Hz)
2‴
5.23 (1H, m )
4.31 (1H, t, J = 8.0 Hz)
4.22 (1H, m )
5.15 (1H, t, J = 7.2 Hz)
3‴
2.87 (1H, dd, J = 8.6, 14.9 Hz)
2.88 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 14.2 Hz)
5.48 (1H, d, J = 9.8 Hz)
2.66 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 14.6 Hz)
2.68 (1H, dd, J = 2.9, 14.0 Hz)
4‴
6.18 (1H, d, J = 9.8 Hz)
5‴
4.98 (1H, m ); 4.86 (1H, m )
4.91 (1H, m ); 4.78 (1H, m )
2″-Me
1.44 (3H, s )
1.43 (3H, s )
1.43 (3H, s )
1.46 (3H, s )
1.40 (3H, s )
1.42 (3H, s )
1.43 (3H, s )
1.41 (3H, s )
1.44 (3H, s )
1.38 (3H, s )
2‴-Me
1.45 (3H, s )
1.45 (3H, s )
3‴-Me
1.71 (3H, s )
1.67 (3H, s )
1.66 (3H, s )
1.60 (3H, s )
6‴-Me
1.79 (3H, s )
1.78 (3H, s )
5-OH
11.94 (1H, s )
12.07 (1H, s )
11.89 (1H, s )
11.63 (1H, s )
11.67 (1H, s )
2′-OMe
3.79 (3H, s )
4′-OMe
3.77 (3H, s )
Table 2 13 C NMR (150 MHz, δ in ppm, CDCl3 ) data for compounds 1 – 5 .
Position
1
2
3
4
5
δ
C (Type)
δ
C (Type)
δ
C (Type)
δ
C (Type)
δ
C (Type)
2
69.3 (CH2 )
69.7 (CH2 )
69.2 (CH2 )
74.0 (CH)
70.2 (CH2 )
3
44.9 (CH)
45.4 (CH)
44.7 (CH)
72.9 (CH)
105.1 (C)
4
196.8 (C)
197.1 (C)
196.6 (C)
194.8 (C)
185.1 (C)
5
159.0 (C)
159.0 (C)
159.0 (C)
158.3 (C)
161.5 (C)
6
103.1 (C)
103.1 (C)
103.1 (C)
103.2 (C)
96.7 (C)
7
163.0 (C)
162.8 (C)
163.2 (C)
163.5 (C)
159.3 (C)
8
96.0 (CH)
96.1 (CH)
96.2 (CH)
96.6 (CH)
103.6 (C)
9
162.3 (C)
162.4 (C)
162.2 (C)
162.4 (C)
163.5 (C)
10
101.3 (C)
101.8 (C)
101.3 (C)
101.5 (C)
101.3 (C)
1′
113.5(C)
113.9 (C)
114.0 (C)
115.0 (C)
140.6 (C)
2′
154.2 (C)
154.9 (C)
158.4 (C)
155.9 (C)
146.6 (C)
3′
100.9 (CH)
106.3 (CH)
101.1 (CH)
105.7 (CH)
99.3 (CH)
4′
158.1 (C)
156.7 (C)
155.1 (C)
155.6 (C)
148.7 (C)
5′
122.8 (C)
118.5 (C)
119.5 (C)
118.4 (C)
114.8 (C)
6′
127.6 (CH)
130.4 (CH)
129.4 (CH)
127.4 (CH)
105.9 (CH)
2″
78.5 (C)
78.5 (C)
78.6 (C)
78.9 (C)
78.9 (C)
3″
126.2 (CH)
126.2 (CH)
126.2 (CH)
126.5 (CH)
126.7 (CH)
4″
115.1 (CH)
115.1 (CH)
115.0 (CH)
114.8 (CH)
114.9 (CH)
1‴
27.8 (CH2 )
28.7 (CH2 )
2‴
122.6 (CH)
78.4 (CH)
75.6 (CH)
121.3 (CH)
76.2 (C)
3‴
132.4 (CH)
37.4 (CH2 )
36.6 (CH2 )
135.1 (C)
128.6 (CH)
4‴
146.5 (C)
147.1 (C)
122.0 (CH)
5‴
111.3 (CH2 )
110.6 (CH2 )
2″-Me
28.4 (CH3 )
28.5 (CH3 )
28.5 (CH3 )
28.5 (CH3 )
28.5 (CH3 )
28.4 (CH3 )
28.5 (CH3 )
28.5 (CH3 )
28.4 (CH3 )
28.5 (CH3 )
2‴-Me
27.6 (CH3 )
27.4 (CH3 )
3‴-Me
25.7 (CH3 )
25.5 (CH3 )
17.7 (CH3 )
17.6 (CH3 )
6‴-Me
18.1 (CH3 )
18.1 (CH3 )
2′-OMe
55.5 (CH3 )
4′-OMe
55.4 (CH3 )
Fig. 4 Key HMBC and 1 H-1 H COSY of rhynchones A – E (1 – 5 ).
Fig. 5 Calculated and experimental ECD spectra for compounds 1, 4 , and 5 .
Rhynchone B (2 ), a yellow oil, was deduced as having the molecular formula C26 H28 O6 by HR-ESI-TOF-MS [M + H2 O – H]−
m/z 437.1606 (calcd. 437.1600), indicating one more index of hydrogen deficiency than
1 . The NMR spectroscopic data of 2 ([Tables 1 ] and [2 ]) also showed structural similarity with 1 . The major difference between these two compounds was found on the B-ring. The substitution
at C-4′ and C-5′ was identified as an isopropenyl dihydrofuran group, which was characterized
by the following: two endocyclic methylene protons, δ
H 2.66 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 14.6 Hz, 3‴a) and 2.87 (1H, dd, J = 8.6, 14.9 Hz, 3‴b)], two exocyclic methylene protons, δ
H 4.86 (H, m, 5‴a) and 4.98 (H, m, 5‴b), an oxymethine signal, δ
H 4.31 (H, t, J = 8.0 Hz),
δ
C 78.49 (C-2‴), and a methyl group [δ
H 1.79 (3H, s, 6‴), δ
C 18.1 (C-6‴)]. These were confirmed by 1 H-1 H COSY correlations (Fig. 14S , Supporting Information) for H-2‴/H-3b‴, and HMBC correlations (Fig. 13S , Supporting Information) from H-2‴ to C-5′/3‴/5‴/6‴ and H-3b‴ to C-4′/5′/6′/2‴/4‴.
The S configuration of C-3 was determined based on its circular dichroism spectrum (Fig. 16S , Supporting Information), and showed a negative cotton effect at 325 nm [36 ]. In the ROESY spectrum (Fig. 15S , Supporting Information), H-2‴ (δ
H 4.31) correlated with H2 -3‴ (δ
H 2.66, 2.87), H3 -6‴(δ
H 1.79) correlated with H-2‴, and the coupling constants of H-2‴ and H-3a‴ were different
from those in crotadihydrofuran A, which indicated that H-2‴ was an β -orientation [37 ]. Thus, the structure of rhynchone B (2 ) was identified as 3S ,2‴R -5,2′-dihydroxy-2‴,2″- dimethylpyrano[6,7 : 5″,6″]-2‴-allyl furano[4′,5′:4″,5″] isoflavanone.
Rhynchone C (3 ), a yellow powder, had a molecular formula of C26 H26 O6 from its HR-ESI-TOF-MS spectra [M + H2 O – H]−
m/z 451.1807 ([M + H2 O – H]− calcd. 451.1757). The NMR data ([Tables 1 ] and [2 ]) revealed a methoxy group (δ
H 3.79, δ
C 55.5) instead of the C-2′ hydroxyl group in 2 . This difference was demonstrated by the HMBC correlation from H3 -2′-OMe to C-2′ at δ
C 158.4 (Fig. 21S , Supporting Information). Thus, 3 was identified as 3S , 2‴R -5-hydroxy-2′-methoxyl-2″, 2″-dimethylpyrano [6,7 : 5″,6″]-2‴-allyl furano[4′,5′:4″,5″]
isoflavanone.
Rhynchone D (4 ), a yellow oily solid, had a molecular formula of C25 H24 O6 based on its HR-ESI-MS ion at [M + H2 O – H]−
m/z 437.1639 (calcd. 437.1600). The NMR spectra (Figs. 26S and 27S , Supporting Information) of 4 exhibited very similar A- and B-ring moieties with those of 1 . The C-4′ was substituted by a hydroxyl group in 2 instead of a methoxy group in 1 . Additionally, incorporating a furan ring in the flavone system, an extra ring was
fused to ring B (C-2-C-3-O-C-2′-C1′). This assertion was supported by the 1 H-1 H COSY correlations of H-2 (δ
H 4.72)/H-3 (δ
H 4.32) (Fig. 30S , Supporting Information) and HMBC correlations from H-2 (δ
H 4.72) to C-4 (δ
C 194.8), C-9 (δ
C 162.4), and C-1′ (δ
C 115.0) and H-3 (δ
H
4.32) to C-4 (δ
C 194.8) and C-1′ (δ
C 115.0) (Fig. 29S , Supporting Information). According to the coupling constant (J = 11.1/11.4 Hz) between H-2/H-3, we concluded that the two rings were trans -fused. In addition, the absolute configuration of 4 was approximate to 2S , 3R -4 , which was characteristic of the positive Cotton effects at 212 and 273 nm and the
negative Cotton effect at 258 nm ([Fig. 5 b ]) in the ECD spectrum. The structure of rhynchone D was deduced as 2S , 3R -5, 4′-dihydroxy-2″, 2″-dimethylpyrano[6,7 : 5″,6″]-5′-prenyl-furano [2,3 : 5′,4′]-
flavonone.
Rhynchone E (5 ), a yellow oily solid, had a molecular formula of C25 H24 O8 based on its HR-ESI-MS (Fig. 33S , Supporting Information) and NMR spectra (Figs. 34S and 35S , Supporting Information). The NMR data ([Tables 1 ] and [2 ]) of substitution on its A- and B-rings resembled those of precatorin A, and the
main difference between the two compounds was the connection between the B- and C-rings.
The molecular mass of rhynchone E (5 ) was 32 mass units higher than precatorin A [4 ], indicating that 5 possessed a hemiacetalic carbon (δ
C 105.1, C-3). This was demonstrated by the following changes of carbon chemical shifts
compared to precatorin A: C-2 (δ
C 70.2, + 0.5 ppm), C-4 (δ
C 185.1, + 11.6 ppm), C-1′ (δ
C 140.6, + 26.1 ppm), C-2′
(δ
C 146.6, -9.3 ppm), and C-6′ (δ
C 105.9, 19.2 ppm) based on HSQC (Fig. 36S , Supporting Information), HMBC (Fig. 37S , Supporting Information), and 1 H-1 H COSY (Fig. 38S , Supporting Information) analyses. The result of 5 showed that the experimental ECD spectrum exhibited a positive Cotton effect at 206 nm
and a negative Cotton effect at 272 nm, which was highly similar to the calculated
ECD pattern of 3S -5 ([Fig. 5 c ]). So, 5 was identified as 3,5-dihydroxy-3-((7-hydroxy-2,2-dimethyl-2H-chromen-6-yl)oxy)-8,8-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-4H,8H-pyrano[2,3-f]chromen-4-one.
Materials and Methods
General experiment procedures
Optical rotations were recorded on an AUTOPOL IV-T automatic polarimeter. The ECD
spectra were obtained using a JASCO J-810 Circular Dichroism Spectrometer. All NMR
data were obtained using a Bruker Avance III 600 MHz NMR spectrometer, and the MS
was obtained using a Thermo Fisher Ultimate 3000 HPLC TOF-MS. Toyopearl HW-40C and
Sephadex LH-20 were employed for gel permeation. A macroporous adsorption resin (D101)
and silica gel (100 – 200, 200 – 300 meshes) were employed for column chromatography.
HPLC separations were carried out on a WuFeng LC-100 pump that was equipped with an
RI2000 refractive index detector using a YMC-Pack ODS-A column (10 × 250 mm, 5 µm)
and a YMC-Pack SIL column (10 × 250 mm, 5 µm). The change of human sperm [Ca2+ ]i was measured using the fluorescent Ca2+ indicator Fluo-4 AM with the EnSpire Multimode Plate Reader. Pipettes were prepared
by a Sutter Micropipette Puller P1000 and Narishige Microforge MF830. The
CatSper current was recorded by a patch-clamping system constructed by an Olympus
IX71 inverted microscope, a Sutter electric triaxial micromanipulator, Axon Axopatch
200B, and Axon Digidata 1550.
Plant material
The whole herb of R. volubilis was collected in Zaoyang County by Mr. Rui-Zhong Zhou, a pharmacist from Zaoyang
Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xiangyang City, Hubei Province. The plant
was identified by Dr. Jinbo Fang, who is an Associate Professor from the School of
Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology
(China), where the voucher specimens (NO. RVL 20 181 101) were deposited.
Extraction and isolation
The air-dried whole plant of R. volubilis (10 kg) was powdered and then extracted three times (24 h each time) with 95% EtOH
at room temperature to obtain a crude extract after filtration and evaporation of
the combined solution. The crude extract was suspended in H2 O followed by solvent partitions with PE, EtOAc, and n -BuOH, then concentrated in a vacuum to afford extracts weighing 29.1 g, 138.8 g,
and 179.2 g, respectively.
PE Fr. (28.1 g) was chromatographed on silica gel (100 – 200 mesh) (PE-EtOAc 100 : 1,
99 : 1, 49 : 1, 19 : 1, 14 : 1, 12 : 1, 9 : 1, 4 : 1, 1 : 1, v/v) to afford nine fractions
(Frs. P0101 – 0109). Fr. P0105 (4.2 g) was subjected to Toyopearl HW-40C (CH2 Cl2 -MeOH, 2 : 1, v/v), resulting in six fractions (Frs. P0701 – 0706). Fr. P0705 (2.2 g)
was isolated by RP-C18 (MeOH-H2 O, 6 : 4, 7 : 3, 8 : 2, 9 : 1 to 1: 0, v/v) to get Frs. P0901 – 0905. Fr. P0904 (127.4 mg)
was purified by RP-HPLC (MeOH-H2 O, 75 : 25, 1.5 mL/min) to afford compounds 1 (4.6 mg, t
R = 86.2 min), 2 (20.7 mg, t
R = 91.1 min), and 4 (4.1 mg, t
R = 107.6 min).
Fr. P0106 (7.9 g) was subjected to RP-C18 (MeOH-H2 O, 4 : 6, 5 : 5, 6 : 4, 7 : 3, 8 : 2, 9 : 1 to 1: 0, v/v) to get Frs. P1201 – 1208.
Fr. P1207 (1.8 g) was chromatographed on Toyopearl HW-40C (CH2 Cl2 -MeOH, 2 : 1, v/v) and Sephadex LH-20 (MeOH) to obtain Frs. P1801 – 1805. Fr. P1804
(206.9 mg) was isolated by silica gel (300 – 400 mesh) eluted with (PE-acetone, 9 : 1 – 4 : 1,
v/v), then purified by RP-HPLC and eluted with MeOH-H2 O (86 : 14, 1.5 mL/min) followed by PTLC and eluted with PE-acetone (4 : 1) to afford
6 (3.6 mg).
EtOAc Fr. (138.8 g) was separated using resin HP-20SS (75 – 150 µm) and eluted with
MeOH-H2 O (4 : 6, 6 : 4, 8 : 2, 9 : 1, 0 : 10, v/v) to obtain six fractions (Frs. E0101 – 0106).
Fr. E0103 (54.2 g) was subjected to silica gel [100 – 200 mesh, (CH2 Cl2 -MeOH, 100 : 0, 99 : 1, 98 : 2, 97 : 3, 96 : 4, 95 : 5, 9 : 1, 8 : 1, 6 : 1, 2 : 1,
1 : 1, 0 : 1, v/v)] to afford 11 fractions (Frs. E0201 – 0211). Fr. E0206 (3.8 g)
was chromatographed on silica gel (60 µm) and eluted with CH2 Cl2 -MeOH (200 : 1, 100 : 1, 50 : 1, 1 : 1, 0 : 1, v/v) to get Frs. E0901 – 0905. Fr.
E0902 (829.9 mg) was purified by Sephadex LH-20 (MeOH) followed by RP-HPLC eluted
with MeOH-H2 O (72 : 28, 1.5 mL/min) and PTLC eluted with CH2 Cl2 -MeOH (49 : 1, v/v), to afford compounds 3 (4.3 mg), 5 (22.7 mg), 7 (4.9 mg), and 8 (5.8 mg).
Fr. E0104 (64.7 g) was isolated with silica gel (60 µm) and eluted with n -hexane-EtOAc, 6 : 1, 5 : 1, 4 : 1, 3 : 1, 2 : 1, 0 : 1, v/v) to afford nine fractions
(Frs. E1301 – 1309). Frs. E1301 – 1303 (6.4 g) were chromatographed on Toyopearl HW-40C
(CH2 Cl2 -MeOH, 2 : 1, v/v) and Sephadex LH-20 (MeOH) and purified by RP-HPLC and eluted with
MeOH-H2 O (69 : 31, 1.5 mL/min) followed by PTLC and eluted with (CH2 Cl2 -MeOH, 49 : 1, v/v) to afford 14 (6.3 mg), 15 (10.7 mg), 16 (6.1 mg), and 17 (7.7 mg). Frs. E1304 – 1307 (15.2 g) were separated using RP-C18 and eluted with
MeOH-H2 O (70 : 30, 75 : 25, 80 : 20, 85 : 15, 90 : 10, 100 : 0, v/v) to obtain seven fractions
(Frs. E1801 – 1807). Fr. E1804 (6.1 g) was chromatographed on silica gel (300 – 400
mesh) and eluted with PE-EtOAc (10 : 1, 9 : 1, 8 : 1, 7 : 1, 6 : 1, 5 : 1, 4 : 1,
3 : 1, 2 : 1, 1 : 1, 0 : 1, v/v) to afford 11
fractions (Frs. E1901 – 1911). Fr. E1906 (3.1 g) was successively isolated with
Sephadex LH-20 (MeOH), RP-HPLC, and eluted with MeOH-H2 O (74 : 26, 1.5 mL/min) followed by PTLC and eluted with (CH2 Cl2 -MeOH, 50 : 1, v/v) to afford 10 (15.1 mg), 11 (12.8 mg), 12 (5.2 mg), and 13 (13.6 mg). Fr. E1807 (4.7 g) was chromatographed on silica gel (60 µm) and eluted
with PE-EtOAc (10 : 1, 9 : 1, 8 : 1, 7 : 1, 6 : 1, 5 : 1, 4 : 1, 3 : 1, 2 : 1, 1 : 1,
0 : 1, v/v) to afford 11 fractions (Frs. E2201 – 2211). Frs. E2204 – 2205 (958.2 mg)
were successively isolated with Sephadex LH-20 (MeOH), RP-HPLC, and eluted with MeOH-H2 O (76 : 24, 1.5 mL/min) followed by PTLC and eluted with PE-acetone (4 : 1) to afford
9 (7.0 mg) and 18 (6.6 mg).
Quantum chemistry calculations
A conformational search of the compounds was implemented in Maestro 10.2 software
(Schrodinger, LLC) where conformers with Boltzmann populations > 5% were taken into
further quantum chemistry calculations. The geometry optimizations, frequency analysis,
and TD-DFT calculations of each conformer were subsequently carried out using the
B3LYP/6 – 31 g (d, p) level with Gaussian 16 B.01 [34 ]. The solvent effects of methanol were taken into consideration by using a solvation
model of IEFPCM during the calculations [35 ]. The calculated ECD data were Boltzmann averaged according to Gibbs free energy
and their ECD spectra were generated by the SpecDis v1.71 program [38 ] with a bandwidth (σ) of 0.16 eV. For all calculated spectra, the vertical axes were
scaled to fit the experimental spectra. The wavelength shift of 2, 0, and − 35 nm
was employed for 1, 4 , and 5 , respectively
(Fig. 41 – 43S , Supporting Information).
Measurement of sperm [Ca2+ ]i
The change of human sperm [Ca2+ ]i was measured using the fluorescent Ca2+ indicator Fluo-4 AM with the EnSpire Multimode Plate Reader as previously described
[39 ]. The action of compounds 1 – 18 (100 mM stock in DMSO) on [Ca2+ ]i of human sperm was detected. The final concentration of DMSO was 0.1%. The change
of sperm [Ca2+ ]i was calculated by ΔF/F0 (%), indicating the percent (%) of fluorescent changes (ΔF) normalized to the mean
basal fluorescence before the application of any chemicals (F0 ). ΔF/F0 (%) = (F – F0 )/F0 × 100%, where F indicates the fluorescent intensity at each recorded time point.
Compounds assay – sperm patch-clamp recordings
The whole-cell patch-clamp technique was applied to record human sperm CatSper as
previously described [40 ]. Seals were formed at the sperm cytoplasmic droplet or the neck region by a 15 – 30 MΩ
pipette. The transition into whole-cell mode was then made by applying short (1 ms)
voltage pulses (400 – 650 mV) combined with light suction. The currents were stimulated
by 1 s voltage ramps from − 100 to + 100 mV from a holding potential of 0 mV. The
monovalent current of CatSper and divalent-free (DVF) solution (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM
HEPES, and 5 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) was used to record basal CatSper monovalent currents.
Then, 1, 10, and 100 µM compounds (1 – 18 ), 1 µM progesterone, and 100 µM compounds (1 – 18 ) together with 1 µM progesterone in DVF were perfused to record CatSper currents.
Data were analyzed with Clampfit version 10.4 software.
Rhynchone A (1)
Pale yellow solid; [α ]D
20 − 5.33° (c 0.1, CH3 OH); UV (MeOH) λ
max nm (log ε ): 204 (4.02), 272 (3.97). IR (KBr) ν
max 3423, 2970, 2881, 1639, 1560, 1494, 1392, 1187 cm−1 ; 1 H NMR (600 MHz in CDCl3 ) and 13 C NMR (150 MHz in CDCl3 ), for data, see [Tables 1 ] and [2 ]; HR-ESI-TOF-MS [M- H]−
m/z 435.1794 ([M – H]− calcd. 435.1807).
Rhynchone B (2)
Yellow oil; [α ]D
20 − 16.7° (c 0.1, CH3 OH); UV (MeOH) λ
max nm (log ε ): 203 (3.68), 272 (3.59). IR (KBr) ν
max 3436, 2982, 2881, 2382, 1624, 1555, 1397, 1165 cm−1 ; 1 H NMR (600 MHz in CDCl3 ) and 13 C NMR (150 MHz in CDCl3 ), for data, see [Tables 1 ] and [2 ]; HR-ESI-TOF-MS [M + H2 O – H]−
m/z 437.1606 ([M + H2 O – H]− calcd. 437.1600).
Rhynchone C (3)
Yellow powder; [α ]D
20 − 23.1° (c 0.1, CH3 OH); UV (MeOH) λ
max nm (log ε ): 202 (3.66), 272 (3.54). IR (KBr) ν
max 3441, 2980, 2882, 1644, 1627, 1392, 1315 cm−1 ; 1 H NMR (600 MHz in CDCl3 ) and 13 C NMR (150 MHz in CDCl3 ), for data, see [Tables 1 ] and [2 ]; HR-ESI-TOF-MS [M- H]−
m/z 435.1794 ([M – H]− calcd. 435.1807).
Rhynchone D (4)
Yellow oily solid; [α ]D
20 − 15.3° (c 0.1, CH3 OH); UV (MeOH) λ
max nm (log ε ): 203 (3.98), 226 (3.56), 273 (3.85). IR (KBr) ν
max 3342, 2980, 1630, 1627, 1491, 1376, 1363, 1169, 1130, 1097 cm−1 ; 1 H NMR (600 MHz in CDCl3 ) and 13 C NMR (150 MHz in CDCl3 ), for data, see [Tables 1 ] and [2 ]; HR-ESI-TOF-MS [M + H2 O – H]−
m/z 437.1639 ([M + H2 O – H]− calcd. 437.1600).
Rhynchone E (5)
Yellow oily solid; [α ]D
20 − 67.1° (c 0.1, CH3 OH); UV (MeOH) λ
max nm (log ε ): 212 (3.90), 276 (3.92), 322 (3.76). IR (KBr) ν
max 3440, 2980, 2881, 1647, 1627, 1484, 1381, 1145 cm−1 ; 1 H NMR (600 MHz in CDCl3 ) and 13 C NMR (150 MHz in CDCl3 ), for data, see [Tables 1 ] and [2 ]; HR-ESI-TOF-MS [M- H]−
m/z 451.1366 ([M – H]− calcd. 451.1392).
Contributorsʼ Statement
J. Xiang: investigation, visualization, and writing – original draft. H. Kang: investigation,
visualization, and writing – original draft. H. G. Li: resources and funding acquisition.
Y. L. Shi: investigation, visualization, and revision. Y. L. Zhang: investigation.
C. L. Ruan: investigation. L. H. Liu: investigation. H. Q. Gao: investigation. T. Luo:
resources and funding acquisition. G. S. Hu: investigation. W. L. Zhu: supervision.
J. M. Jia: supervision. J. C. Chen: resources. J. B. Fang: writing – review and editing,
and funding acquisition. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
