Ultraschall Med 2021; 42(04): 437-438
DOI: 10.1055/a-1542-6288
DUDS meddelelser

Intestinal ultrasound in ulcerative colitis – an objective biomarker for treatment response?

Johan F.K.F. Ilvemark
Department of Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
› Author Affiliations
 

The use of transabdominal intestinal ultrasound (IUS) as an objective biomarker of inflammation in ulcerative colitis (UC) is gaining acceptance [1]. IUS ability to correctly identify inflammation and extent of inflammation has been explained in several studies [2]. The advantages over endoscopy or other cross-sectional modalities are many; IUS is a non-invasive, preparation – and radiation-free, easily repeated and patient friendly modality [1]. When visualizing disease burden in real-time, clinicians can better explain and motivate treatment decisions, helping patients to understand their disease [3].

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Left – Sigmoid colon before treatment (Bowel wall thickness pathological, > 3 mm). Right – Sigmoid colon after treatment (Bowel wall thickness normal, ≤ 3 mm).

Different IUS parameters of inflammation (increased bowel wall thickness (BWT), increased color doppler signals, disrupted bowel wall stratification, loss of haustration, presence of inflammatory mesenteric fat, ascites and mesenteric lymphadenopathy) has been shown to significantly improve/restore during treatment [4]. BWT is the most common and examined parameter [2]. In the largest UC follow-up study to date (n = 224), the percentage of patients with an increased BWT as baseline (sigmoid colon 89 % and descending colon 83 %), decreased significantly already within the first 2 weeks of treatment (sigmoid colon 38 % and descending colon 43 %). BWT remained low at week 6 and 12, with a high correlation with clinical response at week 12 [4]. It has therefore been suggested, that IUS could be an objective biomarker for treatment response in ulcerative colitis and a predicter of treatment outcome. Several studies are currently examining this hypothesis.

IUS might be proven especially useful in severe UC. Severe UC patients has a 34 % risk of steroid treatment failure [6], which is associated with a higher mortality rate compared to steroid treatment responders (2.9–1.8 % vs. 0.19–0.0 % [7]. Early identification of treatment failure is therefore highly warranted. Smith et al. recently published a pilot study, consisting of 10 patients hospitalized with severe UC. A high BWT (median 6.2 mm compared to 4.6 mm) assessed within the first 24 hours of admission, was predictive of steroid treatment failure [5].

Our research group (Herlev, Hvidovre and Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark), has recently finished recruiting 60 hospitalized UC patients. Before intravenous steroid treatment, all patients underwent an IUS assessment (based on BWT, color doppler signals, disrupted bowel wall stratification, loss of haustration, and presence of inflammatory mesenteric fat), followed by a follow-up scan at 48 ± 24 hours after treatment initiation. We hypothesize, that IUS can already detect treatment response within the first 48 ± 24 hours. Data is currently being analyzed.

In conclusion, the use of transabdominal intestinal ultrasound as an objective biomarker for treatment response in UC is gaining acceptance. Initial data are promising, while more studies are highly warranted.


#
  • References

  • 1 Bryant RV, Friedman AB, Wright EK. et al. Gastrointestinal ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease: An underused resource with potential paradigm-changing application. Gut 2018; 973-985 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315655.
  • 2 Smith RL, Taylor KM, Friedman AB. et al. Systematic Review: Clinical Utility of Gastrointestinal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis, Assessment and Management of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohn’s Colitis 2020; 14: 465-479 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz163.
  • 3 Rajagopalan A, Sathananthan D, An YK. et al. Gastrointestinal ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease care: Patient perceptions and impact on disease-related knowledge. JGH Open 2020; 4: 267-272 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12268.
  • 4 Maaser C, Petersen F, Helwig U. et al. Intestinal ultrasound for monitoring therapeutic response in patients with ulcerative colitis: Results from the TRUST&UC study. Gut 2020; 69: 1629-1636 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319451.
  • 5 Smith RL, Taylor KM, Friedman AB. et al. Early Assessment With Gastrointestinal Ultrasound in Patients Hospitalised for a Flare of Ulcerative Colitis and Predicting the Need for Salvage Therapy: A Pilot Study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2021; 47: 1108-1114 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.12.001.
  • 6 Grant RK, Jones GR, Plevris N. et al. The ACE (Albumin, CRP and Endoscopy) Index in Acute Colitis: A Simple Clinical Index on Admission that Predicts Outcome in Patients With Acute Ulcerative Colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2021; 27: 451-457 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izaa088.
  • 7 Lynch RW, Lowe D, Protheroe A. et al. Outcomes of rescue therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis: data from the United Kingdom inflammatory bowel disease audit. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 38: 935-945 DOI: 10.1111/apt.12473.

Publication History

Article published online:
03 August 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

  • References

  • 1 Bryant RV, Friedman AB, Wright EK. et al. Gastrointestinal ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease: An underused resource with potential paradigm-changing application. Gut 2018; 973-985 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315655.
  • 2 Smith RL, Taylor KM, Friedman AB. et al. Systematic Review: Clinical Utility of Gastrointestinal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis, Assessment and Management of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohn’s Colitis 2020; 14: 465-479 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz163.
  • 3 Rajagopalan A, Sathananthan D, An YK. et al. Gastrointestinal ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease care: Patient perceptions and impact on disease-related knowledge. JGH Open 2020; 4: 267-272 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12268.
  • 4 Maaser C, Petersen F, Helwig U. et al. Intestinal ultrasound for monitoring therapeutic response in patients with ulcerative colitis: Results from the TRUST&UC study. Gut 2020; 69: 1629-1636 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319451.
  • 5 Smith RL, Taylor KM, Friedman AB. et al. Early Assessment With Gastrointestinal Ultrasound in Patients Hospitalised for a Flare of Ulcerative Colitis and Predicting the Need for Salvage Therapy: A Pilot Study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2021; 47: 1108-1114 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.12.001.
  • 6 Grant RK, Jones GR, Plevris N. et al. The ACE (Albumin, CRP and Endoscopy) Index in Acute Colitis: A Simple Clinical Index on Admission that Predicts Outcome in Patients With Acute Ulcerative Colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2021; 27: 451-457 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izaa088.
  • 7 Lynch RW, Lowe D, Protheroe A. et al. Outcomes of rescue therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis: data from the United Kingdom inflammatory bowel disease audit. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 38: 935-945 DOI: 10.1111/apt.12473.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Left – Sigmoid colon before treatment (Bowel wall thickness pathological, > 3 mm). Right – Sigmoid colon after treatment (Bowel wall thickness normal, ≤ 3 mm).