Combined Antiplatelet Therapy Reduces the Proinflammatory Properties of Activated Platelets

Keywords

platelets - chemokines - inflammation - monocytes - atherosclerosis - antiplatelet agents

Introduction

Atherothrombosis, a result of atherosclerotic plaque rupture or erosion, can lead to acute coronary syndrome (ACS), ischemic strokes, and cardiovascular deaths and contributes to the global burden of premature mortality and morbidity.[1] Platelet activation plays a central role in atherothrombosis, which in turn leads to the release of prothrombotic and proinflammatory factors and amplifies activation of the coagulation cascade.[2] [3] Although the importance of platelets in the acute phase of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is undisputed, their relevance for the development of atherosclerosis is incompletely understood. Many studies have highlighted functions of platelets beyond hemostasis.[4] For example, platelets can bridge leukocytes to the inflamed vessel wall,[5] [6] [7] they release extracellular vesicles with proinflammatory activity,[8] [9] and they can induce the release of neutrophil extracellular traps.[10] [11] In addition, platelets also release chemokines from α-granules upon activation.[12] [13]

Chemokines are a group of small chemotactic cytokines that orchestrate cell trafficking and play important roles in immune responses, inflammation, angiogenesis, and cell differentiation.[14] The CC and CXC chemokines are the largest subfamilies. The CXC-chemokine ligand 4, CXCL4 (platelet factor 4), is almost exclusively expressed in platelets and the fourth most abundant platelet protein (355,000 copies per platelet).[15] Proteomic analysis suggests that CC-chemokine ligand 5, CCL5 (RANTES), is the only CC-chemokine expressed in relevant amounts in platelets (approximately 4,500 copies per platelet).[15] Platelet activation leads to CCL5 and CXCL4 release from the α-granules and both chemokines can also be deposited on inflamed endothelium and lead to subsequent monocyte arrest.[16] In addition, binding of CCL5 to CXCL4 increases monocyte arrest to endothelial cells under flow.[17] [18] Besides facilitating CCL5-induced monocyte arrest, CXCL4 has several reported physiologic functions, for example, modifying differentiation of T-cells and macrophages, activation of smooth muscle cells, inhibition of apoptosis of neutrophils and monocytes, and increasing oxidized low-density lipoprotein uptake.[19]

Control of platelet reactivity is essential for the secondary prevention of adverse cardiovascular events.[20] [21] After myocardial infarction, “dual antiplatelet therapy,” that is, combined treatment with the cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor acetylsalicylic acid (ASA; aspirin) and purinergic receptor P2Y₁₂ antagonists, for example, clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor, is recommended. For immediate platelet effects, the intravenous P2Y₁₂ antagonist cangrelor or ɑ_IIbβ₃ antagonists are available. Finally, cilostazol is a phosphodiesterase 3 (PDE3) inhibitor and is implemented as a treatment for patients with peripheral arterial disease.[22] Of note, most platelet inhibition strategies bear a nonnegligible risk of severe bleeding complications. In addition, a substantial number of patients does not optimally respond to antiplatelet therapy.[23]

During antiplatelet therapy, a reduction in inflammation was observed in patients.[24] However, it is unclear whether this is due to direct effects of antiplatelet therapy on platelets or indirect, nonplatelet-dependent effects.[24] The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of common antiplatelet drugs on inflammatory functions of platelets and whether this influence is distinct from their established antihemostatic effects. Serving as a model for the inflammatory function of platelets, the release of chemokines by platelets from healthy donors and the chemotactic properties of platelets toward monocytic THP-1 cells were determined, after treatment with antiplatelet drugs. This study provides additional evidence that the anti-inflammatory effects seen in clinical trials might originate from platelets, depending on the pathway of platelet activation.

Materials and Methods

Evasin-4 was expressed in Escherichia coli, purified by high-performance liquid chromatography and refolded as described.[25] All other reagents were at the highest purity available and obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), unless indicated.

Platelet Isolation and Activation

Blood was collected from healthy volunteers and two patients with Glanzmann thrombasthenia, with established deficiency in integrin α_IIbβ₃,[26] with a 21 Gauge needle (vacutainer precision glide, BD) into citrate tubes (9 mL coagulation sodium citrate 3.2% vacuette, Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria). For the condition in the presence of aspirin, donors were given aspirin orally (100 mg Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) the evening before blood donation. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was obtained by centrifugation of blood at 350 g for 15 minutes. Washed platelets were obtained by centrifugation of PRP at 1,240 g for 15 minutes, and a wash step with platelet buffer pH 6.6 (10 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid [HEPES] buffer, 2 mM CaCl₂, 136 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, and 2 mM MgCl₂ supplemented with 0.5% bovine serum albumin [BSA] and 0.2% glucose). All centrifugation steps were performed in presence of anticoagulant acid citrate buffer (80 mM trisodium citrate, 52 mM citric acid, and 183 mM glucose), to prevent platelet activation during isolation procedure. After pelleting, platelets were resuspended in platelet buffer pH 7.45 (10 mM HEPES buffer, 2 mM CaCl₂, 136 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, and 2 mM MgCl₂ supplemented with 0.5% BSA and 0.2% glucose) at a concentration of 2 × 10⁸ platelets/mL. The inclusion of human subjects was approved after full informed consent by the local Maastricht ethics committee, and studies were performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki.

Washed platelets (2 × 10⁸/mL) were activated with different agonists, 100 ng/mL convulxin (CVX, Enzo Life Sciences, Lausen, Switzerland), 50 µM TRAP-6 (AnaSpec Inc. California, United States), or 5 nM thrombin (Haematologic Technologies, New Hampshire, United States) for 30 minutes at 37°C. Platelets were preincubated for 5 minutes at 37°C with inhibitors prior to activation, except cilostazol (10 minutes). Integrin α_IIbβ₃ ligand binding was blocked with 10 µM tirofiban (CAS 144494–65–5, Correvio Int., Geneva, Switzerland) or 10 µM eptifibatide (Integrilin, CAS 188627–80–7, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, United Kingdom). P2Y₁₂ was inhibited with 1 µM cangrelor (CAS 163706–06–7, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland), PDE3 with 5 µM cilostazol (CAS 73963–72–1, Tebu Bio, Le Perray-en-Yvelines, France), and inhibition of thromboxane A2 (TXA2) generation with 100 mg aspirin (ASA, CAS 50–78–2, Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) ingested by donors the evening before blood donation. Activated platelets were spun down by centrifugation at 300 g for 5 minutes, after which the supernatant was filtered with PK50 MiniSart sterile 0.8 µm filters (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany) and centrifugated for 1 hour at 20,000 g. Samples were collected and snap frozen into liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C until analyses.

Chemokine and Serotonin Determination

Washed platelets (2 × 10⁸/mL) were activated as described and after time points (5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes) chemokine samples were collected. Secretion of chemokine CCL5 was determined by an in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); CXCL4 and serotonin secretion were determined by an ELISA kit from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States) and Abnova (Taipei, Taiwan) according to manufacturer's instructions, respectively. For CCL5, samples were diluted into phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 1% BSA, and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature in a Maxisorb 96-well plate (Nunc), coated with CCL5 capture antibody (R&D Systems, Minnesota, United States). After washing with PBS buffer containing 0.05% Tween-20, a second antibody (biotin-labeled goat antihuman CCL5 mAb, home-made) was added, and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature. For detection, incubation with HRP-labeled streptavidin (R&D Systems) was performed in the dark for 20 minutes at room temperature. A TMB substrate kit (KPL Inc., Massachusetts, United States) was used and color development was measured at 450 nm and 550 nm wavelengths. Data analysis was performed with a four-parameter logistic fit calculation.

Cell Migration Assay

For assessment of THP-1 cell migration toward a chemoattractant, a 12-well Boyden chemotaxis chamber (NeuroProbe, Gaithersburg, Germany) with a 5 µm pore polycarbonate membrane (NeuroProbe, Gaithersburg, Germany) was used. The chemoattractants are the supernatants after platelet activation. Donor samples were pooled per condition and diluted four times in RPMI 1% FBS medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, United States). Chemoattractants were added to the lower compartment of the chamber. In some experiments, the tick-derived CC-chemokine inhibitor Evasin-4 was added at 1 µg/mL. THP-1 cells in a concentration of 10⁶/mL cells were added to the upper compartment of the chamber. After incubation of 1.5 hours at 37°C, the membrane was cleared of nonmigrated cells and the membrane was stained with Diff-Quick stain (Eberhard Lehmann GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Stained membrane was imaged with light microscopy (Leica), and cells were counted manually in five fields per well and expressed as cells/mm². The migration assay was done at least four times per condition.

Statistical Analysis

Independent and unpaired experiments were performed using platelets from a total of 38 different healthy blood donors to investigate the effects of antiplatelet drugs. The donor platelets were used for the (buffer) controls and for the treatment with the different compounds. Control groups contained all untreated platelets and were thus higher in number than the treatment groups. Experimental data were represented as median with interquartile range or as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way analysis of variance or with Kruskal–Wallis test with Sidak or Dunn's post hoc analysis, where applicable. Significance of differences of a p-value <0.05 were considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed with Graphpad Prism software version 9.2.

Results

Release of Chemokines from Activated Platelets Is Not Dependent on Activation Pathway

Platelet activation leads to release of their content, for example, coagulation and growth factors, chemokines, and of extracellular vesicles. In this study, a focus lies on the release of the chemokines CXCL4 and CCL5. Platelet activation by convulxin (glycoprotein VI [GPVI] agonist), thrombin (protease-activated receptor [PAR]1/PAR4 agonist), and TRAP-6 (PAR1 agonist) led to comparable levels of released chemokine ([Fig. 1A], [B]). Intriguingly, there was a notable donor-to-donor difference regarding chemokine release by activated platelets ([Fig. 1A], [B]). Already after 5 minutes of platelet activation, maximum levels of CCL5 and CXCL4 were observed with both convulxin and thrombin stimulations ([Fig. 1C], [D]). These findings indicate that activated platelets release chemokines rapidly upon stimulation of GPVI or PAR1/PAR4 receptors.

Fig. 1 Different platelet activation pathways have no influence on chemokine release. Washed platelets (2 × 10⁸/mL) were activated with convulxin (CVX, 100 ng/mL), thrombin (IIa, 5 nM), or TRAP-6 (50 µM) for 30 minutes at 37°C. Platelets were removed and chemokines CCL5 (A) and CXCL4 (B) were determined with enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay. Control (CTRL) represents no stimulated platelets. Chemokine release was followed in time after convulxin (C) and thrombin (D) activation. Closed circles represent convulxin activation and open circles represent thrombin activation. CTRL: n = 31; CVX: n = 28–30, IIa: n = 25–29; and TRAP-6: n = 15. Median with interquartile range (A, B); mean ± standard deviation (C, D). ***p < 0.001, Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn's test.

Impact of Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors on CCL5 and CXCL4 Release by Platelets

Some clinical studies suggested that inhibition of α_IIbβ₃ integrin, responsible for platelet aggregation, reduces the inflammatory response in patients.[24] To investigate whether platelet aggregation inhibitors can also inhibit chemokine release, washed platelets were incubated with eptifibatide or tirofiban for 5 minutes prior to platelet activation with convulxin or thrombin. The release of CCL5 was not significantly reduced after antiplatelet treatment ([Fig. 2A], [B]). Interestingly, whereas eptifibatide hardly showed an effect, the release of chemokine CXCL4 was decreased by over 50% after treatment with tirofiban ([Fig. 2C], [D]). This difference in CCL5 and CXCL4 release was also observed in platelets isolated from two patients with Glanzmann thrombasthenia, who have defective α_IIbβ₃ integrins ([Supplementary Figure S1]). These data suggest that the chemokines CCL5 and CXCL4 are released by differential pathways. Taken together, these findings imply that inhibition of integrin α_IIbβ₃ only has minor effects on chemokine release from activated platelets.

Fig. 2 Effects of antiplatelet drugs against α_IIbβ₃ on chemokine release. Washed platelets (2 × 10⁸/mL) were incubated with indicated compounds, 5 minutes prior to platelet activation, and chemokine release was determined: CCL5 release after convulxin (A) and thrombin (B) activation and CXCL4 release after convulxin (C) and thrombin (D) activation. Closed circles represent convulxin activation and open circles represent thrombin activation. CTRL: n = 25–30; eptifibatide: n = 4–7; and tirofiban: n = 4–5. Median with interquartile range. *p < 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn's test.

Single or Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Influences CCL5 and CXCL4 Release

ASA and P2Y₁₂ inhibitors are commonly prescribed antiplatelet drugs for the secondary prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events.[27] [28] Platelet inhibition with ASA did not show a significant effect on CCL5 release from convulxin-activated platelets, whereas CCL5 release after thrombin activation was reduced ([Fig. 3A]). Interestingly, unlike CCL5, CXCL4 chemokine was reduced after stimulation of convulxin or thrombin ([Fig. 3B]). Similar to ASA, the release of CCL5 was not affected by cangrelor after stimulation of the GPVI pathway using convulxin ([Fig. 4A]). However, CCL5 release was reduced by cangrelor after stimulation of the PAR1/PAR4 pathway with thrombin ([Fig. 4B]). The release of CXCL4 was reduced by cangrelor after stimulation with thrombin and a downward trend (p = 0.1) was observed upon stimulation with convulxin ([Fig. 4C], [D]). Combined treatment of platelets with both ASA and cangrelor did not further increase the overall inhibition of chemokine release ([Fig. 4A]–[D]).

Fig. 3 Effect of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) on chemokine release. Washed platelets (2 × 10⁸/mL) from healthy volunteers exposed to ASA (100 mg p.o.) were activated and CCL5 (A) and CXCL4 (B) release was determined as described. Closed circles represent convulxin activation and open circles represent thrombin activation. CTRL: n = 25–30; and ASA: n = 8. Median with interquartile range. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's test.

Fig. 4 Effects of P2Y₁₂ inhibition on chemokine release. Washed platelets (2 × 10⁸/mL) from healthy volunteers exposed to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA: 100 mg p.o.) were activated and CCL5 (A, B) and CXCL4 (C, D) release was determined as described. Prior to activation, platelets were incubated with P2Y₁₂ inhibitor cangrelor for 5 minutes. Closed circles represent convulxin activation and open circles represent thrombin activation. CTRL: n = 25–30; Cangrelor: n = 4; Cangr. + ASA: n = 8. Median with interquartile range. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn's test.

Impact of Combined Cilostazol and ASA Treatment on CCL5 and CXCL4 Release from Activated Platelets

In accordance with our recent observations,[29] inhibition of platelet cAMP via PDE3 with cilostazol was shown to have an inhibiting effect on chemokine CCL5 release upon stimulation with both convulxin and thrombin ([Figs. 5A], [B] and [6A], [B]), while CXCL4 release was significantly inhibited by cilostazol only after stimulation with thrombin ([Figs. 5C], [D] and [6C], [D]). To investigate whether cilostazol has an additional effect on CCL5 and CXCL4 release from ASA-treated platelets, these platelets were incubated with cilostazol for 10 minutes prior to platelet activation. This only resulted in a minimal decrease in chemokine release compared with ASA alone ([Fig. 5]), except when CCL5 release was measured after triggering with convulxin ([Fig. 5A]). Here addition of cilostazol resulted in a stronger decrease in CCL5 release than ASA alone ([Fig. 5A]), but this effect was not statistically significant. The combination of cilostazol with cangrelor had no additional effect on the release of CCL5 and CXCL4 ([Fig. 6]). These data suggest that combined treatment of platelets with ASA and cilostazol does not potentiate the inhibition of chemokine release after platelet activation.

Fig. 5 Dual treatment with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) + cilostazol treatment has no additional effects on chemokine release. Washed platelets (2 × 10⁸/mL) from healthy volunteers exposed to ASA (100 mg p.o.) were activated and CCL5 (A, B) and CXCL4 (C, D) release was determined as described. Platelets were incubated 10 minutes prior to activation with the PDE3 inhibitor cilostazol. Closed circles represent convulxin activation and open circles represent thrombin activation. CTRL: n = 25–29; Cilo: n = 6; ASA: n = 8; and ASA + Cilo: n = 6. Median with interquartile range. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; and ***p < 0.001; analysis of variance with Sidak test.

Fig. 6 Combination treatment with cangrelor + cilostazol has no additional effects on chemokine release. Washed platelets (2 × 10⁸/mL) from healthy volunteers were pretreated with P2Y₁₂ inhibitor cangrelor, 5 minutes before activation and CCL5 (A, B) and CXCL4 (C, D) release was determined as described. Platelets were incubated 10 minutes prior to activation with the PDE3 inhibitor cilostazol. Closed circles represent convulxin activation and open circles represent thrombin activation. CTRL: n = 25–30; Cilo: n = 6–7; Cangrelor: n = 4; and Cangr. + Cilo: n = 4. Median with interquartile range. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01, analysis of variance with Sidak test.

Platelet-derived serotonin was found to mediate proinflammatory roles during myocardial infarction and during systemic shock.[30] [31] To investigate the effects of antiplatelet drugs on the release of serotonin from platelets after activation with convulxin or thrombin, serotonin was determined in platelet releasates after treatment. Interestingly, only the presence of cangrelor inhibited serotonin release induced by either agonist ([Supplementary Figure S2]).

Combined Treatment of Platelets with Aspirin and Cangrelor or Cilostazol Inhibits Chemotaxis of Monocytic Cells

Chemokines CCL5 and CXCL4 are involved in various immune pathways, for example migration and adhesion of leukocytes. To investigate possible effects of antiplatelet drugs on platelet-induced leukocyte migration, a Boyden chemotaxis chamber was used to assess migration of monocytic THP-1 cells toward platelet supernatants. Releasates of platelets activated with convulxin induced a more pronounced chemotactic response than those induced after activation with thrombin ([Fig. 7]). Platelet activation after exposure to ASA or tirofiban did not lead to a reduced migration with both agonists ([Fig. 7A]). Interestingly, the chemotactic potential of platelets releasate was reduced after inhibition with cangrelor, but only when activated with convulxin ([Fig. 7B]). This inhibition was more pronounced when cangrelor was combined with ASA ([Fig. 7B]). Inhibition of platelets with cilostazol alone led to a slight decrease in migration, which could be further reduced by a combination with ASA ([Fig. 7C]). The combination of cangrelor and cilostazol had no effect of monocytic cell migration ([Fig. 7D]). Furthermore, the inhibitors themselves have no influence on migration of monocytic cells, both in the absence and presence of CCL5 as chemoattractant ([Supplementary Figure S3]).

Fig. 7 Chemoattractant properties of activated platelets and the effects of antiplatelet drugs. Migration of monocytic cells (10⁶/mL) was induced in a 12-well chemotaxis chamber for 90 minutes at 37°C. Buffer, or supernatants of resting or activated washed platelets, was added in the bottom compartment. If applicable, platelets were activated by convulxin or thrombin without or with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) or tirofiban (A), cangrelor or ASA + cangrelor (dual) (B), cilostazol (cilo) or ASA + cilo (dual) (C), and cangrelor or cangrelor + cilo (D). CCL5 (0.5 µg/mL) and platelet releasates without or with Evasin-4 (Ev-4, 1 µg/mL) (E). n = 4–6; median with interquartile range. *p < 0.05; Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn's test.

To further investigate whether the reduction in chemotaxis could be due to a reduced release of CCL5, chemotaxis experiments were performed in the presence of the broad-spectrum CC-chemokine tick-derived antagonist Evasin-4. Indeed, Evasin-4 abolished chemotaxis toward CCL5, and THP-1 migration toward the supernatants of both convulxin- and thrombin-activated platelets was strongly reduced in the presence of Evasin-4 ([Fig. 7E]).

Taken together, these data suggest that combined therapy of ASA and P2Y₁₂ or PDE3 inhibitors can decrease the inflammatory leukocyte recruiting potential of the releasate of activated platelets, possibly by inhibiting the release of CCL5.

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the effect of antiplatelet medication on platelet-chemokine release and platelet releasate-induced chemotaxis. We focused on convulxin and thrombin as these agonists potently trigger protein kinase C activation, which is critical for platelet granule secretion[32] as chemokines CCL5 and CXCL4 reside in α-granules.[16] We could confirm previous observations that chemokine release is a rapid response after platelet activation and occurs nearly instantaneously within 5 minutes after activation.[16] [33] Interestingly, although activation with convulxin and thrombin led to similar amounts of CCL5 and CXCL4 released along with a similar time course, release of CCL5 induced by convulxin alone appeared to be more resistant to antiplatelet compounds than the release of CXCL4. A clear reduction in CXCL4 release was observed after treatment of platelets with tirofiban. This effect was less pronounced when eptifibatide was used. Interestingly, there was no reduction in CCL5 release after incubation with any ɑ_IIbβ₃ inhibitor, neither was CCL5 or CXCL4 release reduced in platelets from the two Glanzmann patients. However, tirofiban appeared to not interfere with other chemoattractants released by platelets, as it did not influence migration of monocytic cells. It should be taken into account that ɑ_IIbβ₃ antagonists on the market are both structurally and functionally different, which leads to different outcomes in different studies. For example, abciximab is a humanized fab fragment of the monoclonal 7e3, the cyclic peptide eptifibatide is not only specific to α_IIbβ₃ integrin but also binds to α_Mβ₂ and to ɑ_vβ₃, and tirofiban is considered to be specific for α_IIbβ₃ integrin and binds to the RGD binding site on the integrin, which might lead to neoepitopes.[24] [34] [35] In animal models, blockade or genetic deletion of α_IIbβ₃ reduced platelet interactions with the endothelium and with leukocytes.[36] [37] This was also observed in models with human platelets and endothelial cells[38] and in patients with ACS.[39] [40] In our study, we investigated platelet releasate-induced leukocyte migration but did not study direct interaction of platelet (-chemokines) with leukocytes and/or the endothelium. Regarding the findings in this study, it can be stated that depending on which platelet-derived chemokines are investigated, there is an anti-inflammatory effect of these drugs.

ASA is well known for its antiplatelet and anti-inflammatory effects. ASA irreversibly acetylates COX-1 and COX-2, thereby inhibiting the production of TXA2 via COX-1, leading to inhibition of platelet aggregation and decreased vasoconstriction.[41] A low dose (81–100 mg[24]) of ASA has anti-inflammatory effects, by triggering the synthesis of arachidonic acid metabolites leading to blockade of the expression of CXCL8 in macrophages and endothelial cells.[24] [42] In this study, we have observed that ASA significantly decreased chemokine release through the thrombin-induced pathway (PAR1/PAR4), and to a lesser extent after activation with convulxin. Despite the observed reduction in chemokine release, the anti-inflammatory response of ASA was not reflected in the migration of monocytes in this study, which was unaffected by ASA. This may suggest that ASA mediates its anti-inflammatory response mainly in a platelet-independent manner.

A resistance of patients toward ASA leads to suboptimal antiplatelet therapy.[23] This issue is addressed, for example, by combining ASA with a second antiplatelet drug, for example, P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors (clopidogrel, ticagrelor, prasugrel). Unlike for clopidogrel, ticagrelor and cangrelor have less data available on their influence on circulating markers of inflammation in patients, although ticagrelor more efficiently reduced CXCL8 levels in healthy volunteers than clopidogrel.[43] Clopidogrel was shown to reduce inflammatory markers in CVD patients, and it can interfere with leukocyte–platelet interactions, although it is unclear whether this is due to vascular or antiplatelet effects.[43] [44] [45] [46] Furthermore, clopidogrel reduced CCL5 plasma levels both in animals and in patients.[47] [48] [49] All P2Y₁₂ antagonists appear to interfere with the interaction of platelets with monocytes and with neutrophils,[43] [45] [50] although all may have platelet-independent effects, as stated above. We have observed that treatment of platelets with cangrelor showed a similar effect as with ASA. The chemokine release induced by thrombin is inhibited by cangrelor, whereas chemokine release induced by convulxin was less well inhibited by cangrelor. Interestingly, cangrelor was the only compound that blocked the release of serotonin. Inhibition of platelets with cangrelor alone did not lead to a reduced migration of monocytic cells. Although cangrelor in combination with ASA did not lead to a further reduction in chemokine release compared with ASA or cangrelor alone, combination of both compounds almost eliminated attraction of monocytic cells by platelet supernatant. A possible explanation for this observation might be that the combination of ASA and cangrelor can inhibit the release of several chemoattractants from platelets, other than CCL5. One possible chemoattractant is adenosine diphosphate (ADP), released from dense granules by activated platelets, and was shown to attract monocytes and macrophages through the action of the P2Y₁₂ receptor in recent studies.[50] [51] [52] Although our results indicated that CCL5 was mainly responsible for the chemotactic effect of platelet supernatants, an involvement of ADP appears feasible since remnant levels of cangrelor in the platelet supernatants might be sufficient to reduce chemotaxis. In addition, cangrelor inhibited the release of serotonin, which is likewise stored in dense granules, and this could explain why a strong inhibition of monocyte chemotaxis toward supernatants of cangrelor + ASA-treated platelets was observed, while CCL5 secretion was poorly affected by this combined treatment. Thus, besides chemokines, antiplatelet drugs can also affect the release of other compounds that mediate monocyte and macrophage migration. For future studies, it would be interesting to compare the chemotactic effects of platelet supernatants treated without or with apyrase, an enzyme that hydrolyzes ADP. Outside the context of platelets and their supernatants, no direct effects of the antiplatelet drugs cangrelor, tirofiban, and cilostazol were found on the chemotaxis of THP-1 cells, both in the presence and absence of CCL5, indicating that the observed effects in this study can be attributed to the actions of these drugs on platelets.

So far, this study has focused on the effect of antiplatelet medications and combinations on the inflammatory properties of platelets. Interestingly, we have observed differential protein and extracellular vesicle secretion patterns after platelet activation throughout this, and in other studies.[19] [29] [53] [54] In this study, we have observed differential CCL5 and CXCL4 release under the influence of different antiplatelet medications. This would suggest that these chemokines are differently packaged inside the α-granule of platelets and that their differential release is governed by autocrine feedback activation mechanisms. Although differential packaging and release of granule content has been described previously in literature, it remains controversial whether this is a physiologic regulatory principle[55] [56] or a stochastically occurring process.[57] [58] Support for the latter comes from studies that show that platelet secretion depends on several factors, for example, cargo solubility, granule shape, and/or granule–plasma membrane fusion routes.[57] In addition, α-granule proteins were found to be stochastically stored in the granules into subdomains.[58] Others did find evidence for a functional separation of α-granule content and of their release depending on the context of platelet activation.[55] [56] Unlike the previous studies, this study also took the effects of inhibitors of platelet activation and activation into account, thereby revealing a differential release of α-granule content.

PDE3 and PDE5 regulate the cAMP- and cGMP-dependent signaling pathways in platelets, and the PDE3 inhibitor cilostazol was shown to inhibit platelet aggregation and the release of P-selectin, CXCL4, and platelet-derived growth factor in previous studies[29] (reviewed in[59]). Moreover, inhibition of PDE3 by cilostazol also decreased monocyte recruitment.[29] In this study, the combination of ASA and cilostazol did not further inhibit chemokine release after platelet activation compared with ASA alone. However, when combined, monocyte recruitment was decreased, which suggests that the combination of ASA and cilostazol can inhibit the release of chemoattractants from platelets. Interestingly, the addition of the CC-chemokine inhibitor Evasin-4 led to a strong reduction in THP-1 chemotaxis toward both convulxin- and thrombin-induced platelet releasates. Although Evasin-4 blocks many CC-chemokines, a proteomics study only detected CCL5 as a CC-chemokine member within platelets.[15] In addition, CXCL4, which is unaffected by Evasin-4, poorly affects monocyte recruitment.[17] [18] This indicates that, at least in this experimental setting, CCL5 is mainly responsible for the chemotactic effects of platelet releasates.

In summary, on basis of our findings we can conclude that the majority of antiplatelet drugs influence the release of inflammatory mediators, chemokines in this study, from activated platelets. Although ASA, P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors, and PDE3 inhibitors also have an effect on the vasculature and leukocytes, they are also able to reduce inflammation in a platelet-dependent manner, for example, by modulating interactions of platelets with other immune cells,[43] [45] and by inhibition of platelet secretion through the thrombin activation pathway (this study). Interestingly, chemokine release from platelets can be effectively reduced by specific combinations of medications. Dual therapy with ASA and a P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitor or with cilostazol shows promising effects in reducing the proinflammatory properties of platelets. Whether antiplatelet drugs can be used to reduce low-grade inflammation, a possible driver of CVD,[60] remains to be determined and it is challenging to pinpoint such effects on platelets. In addition, given the beneficial effects of platelets and their released contents in wound-healing processes,[61] inhibition of chemokine release might not always be advantageous.

Nevertheless, for patients with CVD and notably with atherothrombosis, the reduction in inflammation by targeting of chemokine release during antiplatelet treatment could be supplemented with an anticoagulant, for example, rivaroxaban (direct antifactor Xa inhibitor), to further prevent disease progression and manifestation while minimizing the risk for bleeding complications.

• References

• 1 Herrington W, Lacey B, Sherliker P, Armitage J, Lewington S. Epidemiology of atherosclerosis and the potential to reduce the global burden of atherothrombotic disease. Circ Res 2016; 118 (04) 535-546
• 2 Jackson SP. Arterial thrombosis–insidious, unpredictable and deadly. Nat Med 2011; 17 (11) 1423-1436
• 3 Viles-Gonzalez JF, Fuster V, Badimon JJ. Atherothrombosis: a widespread disease with unpredictable and life-threatening consequences. Eur Heart J 2004; 25 (14) 1197-1207
• 4 Smyth SS, McEver RP, Weyrich AS. et al; 2009 Platelet Colloquium Participants. Platelet functions beyond hemostasis. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 7 (11) 1759-1766
• 5 da Costa Martins P, van den Berk N, Ulfman LH, Koenderman L, Hordijk PL, Zwaginga JJ. Platelet-monocyte complexes support monocyte adhesion to endothelium by enhancing secondary tethering and cluster formation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004; 24 (01) 193-199
• 6 Kuckleburg CJ, Yates CM, Kalia N. et al. Endothelial cell-borne platelet bridges selectively recruit monocytes in human and mouse models of vascular inflammation. Cardiovasc Res 2011; 91 (01) 134-141
• 7 Schrottmaier WC, Mussbacher M, Salzmann M, Assinger A. Platelet-leukocyte interplay during vascular disease. Atherosclerosis 2020; 307: 109-120
• 8 Vajen T, Mause SF, Koenen RR. Microvesicles from platelets: novel drivers of vascular inflammation. Thromb Haemost 2015; 114 (02) 228-236
• 9 Konkoth A, Saraswat R, Dubrou C. et al. Multifaceted role of extracellular vesicles in atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2021; 319: 121-131
• 10 Maugeri N, Campana L, Gavina M. et al. Activated platelets present high mobility group box 1 to neutrophils, inducing autophagy and promoting the extrusion of neutrophil extracellular traps. J Thromb Haemost 2014; 12 (12) 2074-2088
• 11 Vajen T, Koenen RR, Werner I. et al. Blocking CCL5-CXCL4 heteromerization preserves heart function after myocardial infarction by attenuating leukocyte recruitment and NETosis. Sci Rep 2018; 8 (01) 10647
• 12 Gleissner CA. Macrophage phenotype modulation by CXCL4 in atherosclerosis. Front Physiol 2012; 3: 1
• 13 von Hundelshausen P, Schmitt MM. Platelets and their chemokines in atherosclerosis-clinical applications. Front Physiol 2014; 5: 294
• 14 Fernandez EJ, Lolis E. Structure, function, and inhibition of chemokines. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2002; 42: 469-499
• 15 Burkhart JM, Vaudel M, Gambaryan S. et al. The first comprehensive and quantitative analysis of human platelet protein composition allows the comparative analysis of structural and functional pathways. Blood 2012; 120 (15) e73-e82
• 16 Blanchet X, Cesarek K, Brandt J. et al. Inflammatory role and prognostic value of platelet chemokines in acute coronary syndrome. Thromb Haemost 2014; 112 (06) 1277-1287
• 17 von Hundelshausen P, Koenen RR, Sack M. et al. Heterophilic interactions of platelet factor 4 and RANTES promote monocyte arrest on endothelium. Blood 2005; 105 (03) 924-930
• 18 Koenen RR, von Hundelshausen P, Nesmelova IV. et al. Disrupting functional interactions between platelet chemokines inhibits atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic mice. Nat Med 2009; 15 (01) 97-103
• 19 Coenen DM, Heinzmann ACA, Karel MFA, Cosemans JMEM, Koenen RR. The multifaceted contribution of platelets in the emergence and aftermath of acute cardiovascular events. Atherosclerosis 2021; 319: 132-141
• 20 Gurbel PA, Fox KAA, Tantry US, Ten Cate H, Weitz JI. Combination antiplatelet and oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with coronary and peripheral artery disease. Circulation 2019; 139 (18) 2170-2185
• 21 Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S. et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J 2016; 37 (29) 2315-2381
• 22 Tsigkou V, Siasos G, Rovos K, Tripyla N, Tousoulis D. Peripheral artery disease and antiplatelet treatment. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2018; 39: 43-52
• 23 Sibbing D, Byrne RA, Bernlochner I, Kastrati A. High platelet reactivity and clinical outcome - fact and fiction. Thromb Haemost 2011; 106 (02) 191-202
• 24 Müller KA, Chatterjee M, Rath D, Geisler T. Platelets, inflammation and anti-inflammatory effects of antiplatelet drugs in ACS and CAD. Thromb Haemost 2015; 114 (03) 498-518
• 25 Denisov SS, Ramírez-Escudero M, Heinzmann ACA. et al. Structural characterization of anti-CCL5 activity of the tick salivary protein evasin-4. J Biol Chem 2020; 295 (42) 14367-14378
• 26 Rosado JA, Meijer EM, Hamulyak K, Novakova I, Heemskerk JW, Sage SO. Fibrinogen binding to the integrin alpha(IIb)beta(3) modulates store-mediated calcium entry in human platelets. Blood 2001; 97 (09) 2648-2656
• 27 Parker WAE, Storey RF. Novel approaches to P2Y12 inhibition and aspirin dosing. Platelets 2020; 32 (01) 7-14
• 28 Floyd CN. Dual Antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease: comparison between ACC/AHA 2016 and ESC 2017 guidelines. Eur Cardiol 2020; 15: 1-3
• 29 Coenen DM, Heinzmann ACA, Oggero S. et al. Inhibition of phosphodiesterase 3A by cilostazol dampens proinflammatory platelet functions. Cells 2021; 10 (08) 1998
• 30 Mauler M, Herr N, Schoenichen C. et al. Platelet serotonin aggravates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury via neutrophil degranulation. Circulation 2019; 139 (07) 918-931
• 31 Cloutier N, Allaeys I, Marcoux G. et al. Platelets release pathogenic serotonin and return to circulation after immune complex-mediated sequestration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115 (07) E1550-E1559
• 32 Konopatskaya O, Gilio K, Harper MT. et al. PKC alpha regulates platelet granule secretion and thrombus formation in mice. J Clin Invest 2009; 119 (02) 399-407
• 33 van Holten TC, Bleijerveld OB, Wijten P. et al. Quantitative proteomics analysis reveals similar release profiles following specific PAR-1 or PAR-4 stimulation of platelets. Cardiovasc Res 2014; 103 (01) 140-146
• 34 Coller BS. αIIbβ3: structure and function. J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13 (Suppl 1): S17-S25
• 35 Lambrechts K, de Maistre S, Abraini JH, Blatteau JE, Risso JJ, Vallée N. Tirofiban, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist, has a protective effect on decompression sickness in rats: is the crosstalk between platelet and leukocytes essential?. Front Physiol 2018; 9: 906
• 36 Kupatt C, Habazettl H, Hanusch P. et al. c7E3Fab reduces postischemic leukocyte-thrombocyte interaction mediated by fibrinogen. Implications for myocardial reperfusion injury. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000; 20 (10) 2226-2232
• 37 Massberg S, Brand K, Grüner S. et al. A critical role of platelet adhesion in the initiation of atherosclerotic lesion formation. J Exp Med 2002; 196 (07) 887-896
• 38 May AE, Kälsch T, Massberg S, Herouy Y, Schmidt R, Gawaz M. Engagement of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (alpha(IIb)beta3) on platelets upregulates CD40L and triggers CD40L-dependent matrix degradation by endothelial cells. Circulation 2002; 106 (16) 2111-2117
• 39 May AE, Neumann FJ, Gawaz M, Ott I, Walter H, Schömig A. Reduction of monocyte-platelet interaction and monocyte activation in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation. Eur Heart J 1997; 18 (12) 1913-1920
• 40 Neumann FJ, Zohlnhöfer D, Fakhoury L, Ott I, Gawaz M, Schömig A. Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade on platelet-leukocyte interaction and surface expression of the leukocyte integrin Mac-1 in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34 (05) 1420-1426
• 41 Undas A, Brummel-Ziedins K, Mann KG. Why does aspirin decrease the risk of venous thromboembolism? On old and novel antithrombotic effects of acetyl salicylic acid. J Thromb Haemost 2014; 12 (11) 1776-1787
• 42 Otto GP, Sossdorf M, Boettel J. et al. Effects of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid and atherosclerotic vascular diseases on the outcome in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Platelets 2013; 24 (06) 480-485
• 43 Thomas MR, Outteridge SN, Ajjan RA. et al. Platelet P2Y12 inhibitors reduce systemic inflammation and its prothrombotic effects in an experimental human model. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2015; 35 (12) 2562-2570
• 44 Schäfer A, Fraccarollo D, Pförtsch S. et al. Clopidogrel improves endothelial function and NO bioavailability by sensitizing adenylyl cyclase in rats with congestive heart failure. Basic Res Cardiol 2011; 106 (03) 485-494
• 45 Schrottmaier WC, Kral JB, Badrnya S, Assinger A. Aspirin and P2Y12 Inhibitors in platelet-mediated activation of neutrophils and monocytes. Thromb Haemost 2015; 114 (03) 478-489
• 46 Thomas MR, Storey RF. Effect of P2Y12 inhibitors on inflammation and immunity. Thromb Haemost 2015; 114 (03) 490-497
• 47 Coimbra LS, Steffens JP, Rossa Jr C, Graves DT, Spolidorio LC. Clopidogrel enhances periodontal repair in rats through decreased inflammation. J Clin Periodontol 2014; 41 (03) 295-302
• 48 Harding SA, Sarma J, Din JN, Maciocia PM, Newby DE, Fox KA. Clopidogrel reduces platelet-leucocyte aggregation, monocyte activation and RANTES secretion in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Heart 2006; 92 (09) 1335-1337
• 49 Meyer A, Weithaeuser A, Steffens D. et al. Inhibition of platelet function with clopidogrel is associated with a reduction of inflammation in patients with peripheral artery disease. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2016; 17 (03) 169-175
• 50 Siegel PM, Sander L, Fricke A. et al. P₂Y₁₂ receptor blockers are anti-inflammatory drugs inhibiting both circulating monocytes and macrophages including THP-1 cells. Sci Rep 2021; 11 (01) 17459
• 51 Micklewright JJ, Layhadi JA, Fountain SJ. P2Y₁₂ receptor modulation of ADP-evoked intracellular Ca²⁺ signalling in THP-1 human monocytic cells. Br J Pharmacol 2018; 175 (12) 2483-2491
• 52 Kloss L, Dollt C, Schledzewski K. et al. ADP secreted by dying melanoma cells mediates chemotaxis and chemokine secretion of macrophages via the purinergic receptor P2Y12. Cell Death Dis 2019; 10 (10) 760
• 53 Dickhout A, Tullemans BME, Heemskerk JWM, Thijssen VLJL, Kuijpers MJE, Koenen RR. Galectin-1 and platelet factor 4 (CXCL4) induce complementary platelet responses in vitro. PLoS One 2021; 16 (01) e0244736
• 54 Heinzmann ACA, Karel MFA, Coenen DM. et al. Complementary roles of platelet α_IIbβ₃ integrin, phosphatidylserine exposure and cytoskeletal rearrangement in the release of extracellular vesicles. Atherosclerosis 2020; 310: 17-25
• 55 Chatterjee M, Huang Z, Zhang W. et al. Distinct platelet packaging, release, and surface expression of proangiogenic and antiangiogenic factors on different platelet stimuli. Blood 2011; 117 (14) 3907-3911
• 56 Italiano Jr JE, Richardson JL, Patel-Hett S. et al. Angiogenesis is regulated by a novel mechanism: pro- and antiangiogenic proteins are organized into separate platelet alpha granules and differentially released. Blood 2008; 111 (03) 1227-1233
• 57 Jonnalagadda D, Izu LT, Whiteheart SW. Platelet secretion is kinetically heterogeneous in an agonist-responsive manner. Blood 2012; 120 (26) 5209-5216
• 58 Kamykowski J, Carlton P, Sehgal S, Storrie B. Quantitative immunofluorescence mapping reveals little functional coclustering of proteins within platelet α-granules. Blood 2011; 118 (05) 1370-1373
• 59 Gresele P, Momi S, Falcinelli E. Anti-platelet therapy: phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2011; 72 (04) 634-646
• 60 Liu D, Richardson G, Benli FM. et al. Inflammageing in the cardiovascular system: mechanisms, emerging targets, and novel therapeutic strategies. Clin Sci (Lond) 2020; 134 (17) 2243-2262
• 61 Jansen EE, Braun A, Jansen P, Hartmann M. Platelet-therapeutics to improve tissue regeneration and wound healing-physiological background and methods of preparation. Biomedicines 2021; 9 (08) 869