Comment: The Effect of Antenatal Vaginal Progesterone Administration on Uterine, Umbilical, and Fetal Middle Cerebral Artery Doppler Flow: A Cohort Study

Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(03): 373-374
DOI: 10.1055/a-1787-7744

Letter to the Editor

Authors

Jim Thornton

¹University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Zarko Alfirevic

²University of Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom
Vincenzo Berghella

³Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Wessel Ganzevoort

⁴Radboud University, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
Louise Kenny

²University of Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom
Ben Mol

⁵Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Francis Muriithi

⁶University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Dwight Rouse

⁷Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
Andrew Shennan

⁸Kings College, London, United Kingdom
Annika Strandell

⁹University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Västra Götaland, Sweden
Joris A.M. van der Post

¹⁰University of Amsterdam, Duivendrecht, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
Madelon van Wely

¹⁰University of Amsterdam, Duivendrecht, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands

References
1 Maged AM, Shoab AY, Hussein EA. et al. The effect of antenatal vaginal progesterone administration on uterine, umbilical, and fetal middle cerebral artery doppler flow: a cohort study. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37 (05) 491-496
2 Stirnemann J, Villar J, Salomon LJ. et al; International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st), Scientific Advisory Committee, Steering Committees, INTERGROWTH-21st, INTERBIO-21st, Executive Committee, In addition for INTERBIO 21st, Project Coordinating Unit, Data Analysis Group, Data Management Group, In addition for INTERBIO 21st, Ultrasound Group, In addition for INTERBIO-21st, Anthropometry Group, In addition for INTERBIO-21st, Laboratory Processing Group, Neonatal Group, Environmental Health Group, Neurodevelopment Group, Participating countries and local investigators, In addition for INTERBIO-21st, In addition for INTERBIO-21st. International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21^st project. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49 (04) 478-486
3 Salomon LJ, Diaz-Garcia C, Bernard JP, Ville Y. Reference range for cervical length throughout pregnancy: non-parametric LMS-based model applied to a large sample. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33 (04) 459-464