CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2022; 226(06): 399-404
DOI: 10.1055/a-1850-2475
Original Article

Analysis of Factors Related to Neonatal Infection and Monitoring of Bacterial Drug Resistance

Jingwen Xu
1   Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
,
Yanhong Zhang
1   Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
,
Hui Ma
1   Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
,
Renyan Zhang
1   Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
,
Jie Wu
1   Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
› Author Affiliations
 

Abstract

Objective To study the factors related to neonatal infection, as well as bacterial distribution and drug resistance in neonatal infections, in an obstetrics and gynecology hospital in Shanghai.

Methods The bacterial culture and drug resistance monitoring results from neonates treated at the hospital from January 2020 to June 2021 were analyzed and compared with the data for children and newborns from the national bacterial resistance surveillance report.

Results Among the 209 bacterial strains isolated from infected neonates, 90 were gram-positive, including the four most common isolates: coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus, and Streptococcus agalactiae. The remaining 119 strains were gram-negative and included Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Enterobacter aerogenes. The drug sensitivity results showed that the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates were sensitive to linezolid, vancomycin, rifampicin, levofloxacin, and gentamicin. All Klebsiella pneumoniaisolates were sensitive to amikacin, ertapenem, imipenem, and gentamicin. These two strains were resistant to other antibiotics to varying degrees.

Conclusions Understanding the distribution and drug resistance of bacterial pathogens is vital for guiding the rational selection of antibiotics and reducing neonatal mortality and nosocomial infections.


#

Newborns are prone to nosocomial infections because of their immature immune systems, and the risk increases with many factors such as preterm birth, low birth weight, vertical mother-to-infant transmission, perinatal infection, and the unreasonable use of antibiotics [1] [2]. In recent years, with the development of medical technology, the rescue success rate of premature infants and low-birth-weight infants has increased. As an important place for rescuing and treating newborns, the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) has increased the risk of nosocomial infection outbreaks owing to the increase of invasive operations, the extension of hospital stay, and the application of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Studies have shown that the incidence of nosocomial infection in the NICU is 26.05%, and the location is mainly in the blood and lower respiratory tract [3]. Studies have also shown that neonatal sepsis is an important cause of death of children and newborns. Neonatal sepsis accounts for 7% of children’s deaths and 16% of neonatal deaths [4].

It is therefore very important to identify the relevant pathogens and assess their drug resistance to reduce the rate of neonatal infections. In this study, we statistically analyzed infection-related factors, bacterial distribution, and drug resistance in neonates treated at our hospital from January 2020 to June 2021. We compared the findings with the data for children and newborns from the national bacterial resistance surveillance report to provide a scientific basis for clinical formulation and evaluation of antimicrobial management policies.

Materials and Methods

Clinical samples

Clinical samples, including blood, sputum, cerebrospinal fluid, nasopharyngeal swab, and secretion samples, were taken from children admitted to the neonatology department of our hospital. For the analysis, the neonates were classified as having early-onset (within three days of birth) or late-onset (more than three days after birth) infection, being premature (born at<37 gestational weeks) or term (born at≥37 gestational weeks and<42 gestational weeks), and having low birth weight (weight<2500 g) or normal birth weight (weight≥2500 g).


#

Bacterial identification and drug resistance testing

Bacterial identification [5] and drug resistance testing were carried out using a French bioMérieux VITEK 2 Compact automatic bacterial culture identification instrument and its supporting drug susceptibility card. Antibacterial drug sensitivity was defined according to CLSI M100–2019.


#

National drug resistance surveillance data of children and newborn patients [6]

These data were obtained from “Research on Bacterial Resistance Surveillance in Children and Newborn Patients in China from 2014 to 2017” Chinese Medical Journal, Vol. 98, No. 40, October 30, 2018.


#

Statistical analysis

WHONET5.6 and SPSS22.0 were used to analyze the data. Data are expressed as percentages, and the chi-square test was used for between-group comparisons. When the frequency of a listed item was<1, Fisher’s exact probability method was used to compare the data. Statistically significant differences were defined as P<0.05.


#
#

Results

Bacterial survey

Patient characteristics

From January 2020 to June 2021, the Department of Neonatology at our hospital requested bacterial culture analysis of 4,572 samples from neonates. A total of 209 strains were isolated, for a positive culture rate of 4.57%. Among the 209 culture-positive patients, 14 died and 195 were discharged healthy. Of the 14 deaths, 8 were ultra-premature infants due to respiratory failure, and 6 were due to neonatal sepsis. In all, 119 were male (56.9%) and 90 were female (43.1%). The minimum age was 1 day, the maximum age was 3 months, and the average age was 19.3 days. There were 81 cases of vaginal delivery (38.8%) and 128 cases of cesarean section (61.2%); 29 cases (13.9%) had early onset of infection, and 180 cases (86.1%) had late onset of infection; 184 of the infants (88.0%) were born prematurely, and 25 (12.0%) were full-term infants. One hundred and seventy-seven infants (84.7%) had low birth weight, and 32 infants (15.3%) had normal birth weight ([Table 1]).

Table 1 Basic characteristics of the 209 culture-positive neonates.

Project

Classification

Number of cases

Proportion%

Sex

Male

119

56.9

Female

90

43.0

Delivery method

Vaginal delivery

81

38.8

Cesarean section

128

61.2

Onset time

Early onset

29

13.9

Late onset

180

86.1

Gestational age

Premature baby

184

88.0

Full-term child

25

12.0

Birth weight

Low birth weight

177

84.7

Non-low birth weight

32

15.3


#

Specimen typesh

The 209 culture-positive cases were identified from 97 blood samples, 64 were from sputum samples, 15 were from cerebrospinal fluid samples, 25 were from nasopharyngeal swabs, and 8 were from secretions.


#

Bacterial types and distribution

Among the 209 bacterial isolates, 90 (43.1%) were gram-positive. The most commonly isolated bacteria were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (42.2%), Staphylococcus aureus (32.1%), Enterococcus (13.3%), and Streptococcus agalactiae (4.5%). Data from the children and newborn groups of the national drug resistance surveillance report indicate [1] that the top gram-positive bacteria are mainly Staphylococcus aureus (35.6%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (27.4%), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (21.1%), and Enterococcus faecium (4.4%) ([Table 2]).

Table 2 Distribution of the four most common gram-positive bacterial isolates.

Our hospital

CARSS

Bacteria species

Ratio (%)

Bacteria species

Ratio (%)

1

Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus

42.2

Staphylococcus aureus

35.6

2

Staphylococcus aureus

32.1

Streptococcus pneumoniae

27.4

3

Enterococcus

13.3

Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus

21.1

4

Streptococcus agalactiae

4.5

Enterococcus faecium

4.4

Gram-negative bacteria were isolated from 119 cases (56.9%). Among them, the five most common isolates were Klebsiella pneumonia (56.3%), Acinetobacter baumannii (15.1%), Enterobacter aerogenes (7.6%), Enterobacter cloacae (5.9%), and Serratia marcescens (5.9%). Data from the National Drug Resistance Surveillance Children and Newborn Group report show that the top five gram-negative bacteria are Escherichia coli (26.8%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (16.8%), Haemophilus influenzae (15.5%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6.4%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (6.2%) ([Table 3]).

Table 3 Distribution of the five most common gram-negative bacterial isolates.

Rank

Our hospital

CARSS

Bacteria species

Ratio (%)

Bacteria species

Ratio (%)

1

Klebsiella pneumoniae

56.3

Escherichia coli

26.8

2

Acinetobacter baumannii

15.1

Klebsiella pneumoniae

16.8

3

Enterobacter aerogenes

7.6

Haemophilus influenzae

15.5

4

Enterobacter cloacae

5.9

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

6.4

5

Serratia marcescens

5.9

Acinetobacter baumannii

6.2


#

Distribution of pathogenic bacteria in children with early- or late-onset infection

In total, 27 pathogenic bacteria, seven gram-negative bacteria, and 20 gram-positive bacteria were detected in neonates with early onset of infection. Also, 182 pathogenic bacteria, 112 gram-negative bacteria, and 70 gram-positive bacteria were detected in the late-onset group. The pathogenic bacteria distribution between the two groups was not statistically significant, except for Klebsiella pneumoniae and Streptococcus agalactiae (P<0.05).


#

Distribution of pathogenic bacteria in children with different gestational ages

In total, 184 strains of pathogenic bacteria, 108 gram-negative strains, and 76 gram-positive strains were detected in preterm infants, and 25 strains of pathogenic bacteria, 11 gram-negative strains, and 14 gram-positive strains, were detected in the term infant group. The pathogenic bacteria distribution between the two groups was not statistically significant, except for Streptococcus agalactiae (P<0.05).


#

Distribution of pathogenic bacteria in children with different birth weights

In total, 172 pathogenic bacteria, 100 gram-negative strains and 72 gram-positive strains were detected in children with low birth weight; and 27 pathogenic bacteria, nine gram-negative bacteria and 18 gram-positive bacteria were detected in children with normal body weight. The pathogenic bacteria distribution between the two groups was not statistically significant, except for Streptococcus agalactiae (P<0.05).


#

Comparison of EOS and LOS infections in preterm and term infants

We conducted a stratified analysis of EOS and LOS in preterm and term infants. We found that the number of LOS cases in preterm infants was much larger than that in other categories, with a P-value of<0.01, indicating a statistically significant difference. We found that premature infants require long-term parenteral nutrition and long, invasive procedures owing to immature organ development, poor skin and mucosal barrier function, and low humoral and cellular immunity, which are risk factors for LOS. Some studies have found that hospitalization stays≥10 days is a risk factor for nosocomial infection [3], and the results of this study are consistent with it ([Table 4]).

Table 4 Comparison of bacterial infection in preterm infants and term infants.

Premature baby (179)

Full-term baby (20)

P

EOS

LOS

EOS

LOS

Number of infected cases

14

165

10

10

<0.01

The top three in the distribution

Staphylococcus aureus

Klebsiella pneumoniae

Streptococcus agalactiae

Klebsiella pneumoniae

Klebsiella pneumoniae

Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus epidermidis

Staphylococcus aureus

Enterococcus faecium

Staphylococcus epidermidis

Enterococcus faecalis

Acinetobacter baumannii


#

Antimicrobial resistance of the main bacterial isolates

Staphylococcus aureus resistance

In this study, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus were isolated, of which 22 (62.9%) were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The 22 MRSA strains were sensitive to linezolid, vancomycin, rifampicin, levofloxacin, and gentamicin and were resistant to compound trimethoprim, clindamycin, and erythromycin ([Table 5]). The rate of methicillin resistance that we observed in our hospital was lower than that reported at the national level.

Table 5 Comparison of MRSA resistance profiles of isolates in our hospital with resistance rates reported by the National Anti-Drug Surveillance Network.

Drug name

Our hospital

CARSS

R

S

R

S

Linezolid

0

100

0

100.0

Vancomycin

0

100

0

100.0

Rifampin

0

100

4.3

88.8

Levofloxacin

0

100

6.4

92.3

Gentamicin

0

100

6.8

92.0

Compound trimethoprim

4.5

95.5

9

90.9

Clindamycin

36.4

63.6

63.7

35.4

Erythromycin

36.4

63.6

83.3

15.7


#

Streptococcus agalactiae resistance

Five Streptococcus agalactiae strains were isolated in this study. The strains were sensitive to most antibacterial drugs, with a resistance rate of 100% to clindamycin and 60% to tetracycline.


#

Klebsiella pneumoniae resistance

In total, 67 Klebsiella pneumoniae strains were isolated in this study, and the drug sensitivity results ([Table 6]) showed that the rates of sensitivity to amikacin, ertapenem, and imipenem were all 100%.

Table 6 Resistance profiles of 67 Klebsiella pneumoniae strains.

67 Klebsiella pneumoniae

Our hospital

CARSS

R

S

R

S

Amikacin

0

100

3.2

96.5

Levofloxacin

14.9

85.1

5.6

92.9

Ertapenem

0

100

7.7

92.7

Imipenem

0

100

8.8

89.9

Ciprofloxacin

17.9

82.1

8.7

86.9

Piperacillin/ Tazobactam

7.5

92.5

13.2

83.5

Gentamicin

4.5

95.5

19.7

79.7

Compound trimethoprim

35.8

64.2

32.5

67.4

Cefepime

22.3

77.7

27

66.6

Aztreonam

37.3

62.7

32.4

66.3

Ceftazidime

28.3

71.7

31

65.4

Ceftriaxone

34.3

65.7

45.7

53.5

Ampicillin/Sulbactam

32.8

67.2

46.8

46.7

Cefazolin

64.1

35.9

55.4

33.8


#

Acinetobacter baumannii resistance

Eighteen strains of Acinetobacter baumannii were isolated in this study. The drug sensitivity results were compared with national drug resistance monitoring data ([Table 7]). One hundred percent of the bacterial isolates from our hospital were sensitive to tobramycin, imipenem, and gentamicin.

Table 7 Resistance profiles of 18 Acinetobacter baumannii strains.

18 Acinetobacter baumannii

Our hospital

CARSS

R

S

R

S

Tobramycin

0

100

19.1

79.7

Levofloxacin

5.6

94.4

15

79.3

Ciprofloxacin

5.6

94.4

22.3

77

Imipenem

0

100

24.6

74.7

Gentamicin

0

100

23.5

74.4

Cefepime

12.5

87.5

25.7

72.4

Ampicillin/Sulbactam

16.7

83.3

24.8

72.1

Ceftazidime

22.2

77.8

25.2

69.6


#
#
#
#

Discussion

Neonatal infections, especially the likes of neonatal sepsis, pneumonia, or meningitis, are major diseases that threaten newborn lives. Early diagnosis of these diseases is difficult. Bacterial culture is the “gold standard” for diagnosis. Strain identification and drug sensitivity tests provide a scientific basis for guiding rational drug use and controlling infection [7].

This study shows that, from January 2020 to June 2021, the rate of positive bacterial cultures in the samples taken by the neonatology department of our hospital was 4.35%, which is lower than that reported in the national drug resistance monitoring data. This is most likely because of regional differences. Most of the infections detected in newborns delivered at our hospital were acquired in the intrauterine environment; the second most common cause of nosocomial infections was prolonged hospitalization. In contrast, most of the children and neonates reported by the National Drug Resistance Surveillance Network exhibited community-acquired infections. Furthermore, gram-positive bacteria accounted for 43.1% and gram-negative bacteria for 56.9% of isolates in this study, virtually the same as the 45.5% gram-positive and 54.5% gram-negative rates reported by the national drug resistance monitoring network.

This study conducted a stratified analysis of EOS and LOS in preterm infants and term infants, finding that the number of LOS cases in preterm infants was much greater than the number of cases in other categories, with a P-value of<0.01, indicating a statistically significant difference. A possible explanation for this is that premature infants and low birth weight infants undergo more invasive procedures, such as intravenous catheterization and mechanical respiratory support during medical treatment, are treated for a longer time, and receive more antibiotics, increasing their risk of nosocomial infection. This is consistent with the fact that the rate of late-onset infection is significantly higher than that of early-onset infection in our study. According to expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of neonatal sepsis (version 2019), EOS patients were treated with a broad-spectrum combination of antibiotics before blood culture and other non-specific test results. Ampicillin (or penicillin) and third-generation cephalosporin were used as the first-line antimicrobial combination for gram-positive (G+) and gram-negative (G-) bacteria as early as possible. LOS patients were treated with phenazacillin and nafcillin for staphylococcus epidermidis or vancomycin instead of ampicillin combined with third-generation cephalosporin. The follow-up treatment plan should be adjusted according to the results of the drug susceptibility test, and in principle, priority is given to treatment with antibiotics alone rather than in combination. If the antibiotics selected are not empirically in the range of the drug susceptibility test and the clinical effect is good, they will continue to be used; otherwise, they will be changed to the sensitive antibiotics according to the drug susceptibility test results.

Our study shows that Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) is one of the top four gram-positive bacteria isolated at our hospital. This is consistent with the fact that our hospital is a specialist hospital for obstetrics and gynecology, given that GBS normally resides in the vagina and intestines, and newborns can acquire the infection vertically from the mother. Early-onset GBS infections primarily cause pneumonia, meningitis, and sepsis [8] [9]. Studies [10] [11] have shown that GBS is highly sensitive to penicillin, ampicillin, cephalosporins, and vancomycin, and the drug sensitivity tests that we performed yielded similar results. Therefore, for children with early-onset GBS infection, penicillin is the first choice for treatment; for those with mild or severe allergies to penicillin, cefazolin or clindamycin can be used, respectively; and for those who are resistant to clindamycin, vancomycin should be used. Doctors perform skin sensitivity tests on patients before they are given penicillin drugs to prevent allergic reactions to penicillin. If the test is negative, penicillin is given to the patient; otherwise, it is prohibited for those who are positive. Of the 209 patients in this study, 20 did not undergo the penicillin skin sensitivity test, so the results are unknown. The skin test results of the remaining 189 patients were negative. Among the gram-negative bacteria isolated in this study, 18 strains were Acinetobacter baumannii. This is likely because of the frequent use of mechanical ventilation in neonatal intensive care, which increases the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Acinetobacter baumannii is the most common pathogen responsible for ventilator-associated pneumonia [12] [13].

Two of the top five gram-positive bacteria and gram-negative bacteria reported by the national drug resistance surveillance data, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae, were not identified in this study. This may be related to differences in the study populations because these bacteria tend to circulate in the community and are not often the main cause of bacterial infection in neonatal patients.

In this study, 67 strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae were detected, of which 58 strains were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) strains. Strains can acquire ESBL activity through bacterial plasmids, enabling them to hydrolyze broad-spectrum penicillins, cephalosporins, and monocyclic antibiotics (aztreonam), leading to increased drug resistance [14]. The drug sensitivity results showed a sensitivity rate of 100% to all antimicrobial agents tested, except for amikacin, ertapenem, and imipenem, to which the isolates exhibited varying degrees of resistance.

In summary, newborns are susceptible to a wide range of bacterial infections and complex risk factors. There are differences in bacterial distribution and drug resistance in different regions and age groups. Therefore, understanding the distribution and drug resistance of pathogens in our hospital is greatly significant for guiding the rational selection of antibiotics in clinical practice and reducing neonatal mortality and nosocomial infections.


#
#

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

  • References

  • 1 Chu W, Guan S, Yang K. et al. Analysis of high-risk factors of nosocomial infection in neonatal intensive care unit. Anhui Medicine 2015; 192: 307-308
  • 2 Meng X, Wu A. How to deal with the severe challenges of nosocomial infections of multi-drug resistant bacteria. Chinese Journal of Infection Control 2019; 18: 185-192
  • 3 Yu H, Liu Y. et al. Risk factors for nosocomial infection in the neonatal intensive care unit. Chinese Journal of Infection Control 2017; 16: 233-236
  • 4 Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D. et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000–13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet 2015; 385: 430-440 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61698-6.
  • 5 Li Y, Ma Gefu, Ai Jianghua et al. Distribution and drug resistance analysis of Enterobacteriaceae bacteria in a hospital. Laboratory Medicine and Clinics 2020; 17: 837-840
  • 6 National Anti-Drug Surveillance Network. Research on Bacterial Anti-Drug Surveillance of Chinese Children and Newborn Patients from 2014 to 2017. Chinese Medical Journal 2018; 98: 3279–3287
  • 7 Jia Zhonglan, Bi Fuling, Zhang C Distribution and drug resistance analysis of pathogenic bacteria in neonatal sepsis. Chinese Journal of Hospital Infection 2017; 27: 4
  • 8 Villanueva-Uy ME, Wongsiridej P, Sangtawesin V. et al. The burden of invasive neonatal group B streptococcal (GBS) disease in Thailand and the Philippines. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2015; 46: 728-737
  • 9 Ko DW, Zurynski Y, Gilbert GL. et al. Group B streptococcal disease and genotypes in Australian infants. J Paediatr Child Health 2015; 51: 808-814
  • 10 Verani JR, MeGee L, Schrag SJ. et al. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease- revised guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep 2010; 59 (RR-10) 1-36
  • 11 Wu J, Lin R, Lin J. Drug resistance analysis of 112 cases of Streptococcus agalactiae infection in the genitourinary tract of pregnant women. Journal of Medical Research 2008; 37: 88-89
  • 12 Liu C. Analysis of pathogenic bacteria associated with ventilator-associated pneumonia in children and preventive measures. China Maternal and Child Health Care 2018; 32: 5911-5914
  • 13 He K, Luo Z, Wang C. et al. Etiology and drug resistance analysis of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients in intensive care unit. Journal of Clinical Pulmonology 2017; 13: 68-69
  • 14 Guo H, Zhu G, Lian S. Study on the correlation between multidrug resistance of ESBLs Klebsiella pneumoniae and class I integrons. Chinese Journal of Laboratory Diagnosis 2010; 14: 1097

Correspondence

Jie Wu
Tongji University School of Medicine
Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital
2699 Gaoke West Road
Shanghai, China
200092 Shanghai
China   

Publication History

Received: 23 April 2022

Accepted after revision: 27 April 2022

Article published online:
04 July 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

  • References

  • 1 Chu W, Guan S, Yang K. et al. Analysis of high-risk factors of nosocomial infection in neonatal intensive care unit. Anhui Medicine 2015; 192: 307-308
  • 2 Meng X, Wu A. How to deal with the severe challenges of nosocomial infections of multi-drug resistant bacteria. Chinese Journal of Infection Control 2019; 18: 185-192
  • 3 Yu H, Liu Y. et al. Risk factors for nosocomial infection in the neonatal intensive care unit. Chinese Journal of Infection Control 2017; 16: 233-236
  • 4 Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D. et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000–13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet 2015; 385: 430-440 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61698-6.
  • 5 Li Y, Ma Gefu, Ai Jianghua et al. Distribution and drug resistance analysis of Enterobacteriaceae bacteria in a hospital. Laboratory Medicine and Clinics 2020; 17: 837-840
  • 6 National Anti-Drug Surveillance Network. Research on Bacterial Anti-Drug Surveillance of Chinese Children and Newborn Patients from 2014 to 2017. Chinese Medical Journal 2018; 98: 3279–3287
  • 7 Jia Zhonglan, Bi Fuling, Zhang C Distribution and drug resistance analysis of pathogenic bacteria in neonatal sepsis. Chinese Journal of Hospital Infection 2017; 27: 4
  • 8 Villanueva-Uy ME, Wongsiridej P, Sangtawesin V. et al. The burden of invasive neonatal group B streptococcal (GBS) disease in Thailand and the Philippines. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2015; 46: 728-737
  • 9 Ko DW, Zurynski Y, Gilbert GL. et al. Group B streptococcal disease and genotypes in Australian infants. J Paediatr Child Health 2015; 51: 808-814
  • 10 Verani JR, MeGee L, Schrag SJ. et al. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease- revised guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep 2010; 59 (RR-10) 1-36
  • 11 Wu J, Lin R, Lin J. Drug resistance analysis of 112 cases of Streptococcus agalactiae infection in the genitourinary tract of pregnant women. Journal of Medical Research 2008; 37: 88-89
  • 12 Liu C. Analysis of pathogenic bacteria associated with ventilator-associated pneumonia in children and preventive measures. China Maternal and Child Health Care 2018; 32: 5911-5914
  • 13 He K, Luo Z, Wang C. et al. Etiology and drug resistance analysis of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients in intensive care unit. Journal of Clinical Pulmonology 2017; 13: 68-69
  • 14 Guo H, Zhu G, Lian S. Study on the correlation between multidrug resistance of ESBLs Klebsiella pneumoniae and class I integrons. Chinese Journal of Laboratory Diagnosis 2010; 14: 1097