Z Orthop Unfall 2024; 162(02): 179-184
DOI: 10.1055/a-1918-2383
Originalarbeit

The Reliability of Preoperative Total Knee Arthroplasty Planning -a Comparison of Two Calibration Markers

Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: deutsch | English
1   Department for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Koln, Deutschland (Ringgold ID: RIN61059)
,
Johannes Oppermann
1   Department for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Koln, Deutschland (Ringgold ID: RIN61059)
,
Christian Karl Spies
2   Handchirurgie, Vulpius Klinik, Bad Rappenau, Deutschland
,
Christian Paul
3   Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Evangelische Kliniken Johanniter- und Waldkrankenhaus Bonn gGmbH, Bonn, Deutschland (Ringgold ID: RIN62461)
,
Peer Eysel
1   Department for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Koln, Deutschland (Ringgold ID: RIN61059)
,
Nadine Ott
1   Department for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Koln, Deutschland (Ringgold ID: RIN61059)
› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Background Preoperative templating is the gold standard in planning elective total knee arthroplasty. This retrospective study analyses preoperative templating by using two different calibration devices. Methods Preoperative radiographic templating with TraumaCad using two different calibration devices was performed in 231 patients. Results Overall, 60.6% (n = 140) did not match and 39.4% (n = 91) matched for tibial as well as femoral size. Group I showed significantly more combined matches as well as for just the size of the femoral component. Conclusions In this study, the KingMark calibration should be preferred to standardised ball markers.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 16. Mai 2022

Angenommen nach Revision: 01. August 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
04. Oktober 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany