Physical Characteristics of von Willebrand Factor Binding with Platelet Glycoprotein Ibɑ Mutants at Residue 233 Causing Various Biological Functions

Abstract

Glycoprotein (GP: HIS¹-PRO²⁶⁵) Ibɑ is a receptor protein expressed on the surface of the platelet. Its N-terminus domain binds with the A1 domain (ASP¹²⁶⁹-PRO¹⁴⁷²) of its ligand protein von Willebrand factor (VWF) and plays a unique role in platelet adhesion under blood flow conditions. Single amino acid substitutions at residue 233 from glycine (G) to alanine (A), aspartic acid (D), or valine (V) are known to cause biochemically distinct functional alterations known as equal, loss, and gain of function, respectively. However, the underlying physical characteristics of VWF binding with GPIbɑ in wild-type and the three mutants exerting different biological functions are unclear. Here, we aimed to test the hypothesis: biological characteristics of macromolecules are influenced by small changes in physical parameters. The position coordinates and velocity vectors of all atoms and water molecules constructing the wild-type and the three mutants of GPIbɑ (G233A, G233D, and G233V) bound with VWF were calculated every 2 × 10⁻¹⁵ seconds using the CHARMM (Chemistry at Harvard Macromolecular Mechanics) force field for 9 × 10⁻¹⁰ seconds. Six salt bridges were detected for longer than 50% of the calculation period for the wild-type model generating noncovalent binding energy of −1096 ± 137.6 kcal/mol. In contrast, only four pairs of salt bridges were observed in G233D mutant with noncovalent binding energy of −865 ± 139 kcal/mol. For G233A and G233V, there were six and five pairs of salt bridges generating −929.8 ± 88.5 and −989.9 ± 94.0 kcal/mol of noncovalent binding energy, respectively. Our molecular dynamic simulation showing a lower probability of salt bridge formation with less noncovalent binding energy in VWF binding with the biologically loss of function G233D mutant of GPIbɑ as compared with wild-type, equal function, and gain of function mutant suggests that biological functions of macromolecules such as GPIbɑ are influenced by their small changes in physical characteristics.

 

MissingLinkText

Keywords

platelet - von Willebrand factor - salt bridge - molecular dynamic

Introduction

Platelet adhesion and cohesion under blood flow conditions are mediated exclusively by the A1 domain of von Willebrand factor (VWF) located between the D3 and the A2 domain (residues ASP¹²⁶⁹- PRO¹⁴⁷²,[1] [2] 23.87 kDa)[3] binding with glycoprotein (GP) Ibɑ, a receptor protein expressed on the surface of platelet, regardless of the activation status of the platelets.[4] [5] [6] [7] Specific binding characteristics of GPIbɑ binding with VWF include transient binding without stabilization in the absence of specific modulators such as ristocetin that was originally developed as antibiotics[8] but demonstrated to induce VWF-mediated platelet aggregation[9] or botrocetin which was purified from snake venom to induce VWF-mediated platelet aggregations.[10] [11] [12] [13] Transient platelet adhesion mediated by VWF binding with platelet GPIbɑ could be detected under blood flow conditions,[4] but the binding is not stable without the contribution of another VWF/fibrinogen receptor of GPIIb/IIIa alternatively named as integrin ɑ_IIbβ₃, the function of which is activation dependent[14] on the absence of ristocetin or botrocetin.[15] Transient adhesion and cohesion of platelet under high shear flow condition plays crucial roles in both thrombus formation and haemostasis.[5] [16] Accordingly, the bleeding risk increases in conditions where either the quantity or quality of platelet GPIbɑ and VWF are reduced.

The von Willebrand diseases (VWDs) were primarily characterized as bleeding disorders induced by quantitative or qualitative abnormality of VWF.[17] Since the major functions of A1 domain of VWF in hemostasis and thrombus formation are mediated by its binding with platelet GPIbɑ,[4] [5] [18] [19] the functional abnormality in GPIbɑ also causes similar conditions: namely platelet type VWD.[20] [21] Mutations in platelet GPIbɑ cause VWD either by reducing (loss of function) or enhancing (gain of function) its abilities to bind with VWF.[20] [22] [23] While the loss of function mutant(s) of GPIbɑ causes VWD because the GPIbɑ could not bind with VWF, the gain of function mutant(s) of GPIbɑ causes VWD due to enhanced consumption of larger multimers of VWF by stabilizing GPIbɑ binding with VWF even in the absence of ristocetin.[24] Previous biological and crystallographic analysis revealed the importance of C-terminal disulfide loop region (Cys209-Cys248) in GPIbɑ for its binding with VWF.[25] [26] [27] Indeed, both loss of and gain of function of GPIbɑ could be achieved by a single amino acid substitution at G233 in GPIbɑ.[23] [28] [29] The biological functions of macromolecules such as VWF binding with GPIbɑ may be influenced by a small change in their physical characteristics.[30] Previous biological experiments have shown that GPIbɑ with mutation at residue 233 have a distinct biological phenotype, although the theoretical mechanism is unknown.[23] This makes the G233 mutants as a suitable target for analysis.

The molecular dynamic (MD) simulation is a relatively novel technic for biology. The strength of MD simulation is the ability to clarify the quantitative physical and dynamic characteristics of protein–protein interactions including the binding of GPIbɑ to VWF. Indeed, the binding energy equivalent potential of mean forces (PMFs) and binding force in GPIbɑ binding with VWF were calculated by MD simulation.[31] Interlandi et al revealed the importance of salt bridge formation between amino acids located at N-terminal linker in VWF and corresponding N-terminus region in GPIbɑ by MD simulation.[32] Previous publications revealed that single amino-acid mutation at residue 233 located in the β-switch in GPIbɑ causes biological loss and gain of function for binding with VWF at various binding energies.[23] [31] However, the salt bridge formation and noncovalent binding energy between VWF and GPIbɑ mutants with various biological functions are still to be elucidated. A previous report described that the dissociation energy of GPIbɑ with loss-of-function mutant from VWF is only slightly lower compared with wild-type. Thus, we hypothesized that the biological functions of macromolecules of VWF and GPIbɑ with various G233 mutants are driven by small changes in their physical characteristics including salt-bridge formation and attempted to test this hypothesis.

 

MissingLinkText

Methods

Molecular Dynamic Simulation

Initial Structure of Glycoprotein Ibɑ Binding with von Willebrand factor

The position coordinates and velocity vectors of all the atoms constructing the A1 domain of VWF (VWF: residues ASP(D):1269-PRO(P):1466) binding with the N-terminal domain of platelet GPIbɑ (GPIbɑ: residues HIS(H):1-PRO(P):265) were solved by MD simulation calculation as previously published.[2] [31] The energetically most stable structure with a mass center distance between GPIbɑ and VWF of 27.3 Å was selected as the initial structure of wild-type GPIbɑ bound with VWF. The amino acid G233 at GPIbɑ in this structure was substituted by A, D, and V to provide initial binding structures with VWF.

 

MissingLinkText

Molecular Dynamic Simulation Calculation

Water molecules modeled as Chemistry at Harvard Macromolecular Mechanics (CHARMM) transferable intermolecular potential with three interaction sites were placed around the molecules constructing VWF bound with wild-type and G233A, G233D, and G233V mutant GPIbɑ.[33] Then, Newton's second law known as F (force) = M (mass) × A (acceleration) was solved for all atoms constructing GPIbɑ, VWF, and water molecules around them with multidimensional calculations using Nanoscale Molecular Dynamics (NAMD) software as previously published.[2] [31] The effects of any modulators such as ristocetin were not considered. The calculation was conducted on the computers equipped with four sets of NVIDIA Tesla V100 GPU (HPC5000-XSLGPU4TS, HPC systems Inc., Tokyo, Japan). The CHARMM-36 was used as a governing force field.[34] [35] The position coordinates and velocity vectors of each atom and water molecule were calculated in each 2.0 femtosecond (10⁻¹⁵ s). The cut-off length of 12 Å was set as the maximum distance allowing direct interactions of atoms as previously published.[2] Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD) version 1.9.3 was used for visualization of the results such as the snap-shot of the three-dimensional structure of VWF binding with GPIbɑ from the position coordinates of atoms constructing VWF and GPIbɑ.[2] [31]

 

MissingLinkText

Root Mean Square Deviations

In each calculated structure, the average distances between various atoms excluding water molecules were calculated as the root mean square deviations (RMSDs). The RMSDs were calculated every 10 ns from the beginning to the end of the calculation.

 

MissingLinkText

 

MissingLinkText

Noncovalent Binding Energy

The noncovalent binding energies between amino acids constructing GPIbɑ and VWF were calculated with VMD and NAMD energy plugin (version 1.4) as described previously.[30] [36] [37] [38] The noncovalent binding energy was expressed as kilocalorie per mole.

 

MissingLinkText

Salt Bridge Formation

Anionic carboxylate of either aspartic acid (N) or glutamic acid (E) is known to form salt bridges with cationic ammonium (RNH³⁺) of lysine (K) or the guanidinium (RNHC(NH₂)²⁺) of arginine (R).[39] Since the salt bridges were formed between positively charged portions and negatively charged ones,[40] they formed bridges when the distance between these amino acids became less than 4 Å or closer.[41] Within all calculated structures, the presence of salt bridges was calculated by the VMD plug-in software Salt Bridges Plugin (Version 1.1) as previously published.[42] [43] The percentage of the time when the pairs of amino acids form salt bridges within the calculation period was measured.

 

MissingLinkText

 

MissingLinkText

Statistical Analysis

The calculated results of RMSDs and noncovalent binding energy in each condition are shown as mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise described. The values in wild-type and each of G233A, G233D, and G233V mutant were compared by using two-tailed Student's t-tests. p-Values less than 0.05 were considered to denote statistical significance.

 

MissingLinkText

Results

Initial Structure and Root Mean Square Deviations

Panel A in [Fig. 1] shows the position of G233 in the energetically stable structure of wild-type GPIbɑ bound to VWF. Each picture in panel B shows the initial positions of amino acid at 233 in GPIbɑ in wild-type and the three mutants. The initial binding structure of GPIbɑ and VWF were similar across wild-type and all the mutants.

Fig. 1 Initial structure of VWF and GPIbɑ in wild-type and the three mutants at G233. Panel A shows the position of G233 in N-terminus domain of GPIbɑ (blue) binding with A1 domain of VWF (red). The initial positions of amino acid at 233 in wild-type (G) and the three mutants of G233A, G233V, and G233D are shown in panel B. The negatively charged carboxylate are shown in red, while the positively charged ammonium and guanidinium are shown in blue.

[Fig. 2] shows the time-dependent changes in RMSDs of atoms constructing GPIbɑ and VWF excluding water molecules in wild-type and the three mutants. RMSDs stabilized with a fluctuation of less than 3 Å in all conditions within 600 ns of calculation.

Fig. 2 Time-dependent changes in the root mean square deviations (RMSDs) of atoms constructing VWF and GPIbɑ. The RMSDs of atoms constructing VWF and GPIbɑ, excluding water molecules were calculated every 10 ns are shown in wild-type (left upper panel), G233A (right upper panel), G233V (left lower panel), and G233D (right lower panel).

 

MissingLinkText

Noncovalent Binding Energy between Glycoprotein Ibɑ and von Willebrand factor

Noncovalent binging energy generated between wild-type GPIbɑ and VWF was −1096.7 ± 137.6 kcal/mol ([Fig. 3], [Table 1]). The noncovalent binding energy generated between G233A and G233V mutant GPIbɑ with VWF were −929.8 ± 88.5 kcal/mol and −989.9 ± 94.0 kcal/mol, respectively. Both were 15.3 and 9.7% lower than that generated in wild-type GPIbɑ binding with VWF, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). For G233D mutant, the noncovalent binding energy generated between GPIbɑ and VWF was −865.0 ± 139.1 kcal/mol which is 21.1% lower than the value in wild-type GPIbɑ binding with VWF (p < 0.001). Time-dependent changes in noncovalent binding energy in all conditions did not differ substantially ([Supplemental Fig. S1]).

Fig. 3 Noncovalent binding energy generated between VWF and wild type, G233A, G233V, and G233D mutant of GPIbɑ. The means and standard deviations of noncovalent binding energy generated between VWF and GPIbɑ at wild-type (dark purple), G233A (light blue), G233V (gray), and G233D (orange) are shown in kcal/mol.

Table 1 Noncovalent binding energy generated between VWF and GPIbɑ in wild-type and three of the mutants

Mutation	Noncovalent binding energy [kcal/mol]			p-Value
Wild-type	−1096.0	±	137.6	−
G233A	−929.8	±	88.5	<0.001
G233V	−989.9	±	94.0	<0.001
G233D	−865.0	±	139.1	<0.001

 

MissingLinkText

Salt Bridge Formation between Amino Acids in Glycoprotein Ibɑ and von Willebrand factor

Each panel of [Fig. 4] shows the percentages of time periods when each pair of salt bridge was formed during the calculation period. [Fig. 5] shows the results with a heat map. Six pairs of salt bridges (D63-R571, D83-K569, D106-K569, K237-D570, E14-R611, and E128-K608) were formed for more than 50% of the calculation period in wild-type GPIbɑ binding with VWF. The distributions of time periods where various sets of salt bridges formed between each set of amino acids differ substantially among VWF binding with wild-type and the three G233 mutants of GPIbɑ as shown in [Figs. 4] and [5]. The numbers of salt bridges formed for more than 50% of the time period in G233A-GPIbɑ with VWF, G233V-GPIbɑ with VWF, and G233D-GPIbɑ with VWF were 6, 5, and 4, respectively. In a sensitivity analysis, the number of salt bridges formed was 8 in wild-type GPIbɑ binding with VWF when the cut-off value was set as 40% as shown in [Fig. 5]. In this condition, number of salt bridges formed more than 40% of calculating period in VWF binding with G233A, V, and D mutants were 6, 7, and 5, respectively. Dynamic structural fluctuation around these salts bridge during the calculation period in each case is shown in [Supplemental Movies S1] [S2] [S3] to [S4].

Fig. 4 Probability of the presence of salt bridges formed between VWF and GPIba. The probabilities of salt bridge formation for the pairs of amino acids in GPIbɑ-VWF shown at the bottom of each panel are shown in red bar. The upper left panel shows the results of VWF binding with wild-type GPIbɑ. The upper right, lower left, and lower right panel show the results of VWF binding with G233A, G233V, and G233D mutants of GPIbɑ, respectively. Thin black line in each panel shows the threshold of 50%.

Fig. 5 Probability of the presence of salt bridges formed between VWF and GPIbɑ. The probabilities of the presence of each pair of amino acid forming salt bridge are shown in the heat map. The pair of salt bridge formation more than 50% of calculation periods were shown with the color including red. The number of salt bridge formed more than 50% is apparently higher in wild-type and G233V mutant with VWF. The number of salt bridges is substantially lower in G233D mutant.

Supplemental Movie S1 Results of MD calculations of VWF bound with wild-type GPIbɑ. The snap shots of VWF (red) binding with GPIbɑ (blue) calculated as the position coordinates in each 10 ns were reconstructed as the 90 frames movie. The amino acids forming salt bridges for more than 50 were shown as the Corey–Pauling–Koltun model (red in VWF and blue in GPIbɑ).

Supplemental Movie S2 Results of MD calculations of VWF bound with G233A GPIbɑ. The snap shots of VWF (red) binding with GPIbɑ (blue) calculated as the position coordinates in each 10 ns were reconstructed as the 90 frames movie. The amino acids forming salt bridges for more than 50 were shown as the Corey–Pauling–Koltun model (red in VWF and blue in GPIba).

Supplemental Movie S3 Results of MD calculations of VWF bound with G233V GPIbɑ. The snap shots of VWF (red) binding with GPIbɑ (blue) calculated as the position coordinates in each 10 ns were reconstructed as the 90 frames movie. The amino acids forming salt bridges for more than 50 were shown as the Corey–Pauling–Koltun model (red in VWF and blue in GPIbɑ).

Supplemental Movie S4 Results of MD calculations of VWF bound with G233D GPIba. The snap shots of VWF (red) binding with GPIba (blue) calculated as the position coordinates in each 10 ns were reconstructed as the 90 frames movie. The amino acids forming salt bridges for more than 50 were shown as the Corey–Pauling–Koltun model (red in VWF and blue in GPIbɑ).

 

MissingLinkText

 

MissingLinkText

Discussion

Our MD simulation showed that the specific physical characteristics of the probability of salt bridge formation were lower in VWF binding to G233D mutant of GPIbɑ generating less noncovalent binding energy as compared with the binding to GPIbɑ in wild-type, G233A, and G233V mutants. So far, the quantitative relationships between the physical parameters of molecules such as noncovalent binding energy between VWF and GPIbɑ, and their biological functions are still to be clarified. Our finding supporting lower probabilities of salt bridge formation with less noncovalent binding energy in biological loss of function mutation in G233D is in agreement with the hypothesis that the biological functions of macromolecules could be influenced by small changes in their physiological characteristics.[44] Indeed, the loss of VWF binding function in G233D mutant in GPIbɑ was associated with only 21.1% reductions in noncovalent binding energy with only slightly low probabilities of salt bridge formation between them.

One important and specific characteristic of VWF binding with GPIbɑ is that their binding could be detected only under shear flow conditions or in the presence of specific modulators of ristocetin or botrocetin unless with a specific gain of function mutants.[4] [15] [18] [45] [46] Our MD simulation was conducted in the absence of any modulators. Thus, our results represent the conditions of transient VWF binding with GPIbɑ under shear flow conditions. Our results suggest that the loss of VWF binding function in G233D GPIbɑ under shear flow condition[23] is caused by a small change in the probabilities of salt bridge formation and slightly lower noncovalent binding energy between GPIbɑ and VWF.

Despite numerous attempts,[15] [19] [47] [48] [49] an assay system accurately quantifying physical parameters of VWF binding with GPIbɑ under shear flow conditions has not been established. MD simulation enabled to quantify the physical parameters of VWF binding with GPIbɑ in wild-type and three G233 mutants. The quantitative physical parameters obtained by our MD simulation such as noncovalent binding energy in VWF and GPIbɑ provide a clue to understanding the biological function of GPIbɑ and VWF in the absence of specific modulators where the bindings are transient.

The lowest numbers of salt bridge formations and lowest noncovalent binding energy in VWF binding with the loss of function G233D mutant of GPIbɑ as compared with wild-type, equal of function (G233A), and gain of function mutant (G233V) may suggest both the salt bridges and noncovalent binding energy did not reach the threshold necessary to keep the bond between the two molecules strong enough to resist against the fluid shear force. Our results are in agreement with the idea that biological characteristics of protein–protein interaction such as binding depend on the threshold of the probabilities in salt bridge formation and the noncovalent binding energy in them. Yet, the quantitative relationship between physical characteristics of protein bonds and their biological function is still to be elucidated.

Phenotype of the “loss of function” mutants results in a higher risk of bleeding. It is interesting that the bleeding risks were also increased in the “gain of function” mutants. Higher bleeding risk in “gain of function” mutants was explained by the consumption of larger multimers of VWF by their binding with platelets.[22] [50] Our MD calculation did not provide a direct clue to explain the behavior of the “gain of function mutant” of G233V by the number of salt bridges or noncovalent binding energy. It is of note that our MD calculation was started from the structure of VWF bound with GPIbɑ in an energetically stable manner. The structural characteristic of VWF bound with GPIbɑ may differ substantially under the condition where external forces generated by blood flow to the platelet are applied to these molecules.[51] Moreover, the focus of our simulation calculations is to quantify the physical parameters of molecules at nanometer scale (10⁻⁹ meter) from the physical behaviors of atomic at Å scale (10⁻¹⁰ meter). The clinical events of bleeding occur in organ at a millimeter scale (10⁻³ meter). Our MD simulation results are helpful to understand the binding functions of VWF and GPIbɑ at the molecule level but hard to apply directly to dissect the mechanism of the increased risk of bleeding in G233 mutants.

MD calculations provide precise dynamic structures and their physical parameters of target protein even in the presence of interaction with other proteins by calculation with the fundamental law of simple Newton's equation. There is a potential methodological limitation to obtain physical parameters of target molecules from the sum of Newton's equation because the physical movements of atoms sharing electrical cloud should follow the probability-dependent quantum mechanics. In our calculations, quantum mechanics were coarse grained into molecular mechanics by using the CHARMM force field.[52] [53] Despite the fact that the validity of CHARMM force field has been confirmed in various macromolecules,[52] [54] coarse graining quantum mechanics into molecular mechanics may induce errors. So far, the biochemical characteristics of VWF binding with GPIbɑ predicted by MD with CHARMM force field[2] were in agreements with the results from other biochemical experiments in a qualitative manner.[55] [56] The lower numbers of salt bridges and noncovalent binding energy in VWF binding with G233D mutant of GPIbɑ are in agreements with qualitative biological function of G233D mutant. Our findings agree with the hypothesis that the biological functions of macromolecules could be influenced by small changes in their physiological parameters. The quantitative relationships between the calculated physical parameters of target protein interactions and their biological function are still to be elucidated.

In conclusion, our results showing lower probability of salt bridge formation with less noncovalent binding energy in loss of function mutant of G233D GPIbɑ as compared with wild-type, G233A, and G233V in regard to the binding with VWF support the notion that the biological functions of macromolecules could be influenced by only small changes in their physiological parameters. Further investigations are necessary to dissect the mechanism of the gain of function achieve by G233V mutation.

 

MissingLinkText

 

MissingLinkText

Conflict of Interests

The author S.G. acknowledged receiving a consultation fee from Anthos Therapeutics, and Janssen Pharmaceutical, and also personal fee from Duke University as a member of the Steering Committee for EMPACT-MI trial. The author S.G. and M.N. have nothing to disclose.

• References

• 1 Deng W, Wang Y, Druzak SA. et al. A discontinuous autoinhibitory module masks the A1 domain of von Willebrand factor. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15 (09) 1867-1877
• 2 Shiozaki S, Takagi S, Goto S. Prediction of molecular interaction between platelet glycoprotein Ibα and von Willebrand factor using molecular dynamics simulations. J Atheroscler Thromb 2016; 23 (04) 455-464
• 3 Emsley J, Cruz M, Handin R, Liddington R. Crystal structure of the von Willebrand Factor A1 domain and implications for the binding of platelet glycoprotein Ib. J Biol Chem 1998; 273 (17) 10396-10401
• 4 Savage B, Saldívar E, Ruggeri ZM. Initiation of platelet adhesion by arrest onto fibrinogen or translocation on von Willebrand factor. Cell 1996; 84 (02) 289-297
• 5 Goto S, Ikeda Y, Saldívar E, Ruggeri ZM. Distinct mechanisms of platelet aggregation as a consequence of different shearing flow conditions. J Clin Invest 1998; 101 (02) 479-486
• 6 Quach ME, Li R. Structure-function of platelet glycoprotein Ib-IX. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18 (12) 3131-3141
• 7 Kulkarni S, Dopheide SM, Yap CL. et al. A revised model of platelet aggregation. J Clin Invest 2000; 105 (06) 783-791
• 8 Jordan D. Ristocetin. In Mechanism of Action. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1967: 84-89
• 9 Howard MA, Firkin BG. Ristocetin—a new tool in the investigation of platelet aggregation. Thromb Diath Haemorrh 1971; 26 (02) 362-369
• 10 Andrews RK, Booth WJ, Gorman JJ, Castaldi PA, Berndt MC. Purification of botrocetin from Bothrops jararaca venom. Analysis of the botrocetin-mediated interaction between von Willebrand factor and the human platelet membrane glycoprotein Ib-IX complex. Biochemistry 1989; 28 (21) 8317-8326
• 11 Coller BS, Peerschke EI, Scudder LE, Sullivan CA. Studies with a murine monoclonal antibody that abolishes ristocetin-induced binding of von Willebrand factor to platelets: additional evidence in support of GPIb as a platelet receptor for von Willebrand factor. Blood 1983; 61 (01) 99-110
• 12 Read MS, Smith SV, Lamb MA, Brinkhous KM. Role of botrocetin in platelet agglutination: formation of an activated complex of botrocetin and von Willebrand factor. Blood 1989; 74 (03) 1031-1035
• 13 Sen U, Vasudevan S, Subbarao G. et al. Crystal structure of the von Willebrand factor modulator botrocetin. Biochemistry 2001; 40 (02) 345-352
• 14 Calvete JJ. Platelet integrin GPIIb/IIIa: structure-function correlations. An update and lessons from other integrins. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1999; 222 (01) 29-38
• 15 Goto S, Salomon DR, Ikeda Y, Ruggeri ZM. Characterization of the unique mechanism mediating the shear-dependent binding of soluble von Willebrand factor to platelets. J Biol Chem 1995; 270 (40) 23352-23361
• 16 Goto S. Role of von Willebrand factor for the onset of arterial thrombosis. Clin Lab 2001; 47 (7-8): 327-334
• 17 Sadler JE, Budde U, Eikenboom JC. et al; Working Party on von Willebrand Disease Classification. Update on the pathophysiology and classification of von Willebrand disease: a report of the Subcommittee on von Willebrand Factor. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4 (10) 2103-2114
• 18 Savage B, Almus-Jacobs F, Ruggeri ZM. Specific synergy of multiple substrate-receptor interactions in platelet thrombus formation under flow. Cell 1998; 94 (05) 657-666
• 19 Ikeda Y, Handa M, Kawano K. et al. The role of von Willebrand factor and fibrinogen in platelet aggregation under varying shear stress. J Clin Invest 1991; 87 (04) 1234-1240
• 20 Othman M, Kaur H, Emsley J. Platelet-type von Willebrand disease: new insights into the molecular pathophysiology of a unique platelet defect. Semin Thromb Hemost 2013; 39 (06) 663-673
• 21 Miller JL, Castella A. Platelet-type von Willebrand's disease: characterization of a new bleeding disorder. Blood 1982; 60 (03) 790-794
• 22 Sadler JE. For the Subcommittee on von Willebrand Factor of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. A revised classification of von Willebrand disease. Thromb Haemost 1994; 71 (04) 520-525
• 23 Matsubara Y, Murata M, Sugita K, Ikeda Y. Identification of a novel point mutation in platelet glycoprotein Ibalpha, Gly to Ser at residue 233, in a Japanese family with platelet-type von Willebrand disease. J Thromb Haemost 2003; 1 (10) 2198-2205
• 24 Hulstein JJJ, de Groot PG, Silence K, Veyradier A, Fijnheer R, Lenting PJ. A novel nanobody that detects the gain-of-function phenotype of von Willebrand factor in ADAMTS13 deficiency and von Willebrand disease type 2B. Blood 2005; 106 (09) 3035-3042
• 25 Dong J, Schade AJ, Romo GM. et al. Novel gain-of-function mutations of platelet glycoprotein IBalpha by valine mutagenesis in the Cys209-Cys248 disulfide loop. Functional analysis under statis and dynamic conditions. J Biol Chem 2000; 275 (36) 27663-27670
• 26 Tait AS, Cranmer SL, Jackson SP, Dawes IW, Chong BH. Phenotype changes resulting in high-affinity binding of von Willebrand factor to recombinant glycoprotein Ib-IX: analysis of the platelet-type von Willebrand disease mutations. Blood 2001; 98 (06) 1812-1818
• 27 Huizinga EG, Tsuji S, Romijn RA. et al. Structures of glycoprotein Ibalpha and its complex with von Willebrand factor A1 domain. Science 2002; 297 (5584): 1176-1179
• 28 Miller JL, Cunningham D, Lyle VA, Finch CN. Mutation in the gene encoding the alpha chain of platelet glycoprotein Ib in platelet-type von Willebrand disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991; 88 (11) 4761-4765
• 29 Russell SD, Roth GJ. Pseudo-von Willebrand disease: a mutation in the platelet glycoprotein Ib alpha gene associated with a hyperactive surface receptor. Blood 1993; 81 (07) 1787-1791
• 30 Lin J, Seeman NC, Vaidehi N. Molecular-dynamics simulations of insertion of chemically modified DNA nanostructures into a water-chloroform interface. Biophys J 2008; 95 (03) 1099-1107
• 31 Goto S, Oka H, Ayabe K. et al. Prediction of binding characteristics between von Willebrand factor and platelet glycoprotein Ibα with various mutations by molecular dynamic simulation. Thromb Res 2019; 184: 129-135
• 32 Interlandi G, Yakovenko O, Tu A-Y. et al. Specific electrostatic interactions between charged amino acid residues regulate binding of von Willebrand factor to blood platelets. J Biol Chem 2017; 292 (45) 18608-18617
• 33 Boonstra S, Onck PR, Giessen Ev. CHARMM TIP3P water model suppresses peptide folding by solvating the unfolded state. J Phys Chem B 2016; 120 (15) 3692-3698
• 34 Wang L, O'Mara ML. Effect of the force field on molecular dynamics simulations of the multidrug efflux protein P-glycoprotein. J Chem Theory Comput 2021; 17 (10) 6491-6508
• 35 Janowski PA, Liu C, Deckman J, Case DA. Molecular dynamics simulation of triclinic lysozyme in a crystal lattice. Protein Sci 2016; 25 (01) 87-102
• 36 Cerný J, Hobza P. Non-covalent interactions in biomacromolecules. Phys Chem Phys 2007; 9 (39) 5291-5303
• 37 Eskici G, Axelsen PH. Amyloid beta peptide folding in reverse micelles. J Am Chem Soc 2017; 139 (28) 9566-9575
• 38 Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 1996; 14 (01) 33-38 , 27–28
• 39 Kakiuchi T. Salt bridge in electroanalytical chemistry: past, present, and future. J Solid State Electrochem 2011; 15: 1661-1671
• 40 Bosshard HR, Marti DN, Jelesarov I. Protein stabilization by salt bridges: concepts, experimental approaches and clarification of some misunderstandings. J Mol Recognit 2004; 17 (01) 1-16
• 41 Kumar S, Nussinov R. Close-range electrostatic interactions in proteins. ChemBioChem 2002; 3 (07) 604-617
• 42 Ahmed MC, Papaleo E, Lindorff-Larsen K. How well do force fields capture the strength of salt bridges in proteins?. PeerJ 2018; 6: e4967
• 43 Interlandi G, Thomas W. The catch bond mechanism between von Willebrand factor and platelet surface receptors investigated by molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 2010; 78 (11) 2506-2522
• 44 Krissinel E, Henrick K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J Mol Biol 2007; 372 (03) 774-797
• 45 Dong J-F, Berndt MC, Schade A, McIntire LV, Andrews RK, López JA. Ristocetin-dependent, but not botrocetin-dependent, binding of von Willebrand factor to the platelet glycoprotein Ib-IX-V complex correlates with shear-dependent interactions. Blood 2001; 97 (01) 162-168
• 46 Hillery CA, Mancuso DJ, Evan Sadler J. et al. Type 2M von Willebrand disease: F606I and I662F mutations in the glycoprotein Ib binding domain selectively impair ristocetin- but not botrocetin-mediated binding of von Willebrand factor to platelets. Blood 1998; 91 (05) 1572-1581
• 47 Moake JL, Turner NA, Stathopoulos NA, Nolasco L, Hellums JD. Shear-induced platelet aggregation can be mediated by vWF released from platelets, as well as by exogenous large or unusually large vWF multimers, requires adenosine diphosphate, and is resistant to aspirin. Blood 1988; 71 (05) 1366-1374
• 48 Goto S, Sakai H, Goto M. et al. Enhanced shear-induced platelet aggregation in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1999; 99 (05) 608-613
• 49 Goto S, Tamura N, Eto K, Ikeda Y, Handa S. Functional significance of adenosine 5′-diphosphate receptor (P2Y(12)) in platelet activation initiated by binding of von Willebrand factor to platelet GP Ibalpha induced by conditions of high shear rate. Circulation 2002; 105 (21) 2531-2536f
• 50 Othman M. Platelet-type Von Willebrand disease: three decades in the life of a rare bleeding disorder. Blood Rev 2011; 25 (04) 147-153
• 51 Tamura N, Shimizu K, Shiozaki S. et al. Important regulatory roles of erythrocytes in platelet adhesion to the von Willebrand factor on the wall under blood flow conditions. Thromb Haemost 2022; 122 (06) 974-983
• 52 Schmidt JM, Brueschweiler R, Ernst RR. et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of the proline conformational equilibrium and dynamics in antamanide using the CHARMM force field. J Am Chem Soc 1993; 115: 8747-8756
• 53 Lagant P, Nolde D, Stote R. et al. Increasing normal modes analysis accuracy: The SPASIBA spectroscopic force field introduced into the CHARMM program. J Phys Chem A 2004; 108: 4019-4029
• 54 Brooks BR, Brooks III CL, Mackerell Jr AD. et al. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 2009; 30 (10) 1545-1614
• 55 Tobimatsu H, Nishibuchi Y, Sudo R, Goto S, Tanishita K. Adhesive forces between A1 domain of von Willebrand factor and N-terminus domain of glycoprotein Ibα measured by atomic force microscopy. J Atheroscler Thromb 2015; 22 (10) 1091-1099
• 56 Kim J, Zhang CZ, Zhang X, Springer TA. A mechanically stabilized receptor-ligand flex-bond important in the vasculature. Nature 2010; 466 (7309): 992-995

Publication History

Received: 20 May 2022

Accepted: 05 August 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
07 September 2022

Article published online:
07 December 2022