Download PDF
Aktuelle Urol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2063-3144
Review

Clinical and pathological risk factors for tumour recurrence and upstaging in second TURBT for patients with NMIBC: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Klinische und pathologische Risikofaktoren für Tumorrezidive und Upstaging in der zweiten TURBT für Patienten mit NMIBC: Eine systematische Überprüfung und Metaanalyse
Yavuz Guler 
1   Department of Urology, TC Istanbul Rumeli University, Istanbul, Turkey (Ringgold ID: RIN448245)
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ziel Offenlegung signifikanter Risikofaktoren durch Identifizierung gepoolter Effektschätzungsstatistiken in einer systemischen Überprüfung und Metaanalyse klinischer und pathologischer Risikofaktoren, die ein Tumorrezidiv und ein Upstaging auf eine zweite TURBT bei Patienten mit hochgradigem NMIBC vorhersagen.

Material-Methode Alle Datenquellen wurden umfassend bis Oktober 2022 untersucht. Die Daten wurden aus den relevanten Studien extrahiert und mit der Software RevMan analysiert. In einem inversen Varianzmodell mit zufälligen und festen Effekten werden Odds Ratio (OR)-Werte mit 95%-Konfidenzintervallen [95%-KI] angegeben.

Ergebnisse Der Review umfasste insgesamt 18 Studien und 4548 Patienten. Gemäß den gepoolten Effektschätzern waren Carcinoma in situ (CIS), Tumorgrad, Multiplizität und Chirurgenfaktoren signifikante Risikofaktoren. Die gepoolten Effektschätzungen für das Tumorstadium und die Tumormorphologie waren sehr nahe an der Signifikanz. Für CIS, Grad, Multiplizität und Chirurgenfaktor, OR, IVR oder IVF [95%-KI] waren die p- und I2-Werte 1,8 [1,1, 3,0], 0,03, 75%; 2 [1,1, 3,4], 0,02, 53%; 1,3 [1,2, 1,6], <0,01, 40%; und 2 [1,4, 3], <0,01, 66%.

Schlussfolgerungen Als Ergebnis der ersten TURBT; Eine zweite TURBT sollte in den 2–6 Wochen der postoperativen Phase für Patienten mit hochgradigem, begleitendem CIS, multipler, solider Morphologie, DM(-) im pathologischen Präparat und NMIBC, das von Trainern/Juniorchirurgen operiert wird, geplant werden.

Abstract

Objective To reveal significant risk factors by identifying pooled effect estimates with a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and pathological risk factors predicting tumour recurrence and upstaging in a second transurethral resection of a bladder tumour (TURBT) in patients with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

Material and Methods All data sources were broadly investigated up to October 2022. Data was extracted from the relevant studies and analysed with the RevMan software. In an inverse variance random and fixed effects model, Odds ratio (OR) values were given with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI].

Results The review included a total of 18 studies and 4548 patients. According to the pooled effect estimates, carcinoma in situ (CIS), tumour grade, multiplicity and surgeon factors were significant risk factors. Pooled effect estimates for tumour stage and tumour morphology were very close to significance. For CIS, grade, multiplicity and surgeon factor, OR, IVR or IVF [95% CI], p and I2 values were 1.8 [1.1, 3.0], 0.03, 75%; 2 [1.1, 3.4], 0.02, 53%, 1.3 [1.2, 1.6], <0.01, 40%, and 2 [1.4, 3], <0.01, 66%, respectively.

Conclusions NMIBC patients with a first TURBT performed by trainer or junior surgeons, with high grade among pathological risk factors and concomitant CIS and tumour multiplicity among clinical factors, have a high probability of tumour recurrence and upstaging in a second TURBT.

Schlüsselwörter

zweite TURBT - Re-TURBT - Risikofaktoren - CIS - Multiplizität

Keywords

second TURBT - risk factors - CIS - multiplicity - repeated TURBT

Supporting information



Publication History

Received: 31 December 2022

Accepted after revision: 21 March 2023

Article published online:
01 June 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden APM. et al. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 466-477 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.031.4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Miladi M, Peyromaure M, Zerbib M. et al. The value of a second transurethral resection in evaluating patients with bladder tumours. Eur Urol 2003; 43: 241-245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Giulianelli R, Gentile BC, Mirabile G. et al. Can re-TURBT be useful in pT1HG diseaseas a risk indicator of recurrence and progression? A single centre experience. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2017; 89: 272-276 DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2017.4.272.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Culpan M, Kazan O, Acar HC. et al. The probability of residual tumor detection in the second transurethral resection of pT1 urothelial bladder cancer according to the risk factors. Actas Urologicas Esponalas 2022; 46: 423-430
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies inmeta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25: 603-605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Akitake M, Yamaguchı A, Shiota M. et al. Predictive factors for residual cancer in second transurethral resection for non-muscle – invasive bladder cancer. Anticancer research 2019; 39: 4325-4328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ayati M, Amini E, Damavand RS. et al. Second transurethral resection of bladder: Is it Necessary in All T1 and/or High-Grade Tumors?. Urological Oncology 2019; 16: 152-156
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Zaman M, Hasan S, Chowdhury GM. et al. Evaluation of second-look transurethral resection in re-staging of patients with superficial bladder cancer. Bangladesh J Urol 2015; 18: 16-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Takaoka EI, Matsui Y, Inoue T. et al. risk factors for intravesical recurrence in patients with high-grade T1 bladder cancer in the second TUR era. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2013; 43: 404-409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Czech AK, Gronostaj K, Frydrych J. et al. Identification of potential prognostic factors for absence of residual disease in the second resection of T1 bladder cancer. Cent European J Urol 2019; 72: 252-257
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tae BS, Jeong CW, Kwak C. et al. Pathology in repeated transurethral resection of a bladder tumor as a risk factor for prognosis of high-risk non muscle-invasive bladder cancer. PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0189354 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189354.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ali MH, Ismail IY, Eltobgy A. et al. Evaluation of second-look transurethral resection in restaging of patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. Journal of endourology 2010; 24: 2047-2050
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Soria F, Andrea DD, Moschini M. et al. Predictive factors of the absence of residual disease at repeated transurethral resection of the bladder. Is there a possibility to avoid it in well-selected patients?. Urologic Oncology:Seminars and original investigations 2020; 38: 77.e1-77.e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Mariappan P, Zachou A, Grigor KM. Detrusor muscle in the first, apperently complete transurethral resection of bladder tumour specimen is a surrogate marker of resection quality, predicts risk of early recurrence, and is dependent on operator experience. European urology 2010; 57: 843-849
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Fan J, Zhang X, Fan J. et al. Risk stratification fort he rate and location of residual bladder tumor fort he decision of re- transurethral resection of bladder tumor. Frontiers oncology 2022; 12: 788568 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.788568..
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ferro M, Lorenzo GD, Buonerba C. et al. Predictors of residual T1 high grade on re-transurethral resection in a large multi-instutional cohort of patients with primary T1 high-grade /grade 3 bladder cancer. Journal of cancer 2018; 9: 4250-4254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ferro M, Vartolomei MD, Cantiello F. et al. High grade T1 on re-transurethral resection after initial high grade T1 confers worse oncological outcomes:Results of a multi-instutional study. Urol Int 2018; 101: 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Süer E, Özcan C, Baltacı S. et al. Time between first and second transurethral resection of bladder tumors patients with high grade T1 tumors: Is it a risk factor for residual tumor detection?. Urol Int 2013; 91: 182-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Fujikawa A, Yumura Y, Yao M. et al. An evaluation to define the role of repeat transurethral resection in a treatment algoritm for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Indian journal of urology 2012; 28: 267-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Shindo T, Nishiyama N, Masumori N. Second transurethral resection against Ta high grade tumor: Residual location and predictive factor. A single center, retrospective study. Japanese journal of endourology 2018; 31: 108-112
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lodde M, Mayr R, Martini T. et al. Positive urine cytology and carcinoma in situ prior to second transurethral resection of the bladder correlate with positive second resection histology and the need for subsequent cystectomy. Word J urol 2012; 30: 841-846
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kamiya N, Suzuki H, Suyama T. et al. Clinical outcomes of second transurethral resection in non-muscle invasive high-grade bladder cancer: a retrospective, multi-institutional, collaborative study. Int J Clin Oncol 2017; 22: 353-358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cumberbatch MGK, Foerster B, Catto JWF. et al. Repeat transurethral resection in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review. Eur Urol 2018; 73: 925-933 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.02.014.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Divrik T, Yildırım U, Eroglu AS. et al. Is a second transurethral resection necessary for newly diagnosed pT1 bladder cancer?. J Urol 2006; 175: 1258-1261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hashine K, Ide T, Nakashima T. et al. Results of second transurethral resection for high grade T1 bladder cancer. Urol Ann 2016; 8: 10-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Klan R, Loy V, Huland H. Residual tumor discovered in routine second transurethral resection in patients with stage T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol 1991; 146: 316-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Nieder AM, Brausi M, Lamm D. et al. Management of stage T1 tumors of the bladder: International consensus panel. Urology 2005; 66: 108-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Herr HW. Restaging transurethral resection of high risk superficial bladder cancer improves the initial responce to bacillus Calmette- Guerin therapy. J Urol 2005; 174: 2134-2137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Keir ME, Butte MJ, Freeman GJ. et al. PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annual review of immunology 2008; 26: 677-704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Divrik RT, Yildırım U, Zorlu F. et al. The effect of repeat transurethral resection on recurrence and progression rates in patients with T1 tumours of the bladder who received intravesical mitomycin: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Urol 2006; 175: 1641-1644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Divrik RT, Sahin AF, Yildırım U. et al. Impact of routine second transurethral resection of the long term outcome of patients with newly diagnosed pT1 urothelial carcinoma with respect to recurrence, progression rate, and disease specific survival: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 185-190
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Kulkarni GS, Hakenberg OW, Gschwend JE. et al. An updated critical analysis of the treatment strategy for newly diagnosed high-grade T1 (previously T1G3) bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 60-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Grimm MC, Ackermann R, Vogeli TA. Effect of routine repeat transurethral resection for superficial bladder cancer: A long term observational study. J Urol 2003; 170: 433-437
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Herr HW, Donat SM. a re-staging transurethral resection predicts early progression of superficial bladder cancer. BJU Int 2006; 97: 1194-1198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Holmang S. High-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: Is re-resection necessary in all patients before intravesical bacillus calmette- guerin treatment?. Scand J Urol 2013; 47: 363-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Hermdan T, Johansson R, Jahnson S. et al. 5-year outcome of a randomized study comparing bacillus calmette-guerin with epirubicin and interferon-alfa2b in patients with T1 bladder cancer. J Urol 2014; 191: 1244-1249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Sanseverino R, Napodano G, Campitelli A. et al. Prognostic impact of ReTURB in high grade T1 primary bladder cancer. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2016; 88: 81-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Dalbagni G, Vora K, Kaag M. et al. Clinical outcome in a contemporary series of restaged patients with clinical T1 bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2009; 56: 903-910
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Fritsche HM, Burger M, Svatek RS. et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with clinical T1 grade 3 urothelial carcinoma treated with radical cystectomy: Results from an international cohort. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 300-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Breyer J, Otto W, Wirtz RM. et al. ERBB2 expression as potential risk stratification for early cystectomy in patients with pT1 bladder cancer and concomitant carcinoma in situ. Urol int 2017; 98: 282-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Lazica DA, Roth S, Brandt AS. et al. Second transurethral resection after Ta high grade bladder tumor: A 45 year period at a single university center. Urol Int 2014; 92: 131-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Rink M, Babjuk M, Catto JW. et al. Hexyl aminolevulinate-guided fluorescence cystoscopy in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a critical review of the current literature. Eur Urol 2013; 64: 624-638 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.07.007.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Brausi M, Collette L, Kurt K. et al. EORTC Genito-urinary Tract Cancer Collaborative Group: Variability in the recurrence rate at first follow-up cystoscopy after TUR in stage Ta T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a combined analysis of seven EORTC studies. Eur Urol 2002; 41: 523-531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Zurkirchen MA, Sulser T, Gaspert A. et al. Second transurethral resection of superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a must even for experienced urologists. Urol Int 2004; 72: 99-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Divrik RT, Sahin AF, Yildırım U. et al. Impact of routine second transurethral resection on the long-term outcome of patients with newly diagnosed pT1 urothelial carcinoma with respect to recurrence, progression rate, and disease-specific survival: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 2002; 58: 185-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Gill Ts, Das RK, Basu S. et al. Predictive factors for residual tumor and tumor upstaging on relook transurethral resection of bladder tumor in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol Ann 2014; 6: 305-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Badalato GM, Gaya JM, Hruby G. et al. Immediate radical cystectomy vs conservative management for high grade cT1 bladder cancer: Is there a survival difference?. BJU Int 2012; 110: 1471-1477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Huang J, Fu J, Zhan H. et al. Analysis of the absence of the detrusor muscle in initial transurethral resected specimens and presence of residual tumor tissue. Urol Int 2012; 89: 319-325
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar