The Effect of Various Training Variables on Developing Muscle Strength in Velocity-based Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Velocity-based training is an advanced auto-regulation method that uses objective indices to dynamically regulate training loads. However, it is unclear currently how to maximize muscle strength with appropriate velocity-based training settings. To fill this gap, we conducted a series of dose-response and subgroup meta-analyses to check the effects of training variables/parameters, such as intensity, velocity loss, set, inter-set rest intervals, frequency, period, and program, on muscle strength in velocity-based training. A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies via PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, and Cochrane. One repetition maximum was selected as the outcome to indicate muscle strength. Eventually, twenty-seven studies with 693 trained individuals were included in the analysis. We found that the velocity loss of 15 to 30%, the intensity of 70 to 80%1RM, the set of 3 to 5 per session, the inter-set rest interval of 2 to 4 min, and the period of 7 to 12 weeks could be appropriate settings for developing muscle strength. Three periodical programming models in velocity-based training, including linear programming, undulating programming, and constant programming, were effective for developing muscle strength. Besides, changing periodical programming models around every 9 weeks may help to avoid a training plateau in strength adaption.

Key words

velocity-based training - strength training - athletic performance - training prescription

Publication History

Received: 24 November 2022

Accepted: 17 May 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
17 May 2023

Article published online:
15 August 2023

• References

• 1 Nicola F, Catherine S. Dose-response relationship of resistance training in older adults: A meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2011; 45: 233
• 2 Suchomel TJ, Nimphius S, Stone MH. The importance of muscular strength in athletic performance. Sports Med 2016; 46: 1419-1449
• 3 Khodadad Kashi S, Mirzazadeh ZS, Saatchian V. A systematic review and meta-analysis of resistance training on quality of life, depression, muscle strength, and functional exercise capacity in older adults aged 60 years or more. Biol Res Nurs. 2022 10998004221120945.
• 4 Roberts BM, Nuckols G, Krieger JW. Sex differences in resistance training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res 2020; 34: 1448-1460
• 5 Androulakis-Korakakis P, Fisher JP, Steele J. The minimum effective training dose required to increase 1RM strength in resistance-trained men: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2020; 50: 751-765
• 6 Zhang X, Li H, Bi S. et al. Auto-regulation method vs. fixed-loading method in maximum strength training for athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Physiol 2021; 12: 651112
• 7 Zhang X, Feng S, Peng R. et al. The role of velocity-based training (VBT) in enhancing athletic performance in trained individuals: A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19: 9252
• 8 Suchomel TJ, Nimphius S, Bellon CR. et al. Training for muscular strength: Methods for monitoring and adjusting training intensity. Sports Med 2021; 51: 2051-2066
• 9 Weakley J, Mann B, Banyard H. et al. Velocity-based training: From theory to application. Strength Cond J 2021; 43: 31-49
• 10 Orange ST, Hritz A, Pearson L. et al. Comparison of the effects of velocity-based vs. traditional resistance training methods on adaptations in strength, power, and sprint speed: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and quality of evidence appraisal. J Sports Sci 2022; 1-15
• 11 Held S, Speer K, Rappelt L. et al. The effectiveness of traditional vs. velocity-based strength training on explosive and maximal strength performance: A network meta-analysis. Front Physiol 2022; 13: 926972
• 12 Marques DL, Neiva HP, Marinho DA. et al. Velocity-monitored resistance training in older adults: The effects of low-velocity loss threshold on strength and functional capacity. J Strength Cond Res 2021; 36: 3200-3208
• 13 Montalvo-Pérez A, Alejo LB, Valenzuela PL. et al. Traditional versus velocity-based resistance training in competitive female cyclists: A randomized controlled trial. Front Physiol 2021; 12: 586113
• 14 Pareja-Blanco F, Sánchez-Medina L, Suárez-Arrones L. et al. Effects of velocity loss during resistance training on performance in professional soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2017; 12: 512-519
• 15 Lesinski M, Prieske O, Granacher U. Effects and dose-response relationships of resistance training on physical performance in youth athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50: 781-795
• 16 Pareja-Blanco F, Alcazar J, Cornejo-Daza PJ. et al. Effects of velocity loss in the bench press exercise on strength gains, neuromuscular adaptations, and muscle hypertrophy. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2020; 30: 2154-2166
• 17 Abuajwa B, Hamlin M, Hafiz E. et al. The effect of high and low velocity-based training on the throwing performance of collegiate handball players. PeerJ 2022; 10: e14049
• 18 Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015; 4: 1-9
• 19 Grgic J, Schoenfeld BJ, Davies TB. et al. Effect of resistance training frequency on gains in muscular strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2018; 48: 1207-1220
• 20 Marshall J, Bishop C, Turner A. et al. Optimal training sequences to develop lower body force, velocity, power, and jump height: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med 2021; 1-27
• 21 Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD. et al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 2003; 83: 713-721
• 22 de Morton NA. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: A demographic study. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2009; 55: 129-133
• 23 Xu C, Doi SA. The robust error meta-regression method for dose-response meta-analysis. JBI Evid Implement 2018; 16: 138-144
• 24 Durrleman S, Simon R. Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med 1989; 8: 551-561
• 25 Jukic I, Castilla AP, Ramos AG. et al. The acute and chronic effects of implementing velocity loss thresholds during resistance training: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and critical evaluation of the literature. Sports Med 2023; 53: 177-214
• 26 Zhao Y, Hu F, Feng Y. et al. Association of cycling with risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Sports Med 2021; 51: 1439-1448
• 27 Jayedi A, Gohari A, Shab-Bidar S. Daily step count and all-cause mortality: A dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Sports Med 2021; 1-11
• 28 Rodríguez-Rosell D, Yáñez-García JM, Mora-Custodio R. et al. Effect of velocity loss during squat training on neuromuscular performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2021; 31: 1621-1635
• 29 Galiano C, Pareja-Blanco F, Hidalgo de Mora J. et al. Low-velocity loss induces similar strength gains to moderate-velocity loss during resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 2022; 36: 340-345
• 30 Hernández-Belmonte A, Pallarés JG. Effects of velocity loss threshold during resistance training on strength and athletic adaptations: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Appl Sci 2022; 12: 4425
• 31 Fry AC. The role of resistance exercise intensity on muscle fibre adaptations. Sports Med 2004; 34: 663-679
• 32 Pearson SJ, Hussain SR. A review on the mechanisms of blood-flow restriction resistance training-induced muscle hypertrophy. Sports Med 2015; 45: 187-200
• 33 Medicine ACoS. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 687-708
• 34 Radaelli R, Fleck SJ, Leite T. et al. Dose-response of 1, 3, and 5 sets of resistance exercise on strength, local muscular endurance, and hypertrophy. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29: 1349-1358
• 35 Krieger JW. Single versus multiple sets of resistance exercise: A meta-regression. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 1890-1901
• 36 Ralston GW, Kilgore L, Wyatt FB. et al. The effect of weekly set volume on strength gain: A meta-analysis. Sports Med 2017; 47: 2585-2601
• 37 Humburg H, Baars H, Schroeder J. et al. 1-set vs. 3-set resistance training: a crossover study. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21: 578
• 38 Winett RA. Meta-analyses do not support performance of multiple sets or high volume resistance training. J Exerc Physiol Online 2004; 7: 10-20
• 39 Ratamess NA, Falvo MJ, Mangine GT. et al. The effect of rest interval length on metabolic responses to the bench press exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 2007; 100: 1-17
• 40 Grgic J, Schoenfeld BJ, Skrepnik M. et al. Effects of rest interval duration in resistance training on measures of muscular strength: A systematic review. Sports Med 2018; 48: 137-151
• 41 Prevost MC. Glycogen supercompensation enhances athletic performance. Perform Enhanc Health 1999; 1: 1-10
• 42 Mukhopadhyay K. Physiological basis of adaptation through super-compensation for better sporting result. Adv Health Exerc 2022; 1: 30-42
• 43 Elmahgoub SS, Calders P, Lambers S. et al. The effect of combined exercise training in adolescents who are overweight or obese with intellectual disability: The role of training frequency. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 2274-2282
• 44 Stone M, O'bryant H, Schilling B. et al. Periodization: Effects of manipulating volume and intensity. Part 1. Strength Cond J 1999; 21: 56
• 45 Williams TD, Tolusso DV, Fedewa MV. et al. Comparison of periodized and non-periodized resistance training on maximal strength: A meta-analysis. Sports Med 2017; 47: 2083-2100
• 46 Riscart-López J, Rendeiro-Pinho G, Mil-Homens P. et al. Effects of four different velocity-based training programming models on strength gains and physical performance. J Strength Cond Res 2021; 35: 596-603
• 47 Ahmadizad S, Ghorbani S, Ghasemikaram M. et al. Effects of short-term nonperiodized, linear periodized and daily undulating periodized resistance training on plasma adiponectin, leptin and insulin resistance. Clin Biochem 2014; 47: 417-422
• 48 Mann JB, Thyfault JP, Ivey PA. et al. The effect of autoregulatory progressive resistance exercise vs. linear periodization on strength improvement in college athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 1718-1723
• 49 Prestes J, Frollini AB, de Lima C. et al. Comparison between linear and daily undulating periodized resistance training to increase strength. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 2437-2442
• 50 Miranda F, Simao R, Rhea M. et al. Effects of linear vs. daily undulatory periodized resistance training on maximal and submaximal strength gains. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 1824-1830
• 51 Rhea MR, Ball SD, Phillips WT. et al. A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for strength. J Strength Cond Res 2002; 16: 250-255
• 52 Simão R, Spineti J, de Salles BF. et al. Comparison between nonlinear and linear periodized resistance training: hypertrophic and strength effects. J Strength Cond Res 2012; 26: 1389-1395
• 53 Harries SK, Lubans DR, Callister R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of linear and undulating periodized resistance training programs on muscular strength. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29: 1113-1125
• 54 Rodríguez-Rosell D, Martínez-Cava A, Yáñez-García JM. et al. Linear programming produces greater, earlier and uninterrupted neuromuscular and functional adaptations than daily-undulating programming after velocity-based resistance training. Physiol Behav 2021; 233: 113337
• 55 Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Fundamentals of resistance training: Progression and exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 674-688
• 56 Arandjelović O. A mathematical model of neuromuscular adaptation to resistance training and its application in a computer simulation of accommodating loads. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 110: 523-538
• 57 Sánchez-Moreno M, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Díaz-Cueli D. et al. Effects of velocity loss threshold within resistance training during concurrent training on endurance and strength performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2021; 16: 849-857
• 58 Sánchez-Moreno M, Cornejo-Daza PJ, González-Badillo JJ. et al. Effects of velocity loss during body mass prone-grip pull-up training on strength and endurance performance. J Strength Cond Res 2020; 34: 911-917
• 59 Rodríguez-Rosell D, Yáñez-García JM, Mora-Custodio R. et al. Velocity-based resistance training: Impact of velocity loss in the set on neuromuscular performance and hormonal response. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2020; 45: 817-828
• 60 Rodiles-Guerrero L, Pareja-Blanco F, León-Prados JA. Effect of velocity loss on strength performance in bench press using a weight stack machine. Int J Sports Med 2020; 41: 921-928
• 61 Rodiles-Guerrero L, Cornejo-Daza PJ, Sánchez-Valdepeñas J. et al. Specific Adaptations to 0%, 15%, 25%, and 50% Velocity-Loss Thresholds During Bench Press Training. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2022; 1: 1-11
• 62 Ramírez JM, Núñez VM, Lancho C. et al. Velocity-based training of lower limb to improve absolute and relative power outputs in concentric phase of half-squat in soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29: 3084-3088
• 63 Pérez-Castilla A, García-Ramos A, Padial P. et al. Effect of different velocity loss thresholds during a power-oriented resistance training program on the mechanical capacities of lower-body muscles. J Sports Sci 2018; 36: 1331-1339
• 64 Pareja-Blanco F, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Sánchez-Medina L. et al. Effects of velocity loss during resistance training on athletic performance, strength gains and muscle adaptations. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2017; 27: 724-735
• 65 Pareja-Blanco F, Alcazar J, Sánchez-Valdepeñas J. et al. Velocity Loss as a Critical Variable Determining the Adaptations to Strength Training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2020; 52: 1752-1762
• 66 Orange ST, Metcalfe JW, Robinson A. et al. Effects of in-season velocity-versus percentage-based training in academy rugby league players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2019; 15: 554-561
• 67 Jiménez-Reyes P, Castaño-Zambudio A, Cuadrado-Peñafiel V. et al. Differences between adjusted vs. non-adjusted loads in velocity-based training: Consequences for strength training control and programming. PeerJ 2021; 9: e10942
• 68 Hernández-Belmonte A, Martínez-Cava A, Morán-Navarro R. et al. A comprehensive analysis of the velocity-based method in the shoulder press exercise: Stability of the load-velocity relationship and sticking region parameters. Biol Sport 2021; 38: 235-243
• 69 Held S, Hecksteden A, Meyer T. et al. Improved strength and recovery after velocity-based training: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2021; 16: 1185-1193
• 70 Dorrell HF, Moore JM, Gee TI. Comparison of individual and group-based load-velocity profiling as a means to dictate training load over a 6-week strength and power intervention. J Sports Sci 2020; 38: 2013-2020
• 71 Banyard HG, Tufano JJ, Weakley JJ. et al. Superior changes in jump, sprint, and change-of-direction performance but not maximal strength following 6 weeks of velocity-based training compared with 1-repetition-maximum percentage-based training. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2020; 16: 232-242
• 72 Andersen V, Paulsen G, Stien N. et al. Resistance training with different velocity loss thresholds induce similar changes in strengh and hypertrophy. J Strength Cond Res. 2021
• 73 Pallarés JG, Cava AM, Courel-Ibáñez J. et al. Full squat produces greater neuromuscular and functional adaptations and lower pain than partial squats after prolonged resistance training. Eur J Sport Sci 2020; 20: 115-124
• 74 Veliz RR, Requena B, Suarez-Arrones L. et al. Effects of 18-week in-season heavy-resistance and power training on throwing velocity, strength, jumping, and maximal sprint swim performance of elite male water polo players. J Strength Cond Res 2014; 28: 1007-1014
• 75 Pareja-Blanco F, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Sánchez-Medina L. et al. Effect of movement velocity during resistance training on neuromuscular performance. Int J Sports Med 2014; 35: 916-924
• 76 González-Badillo JJ, Rodríguez-Rosell D, Sánchez-Medina L. et al. Maximal intended velocity training induces greater gains in bench press performance than deliberately slower half-velocity training. Eur J Sport Sci 2014; 14: 772-781