Zahnmedizin up2date, Table of Contents Zahnmedizin up2date 2024; 18(04): 333-351DOI: 10.1055/a-2340-8148 Zahnerhaltung, Prävention und Restauration Non-Prep-Bridges im Seitenzahngebiet – ein neues Anwendungsfeld der konservierenden Zahnheilkunde – Teil 2 Authors Hans Jörg Staehle Recommend Article Abstract Buy Article(opens in new window) All articles of this category(opens in new window) Bei diesem Beitrag handelt es sich um die Fortsetzung des Beitrags „Non-Prep-Bridges … – Teil 1: Direkte Vorgehensweisen“. Teil 2 informiert über den aktuellen Wissensstand sowie die klinischen Möglichkeiten der indirekten Versorgungsmethoden mit Non-Prep-Bridges (NPBs) und diskutiert die Vor- und Nachteile im Vergleich mit den direkten Methoden. Full Text References Literatur 1 Listl S, Faggion jr. CM, Staehle HJ. Professional variability in decision making in modern dentistry: A pilot study. Oper Dent 2016; 41: 79-87 2 Kern M. Adhäsivbrücken: Minimalinvasiv – ästhetisch – bewährt. Berlin: Quintessenz; 2017 3 Yazigi C, Kern M. Clinical evaluation of zirconia cantilevered single-retainer resin-bonded fixed dental protheses replacing missing canines and posterior teeth. J Dent 2022; 116: 103907 4 Staehle HJ. A new restorative method for the closure of single-tooth gaps – Technique description and case series. J Adhes Dent 2019; 21: 239-245 5 Staehle HJ. Minimally invasive restorative treatment. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1: 267-284 6 Staehle HJ, Wohlrab T, Saure D. et al. A 6.5-year clinical follow-up of direct resin composite buildups in the posterior dentition: Introduction of a new minimally invasive restorative method. J Dent 2015; 43: 1211-1217 7 Staehle HJ, Sekundo C, Hieronymus H. et al. Replacing single missing teeth in the posterior region using direct composite restorations: Survival and clinical quality. J Dent 2021; 113: 103754 8 Staehle HJ. New methods for replacing single missing teeth with non-prep bridges (NPBs) – A case series. J Adhes Dent 2023; 25: 195-210 9 Wolff D, Hahn P, Ding P. et al. Proximal contact tightness between direct-composite additions in the posterior dentition: An in vitro investigation. Oper Dent 2012; 37: 272-280 10 Sekundo C, Staehle H. Mapping the product range of interdental brushes: Sizes, shapes, and forces. Oral Health Prev Dent 2020; 18: 343-354 11 Staehle HJ, Frese C, Sekundo C. Mechanical plaque control in the interdental space with the “Heidelberg-Set”. Quintess Int 2021; 52: 176-186 12 Staehle HJ, Kim T-S, Sekundo C. New options for subgingival oral hygiene with a flattened interdental brush design – In vitro examination and case report. Oral Health Prev Dent 2023; 21: 131-140 13 Brauer HU. Kompositinjektionstechnik – Schritt für Schritt. Zahnmedizin up2date 2022; 16: 395-397 14 Diaz E, Conejo J, Flores J, Blatz MB. Full-mouth Rehabilitation with the flowable Injection Technique. In: Duarte jr. S. Quintessence of dental Technology 2018. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2018: 204-218 15 Terry DA. Restoring with Flowables. Berlin: Quintessenz; 2017 16 Tauböck TT, Schmidlin PR, Attin T. Vertical bite rehabilitation of severely worn dentitions with direct composite restorations: Clinical performance up to 11 year. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 1732 17 Valente LL, Sarkis-Onofre R, Gonçalves AP. et al. Repair bond strength of dental composites: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes 2016; 69: 15-26 18 Fouquet V, Lachard F, Abdel-Gawad S. et al. Shear bond strength of a direct resin composite to CAD-CAM composite blocks: Relative contribution of micromechanical and chemical block surface treatment. Materials 2022; 15: 5018 19 Grangeiro MTV, Rossi NR, Barreto LAL. et al. Effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of the hybrid ceramic characterization layer. J Adhes Dent 2021; 23: 429-435
