Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2576-1505
From Steps to Mobility Levels: Validating a Consumer-Grade Activity Monitor for Automated Recording of Patient Mobility in Hospitals
Funding None.

Abstract
Background
Patient mobility during hospitalization is essential for high-quality healthcare as mobility is linked to physical function and quality of life. The Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (JH-HLM) scale is a validated method to assess mobility in hospitalized patients. Although the JH-HLM is widely utilized, it has limitations including ceiling effects, unobserved mobility events going unrecorded, and the staff time needed to observe and document.
Objectives
We explored the feasibility of using a consumer-grade activity monitor (Fitbit) to predict JH-HLM scores and address these limitations.
Methods
JH-HLM scores and step counts were recorded simultaneously using behavioral mapping and analyzed over 1-hour periods among inpatients. We predicted JH-HLM scores based on step counts by fitting ordinal logistic regressions, according to three categorizations of JH-HLM scores reflecting increasing mobility-granularity.
Results
We collected data for 189 patient-hours in a cohort of 20 participants. Step counts increased with higher JH-HLM mobility scores. When predicting JH-HLM scores from step counts, there was a trade-off between accuracy and mobility granularity: overall accuracy was 75% when categorizing patient-hours as immobility (JH-HLM of 1 to 5) or mobility (JH-HLM of 6 to 8); accuracy was 68% when categorizing immobility, shorter walking behavior (JH-HLM of 6 to 7), and longer walking behavior (JH-HLM of 8); accuracy was 61% when categorizing immobility and three progressively higher volumes of walking (JH-HLM of 6, 7 and 8).
Conclusion
Step counts from the activity monitor could be used to predict whether a patient was immobile or mobile but may lack the sensitivity to accurately predict specific mobility levels.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
Institutional review board approval (IRB00205546) for this study was obtained from the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board. Oral consent was obtained from all participating patients at the beginning of each observation day.
Publication History
Received: 30 September 2024
Accepted: 05 April 2025
Article published online:
06 August 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Alaparthi GK, Gatty A, Samuel SR, Amaravadi SK. Effectiveness, safety, and barriers to early mobilization in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Res Pract 2020; 2020 (01) 7840743
- 2 Hoyer EH, Friedman M, Lavezza A. et al. A unit-based, multi-center evaluation of adopting mobility measures and daily mobility goals in the hospital setting. Appl Nurs Res 2023; 70: 151655
- 3 Klein LM, Young D, Feng D. et al. Increasing patient mobility through an individualized goal-centered hospital mobility program: a quasi-experimental quality improvement project. Nurs Outlook 2018; 66 (03) 254-262
- 4 Valkenet K, Bor P, van Delft L, Veenhof C. Measuring physical activity levels in hospitalized patients: a comparison between behavioural mapping and data from an accelerometer. Clin Rehabil 2019; 33 (07) 1233-1240
- 5 Wald HL, Ramaswamy R, Perskin MH. et al; Quality and Performance Measurement Committee of the American Geriatrics Society. The case for mobility assessment in hospitalized older adults: American Geriatrics Society White Paper Executive Summary. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019; 67 (01) 11-16
- 6 Emery-Tiburcio EE, Mack L, Zonsius MC, Carbonell E, Newman M. The 4Ms of an age-friendly health system. Am J Nurs 2021; 121 (11) 44-49
- 7 Hoyer EH, Young DL, Friedman LA. et al. Routine inpatient mobility assessment and hospital discharge planning. JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179 (01) 118-120
- 8 Hiser S, Urbanek J, Young DL. et al. Improving patient selection for use of consumer grade physical activity monitors in the hospital. Braz J Phys Ther 2022; 26 (05) 100447
- 9 Hoyer EH, Young DL, Klein LM. et al. Toward a common language for measuring patient mobility in the hospital: reliability and construct validity of interprofessional mobility measures. Phys Ther 2018; 98 (02) 133-142
- 10 Treacy D, Hassett L, Schurr K, Chagpar S, Paul SS, Sherrington C. Validity of different activity monitors to count steps in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. Phys Ther 2017; 97 (05) 581-588
- 11 Mudge AM, McRae P, McHugh K. et al. Poor mobility in hospitalized adults of all ages. J Hosp Med 2016; 11 (04) 289-291
- 12 Valkenet K, McRae P, Reijneveld E. et al. Inpatient physical activity across a large university city hospital: a behavioral mapping study. Physiother Theory Pract 2024; 40 (01) 153-160
- 13 Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Klassen TD. et al. Capturing step counts at slow walking speeds in older adults: comparison of ankle and waist placement of measuring device. J Rehabil Med 2015; 47 (09) 830-835
- 14 Boerrigter JL, Geelen SJG, van Berge Henegouwen MI. et al. Extended mobility scale (AMEXO) for assessing mobilization and setting goals after gastrointestinal and oncological surgery: a before-after study. BMC Surg 2022; 22 (01) 38
- 15 Fuchita M, Ridgeway KJ, Sandridge B. et al. Comparison of postoperative mobilization measurements by activPAL versus Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility scale after major abdominal surgery. Surgery 2023; 174 (04) 851-857
- 16 Zelada MA, Salinas R, Baztán JJ. Reduction of functional deterioration during hospitalization in an acute geriatric unit. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2009; 48 (01) 35-39
- 17 Levin C, Rand D, Gil E, Agmon M. The relationships between step count and hospitalisation-associated outcomes in acutely hospitalised older adults—a systematic review. J Clin Nurs 2021; 00: 1-15
- 18 Rivas E, Cohen B, Pu X. et al. Pain and opioid consumption and mobilization after surgery: post hoc analysis of two randomized trials. Anesthesiology 2022; 136 (01) 115-126
- 19 Daskivich TJ, Houman J, Lopez M. et al. Association of wearable activity monitors with assessment of daily ambulation and length of stay among patients undergoing major surgery. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2 (02) e187673
- 20 Groat D, Kwon HJ, Grando MA, Cook CB, Thompson B. Comparing real-time self-tracking and device-recorded exercise data in subjects with type 1 diabetes. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9 (04) 919-926