Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2591-4016
Real-World Challenges of Using Assisted Living Technologies across Different Australian Aged Care Settings: A Qualitative Study of User Experiences
Funding This study was funded by the International Macquarie Research Excellence Scholarship (iMQRES) awarded to N.A.

Abstract
Background
Aging populations strain health care systems. Assisted Living Technologies (ALTs) emerge as a potential solution for promoting independent living among older adults. However, the real-world effect of ALTs remains unclear.
Objective
This study explores benefits and challenges (anticipated and unanticipated) of ALTs for older adults and informal caregivers across three aged care settings (residential aged care facilities [RACFs], retirement villages [RVs], and home-dwelling communities [HDCs]) in Australia.
Methods
Three ALTs (fall detection sensors, sleep monitors, and smartwatches) were deployed across three settings. NASSS framework (Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability), informed by sociotechnical theories, guided analysis of the interplay between technology, user needs, and caregiving context in ALTs implementation. Semistructured interviews with 14 older adults and 9 caregivers from 19 households explored user experiences. Benefits and challenges of using ALTs for older adults and informal caregivers were categorized using the consequences framework.
Results
Setting-specific challenges alongside common benefits and challenges across care settings were revealed. The NASSS framework analysis showed how technology limitations, user needs, and caregiving context influenced these outcomes. In RACFs, where residents receive constant nursing assistance, informal caregivers faced uncertainty regarding who was responsible for monitoring residents. In RVs, with a strong sense of community, informal caregivers (often neighbors) were more prone to overreacting to false alarms. Shared sleeping arrangements among HDCs made interpreting sleep data challenging.
Conclusion
Implementing ALTs in elderly care settings requires a context-sensitive approach. In RACFs, clear role definitions for informal caregivers and staff are essential. For RVs, design should support help-seeking aligned with residents' social and geographical contexts. Home-dwelling settings may benefit from advanced sleep monitoring tailored to shared living arrangements. Future ALTs development should focus on real-world contexts to promote successful aging in place.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
The study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. The study received ethical approval from the Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref number: 520221098339905).
Publication History
Received: 09 December 2024
Accepted: 17 April 2025
Article published online:
29 August 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Mitchell E, Walker R. Global ageing: successes, challenges and opportunities. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2020; 81 (02) 1-9
- 2 He W, Goodkind D, Kowal PR. An Aging World: 2015. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau; 2016
- 3 Boldy D, Grenade L, Lewin G, Karol E, Burton E. Older people's decisions regarding ‘ageing in place’: a Western Australian case study. Australas J Ageing 2011; 30 (03) 136-142
- 4 Pruitt S, Canny J, Epping-Jordan J. Preparing a Health Care Workforce for the 21st Century: The Challenge of Chronic Conditions. World Health Organization; 2005
- 5 Armstrong BK, Gillespie JA, Leeder SR, Rubin GL, Russell LM. Challenges in health and health care for Australia. Med J Aust 2007; 187 (09) 485-489
- 6 Panagiotou OA, Kosar CM, White EM. et al. Risk factors associated with all-cause 30-day mortality in nursing home residents with COVID-19. JAMA Intern Med 2021; 181 (04) 439-448
- 7 Miralles O, Sanchez-Rodriguez D, Marco E. et al. Unmet needs, health policies, and actions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a report from six European countries. Eur Geriatr Med 2021; 12 (01) 193-204
- 8 Heneghan C, Dietrich M, Brassey J, Jefferson T. Effects of COVID-19 in care homes-A mixed methods review. medRxiv 2022:04.14.22273903
- 9 Cousins S. Australian Commission calls for overhaul of aged care. Lancet 2021; 397 (10278): 957
- 10 Cousins S. Experts criticise Australia's aged care failings over COVID-19. Lancet 2020; 396 (10259): 1322-1323
- 11 Goldman DP, Chen C, Zissimopoulos J, Rowe JW. Research Network on an Aging Society. Opinion: Measuring how countries adapt to societal aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115 (03) 435-437
- 12 Cheek P, Nikpour L, Nowlin HD. Aging well with smart technology. Nurs Adm Q 2005; 29 (04) 329-338
- 13 Agüero-Torres H, von Strauss E, Viitanen M, Winblad B, Fratiglioni L. Institutionalization in the elderly: the role of chronic diseases and dementia. Cross-sectional and longitudinal data from a population-based study. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54 (08) 795-801
- 14 Steele R, Lo A, Secombe C, Wong YK. Elderly persons' perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78 (12) 788-801
- 15 Lewin D, Adshead S, Glennon B. et al. Assisted living technologies for older and disabled people in 2030. A final report to Ofcom London. Plum Consulting; 2010
- 16 van Hoof J, Kort HS, Rutten PG, Duijnstee MSH. Ageing-in-place with the use of ambient intelligence technology: perspectives of older users. Int J Med Inform 2011; 80 (05) 310-331
- 17 Baig MM, Afifi S, GholamHosseini H, Mirza F. A systematic review of wearable sensors and IoT-based monitoring applications for older adults–a focus on ageing population and independent living. J Med Syst 2019; 43 (08) 233
- 18 Cahill J, McLoughlin S, Wetherall S. The design of new technology supporting wellbeing, independence and social participation, for older adults domiciled in residential homes and/or assisted living communities. Technologies (Basel) 2018; 6 (01) 18
- 19 Jaschinski C, Ben Allouch S. Listening to the ones who care: exploring the perceptions of informal caregivers towards ambient assisted living applications. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 2019; 10: 761-778
- 20 Gettel CJ, Chen K, Goldberg EM. Dementia care, fall detection, and ambient-assisted living technologies help older adults age in place: A scoping review. J Appl Gerontol 2021; 40 (12) 1893-1902
- 21 Bouma H. Gerontechnology: emerging technologies and their impact on aging in society. Stud Health Technol Inform 1998; 48: 93-104
- 22 Fleming R, Sum S. Empirical studies on the effectiveness of assistive technology in the care of people with dementia: a systematic review. J Assist Technol 2014; 8 (01) 14-34
- 23 Greenhalgh T, Procter R, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Shaw S. The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: discourse analysis. BMJ Open 2012; 2 (04) e001574
- 24 Demiris G, Hensel BK. Technologies for an aging society: a systematic review of “smart home” applications. Yearb Med Inform 2008; 33-40
- 25 Steventon A, Bardsley M, Billings J. et al.; Whole System Demonstrator Evaluation Team. Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMJ 2012; 344: e3874
- 26 Bächle M, Daurer S, Judt A, Mettler T. Assistive technology for independent living with dementia: Stylized facts and research gaps. Health Policy Technol 2018; 7 (01) 98-111
- 27 Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Procter R, Stones R. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Soc Sci Med 2013; 93: 86-94
- 28 Greenhalgh T, Procter R, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Rouncefield M. What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services. BMC Med 2015; 13: 91
- 29 Greenhalgh T, Shaw S, Wherton J. et al. SCALS: a fourth-generation study of assisted living technologies in their organisational, social, political and policy context. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (02) e010208
- 30 Ammenwerth E. Technology acceptance models in health informatics: TAM and UTAUT. Stud Health Technol Inform 2019; 263: 64-71 . IOS Press
- 31 Shachak A, Kuziemsky C, Petersen C. Beyond TAM and UTAUT: Future directions for HIT implementation research. J Biomed Inform 2019; 100: 103315
- 32 Stokke R. The personal emergency response system as a technology innovation in primary health care services: An integrative review. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18 (07) e187
- 33 Aloulou H, Mokhtari M, Tiberghien T. et al. Deployment of assistive living technology in a nursing home environment: methods and lessons learned. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13 (01) 42
- 34 Kuziemsky CE, Borycki E, Nøhr C, Cummings E. The nature of unintended benefits in health information systems. Quality of Life through Quality of Information. IOS Press; 2012: 896-900
- 35 Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (02) 104-112
- 36 Buys L, Miller E, Barnett K. The personal, practical and policy implications of older Australians' residential choice: Impact of retirement village vs. community living on family and formal support. J Hous Elder 2006; 20 (1–2): 31-46
- 37 Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C. et al. Beyond adoption: A New framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19 (11) e367
- 38 Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dykstra RH, Guappone K, Carpenter JD, Seshadri V. Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 (Suppl. 01) S21-S27
- 39 Azungah T. Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Qual Res J 2018; 18 (04) 383-400
- 40 Tian YJA, Felber NA, Pageau F, Schwab DR, Wangmo T. Benefits and barriers associated with the use of smart home health technologies in the care of older persons: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24 (01) 152
- 41 Alemdar H, Ersoy C. Wireless sensor networks for healthcare: A survey. Comput Netw 2010; 54 (15) 2688-2710
- 42 Percy Campbell J, Buchan J, Chu CH, Bianchi A, Hoey J, Khan SS. User perception of smart home surveillance among adults aged 50 years and older: Scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024; 12: e48526
- 43 Kristoffersson A, Kolkowska E, Loutfi A. Summative evaluation of a sensor-based cognitive assistive technology: Impact on quality of life and perceived utility. Gerontechnology (Valkenswaard) 2019;18(2)
- 44 Ohta S, Nakamoto H, Shinagawa Y, Tanikawa T. A health monitoring system for elderly people living alone. J Telemed Telecare 2002; 8 (03) 151-156
- 45 Wai AAP, Fook VFS, Jayachandran M. et al. Smart wireless continence management system for persons with dementia. Telemed J E Health 2008; 14 (08) 825-832
- 46 Lussier M, Couture M, Moreau M. et al. Integrating an ambient assisted living monitoring system into clinical decision-making in home care: An embedded case study. Gerontechnology 2020; 19 (01) 77-92
- 47 Epstein I, Aligato A, Krimmel T, Mihailidis A. Older adults' and caregivers' perspectives on in-home monitoring technology. J Gerontol Nurs 2016; 42 (06) 43-50
- 48 Sánchez VG, Anker-Hansen C, Taylor I, Eilertsen G. Older people's attitudes and perspectives of welfare technology in Norway. J Multidiscip Healthc 2019; 12: 841-853
- 49 Lee ML, Dey AK. Sensor-based observations of daily living for aging in place. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 2015; 19: 27-43
- 50 Snyder M, Dringus L, Maitland Schladen M, Chenail R, Oviawe E. Remote monitoring technologies in dementia care: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of family caregivers' experiences. Qual Rep 2020; 25 (05) 1233-1252
- 51 Seelye AM, Wild KV, Larimer N, Maxwell S, Kearns P, Kaye JA. Reactions to a remote-controlled video-communication robot in seniors' homes: a pilot study of feasibility and acceptance. Telemed J E Health 2012; 18 (10) 755-759
- 52 Milligan C, Roberts C, Mort M. Telecare and older people: who cares where?. Soc Sci Med 2011; 72 (03) 347-354
- 53 Holthe T, Halvorsrud L, Lund A. A critical occupational perspective on user engagement of older adults in an assisted living facility in technology research over three years. J Occup Sci 2020; 27 (03) 376-389
- 54 Alexander GL, Wakefield BJ, Rantz M. et al. Passive sensor technology interface to assess elder activity in independent living. Nurs Res 2011; 60 (05) 318-325
- 55 Geier J, Mauch M, Patsch M, Paulicke D. How nurses assess telepresence systems in outpatient care-A qualitative study. Pflege 2020; 33 (01) 43-51
- 56 Londei ST, Rousseau J, Ducharme F. et al. An intelligent videomonitoring system for fall detection at home: perceptions of elderly people. J Telemed Telecare 2009; 15 (08) 383-390
- 57 Ghorayeb A, Comber R, Gooberman-Hill R. Older adults' perspectives of smart home technology: Are we developing the technology that older people want?. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2021; 147: 102571
- 58 Berridge C, Chan KT, Choi Y. Sensor-based passive remote monitoring and discordant values: Qualitative study of the experiences of low-income immigrant elders in the United States. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019; 7 (03) e11516
- 59 Dermody G, Fritz R, Glass C, Dunham M, Whitehead L. Factors influencing community-dwelling older adults' readiness to adopt smart home technology: A qualitative exploratory study. J Adv Nurs 2021; 77 (12) 4847-4861
- 60 Verloo H, Kampel T, Vidal N, Pereira F. Perceptions about technologies that help community-dwelling older adults remain at home: Qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22 (06) e17930
- 61 Garg V, Camp LJ, Lorenzen-Huber L, Shankar K, Connelly K. Privacy concerns in assisted living technologies. Ann Telecommun 2014; 69: 75-88
- 62 Hall SS, Kandiah J, Saiki D, Nam J, Harden A, Park S. Implications of smart wear technology for family caregiving relationships: focus group perceptions. Soc Work Health Care 2014; 53 (09) 994-1014
- 63 Mitchell LL, Peterson CM, Rud SR. et al. “It's like a cyber-security blanket”: The utility of remote activity monitoring in family dementia care. J Appl Gerontol 2020; 39 (01) 86-98
- 64 Sriram V, Jenkinson C, Peters M. Informal carers' experience of assistive technology use in dementia care at home: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2019; 19 (01) 160
- 65 Pekkarinen S, Melkas H. Safety alarm systems and related services: From potholes to innovation opportunities. Technological Applications and Advancements in Service Science, Management, and Engineering. IGI Global; 2012: 339-357
- 66 McWhirter M. A dispersed alarm system for the elderly and its relevance to local general practitioners. J R Coll Gen Pract 1987; 37 (299) 244-247
- 67 Yusif S, Soar J, Hafeez-Baig A. Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: A systematic review. Int J Med Inform 2016; 94: 112-116
- 68 Tiersen F, Batey P, Harrison MJC. et al. Smart home sensing and monitoring in households with dementia: user-centered design approach. JMIR Aging 2021; 4 (03) e27047
- 69 Smole-Orehek K, Hvalič-Touzery S, Petrovčič A, Dolničar V, Debevc M, Kožuh I. Psychological outcomes of eCare technologies use for informal carers: A scoping study. Gerontechnology (Valkenswaard) 2019 18. 01 -393
- 70 Sendelbach S, Funk M. Alarm fatigue: a patient safety concern. AACN Adv Crit Care 2013; 24 (04) 378-386 , quiz 387–388
- 71 Skubic M, Alexander G, Popescu M, Rantz M, Keller J. A smart home application to eldercare: current status and lessons learned. Technol Health Care 2009; 17 (03) 183-201
- 72 Caldeira C, Nurain N, Connelly K. “I hope I never need one”: Unpacking Stigma in Aging in Place Technology. 2022: 1-12
- 73 Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Sage Publications; 2016
- 74 John CW, Creswell JD. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications; 2018
- 75 Garcia Reyes EP, Kelly R, Buchanan G, Waycott J. Understanding older adults' experiences with technologies for health self-management: Interview study. JMIR Aging 2023; 6: e43197
- 76 Reichstadt J, Sengupta G, Depp CA, Palinkas LA, Jeste DV. Older adults' perspectives on successful aging: Qualitative interviews. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010; 18 (07) 567-575
- 77 Viner HE, Yuill N, Costa AP, Radford H, Kornadt AE. A qualitative interview study on quality of life and ageing experiences of autistic adults. Commun Psychol 2024; 2 (01) 99
- 78 Taylor E, Goodwin VA, Ball S, Clegg A, Brown L, Frost J. Older adults' perspectives of independence through time: Results of a longitudinal interview study. Gerontologist 2024; 64 (02) gnad073