Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2025; 46(13): 973-981
DOI: 10.1055/a-2625-4264
Training & Testing

Relationship Between Dryland Profile and Kinematics of Breaststroke Pullout Techniques

Authors

  • Mário J. Costa 

    1   Research Centre for Sports Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, CIFI2D, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal (Ringgold ID: RIN510500)
    2   Porto Biomechanics Laboratory, LABIOMEP-UP, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal (Ringgold ID: RIN517817)

  • Ana Gay 

    3   Department of Physical Education and Sports, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain (Ringgold ID: RIN16741)

  • Francisco A. Ferreira

    1   Research Centre for Sports Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, CIFI2D, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal (Ringgold ID: RIN510500)

  • Joao Paulo Vilas Boas 

    1   Research Centre for Sports Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, CIFI2D, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal (Ringgold ID: RIN510500)
    2   Porto Biomechanics Laboratory, LABIOMEP-UP, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal (Ringgold ID: RIN517817)

  • Catarina C. Santos 

    4   Higher Education School, Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal (Ringgold ID: RIN217120)
    5   Department of Sport Sciences, Higher Institute of Educational Sciences of the Douro, Penafiel, Portugal (Ringgold ID: RIN444606)

Supported by: Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology UIDP/05913/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/059)
Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to make a sex comparison on dryland strength, range of motion (ROM), and kinematics of the breaststroke underwater pullout and (2) to analyze the relationship between dryland strength, ROM, and kinematics of different pullout techniques in both male and female swimmers. Sixteen trained swimmers, nine males (20.67±2.71 years old) and seven females (18.86±0.83 years old), performed 3×25 m breaststroke using two pullout breaststroke techniques: Fly-Kick first and Combined. A speedometer and video footage were used to assess the pullout phase kinematics and the total underwater sequence. Dryland assessments included the maximum jump height, the isometric peak strength of internal shoulder rotation (IR) (at 90°), and knee extensors (at 60°). The joint ROM of knee flexion (KF), plantar flexion (PF), and hip internal rotation were also considered. Velocity–time curves of both techniques according to sex were dissected using statistical parametric mapping. An independent t-test was used to compare differences between swimmers’ sex in kinematic and dryland variables while the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used for associations. Higher instantaneous velocity at ~24–26, ~31–42, and 54.5–63% during the glide phase duration was found for males in the Fly-Kick first technique. Males also displayed a higher peak (3.29 m·s−1) and mean velocity (1.58–1.65 m·s−1) in the total underwater path or in the glide and propulsion phases of both pullout techniques. While males performed better in jump height (33.89 cm) and peak strength of IR (172–176 N), females showed a higher ROM mostly in PF (161–165°). A high and positive correlation between dryland strength and kinematics in both pullout techniques was found in males. The ROM failed to correlate with pullout kinematics, except for the KF in females during the recovery phase (r=0.82–0.86). In conclusion, male breaststrokers perform better than females on dryland strength but not in joint ROM, which provides them with an advantage mainly in the Fly-Kick first underwater pullout.

Keywords

swimming - training - biomechanics - underwater pullout


Publication History

Received: 02 January 2025

Accepted after revision: 29 May 2025

Article published online:
26 June 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany