Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2684-8621
Simulated Wear and Fatigue Performance of Cobalt–Chrome–Molybdenum and Co–Cr–Free Nitrided Titanium Femoral Components in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract
Cobalt–chromium–molybdenum (Co–Cr–Mo) femoral components are widely used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to their mechanical strength and wear performance. However, concerns regarding corrosion, metal ion release, and hypersensitivity have prompted the development of alternative materials, including nitrided titanium–aluminum–vanadium (nTi–6Al–4V). This study aimed to compare the simulated wear performance of Co–Cr–Mo and nTi–6Al–4V femoral components when articulated against conventional polyethylene articular surface bearings and evaluate the fatigue performance of nTi–6Al–4V components. In vitro wear testing, per ISO 14243-3, was conducted for 5 million cycles (Mc) using posterior-stabilized Persona Primary knee system femoral components manufactured from Co–Cr–Mo and nTi–6Al–4V coupled with conventional ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene articular surfaces. Mean steady-state wear rates (mg/Mc) of the articular surface bearings were gravimetrically determined. Surface roughness (Ra) measurements of the femoral components and the articulating surfaces were captured using a contacting stylus profilometer. Polyethylene wear debris morphology was also analyzed. Two fatigue loading scenarios (cantilever loading and three-point bend) of the posterior condyles of femoral components were completed for 10 Mc. The mean steady-state wear rate of the nTi–6Al–4V bearing couple (17.0 ± 1.8 mg/Mc) was noninferior to the Co–Cr–Mo bearing couple (22.8 ± 6.7 mg/Mc). No statistically significant differences were found in the Ra measurements of femoral components or articular surfaces before and after 5.0 Mc (p = 0.21). No statistical difference in polyethylene debris morphology was observed between components (p = 0.07). In both fatigue loading scenarios, no fracture or cracking of the nTi–6Al–4V femoral components occurred. The Co–Cr–Mo and nTi–6Al–4V bearing couples performed similarly regarding mean steady-state wear rates, Ra measurements, and debris morphology in simulated wear conditions. These results provide insights into the wear properties of Co–Cr free femoral TKA components. Additionally, the nTi–6Al–4V components met the performance requirements related to posterior condyle fatigue strength. Further clinical studies are needed to confirm these in vitro findings.
Keywords
cobalt–chromium–molybdenum - nitrided titanium–aluminum–vanadium - total knee arthroplasty - wear performancePublication History
Received: 22 May 2025
Accepted: 15 August 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
18 August 2025
Article published online:
27 August 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Pande S, Dhatrak P. Recent developments and advancements in knee implants materials, manufacturing: a review. Mater Today Proc 2021; 46: 756-762
- 2 Callaghan JJ, Martin CT, Gao Y. et al. What can be learned from minimum 20-year followup studies of knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (01) 94-100
- 3 Victor J, Ghijselings S, Tajdar F. et al. Total knee arthroplasty at 15-17 years: does implant design affect outcome?. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (02) 235-241
- 4 Tidd JL, Gudapati LS, Simmons HL, Klika AK, Pasqualini I, Piuzzi NS. Cleveland Clinic Arthroplasty Group. Do patients with hypoallergenic total knee arthroplasty implants for metal allergy do worse? An analysis of health care utilizations and patient-reported outcome measures. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39 (01) 103-110
- 5 DeFrance MJ, Scuderi GR. Are 20% of patients actually dissatisfied following total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of the literature. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38 (03) 594-599
- 6 Gunaratne R, Pratt DN, Banda J, Fick DP, Khan RJK, Robertson BW. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (12) 3854-3860
- 7 Kurtz PW, Kurtz MA, Aslani S. et al. Wear, material transfer, and electrocautery damage are ubiquitous on CoCrMo femoral knee retrievals. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2024; 112 (12) e35504
- 8 Middleton S, Toms A. Allergy in total knee arthroplasty: a review of the facts. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B (04) 437-441
- 9 Hallab N, Merritt K, Jacobs JJ. Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83 (03) 428-436
- 10 Razak A, Ebinesan AD, Charalambous CP. Metal hypersensitivity in patients with conventional orthopaedic implants. JBJS Rev 2014; 2 (02) e1
- 11 Luetzner J, Krummenauer F, Lengel AM, Ziegler J, Witzleb WC. Serum metal ion exposure after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 461 (461) 136-142
- 12 Reiner T, Sorbi R, Müller M. et al. Blood metal ion release after primary total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study. Orthop Surg 2020; 12 (02) 396-403
- 13 Kretzer JP, Reinders J, Sonntag R. et al. Wear in total knee arthroplasty–just a question of polyethylene?: Metal ion release in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (02) 335-340
- 14 Lukas S, Martinot P, Putman S. et al. Metal ion release after hip resurfacing arthroplasty and knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study of one hundred ninety-five cases. Int Orthop 2024; 48 (01) 119-126
- 15 Lachiewicz PF, Watters TS, Jacobs JJ. Metal hypersensitivity and total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016; 24 (02) 106-112
- 16 Thakur RR, Ast MP, McGraw M, Bostrom MP, Rodriguez JA, Parks ML. Severe persistent synovitis after cobalt-chromium total knee arthroplasty requiring revision. Orthopedics 2013; 36 (04) e520-e524
- 17 Niki Y, Matsumoto H, Otani T. et al. Screening for symptomatic metal sensitivity: a prospective study of 92 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Biomaterials 2005; 26 (09) 1019-1026
- 18 Wang Y, Dai S. Structural basis of metal hypersensitivity. Immunol Res 2013; 55 (1-3): 83-90
- 19 Innocenti M, Vieri B, Melani T, Paoli T, Carulli C. Metal hypersensitivity after knee arthroplasty: fact or fiction?. Acta Biomed 2017; 88 (2S): 78-83
- 20 Matar HE, Porter PJ, Porter ML. Metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review and evidence-based practical approach. Bone Jt Open 2021; 2 (10) 785-795
- 21 Gowd AK, Bang KE, Bullock GS. et al. Oxidized zirconium versus cobalt chromium for primary TKA: no difference in midterm revision rates from the American Joint Replacement Registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2023; 481 (08) 1553-1559
- 22 Basgul C, MacDonald DW, Klein GR, Piuzzi NS, Kurtz SM. Retrieval analysis of titanium nitride coatings for orthopaedic implants. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39 (9S1): S272-S279
- 23 Louwerens JKG, Hockers N, Achten G, Sierevelt IN, Nolte PA, van Hove RP. No clinical difference between TiN-coated versus uncoated cementless CoCrMo mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty; 10-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29 (03) 750-756
- 24 Nakamura S, Ito H, Nakamura K, Kuriyama S, Furu M, Matsuda S. Long-term durability of ceramic tri-condylar knee implants: a minimum 15-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (06) 1874-1879
- 25 Xiang S, Zhao Y, Li Z, Feng B, Weng X. Clinical outcomes of ceramic femoral prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res 2019; 14 (01) 57
- 26 Kim JK, Park IW, Ro DH, Mun BS, Han HS, Lee MC. Is a titanium implant for total knee arthroplasty better? A randomized controlled study. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36 (04) 1302-1309
- 27 Park SW, Kim H, In Y. Fracture of titanium nitride-coated femoral component after total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2014; 21 (04) 871-874
- 28 Abd-Elaziem W, Darwish MA, Hamada A, Daoush WM. Titanium-based alloys and composites for orthopedic implants applications: a comprehensive review. Mater Des 2024; 241: 112850
- 29 Fabry C, Zietz C, Baumann A, Ehall R, Bader R. High wear resistance of femoral components coated with titanium nitride: a retrieval analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (09) 2630-2639
- 30 Herbster M, Döring J, Nohava J, Lohmann CH, Halle T, Bertrand J. Retrieval study of commercially available knee implant coatings TiN, TiNbN and ZrN on TiAl6V4 and CoCr28Mo6. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2020; 112: 104034
- 31 Vadiraj A, Kamaraj M. Fretting fatigue studies of titanium nitride-coated biomedical titanium alloys. J Mater Eng Perform 2006; 15: 553-557
- 32 Blunn Gw M. Four station knee simulator wear testing comparing titanium niobium nitride with cobalt chrome. J Bioeng Biomed Sci 2013; 3 (03) 125
- 33 Łapaj Ł, Rozwalka J. Retrieval analysis of TiN (titanium nitride) coated knee replacements: coating wear and degradation in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2020; 108 (04) 1251-1261
- 34 International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14243-1:2009: Implants for surgery — wear of total knee-joint prostheses part 1: loading and displacement parameters for wear-testing machines with load control and corresponding environmental conditions for test; 2009
- 35 International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14243-3:2014: Implants for surgery—wear of total knee-joint prostheses—part 3: loading and displacement parameters for wear-testing machines with displacement control and corresponding environmental conditions; 2014
- 36 Bartel DL, Bicknell VL, Wright TM. The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68 (07) 1041-1051
- 37 ZRM_WA_0289_11. Characterization of Delamination Wear in UHMWPE Tibial Inserts in Total Knee Arthroplasty
- 38 Stachowiak GW, Batchelor AW. Engineering Tribology. 2nd ed.. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000
- 39 ASTM International. ASTM F2003-02(2022): Standard Practice for Accelerated Aging of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene After Gamma Irradiation in Air; 2022
- 40 International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14243-2:2016: Implants for surgery—wear of total knee joint prostheses—part 2: methods of measurement. Published online 2016
- 41 International Organization for Standardization. ISO 21920:2021: Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface texture: Profile, Parts 1, 2 and 3. Published online 2021
- 42 Dumbleton JH, Manley MT, Edidin AA. A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17 (05) 649-661
- 43 Silva M, Shepherd EF, Jackson WO, Dorey FJ, Schmalzried TP. Average patient walking activity approaches 2 million cycles per year: pedometers under-record walking activity. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17 (06) 693-697
- 44 Rossi SMP, Perticarini L, Mosconi M, Ghiara M, Benazzo F. Ten-year outcomes of a nitrided Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy fixed-bearing total knee replacement with a highly crosslinked polyethylene-bearing in patients with metal allergy. Knee 2020; 27 (05) 1519-1524
- 45 Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS. High-flexion total knee arthroplasty: survivorship and prevalence of osteolysis: results after a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (15) 1378-1384
- 46 De Baets T, Waelput W, Bellemans J. Analysis of third body particles generated during total knee arthroplasty: is metal debris an issue?. Knee 2008; 15 (02) 95-97
- 47 Cowie RM, Jennings LM. Third body damage and wear in arthroplasty bearing materials: a review of laboratory methods. Biomater Biosyst 2021; 4: 100028
- 48 Long M, Rack HJ. Titanium alloys in total joint replacement–a materials science perspective. Biomaterials 1998; 19 (18) 1621-1639
- 49 Galas A, Banci L, Innocenti B. The effects of different femoral component materials on bone and implant response in total knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis. Materials (Basel) 2023; 16 (16) 5605
- 50 van Hove RP, Sierevelt IN, van Royen BJ, Nolte PA. Titanium-nitride coating of orthopaedic implants: a review of the literature. BioMed Res Int 2015; 2015: 485975
- 51 Deroche E, Batailler C, Shatrov J, Gunst S, Servien E, Lustig S. No clinical difference at mid-term follow-up between TiN-coated versus uncoated cemented mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a matched cohort study. SICOT J 2023; 9: 5
- 52 Siljander BR, Chandi SK, Debbi EM, McLawhorn AS, Sculco PK, Chalmers BP. A comparison of clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty in patients with preoperative nickel allergy receiving cobalt chromium or nickel-free implant. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38 (7, Suppl 2): S194-S198
- 53 Hauer G, Leitner L, Ackerl MC. et al. Titanium-nitride coating does not result in a better clinical outcome compared to conventional cobalt-chromium total knee arthroplasty after a long-term follow-up: a propensity score matching analysis. Coatings 2020; 10 (05) 442
- 54 Lawrie CM, Bartosiak KA, Barrack TN, Nunley RM, Wright RW, Barrack RL. James A. Rand Young Investigator's Award: questioning the “nickel free” total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37 (8S): S705-S709