Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2712-4022
Revision Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Prevalence of Anatomic Risk Factors and Early Outcomes
Authors
Abstract
The rate of recurrent instability following primary medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has been reported to be as high as 6.7%. However, limited studies have reported on clinical outcomes and complications following revision MPFL reconstruction. Furthermore, the role of previously identified risk factors for primary failure (e.g., patella alta and trochlear dysplasia) warrants further study in this patient population. Therefore, the goal of this study was 2-fold. First, to evaluate the prevalence of anatomic risk factors and technical errors among patients presenting for revision patellofemoral surgery. Second, to report early clinical outcomes following revision MPFL reconstruction. A single-surgeon registry was queried for patients who underwent revision MPFL reconstruction (including prior MPFL imbrication, MPFL reconstruction, tibial tubercle osteotomy [TTO]) from November 2015 to June 2022. Preoperative imaging was evaluated for risk factors including (1) misplacement of the femoral tunnel, (2) Caton-Deschamps index, (3) tibial tubercle–trochlear groove distance (TT-TG), (4) patellar tilt, and (5) trochlear dysplasia. Patient-reported outcomes and complications were obtained at final follow-up (minimum 1 year). The study included 32 patients (72% female, age: 23.9 ± 6.6 years). Mean time from index surgery to revision MPFL reconstruction was 4.8 ± 4.7 years (range 0.6 to 17.9 years). The most prevalent anatomic risk factors were patella alta (72%), TT-TG >15 mm (53%), trochlear dysplasia (Dejour type B, C, or D) (50%), and excessive patellar tilt (41%). The median number of risk factors was 3 (range 0–6), and 17 patients (53%) had three or more risk factors. At final follow-up (24.1 ± 14.5 months), no patients experienced recurrent patellofemoral instability or graft failure. Postoperative IKDC (p < 0.001) and SF-12 PCS (p < 0.001) scores improved significantly compared with preoperatively. In conclusion, the majority of patients presenting for revision MPFL reconstruction had three or more risk factors for recurrent dislocation.
Level of Evidence:
IV, Case Series.
Keywords
patellofemoral instability - patellar dislocation - medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction - MPFL - revisionPublication History
Received: 02 December 2024
Accepted: 26 September 2025
Article published online:
18 November 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML. et al. Epidemiology and natural history of acute patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (05) 1114-1121
- 2 Hawkins RJ, Bell RH, Anisette G. Acute patellar dislocations. The natural history. Am J Sports Med 1986; 14 (02) 117-120
- 3 Arendt EA, Askenberger M, Agel J, Tompkins MA. Risk of redislocation after primary patellar dislocation: a clinical prediction model based on magnetic resonance imaging variables. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (14) 3385-3390
- 4 Ling DI, Brady JM, Arendt E. et al. Development of a multivariable model based on individual risk factors for recurrent lateral patellar dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103 (07) 586-592
- 5 Kohn LM, Meidinger G, Beitzel K. et al. Isolated and combined medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in revision surgery for patellofemoral instability: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (09) 2128-2135
- 6 Feucht MJ, Mehl J, Forkel P. et al. Failure analysis in patients with patellar redislocation after primary isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8 (06) 2325967120926178
- 7 Nelitz M, Williams RS, Lippacher S, Reichel H, Dornacher D. Analysis of failure and clinical outcome after unsuccessful medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in young patients. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (11) 2265-2272
- 8 Tanaka MJ, Bollier MJ, Andrish JT, Fulkerson JP, Cosgarea AJ. Complications of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: common technical errors and factors for success: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (12) e87
- 9 Sanchis-Alfonso V, Montesinos-Berry E, Ramirez-Fuentes C, Leal-Blanquet J, Gelber PE, Monllau JC. Failed medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: causes and surgical strategies. World J Orthop 2017; 8 (02) 115-129
- 10 Parikh SN, Nathan ST, Wall EJ, Eismann EA. Complications of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in young patients. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (05) 1030-1038
- 11 Jimenez AE, Levy BJ, Grimm NL. et al. Relationship between patellar morphology and known anatomic risk factors for patellofemoral instability. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9 (03) 2325967120988690
- 12 Monk AP, Doll HA, Gibbons CLMH. et al. The patho-anatomy of patellofemoral subluxation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (10) 1341-1347
- 13 Steensen RN, Bentley JC, Trinh TQ, Backes JR, Wiltfong RE. The prevalence and combined prevalences of anatomic factors associated with recurrent patellar dislocation: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (04) 921-927
- 14 Stephen JM, Kaider D, Lumpaopong P, Deehan DJ, Amis AA. The effect of femoral tunnel position and graft tension on patellar contact mechanics and kinematics after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (02) 364-372
- 15 Hiemstra LA, Kerslake S, Lafave M. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction femoral tunnel accuracy: relationship to disease-specific quality of life. Orthop J Sports Med 2017; 5 (02) 2325967116687749
- 16 Hopper GP, Leach WJ, Rooney BP, Walker CR, Blyth MJ. Does degree of trochlear dysplasia and position of femoral tunnel influence outcome after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction?. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (03) 716-722
- 17 Tscholl PM, Ernstbrunner L, Pedrazzoli L, Fucentese SF. The relationship of femoral tunnel positioning in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction on clinical outcome and postoperative complications. Arthroscopy 2018; 34 (08) 2410-2416
- 18 Walker M, Maini L, Kay J, Siddiqui A, Almasri M, de Sa D. Femoral tunnel malposition is the most common indication for revision medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with promising early outcomes following revision reconstruction: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30 (04) 1352-1361
- 19 Nelitz M, Dreyhaupt J, Lippacher S. Combined trochleoplasty and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocations in severe trochlear dysplasia: a minimum 2-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (05) 1005-1012
- 20 Chatterton A, Nielsen TG, Sørensen OG, Lind M. Clinical outcomes after revision surgery for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (03) 739-745
- 21 Zimmermann F, Milinkovic DD, Börtlein J, Balcarek P. Revision surgery for failed medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction results in better disease-specific outcome scores when performed for recurrent instability than for patellofemoral pain or limited range of motion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30 (05) 1718-1724
- 22 Zimmermann F, Börtlein J, Milinkovic DD, Balcarek P. Patient-reported outcomes after revision surgery for failed medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a matched-pair analysis including correction of predisposing factors. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48 (14) 3566-3572
- 23 Balcarek P, Oberthür S, Hopfensitz S. et al. Which patellae are likely to redislocate?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (10) 2308-2314
- 24 Wierer G, Krabb N, Kaiser P. et al. The patellar instability probability calculator: a multivariate-based model to predict the individual risk of recurrent lateral patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med 2022; 50 (02) 471-477
- 25 Mulford JS, Wakeley CJ, Eldridge JDJ. Assessment and management of chronic patellofemoral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (06) 709-716
- 26 Kruckeberg BM, Chahla J, Moatshe G. et al. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the medial patellar ligaments: an anatomic and radiographic study. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (01) 153-162
- 27 Schöttle PB, Schmeling A, Rosenstiel N, Weiler A. Radiographic landmarks for femoral tunnel placement in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (05) 801-804
- 28 Fujino K, Tajima G, Yan J. et al. Morphology of the femoral insertion site of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (04) 998-1003
- 29 Servien E, Fritsch B, Lustig S. et al. In vivo positioning analysis of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (01) 134-139
- 30 Verhulst FV, van Sambeeck JDP, Olthuis GS, van der Ree J, Koëter S. Patellar height measurements: Insall-Salvati ratio is most reliable method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020; 28 (03) 869-875
- 31 Paul RW, Brutico JM, Wright ML. et al. Strong agreement between magnetic resonance imaging and radiographs for Caton-Deschamps Index in patients with patellofemoral instability. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2021; 3 (06) e1621-e1628
- 32 Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Guier C. Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1994; 2 (01) 19-26
- 33 Camp CL, Heidenreich MJ, Dahm DL, Bond JR, Collins MS, Krych AJ. A simple method of measuring tibial tubercle to trochlear groove distance on MRI: description of a novel and reliable technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (03) 879-884
- 34 Ho CP, James EW, Surowiec RK. et al. Systematic technique-dependent differences in CT versus MRI measurement of the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (03) 675-682
- 35 Schoettle PB, Zanetti M, Seifert B, Pfirrmann CWA, Fucentese SF, Romero J. The tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance; a comparative study between CT and MRI scanning. Knee 2006; 13 (01) 26-31
- 36 Powers CM, Shellock FG, Pfaff M. Quantification of patellar tracking using kinematic MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8 (03) 724-732
- 37 Caton JH, Dejour D. Tibial tubercle osteotomy in patello-femoral instability and in patellar height abnormality. Int Orthop 2010; 34 (02) 305-309
- 38 Deojour D, Coultre BL. Osteotomies in patello-femoral instabilities. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2007; Mar; 15 (01) 39-46
- 39 Higgins LD, Taylor MK, Park D. et al; International Knee Documentation Committee. Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. Joint Bone Spine 2007; 74 (06) 594-599
- 40 Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15 (02) 155-163
- 41 Gravesen KS, Kallemose T, Blønd L, Troelsen A, Barfod KW. Persistent morbidity after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction—a registry study with an eight-year follow-up on a nationwide cohort from 1996 to 2014. Knee 2019; 26 (01) 20-25
- 42 Chen J, Han K, Jiang J. et al. Radiographic reference points do not ensure anatomic femoral fixation sites in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a quantified anatomic localization method based on the Saddle Sulcus. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49 (02) 435-441
- 43 Jaecker V, Brozat B, Banerjee M, Otchwemah R, Bouillon B, Shafizadeh S. Fluoroscopic control allows for precise tunnel positioning in MPFL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (09) 2688-2694
- 44 Wang HJ, Song YF, Yan X. et al. Using anatomic landmarks to locate Schöttle's point was accurate without fluoroscopy during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2021; 37 (06) 1902-1908
- 45 Leite C, Santos TP, Giglio PN, Pécora JR, Camanho GL, Gobbi RC. Tibial tubercle osteotomy with distalization is a safe and effective procedure for patients with patella alta and patellar instability. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; Jan 21; 9 (01) 2325967120975101
- 46 Allen MM, Krych AJ, Johnson NR, Mohan R, Stuart MJ, Dahm DL. Combined tibial tubercle osteotomy and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent lateral patellar instability in patients with multiple anatomic risk factors. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 2018; 34 (08) 2420-2426 .e3
- 47 Davis M, Meta F, Dancy ME. et al. Pain and hardware removal after tibial tubercle osteotomy: incidence, associated factors, and outcomes. Orthop J Sports Med 2025 13. 03 ):23259671251324481
- 48 Schmiesing A, Engelking M, Agel J, Arendt EA. Distalization of the tibial tubercle for patellar stabilization combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: length of distalization or residual patella alta and its affect on outcome. Am J Sports Medicine 2022; 50 (06) 1627-1634
- 49 Payne J, Rimmke N, Schmitt LC, Flanigan DC, Magnussen RA. The incidence of complications of tibial tubercle osteotomy: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (09) 1819-1825
- 50 Kreutzer A, Zimmerman R, Kim C, Bastrom T, Schlechter JA. Evaluating the outcomes of trochleoplasty in the treatment of patellofemoral instability in the adolescent and young adult knee with severe trochlear dysplasia: a minimum 2-year follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med 2025 13. 03 ):23259671251321499
- 51 Wierer G, Milinkovic D, Seitlinger G, Liebensteiner M, Post W, Winkler PW. Derotational osteotomy is a relevant procedure in the management of lateral patellar dislocation: an expert survey of the International Patellofemoral Study Group. J Exp Orthop 2025; 12 (01) e70116
- 52 Lehane K, Wolfe I, Buseck A. et al. Predictors of increased complication rate following tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO). Knee 2025; 53: 93-102
- 53 Franciozi CE, Ambra LF, Albertoni LJB. et al. Anteromedial tibial tubercle osteotomy improves results of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability in patients with tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance of 17 to 20 mm. Arthroscopy 2019; 35 (02) 566-574
- 54 Kim JM, Sim JA, Yang H, Kim YM, Wang JH, Seon JK. Clinical comparison of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with or without tibial tuberosity transfer for recurrent patellar instability. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49 (12) 3335-3343