Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2716-2121
Energy-based Options for Male Facial Rejuvenation
Authors

Abstract
Aims and Backgrounds
In recent years, the advancements of minimally invasive, energy-based facial treatments have been followed by an increase in male patient's demand. This article presents a review of current energy-based devices for male facial rejuvenation, aiming to inform clinicians on evidence-based treatment options.
Technology
A search of the scientific literature in the PubMed database from inception to June 2025 was conducted. Articles were included if they discussed energy-based options for male facial rejuvenation. Out of 70 articles screened, 23 met the inclusion criteria. In included articles, 18 energy-based options used for male facial rejuvenation were reported.
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance
This review provides an overview of the wide array of energy-based devices available for male facial rejuvenation. The literature suggests that these technologies can be effectively and safely used to tighten skin, improve contouring while reducing adiposity, enhance skin quality and tone, and manage cosmetic vascular lesions.
Declaration of GenAI Use
During the writing process of this article, the authors used ChatGPT to assist in refining parts of the text to improve clarity and conciseness. The authors have reviewed and edited the text, and they take full responsibility for the content of the article.
Publication History
Received: 10 July 2025
Accepted: 02 October 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
06 October 2025
Article published online:
14 October 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Somenek M. Minimally invasive male facial rejuvenation: energy-based devices. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2024; 32 (03) 437-445
- 2 Triana L, Palacios Huatuco RM, Campilgio G, Liscano E. Trends in surgical and nonsurgical aesthetic procedures: a 14-year analysis of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery-ISAPS. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024; 48 (20) 4217-4227
- 3 International Survey on Aesthetic/Cosmetic Procedures (ISAPS). ISAPS International Survey on Aesthetic/Cosmetic Procedures. 2023 . Accessed June 20, 2025 at: https://www.isaps.org/media/rxnfqibn/isaps-global-survey_2023.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
- 4 Truasheim S, Bonell S. Does social media engagement influence men's consideration of cosmetic surgery?. J Technol Behav Sci 2024; 9 (02) 191-203
- 5 Juhász M, Marmur E. Energy-based devices in male skin rejuvenation. Dermatol Clin 2018; 36 (01) 21-28
- 6 Mendelson BC, Wong CH. Changes in the facial skeleton with aging: implications and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44 (04) 1159-1161
- 7 Giacomoni PU, Mammone T, Teri M. Gender-linked differences in human skin. J Dermatol Sci 2009; 55 (03) 144-149
- 8 Crispin MK, Hruza GJ, Kilmer SL. Lasers and energy-based devices in men. Dermatol Surg 2017; 43 (Suppl. 02) S176-S184
- 9 Park JY, Hong W, Lee KC. et al. Customizing microfocused ultrasound with visualization treatment for facial lifting in Asian men: experience and practical insights from Korea. J Cosmet Dermatol 2025; 24 (06) e70278
- 10 Khan U, Khalid N. A systematic review of the clinical efficacy of micro-focused ultrasound treatment for skin rejuvenation and tightening. Cureus 2021; 13 (12) e20163
- 11 Dayan E, Rovatti P, Aston S, Chia CT, Rohrich R, Theodorou S. Multimodal radiofrequency application for lower face and neck laxity. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (08) e2862
- 12 Sadick NS, Harth Y. A 12-week clinical and instrumental study evaluating the efficacy of a multisource radiofrequency home-use device for wrinkle reduction and improvement in skin tone, skin elasticity, and dermal collagen content. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2016; 18 (08) 422-427
- 13 Mohamadi F, Pourgholi E, Vahabi SM. et al. Comparative analysis of erbium: glass 1550 nm and combined erbium: YAG & Nd: YAG lasers for perioral rejuvenation: a prospective study. Lasers Med Sci 2025; 40 (01) 291
- 14 Salameh F, Daniely D, Kauvar A, Carasso RL, Mehrabi JN, Artzi O. Treatment of periorbital wrinkles using thermo-mechanical fractional injury therapy versus fractional non-ablative 1565 nm laser: a comparative prospective, randomized, double-arm, controlled study. Lasers Surg Med 2022; 54 (01) 46-53
- 15 Russe E, Purschke M, Farinelli WA. et al. Micro-fractional, directional skin tightening: a porcine model. Lasers Surg Med 2016; 48 (03) 264-269
- 16 Carruthers KH, Vyas K, Remy K, McCarty JC, Austen Jr WG. Micro-coring: a novel approach to perioral rejuvenation. Aesthet Surg J 2024; 44 (11) 1209-1217
- 17 Sharma Y, Jain P, Gottam SB, Sarkar A, Prasad N. Prospective evaluation of fractional carbon dioxide laser treatment of mature burn scars, post-traumatic scars, and post-acne scars. Cureus 2024; 16 (04) e58358
- 18 Kohl E, Meierhöfer J, Koller M. et al. Fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of rhytides and photoageing: a prospective study using profilometric analysis. Br J Dermatol 2014; 170 (04) 858-865
- 19 Arias F, Gala Z, Stetz L, Elfanagely O, Greco G. A prospective comparison of patient-reported outcomes after facial laser resurfacing. Plast Reconstr Surg 2025; 156 (01) 37e-46e
- 20 Mineroff J, Austin E, Feit E. et al. Male facial rejuvenation using a combination 633, 830, and 1072 nm LED face mask. Arch Dermatol Res 2023; 315 (09) 2605-2611
- 21 Alqam M, Wamsley CE, Hitchcock T, Jones BC, Akgul Y, Kenkel JM. Efficacy and tolerability of a microneedling device for treating wrinkles on the neck. Aesthet Surg J 2022; 42 (10) 1154-1160
- 22 Khetarpal S, Desai S, Kruter L. et al. Picosecond laser with specialized optic for facial rejuvenation using a compressed treatment interval. Lasers Surg Med 2016; 48 (08) 723-726
- 23 Zhou Y, Hamblin MR, Wen X. An update on fractional picosecond laser treatment: histology and clinical applications. Lasers Med Sci 2023; 38 (01) 45
- 24 Grunewald S, Kauer F, Bodendorf MO, Simon JC, Paasch U. Treatment of superficial vascular skin changes with a 532 nm lithium-borate laser. Med Laser Appl 2008; 23 (02) 55-60
- 25 Zawodny P, Malec W, Gill K, Skonieczna-Żydecka K, Sieńko J. Assessment of the effectiveness of treatment of vascular lesions within the facial skin with a laser with a wavelength of 532 nm based on photographic diagnostics with the use of polarized light. Sensors (Basel) 2023; 23 (02) 1010
- 26 Lee MWC. Combination 532-nm and 1064-nm lasers for noninvasive skin rejuvenation and toning. Arch Dermatol 2003; 139 (10) 1265-1276
- 27 Urdiales-Gálvez F, Castellano-Miralla A. Effectiveness and safety of a narrow band spectrum intense pulsed-light dye with long pulse Nd:YAG laser for treating facial vascular lesions. J Cosmet Dermatol 2023; 22 (Suppl. 02) 8-15
- 28 Victor Ross E, Chodkiewicz H, Javvaji S, Zumwalt J, Kutscher TD, Tran C. Enhanced pulsed dye laser for facial rejuvenation. Lasers Surg Med 2021; 53 (01) 109-114
- 29 Guida S, Galimberti MG, Bencini M, Pellacani G, Bencini PL. Telangiectasia of the face: risk factors for reappearance in patients treated with dye laser. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017; 31 (08) 1355-1359
- 30 Keaney TC, Tanzi E, Alster T. Comparison of 532 nm potassium titanyl phosphate laser and 595 nm pulsed dye laser in the treatment of erythematous surgical scars: a randomized, controlled, open-label study. Dermatol Surg 2016; 42 (01) 70-76
- 31 Nguyen L, Dierckxsens C, Kerscher M, Hartjen A, Schneider SW, Herberger K. Rosacea treatment with 532 nm KTP versus 595 nm pulsed dye laser—a prospective, controlled study. J Cosmet Dermatol 2024; 23 (07) 2443-2449
- 32 Yim S, Lee YH, Choi YJ, Kim WS. Split-face comparison of the picosecond 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser using a microlens array and the quasi-long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser for treatment of photoaging facial wrinkles and pores in Asians. Lasers Med Sci 2020; 35 (04) 949-956
- 33 Mandavia R, Ahmed M, Parmar D, Cariati M, Shahidi S, Lapa T. Treatment of periorbital veins with vascular laser: a systematic review and retrospective case series. J Cosmet Dermatol 2024; 23 (08) 2603-2617
- 34 Shimojima K, Hashimoto M, Yamaoka Y, Kapoor KM. Combination treatment with cryolipolysis and hyaluronic acid fillers for jawline enhancement. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2024; 17 (00) 2989-2998
- 35 Jain M, Savage NE, Spiteri K, Snell BJA. A 3-dimensional quantitative analysis of volume loss following submental cryolipolysis. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (02) 123-132
- 36 Sarnoff DS. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a novel 1440nm Nd:YAG laser for neck contouring and skin tightening without liposuction. J Drugs Dermatol 2013; 12 (12) 1382-1388
- 37 Piccolo D, Mutlag MH, Fusco I, Bonan P. Facial and body contouring with 1444 nm Nd:YAG laser-assisted lipolysis: clinical evidence. Skin Res Technol 2023; 29 (07) e13400
- 38 Nilforoushzadeh MA, Heidari A, Ghane Y. et al. The endo-lift laser (intralesional 1470 nm diode laser) for dermatological aesthetic conditions: a systematic review. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024; 48 (23) 5097-5114
