Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2718-3825
The Evolving Standards for Facial Plastic Photography in the Age of Social Media
Authors

Abstract
Introduction
Standardized photography is foundational in facial plastic surgery (FPS) for accurate documentation of outcomes. The increased use of smartphones and social media introduces challenges such as variable lighting, filters, and digital manipulation that can distort results.
Objectives & Hypotheses
To examine current FPS photography standards and propose updated guidelines that address the influence of digital platforms. We hypothesize that modern adaptations are required to ensure accuracy and patient trust.
Study Design
Perspective on FPS photography standards in the age of social media.
Methods
We reviewed published recommendations, historical practices, and recent studies on perioperative FPS photography, including the impact of smartphone technology and social media on standardization.
Results
Findings highlight that smartphone photography and social media images often introduce bias through inconsistent angles, lighting, and digital enhancements.
Conclusion
Revised photographic guidelines that integrate digital-era considerations are necessary to maintain accuracy, transparency, and ethical standards in FPS.
‡ These authors contributed equally to this article.
Publication History
Received: 29 July 2025
Accepted: 22 September 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
08 October 2025
Article published online:
22 October 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Schwartz MS, Tardy Jr ME. Standardized photodocumentation in facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast Surg 1990; 7 (01) 1-12
- 2 Mang WL, Neidel F, Becker A, Mackowski MS, Schantz J-T, Then-Schlagau U. Photographic documentation in aesthetic and plastic surgery. Manual of Aesthetic Surgery 2010; 1-6
- 3 Becker DG, Tardy Jr ME. Standardized photography in facial plastic surgery: pearls and pitfalls. Facial Plast Surg 1999; 15 (02) 93-99
- 4 Henderson JL, Larrabee Jr WF, Krieger BD. Photographic standards for facial plastic surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005; 7 (05) 331-333
- 5 Basa K, Spiegel JH. Facial plastic surgery on Instagram: what is trending? What is working?. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41 (07) 846-851
- 6 ElAbd R, Alghanim K, Alnesef M, Alyouha S, Samargandi OA. Aesthetic surgery before-and-after photography bias on Instagram. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023; 47 (05) 2144-2149
- 7 Social Media Guide for Physicians. American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; 2024. . Accessed at: https://www.aafprs.org/Professionals/Resources/SocialMediaGuide/MD/SMG.aspx?hkey=a4221af8-d8cf-4dd8-bc8f-c81e13662852
- 8 Swamy RS, Most SP. Pre- and postoperative portrait photography: standardized photos for various procedures. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2010; 18 (02) 245-252
- 9 Parsa S, Basagaoglu B, Mackley K, Aitson P, Kenkel J, Amirlak B. Current and future photography techniques in aesthetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum 2021; 4: ojab050
- 10 DiBernardo BE, Adams RL, Krause J, Fiorillo MA, Gheradini G. Photographic standards in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (02) 559-568
- 11 Deot N, Kiprovski A, Hatala A, Obayemi Jr A, Suryadevara A, Davila RO. Evaluation of mobile and digital single-lens reflex photography for facial surgical analysis. Laryngoscope 2023; 133 (10) 2590-2596
- 12 Thornton SM, Attaluri PK, Wirth PJ. et al. Picture perfect: standardizing and safekeeping clinical photography in plastic surgery. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum 2024; 6: ojae012
- 13 Toriumi DM. Structure Rhinoplasty: Lessons Learned in 30 Years. DMT Solutions; 2019
- 14 Prantl L, Brandl D, Ceballos P. A proposal for updated standards of photographic documentation in aesthetic medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017; 5 (08) e1389
- 15 Daniel RK, Hodgson J, Lambros VS. Rhinoplasty: the light reflexes. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 85 (06) 859-866 , discussion 867–868
- 16 Khavkin J, Ellis DA. Standardized photography for skin surface. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2011; 19 (02) 241-246
- 17 Capon T. Standardised anatomical alignment of the head in a clinical photography studio. A comparison between the Frankfort Horizontal and the natural head position. J Vis Commun Med 2016; 39 (3-4): 105-111
- 18 Sturgill M. Don't Be Fooled: How to Analyze Before and After Photos Like a Pro. 2024 . Accessed at https://www.sturgillmd.com/facial-focus/dont-be-fooled-how-to-analyze-before-and-after-photos-like-a-pro
- 19 Spira M. Otoplasty: what I do now—a 30-year perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (03) 834-840 , discussion 841
- 20 Thomas JR, Tardy Jr ME, Przekop H. Uniform photographic documentation in facial plastic surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1980; 13 (02) 367-381
- 21 McGuckin KR. IMI National Guidelines A Guide to Good Practice Wound Management Photography. Institute of Medical Illustrators. 2019
- 22 Gonzlez-Ulloa M. MARIO GONZALEZ ULLOA. A quantum method for the appreciation of the morphology of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 1964; 34 (03) 241-246
