Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2731-3735
Muscle-to-Bone Ratio in Collegiate Female Athletes in Low and High Impact Sports
Authors
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to compare the muscle-to-bone ratio in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I female athletes (n=387) to those in age-matched controls (n=209). In addition, we examined the muscle-to-bone ratio in low and high impact sports. Total and regional lean soft tissue, fat mass, and bone mineral content were determined by dual X-ray absorptiometry. The muscle-to-bone ratio was calculated by dividing lean soft tissue by bone mineral content. Athletes were categorized by sports: basketball (n=66), cross-country (n=49), diving (n=17), soccer (n=69), softball (n=71), swimming (n=93), and volleyball (n=22). There were significant differences between controls and athletes for total lean soft tissue, fat mass, and bone mineral content. When the total muscle-to-bone ratio in athletes was compared to that in controls, there were no significant differences; however, there were significant differences in the regional muscle-to-bone ratio. Low impact sports (i.e., diving and swimming) had significantly higher total and regional muscle-to-bone ratios than high impact sports (i.e., cross-country, basketball, volleyball, softball, and soccer). The differences identified between sports in total and regional muscle-to-bone ratios may be a result of sport-specific impact and mechanical strain affecting the balance between the muscle and the bone. This study provides insights into how training-induced body composition impacts the balance between the tissues in female athletes.
Publication History
Received: 16 June 2025
Accepted after revision: 23 October 2025
Article published online:
12 December 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Frost HM. Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”. A proposal. Anat Rec 1987; 219: 1-9
- 2 Schoenau E. From mechanostat theory to development of the “Function Mucle-Bone-Unit”. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2005; 5 (03) 232-238
- 3 Bernal-Orozco MF, Posada-Falomir M, Quiñónez-Gastélum CM. et al. Anthropometric and body composition profile of young professional soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2020; 34 (07) 1911-1923
- 4 Brocherie F, Girard O, Forchino F. et al. Relationships between anthropometric measures and athletic performance, with special reference to repeated-sprint ability, in the Qatar national soccer team. J Sports Sci 2014; 32 (13) 1243-1254
- 5 Carvajal W, Betancourt H, León S. et al. Kinanthropometric profile of Cuban women Olympic volleyball champions. MEDICC Rev 2012; 14 (02) 7
- 6 Holway FE, Garavaglia R. Kinanthropometry of group I rugby players in Buenos Aires, Argentina. J Sports Sci 2009; 27 (11) 1211-1220
- 7 Ireland A, Maden-Wilkinson T, Mcphee J. et al. Upper limb muscle–bone asymmetries and bone adaptation in elite youth tennis players. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013; 45 (09) 1749-1758
- 8 Dengel DR, Evanoff NG. Positional differences in muscle-to-bone ratio in National Football League players. Int J Sports Med 2023; 44: 720-723
- 9 Dengel DR, Studee HR, Juckett WT. et al. Muscle-to-bone ratio in NCAA division I collegiate football players by position. J Strength Cond Res 2024; 38 (09) 1607-1612
- 10 Gomez-Bruton A, Gonzalez-Aguero A, Matute-Llorente A. et al. The muscle-bone unit in adolescent swimmers. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30 (05) 1079-1088
- 11 Juckett WT, Stanforth PR, Czeck MA, Evanoff NG, Dengel DR. Total and regional body composition of NCAA collegiate female rowing athletes. Int J Sports Med 2023; 44: 592-598
- 12 Westerberg HE, Stanforth PR, Carbuhn A, Bosch TA, Dengel DR. Muscle-to-bone and soft tissue-to-bone ratios in track and field athletes. Int J Sports Med 2025; 46: 90-96
- 13 Rothney MP, Martin F-P, Xia Y. et al. Precision of GE Lunar iDXA for the measurement of total and regional body composition in nonobese adults. J Clin Densitom 2012; 15 (04) 399-404
- 14 McKay AKA, Stellingwerff T, Smith ES. et al. Defining training and performance caliber: A participant classification framework. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2022; 17 (02) 317-331
- 15 Jurimae J, Cicchella A, Tillmann V. et al. Effect of pubertal development and physical activity on plasma ghrelin concentration in boys. J Endocrinol Invest 2009; 32: 18-22
- 16 Hagman M, Helge EW, Hornstrup T. et al. Bone mineral density in lifelong trained male football players compared with young and elderly untrained men. J Sport Health Sci 2018; 7: 159-168
- 17 Lozano-Berges G, Matute-Llorente Á, González-Agüero A. et al. Soccer helps build strong bones during growth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr 2017; 177: 295-310
- 18 Burt LA, Greene DA, Ducher G, Naughton GA. Skeletal adaptations associated with pre-pubertal gymnastics participation as determined by DXA and pQCT: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport 2013; 16: 231-239
- 19 Tenforde AS, Fredericson M. Influence of sports participation on bone health in the young athlete: a review of the literature. PM&R 2011; 3: 861-867
- 20 Guadalupe-Grau A, Fuentes T, Guerra B, Calbet JA. Exercise and bone mass in adults. Sports Med 2009; 39: 439-468
- 21 Meakin LB, Price JS, Lanyon LE. The contribution of experimental in vivo models to understanding the mechanisms of adaptation to mechanical loading in bone. Front Endocrinol 2014; 5: 154
