Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2765-7072
How to Do It

Mitral Valve Procedures and Multivessel CABG through a Single Left Anterior Minithoracotomy

Authors

  • Volodymyr Demianenko

    1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart-Thorax Center, Klinikum Fulda, University Medicine Marburg, Campus Fulda, Fulda, Germany
  • Hilmar Dörge

    1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart-Thorax Center, Klinikum Fulda, University Medicine Marburg, Campus Fulda, Fulda, Germany
  • Markus Schlömicher

    1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart-Thorax Center, Klinikum Fulda, University Medicine Marburg, Campus Fulda, Fulda, Germany
  • Marius Grossmann

    1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart-Thorax Center, Klinikum Fulda, University Medicine Marburg, Campus Fulda, Fulda, Germany
  • Ahmed Belmenai

    1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart-Thorax Center, Klinikum Fulda, University Medicine Marburg, Campus Fulda, Fulda, Germany
  • Christian Sellin

    1   Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart-Thorax Center, Klinikum Fulda, University Medicine Marburg, Campus Fulda, Fulda, Germany
 

Abstract

We describe a technique for concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and mitral valve (MV) replacement or annuloplasty with ring implantation performed through a single left anterior minithoracotomy (LAmT). Four patients underwent combined MV and CABG surgery using peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass, a transseptal approach to the MV, and complete coronary revascularization. MV exposure was successfully achieved in all cases without conversion to sternotomy. No major complications such as stroke, reoperation for bleeding, or early mortality occurred. Our initial results demonstrate that single LAmT is a feasible sternum-sparing approach for patients requiring simultaneous coronary and mitral procedures.


Introduction

Traditional mitral valve (MV) surgery is typically performed via median sternotomy. With advances in minimally invasive cardiac techniques, isolated MV procedures commonly utilize right-sided minithoracotomy. However, combined MV and coronary procedures remain predominantly sternotomy-based due to extensive exposure requirements.

We previously standardized the left anterior minithoracotomy (LAmT) approach for multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), known as the Total Coronary Revascularization via left Anterior Thoracotomy (TCRAT) technique.[1] Based on this experience, we explored the feasibility of accessing the aortic valve via the same incision.[2] [3] We have now expanded this approach to encompass MV surgery such as annuloplasty with ring implantation or replacement, allowing both MV procedures and complete coronary revascularization through a single minimally invasive incision.


Technique Description

All patients routinely underwent preoperative computed tomography angiography for evaluation of vascular anatomy and screening for significant atherosclerosis or calcifications. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed preoperatively to assess MV morphology, function, and the severity of regurgitation.

General anesthesia induction followed an opioid-based multimodal approach. Placement of a jugular venous central line and a jugular venous return cannula, along with systemic heparinization, preceded cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) cannulation. A 5- to 6-cm-long skin incision was made along the left fourth intercostal space (ICS), starting at the left sternal border. A muscle-sparing dissection was performed, and a rib spreader with concave blades was inserted. The left internal mammary artery (LIMA) was harvested using a pedicled technique with long-tip diathermy, starting from the distal bifurcation and extending proximally beyond the origin of the left mammary vein. CPB was initiated via open Seldinger axillary arterial cannulation and percutaneous venous cannulation with vacuum-assisted venous drainage.[4]

The pericardium was opened in a T-shaped fashion. The ascending aorta was encircled and cross-clamped using a transthoracic clamp introduced through the second ICS. Cold blood cardioplegia was delivered for myocardial protection. Tapes placed around the inferior vena cava, superior vena cava, and left pulmonary veins ([Fig. 1]) facilitated exposure of the coronary targets and MV.

Zoom
Fig. 1 Schematic showing bands placement around the vessels. AO, aorta; IVC, inferior vena cava; LVP, left pulmonary vein; SVC, superior vena cava.

The first step was coronary revascularization, initiated with distal anastomoses to the lateral and inferior walls. This strategy allowed the grafts to be used subsequently for intermittent cardioplegia delivery.

The next step was the MV procedure, for which the surgeon repositioned the patient to the right side. An important technical aspect for achieving optimal MV exposure is the use of lateral traction tapes around the inferior and superior vena cavae and the ascending aorta. This maneuver displaces the mediastinal structures into the left pleural cavity, thereby optimizing surgical access. The right atrium was opened, and the interatrial septum was vertically incised for standard transseptal MV access. Exposure was maintained using stay sutures and small retractors, employing standard or long-shafted instruments as anatomically required ([Fig. 2]). Depending on preoperative assessment and intraoperative inspection, either MV procedure was performed using standard techniques. Knotting was facilitated using the Cor-Knot automated fastener (LSI Solutions, Victor, NY). The interatrial septum and right atrium were closed ([Video 1], available in the online version only).

Zoom
Fig. 2 Visualization of mitral valve exposure through interatrial access. Arrows indicate the directions of band tension. AL, anterior leaflet; Ao, aorta; IVC, inferior vena cava; LA, left atrium; PL, posterior leaflet; RA, right atrium; SVC, superior vena cava.
Video 1 A detailed step-by-step guide to performing combined mitral valve and coronary artery bypass grafting procedures via a single left anterior minithoracotomy. Step-by-step demonstration of combined mitral valve procedure and multivessel CABG through a single LAmT. Key operative steps include patient positioning, incision, LIMA harvest, CPB setup, coronary anastomoses, transseptal mitral valve exposure, valve procedure, and final graft configuration. CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; ICS, intercostal space; LamT, left anterior minithoracotomy; LIMA, left internal mammary artery; MV, mitral valve.

As the final step, the anastomosis between LIMA and the left anterior descending artery, or the construction of T-grafts, was performed. Proximal coronary anastomoses were completed on the beating heart after aortic cross-clamp removal using a side-biting clamp. Perioperative patient characteristics and operative data are summarized in [Table 1].

Table 1

Perioperative patient characteristics and operative data

Age

Sex

MR grade

BMI

EF (%)

EuroSCORE II

Operative time, minutes

CPB time, minutes

Aortic cross-clamp time, minutes

Mitral valve procedure

Graft configuration

RBC (unit)

ICU stay (days)

Hospital stay (days)

Postop Echo findings

Postop complications

43

F

Severe

37

55

1.44

343

212

148

MVR mech (29 mm)

Lima to LAD, SVG to LCx

0

1

10

No paravalvular leakage; MPG 4 mm Hg

None

69

M

Severe

31

55

2.16

419

263

185

MVR bio (33 mm)

LIMA to LAD, SVG to LCx

2

7

14

No paravalvular leakage; MPG 4 mm Hg

Neoplasia (on therapy during ICU stay)

77

M

Moderate to Severe

24

45

3.48

342

196

143

MV repair (ring 34 mm)

LIMA to LAD, RA to LCx and RCA

1

2

10

Trivial MI

None

67

M

Severe

30

50

2.27

315

185

132

MV repair (ring 32 mm)

LIMA to LAD, RA to LCx and RCA

1

2

9

Trivial MI

None

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; EF, ejection fraction; ICU, intensive care unit; LAD, left anterior descending artery; LCx, left circumflex artery; LIMA, left internal mammary artery; MI, mitral insufficiency; MPG, mean pressure gradient; MR, mitral regurgitation; MVR, mitral valve replacement; MV, mitral valve; RA, radial artery; RBC, red blood cell; RCA, right coronary artery; SVG, saphenous vein graft.



Discussion

Our preliminary experience demonstrates the feasibility of performing combined MV surgery and complete anatomical coronary revascularization through a single LAmT incision. Avoiding sternotomy eliminates the risk of sternal wound complications and accelerates postoperative recovery. Previously described sternum-sparing techniques for combined procedures include bilateral thoracotomies, hybrid methods, or complex transapical approaches.[5] [6] The presented technique employs a single incision and standard surgical instruments, thereby streamlining the procedure and enhancing its general applicability.

As TCRAT is an on-pump, arrested-heart procedure, it inherently offers the possibility of combining minimally invasive multivessel CABG with other cardiac procedures. A key element of the presented technique is the use of CPB with cardiac arrest during all surgical steps, which allows controlled manipulation of the decompressed heart as well as safe access to all cardiac structures and optimal exposure within the limited operative field. Despite prolonged cross-clamp times, meticulous myocardial protection using repeated cold blood cardioplegia administered into the aortic root and subsequently through the distal anastomoses prevented myocardial injury and renal dysfunction.

This approach is not suitable for all patients. Exclusion criteria include ascending aortic calcifications, previous cardiac surgery, and complex chest wall anatomy, such as pectus excavatum. At the current stage of our experience, we would not recommend this approach in patients with severe mitral annular calcification or in patients requiring more complex MV repair techniques other than annuloplasty. However, future refinements may represent an avenue for expansion of this approach. Prior experience with the TCRAT technique significantly enhances procedural safety and success.



Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


Correspondence

Volodymyr Demianenko, MD, PhD
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart-Thorax Center Klinikum Fulda, University Medicine Marburg
Campus Fulda, Pacelliallee 4, 36043 Fulda
Germany   

Publication History

Received: 23 June 2025

Accepted: 17 November 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
05 December 2025

Article published online:
15 December 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany


Zoom
Fig. 1 Schematic showing bands placement around the vessels. AO, aorta; IVC, inferior vena cava; LVP, left pulmonary vein; SVC, superior vena cava.
Zoom
Fig. 2 Visualization of mitral valve exposure through interatrial access. Arrows indicate the directions of band tension. AL, anterior leaflet; Ao, aorta; IVC, inferior vena cava; LA, left atrium; PL, posterior leaflet; RA, right atrium; SVC, superior vena cava.