Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2779-0035
External Quality Assessment for Unfractionated Heparin Monitoring: An Update from Australasia/Asia-Pacific
Authors
Abstract
Unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains a major anticoagulant therapy applied within the acute hospital system. Due to intra- and interpatient variability, UFH monitoring needs to be applied to ensure patients remain free of thrombotic and bleeding complications at too low and too high an UFH level, respectively. Monitoring of UFH therapy is usually achieved using either an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or an anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) method. The former is a clotting assay that evaluates both the anti-factor IIa (anti-IIa or anti-thrombin) and anti-Xa anticoagulant activity of UFH and the latter is a chromogenic assay that evaluates just the anti-Xa anticoagulant activity of UFH. The aPTT method is perhaps more widely utilized since aPTT testing is performed by all hemostasis laboratories performing routine coagulation tests. However, the aPTT method requires establishment of an aPTT UFH therapeutic range. The anti-Xa method is favored in larger hospital sites and by most experts and uses a standard UFH therapeutic range. We report findings for aPTT and anti-Xa testing for UFH monitoring in our geographic region using recent data (testing for the past 5 years; 2020–2024 inclusive) from the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program, an international external quality assessment (EQA) program, with over 110 enrolments for this EQA module. Four samples are assessed each year, with these comprising various levels of UFH. Good reproducibility was observed for duplicate samples sent in different surveys. Coefficient of variation (%) data revealed moderate variation for samples containing UFH (10–40% for anti-Xa; 10–25% for aPTT). Anti-Xa reagents containing dextran sulphate tended to yield higher anti-Xa values than those without. Interpretations regarding UFH levels being below, within, or above therapeutic levels were generally reported as expected, according to the level of UFH present in the sample, especially for anti-Xa testing.
Keywords
unfractionated heparin - anti-factor Xa - aPTT - laboratory testing - EQA - proficiency testing - assay variabilityData Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Contributors' Statement
All authors contributed to various elements of the study execution, study design, data analysis, or data interpretation. E.J.F. wrote the original draft of the manuscript; all authors contributed to revision and approved the manuscript for submission and publication.
Publication History
Received: 26 October 2025
Accepted: 23 December 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
24 December 2025
Article published online:
08 January 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Ifergan A, Loutati R, Tvito A. et al; Jerusalem Platelets Thrombosis, Intervention in Cardiology (JUPITER-19) Study Group. Impact of time in therapeutic range (TTR) within the first 72 h on prognosis in patients with pulmonary embolism treated with unfractionated heparin. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2025; (epub ahead of print)
- 2 Delange B, Bouzillé G, Guillot P. et al. Anti-factor Xa during unfractionated heparin therapy in critically ill patients: development of prediction models using machine learning. Digit Health 2025; 11: 20 552076241305957
- 3 Gouin-Thibault I, Castellucci LA, Connors JM. et al. Results of an international survey on the management of therapeutic intensity unfractionated heparin: communication from the SSCs of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2025; 23 (05) 1717-1726
- 4 Feng I, Powley TR, Yang CG. et al. Unfractionated heparin monitoring by anti-factor Xa versus activated partial thromboplastin time strategies during venoarterial extracorporeal life support. Perfusion 2025; 40 (07) 1575-1584
- 5 Gouin-Thibault I, Mansour A, Hardy M. et al. Management of therapeutic-intensity unfractionated heparin: a narrative review on critical points. TH Open 2024; 8 (03) e297-e307
- 6 Favaloro EJ, Pasalic L, Lippi G. Unfractionated heparin: optimizing laboratory monitoring and reducing unwanted interference in everyday hemostasis test practice. Pol Arch Intern Med 2024; 134 (03) 16684
- 7 Safani M, Appleby S, Chiu R. et al. Application of anti-Xa assay in monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy in contemporary antithrombotic management. Expert Rev Hematol 2023; 16 (01) 1-8
- 8 Bonar RA, Favaloro EJ, Marsden K. External quality assurance for heparin monitoring. Semin Thromb Hemost 2012; 38 (06) 632-639
- 9 Hollestelle MJ, van der Meer FJM, Meijer P. Quality performance for indirect Xa inhibitor monitoring in patients using international external quality data. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020; 58 (11) 1921-1930
- 10 Amiral J, Amiral C, Dunois C. Optimization of heparin monitoring with anti-FXa assays and the impact of dextran sulfate for measuring all drug activity. Biomedicines 2021; 9 (06) 700
- 11 Jennings I, Kitchen D, Kitchen S, Woods T, Walker I. The importance of commutability in material used for quality control purposes. Int J Lab Hematol 2019; 41 (01) 39-45
- 12 Smahi M, De Pooter N, Hollestelle MJ, Toulon P. Monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy: lack of standardization of anti-Xa activity reagents. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18 (10) 2613-2621
- 13 Kitchen S, Cartwright I, Woods TA, Jennings I, Preston FE. Lipid composition of seven APTT reagents in relation to heparin sensitivity. Br J Haematol 1999; 106 (03) 801-808
- 14 Kitchen S, Jennings I, Woods TA, Preston FE. Wide variability in the sensitivity of APTT reagents for monitoring of heparin dosage. J Clin Pathol 1996; 49 (01) 10-14
- 15 Favaloro EJ, Arunachalam S, Dean E. et al. Activated protein C resistance testing: an update from Australasia/Asia-Pacific. Int J Lab Hematol 2025; 47 (04) 720-729