Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2794-0336
A New Dawn: Resident Recruitment in the United States in the Post-COVID Era
Authors
Abstract
The widespread adoption of virtual residency interviews in response to the COVID-19 pandemic led to an explosion in literature comparing the pros and cons of virtual and in-person interviews, but also led to an explosion in already-high residency application and interview volumes. While virtual interviews were substantially cheaper for all involved, there is fear that applicants and programs cannot judge one another as well as during in-person interviews. Likewise, increases in application volumes have made holistic application review more challenging for program directors, but the recent rise in “preference signaling” seems to be an optimal solution to that issue. 2020 also saw increased awareness of systemic inequities in the United States, and medical education and residency recruitment was not immune from scrutiny. Finally, the rise of artificial intelligence could again fundamentally change the resident selection process. It is imperative that the GME community continues to adapt to a changing world.
Contributors' Statement
W.A.D. contributed conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, software, and writing—original draft, review, and editing. J.B.R. contributed to conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, project administration, resources, supervision, and writing—original draft, review, and editing.
Publication History
Received: 04 August 2025
Accepted: 20 January 2026
Article published online:
19 February 2026
© 2026. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 National Resident Matching Program. The Matching Algorithm. Accessed July 14, 2025 at: https://www.nrmp.org/imatch/matching-algorithm/
- 2 Meyer AM, Hart AA, Keith JN. COVID-19 increased residency applications and how virtual interviews impacted applicants. Cureus 2022; 14 (06) e26096
- 3 Uwah MS, Umanskiy K, Shaffer VO, Olortegui KS. The emperor's new virtual clothes: conducting colon and rectal surgery residency interviews in the post-COVID era. Dis Colon Rectum 2025; 68 (07) 800-802
- 4 Mehkri Y, Pierzchajlo N, Kemeness C. et al. A cost analysis of medical students applying to neurological surgery residency: an analysis of the Texas STAR database. J Clin Neurosci 2023; 117: 151-155
- 5 Nguyen BM, Guh J, Freeman B. Black lives matter: moving from passion to action in academic medical institutions. J Natl Med Assoc 2022; 114 (02) 193-198
- 6 Gottlieb-Smith R, Xixis K, Martindale JM, Goldstein JHR, Rosati J. Artificial intelligence in residency recruitment: impact on equity. Neurol Educ 2024; 3 (03) e200150
- 7 Granger CJ, Khosla A, Osei DA, Dy CJ. Optimizing the virtual interview experience for hand surgery fellowships. J Hand Surg Am 2022; 47 (04) 379-383
- 8 Wolff M, Burrows H. Planning for virtual interviews: residency recruitment during a pandemic. Acad Pediatr 2021; 21 (01) 24-31
- 9 Yee JM, Moran S, Chapman T. From beginning to end: a single radiology residency program's experience with web-based resident recruitment during COVID-19 and a review of the literature. Acad Radiol 2021; 28 (08) 1159-1168
- 10 Estevez TP, Casasnovas CE, Safin DS. Structuring the future residency recruitment seasons: applicants' perspective on the virtual experience during the 2020-2021 interview season. Acad Psychiatry 2022; 46 (01) 140-141
- 11 Ponterio JM, Levy L, Lakhi NA. Evaluation of the virtual interviews for resident recruitment due to COVID-19 travel restrictions: a nationwide survey of US senior medical students. Fam Med 2022; 54 (10) 776-783
- 12 Daniel M, Gottlieb M, Wooten D. et al. Virtual interviewing for graduate medical education recruitment and selection: a BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 80. Med Teach 2022; 44 (12) 1313-1331
- 13 Chesney TR, Bogach J, Devaud N, Govindarajan A, Wright FC. How we did it: creating virtual interviews for postgraduate medical trainee recruitment and keeping it personal. Ann Surg 2021; 273 (02) e60-e62
- 14 Lakhani DA, Deng F, Chung C. et al. Virtual radiology fellowship recruitment: benefits, limitations, and future directions. Acad Radiol 2023; 30 (03) 548-551
- 15 Weidner A, Ormsby M, Shih G. What's worth doing in virtual recruitment? A regional survey of program directors and incoming interns. Fam Med 2022; 54 (10) 784-790
- 16 Nguyen JK, Moran SK, Yee JM, Grimm LJ, Heitkamp DE, Chapman T. Moving towards equity, wellness, and environmental sustainability: arguments for virtual radiology residency recruitment and strategies for application control. Acad Radiol 2022; 29 (07) 1124-1128
- 17 Plack DL, Abcejo AS, Kraus MB, Renew JR, Long TR, Sharpe EE. Postgraduate-year-1 residents' perceptions of social media and virtual applicant recruitment: cross-sectional survey study. Interact J Med Res 2023; 12: e42042
- 18 Bernstein SA, Gu A, Chretien KC, Gold JA. Graduate medical education virtual interviews and recruitment in the era of COVID-19. J Grad Med Educ 2020; 12 (05) 557-560
- 19 Odei B, Holliday EB, Jagsi R. et al. Recruitment challenges and opportunities for radiation oncology residency programs during the 2020-2021 virtual residency match. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 109 (02) 637-638
- 20 Cutshall H, Hattaway R, Singh NP, Rais-Bahrami S, McCleskey B. The #Path2Path virtual landscape during the COVID-19 pandemic: preparing for the 2020 pathology residency recruitment season. Acad Pathol 2021; 8: 23 742895211002783
- 21 Langenfeld SJ. Virtual interviews for resident and fellow recruitment. Surgery 2023; 174 (03) 733-734
- 22 Snyder MH, Reddy VP, Iyer AM. et al; Society of Neurological Surgeons and American Association of Neurological Surgeons Young Neurosurgeons Committee. Applying to residency: survey of neurosurgical residency applicants on virtual recruitment during COVID-19. J Neurosurg 2021; 137 (01) 273-282
- 23 Petersen TL, King JC, Fussell JJ. et al. Benefits and limitations of virtual recruitment: perspectives from subspeciality directors. Pediatrics 2022; 150 (04) e2022056735
- 24 Dalrymple WA, Ulep R, Ratliff JB. et al. Education research: has video killed the interview star?: a survey of current neurology residents on in-person vs virtual residency interviews. Neurol Educ 2024; 3 (04) e200161
- 25 Vaysburg DM, Delman AM, Ammann AM. et al. General surgery residency virtual recruitment during the pandemic: an analysis of applicant surveys. J Surg Res 2023; 283: 33-41
- 26 Tseng J. How has COVID-19 affected the costs of the surgical fellowship interview process?. J Surg Educ 2020; 77 (05) 999-1004
- 27 Heitkamp NM, Snyder AN, Ramu A. et al. Lessons learned: applicant equity and the 2020-2021 virtual interview season. Acad Radiol 2021; 28 (12) 1787-1791
- 28 Muallem E, Burrows H, Wolff M. Planning for virtual interviews: residency recruitment during a pandemic-an update. Acad Pediatr 2023; 23 (07) 1309-1311
- 29 Cooke EA, Huang J, Cole HA. et al. Virtual interviewing for radiology residency: pluses, minuses, and a review of the literature. Acad Radiol 2023; 30 (04) 603-616
- 30 Rajendran L, Nadler A. Virtual interviews in postgraduate medical education recruitment: is there a future post-pandemic?. J Grad Med Educ 2022; 14 (04) 377-381
- 31 McKillip R, Ernst M, Ahn J, Tekian A, Shappell E. Toward a resident personal finance curriculum: quantifying resident financial circumstances, needs, and interests. Cureus 2018; 10 (04) e2540
- 32 Frame KA, Fortenberry KT, Cochella S. et al. Impact of virtual recruitment on costs, time spent, and applicant perspectives within a family medicine residency program. PRiMER Peer-Rev Rep Med Educ Res 2023; 7: 38
- 33 Narang J, Zheng DX, Xu JR. et al. Estimating carbon emission and cost savings from virtual dermatology residency interviews. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 88 (03) 676-678
- 34 Gallo K, Becker R, Borin J, Loeb S, Patel S. Virtual residency interviews reduce cost and carbon emissions. J Urol 2021; 206 (06) 1353-1355
- 35 US EPA O. Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator. August 28, 2015. Accessed July 9, 2025, at: https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator
- 36 Ponterio JM, Levy L, Lakhi NA. Evaluation of the virtual interview format for resident recruitment as a result of COVID-19 restrictions: residency program directors' perspectives. Acad Med 2022; 97 (09) 1360-1367
- 37 Simmons RP, Ortiz J, Kisielewski M, Zaas A, Finn KM. Virtual recruitment: experiences and perspectives of internal medicine program directors. Am J Med 2022; 135 (02) 258-263.e1
- 38 Das AJ, Augustin RC, Corbelli JA, Bump GM. Residency and fellowship program leaders' perceptions of virtual recruitment and interviewing. J Grad Med Educ 2022; 14 (06) 710-713
- 39 Rockney D, Benson CA, Blackburn BG. et al. Virtual recruitment is here to stay: a survey of ID fellowship program directors and matched applicants regarding their 2020 virtual recruitment experiences. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021; 8 (08) ofab383
- 40 Han AY, Obiri-Yeboah D, French JC, Lipman JM. The virtual recruitment onion: peeling back the layers of the interview season during the COVID-era. J Surg Educ 2022; 79 (01) 77-85
- 41 Hunt TC, Winzer BM, Siodis GK, Kanumuambidi JT, Quarrier SO, Rashid HH. Applicant preferences and perspectives in the new era of the urology residency match. Urology 2025; 205: 342-350
- 42 Breitkopf D, Albold C, Barlow J. et al. Virtual residency recruitment: future directions in the new era. Ann Med 2022; 54 (01) 3342-3348
- 43 Romano R, Mukherjee D, Michael LM. et al; Society of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Neurological Surgeons Medical Student Committee. Optimizing the residency application process: insights from neurological surgery during the pandemic virtual application cycle. J Neurosurg 2022; 137 (03) 877-885
- 44 Nimer M, Lefevre R, Clark A, Farr D, Bhat S, AbdelFattah K. Initial experiences with a 2-stage residency interview process. J Grad Med Educ 2024; 16 (05) 588-595
- 45 O'Connor AB, McGarry K, Finn KM, Harris L, Zaas AK. Internal medicine resident perspectives on virtual recruitment. JAMA Intern Med 2023; 183 (06) 619-621
- 46 Tiozzo E, Reccoppa L, Alvarez G. et al. Interview type and signal preferences of interview applicants to a physical medicine and rehabilitation residency program: a pilot study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2025; 104 (09) 844-848
- 47 Fereydooni A, Fisher AT, Yang L. et al. Comparison of in-person and virtual integrated vascular surgery residency interviews from the applicant's perspective. Ann Vasc Surg 2025; 118: 113-121
- 48 Huang MM, Driscoll CB, Handa N, Panken EJ, Vo AX, Bennett NE. Assessment of applicant and program director attitudes toward a hybrid approach to urology residency interviews. Urology 2025; 202: 122-129
- 49 England E, Kanfi A, Tobler J. In-person second look during a residency virtual interview season: an important consideration for radiology residency applicants. Acad Radiol 2023; 30 (06) 1192-1199
- 50 Rigberg D, Smith BK, Sun T. et al. Vascular in-person for students in the match trial: an investigation of postinterview site visits to address the limitations of virtual interviews. J Vasc Surg 2024; 80 (02) 564-571.e12
- 51 Chilukuri PK, Bergin CR, Celaya MP, Johnson KA, O'Malley CW. Internal medicine residency program applicant perceptions of the SPLIT recruitment model before and after universal virtual interviews. J Gen Intern Med 2025; 40 (01) 22-29
- 52 Weissbart SJ, Kim SJ, Feinn RS, Stock JA. Relationship between the number of residency applications and the yearly match rate: time to start thinking about an application limit?. J Grad Med Educ 2015; 7 (01) 81-85
- 53 Singh NP, Boyd CJ. Rapidly increasing number and cost of residency applications in surgery. Am Surg 2023; 89 (12) 5729-5736
- 54 Here's how many residency programs med students really apply to. American Medical Association. September 16, 2024. Accessed July 10, 2025, at: https://www.ama-assn.org/medical-students/preparing-residency/heres-how-many-residency-programs-med-students-really-apply
- 55 ERAS Statistics. AAMC. Accessed November 25, 2025, at: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/publication/eras-statistics
- 56 Huang RD, Lutfy-Clayton L, Franzen D. et al. More is more: drivers of the increase in emergency medicine residency applications. West J Emerg Med 2020; 22 (01) 77-85
- 57 Sweet ML, Williams CM, Stewart E. et al. Internal medicine residency program responses to the increase of residency applications: differences by program type and characteristics. J Grad Med Educ 2019; 11 (06) 698-703
- 58 Chang CWD, Erhardt BF. Rising residency applications: how high will it go?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 153 (05) 702-705
- 59 Whipple ME, Law AB, Bly RA. A computer simulation model to analyze the application process for competitive residency programs. J Grad Med Educ 2019; 11 (01) 30-35
- 60 Weissbart SJ, Hall SJ, Fultz BR, Stock JA. The urology match as a prisoner's dilemma: a game theory perspective. Urology 2013; 82 (04) 791-797
- 61 Morgan HK, Winkel AF, Standiford T. et al. The case for capping residency interviews. J Surg Educ 2021; 78 (03) 755-762
- 62 Program Signaling for the 2025 MyERAS Application Season. Students & Residents. Accessed July 3, 2025, at: https://students-residents.aamc.org/applying-residencies-eras/program-signaling-2025-myeras-application-season
- 63 Rosenblatt AE, LaFemina J, Sood L. et al. Impact of preference signals on interview selection across multiple residency specialties and programs. J Grad Med Educ 2023; 15 (06) 702-710
- 64 Benjamin WJ, Lenze NR, Bohm LA. et al. Impact of applicants' characteristics and geographic connections to residency programs on preference signaling outcomes in the match. Acad Med 2024; 99 (04) 437-444
- 65 Romanoski NL, Morgan HK, Kerlek A. et al. The relative influence of program signaling, geographic preferences, and in-state status in determining odds of interview invitation in residency selection. J Grad Med Educ 2025; 17 (01) 56-62
- 66 Breeding T, Nasef H, Amin Q. et al. Virtual signaling and emerging trends in its use across surgical specialties. Am Surg 2024; 90 (06) 1740-1743
- 67 Chagarlamudi K, Faraji N, Higinbotham A. et al. Decoding program signals: a radiology residency program's experience with the ERAS supplemental application. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2023; 52 (05) 383-386
- 68 Lakhani DA, Radmard M, Tafazolimoghadam A. et al. Preference signaling in the radiology residency match: national survey of applicants. J Am Coll Radiol 2025; 22 (01) 116-124
- 69 Park A, Smith EB, Ho C, Gimarc D, Resnik C, Hossain R. What do program and geographic preference signals signal? A survey of diagnostic radiology and integrated interventional radiology residency applicants. Acad Radiol 2024; 31 (07) 3035-3042
- 70 Deckey DG, Lin E, Gerhart CRB, Brinkman JC, Patel KA, Bingham JS. Decoding the signals: an analysis of preference signaling in the 2023 orthopaedic surgery residency match. JBJS Open Access 2023; 8 (03) e23.00052
- 71 Kotlier JL, Mihalic AP, Petrigliano FA, Liu JN. Understanding the match: the effect of signaling, demographics, and applicant characteristics on match success in the orthopaedic residency application process. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024; 32 (05) e231-e239
- 72 Yousef A, Nichol A, Watson D. Impact of Applicant Signaling for Otolaryngology Interviews. Laryngoscope 2025; 135 (01) 80-86
- 73 Schafer KR, Heincelman M, Adams W. et al. Internal medicine applicants' experiences with program signaling and second looks: a multi-institutional survey. Am J Med 2024; 137 (08) 784-789
- 74 Norton DL, Richardson KM, Lippert WC, Valente J, Williams DM. Sending a signal: evaluating the impact of program and geographic preference signaling on the internal medicine residency match. Cureus 2024; 16 (08) e67379
- 75 Leopold Z, Rajagopalan A, Mikhail M. et al. Preference signaling in the 2022 urology residency match - the applicant perspective. Urology 2022; 170: 33-37
- 76 Banks E, Winkel AF, Morgan HK, Connolly A, Hammoud MM, George KE. Program signaling in obstetrics and gynecology residency applications. Obstet Gynecol 2024; 143 (02) 281-283
- 77 Cai F, Southworth E, Santiago S. et al. The golden tickets: impact of preference signaling on obstetrics and gynecology residency applicants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230 (02) 262.e1-262.e9
- 78 Dutoit AP, Teeter EG, Wolpaw JT. et al. The impact of program and geographic signaling on anesthesia residency applications, interviews, and the match. Anesth Analg 2025; 141 (04) 876-883
- 79 Minhas A, Berkay F, Hudson T, Barry K, Froehle AW, Krishnamurthy A. Perceptions of preference signaling in orthopaedic surgery: a survey of applicants and program directors. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024; 32 (02) e95-e105
- 80 Spatz C, Olaf M, Ellison H. Practical tips for undergraduate medical education advisors in residency application signaling. J Med Educ Curric Dev 2024; 11: 23 821205241253230
- 81 Thakker S, Stirrat T, Lipner SR, Adotama P. Preference signaling in dermatology residency: an ethical analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2025; S0190-9622 (25)00357–3:
- 82 Breeding T, Amin Q, Wright DD, Elkbuli A. Program signaling in the new era of residency applications: an asset or liability?. Am Surg 2024; 90 (04) 518-520
- 83 Schoppen Z, Morgan HK, Hammoud M, Marzano D, George K, Winkel AF. Applicant experience in communication with residency programs after the introduction of program signaling. J Surg Educ 2023; 80 (12) 1762-1772
- 84 Mun F, Suresh KV, Li TP, Aiyer AA, LaPorte DM. Preference signaling for orthopaedic surgery applicants: a survey of residency program directors. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30 (23) 1140-1145
- 85 Suresh KV, Covarrubias O, Mun F, LaPorte DM, Aiyer AA. Preference signaling survey of program directors-after the match. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024; 32 (05) 220-227
- 86 Sorenson JC, Ryan PM, Dennison JG, Ward RA, Fornfeist DS. The power of preference signaling: a monumental shift in the orthopaedic surgery application process. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2025; 33 (02) 51-55
- 87 Gold S, Hojjatie R, Blalock TW. To the editor: mixed signals: where is transparency in preference signaling?. J Grad Med Educ 2024; 16 (02) 233
- 88 Alexander AB, Funches L, Katta-Charles S. et al. Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of holistic practices for inclusive recruitment in graduate medical education. J Med Educ Curric Dev 2024; 11: 23 821205241260243
- 89 Shen MJ, Peterson EB, Costas-Muñiz R. et al. The effects of race and racial concordance on patient-physician communication: a systematic review of the literature. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2018; 5 (01) 117-140
- 90 Jordan MC, Tchopev ZN, McClean II JC. Education research: diversity in neurology graduate medical education leadership. Neurol Educ 2023; 2 (02) e200060
- 91 McDade W, Mason BS. Making the case for equity in graduate medical education. J Natl Med Assoc 2021; 113 (01) 3-5
- 92 Butler PD, Fowler JC, Meer E, Rosen IM, Reyes IM, Berns JS. A blueprint for increasing ethnic and racial diversity in U.S. residency training programs. Acad Med 2022; 97 (11) 1632-1636
- 93 Hamilton RH. Enhancing diversity in academic neurology: from agnosia to action. Ann Neurol 2016; 79 (05) 705-708
- 94 Marulanda-Londoño ET, Bell MW, Hope OA. et al. Reducing neurodisparity: recommendations of the 2017 AAN diversity leadership program. Neurology 2019; 92 (06) 274-280
- 95 Robbins NM, Charleston IV L, Saadi A. et al. Black patients matter in neurology: race, racism, and race-based neurodisparities. Neurology 2022; 99 (03) 106-114
- 96 Clayborne EP, Martin DR, Goett RR, Chandrasekaran EB, McGreevy J. Diversity pipelines: the rationale to recruit and support minority physicians. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2021; 2 (01) e12343
- 97 Sungar WG, Angerhofer C, McCormick T. et al. Implementation of holistic review into emergency medicine residency application screening to improve recruitment of underrepresented in medicine applicants. AEM Educ Train 2021; 5 (Suppl. 01) S10-S18
- 98 ACGME. ACGME Common Program Requirements (Residency). Published online July 1, 2023. Accessed June 10, 2025, at: https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/cprresidency_2023.pdf
- 99 Weinstein D, Thibault G. ACGME Board Executive Action. Published online May 9, 2025. Accessed June 10, 2025, at: https://www.acgme.org/newsroom/2025/5/acgme-board-executive-committee-action/
- 100 Andriole DA, Grbic D, Jurich DP, Mechaber AJ, Roskovensky L, Young GHUS. U.S. medical school graduates' placement in graduate medical education: a national study. Acad Med 2025; 100 (02) 158-169
- 101 Bowe SN, Wang X, Whipple ME, Bly RA. Evidence of specialty-specific gender disparities in resident recruitment and selection. J Grad Med Educ 2021; 13 (06) 841-847
- 102 Aguwa UT, Aguwa CJ, Onor GI. et al. Racial and ethnic diversity within U.S. residencies: trends from 2011 to 2019. J Surg Educ 2022; 79 (03) 587-594
- 103 Lee JKH, McGuire C, Raîche I, Domecq MC, Tudorache M, Gawad N. Underrepresented in medicine (URiM) residents: a scoping review on prevalence trends & improving recruitment. Am J Surg 2024; 237: 115924
- 104 Gil Tommee C, Nalleballe K, Dandu V. et al. Trends in demographics of neurology house staff in the United States. Cureus 2021; 13 (09) e17754
- 105 Saleem S, Naveed S, Mohyud Din Chaudhary A. et al. Racial and gender disparities in neurology. Postgrad Med J 2021; 97 (1153): 716-722
- 106 Ku MC, Li YE, Prober C, Valantine H, Girod SC. Decisions, decisions: how program diversity influences residency program choice. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 213 (02) 294-305
- 107 Agawu A, Fahl C, Alexis D. et al. The influence of gender and underrepresented minority status on medical student ranking of residency programs. J Natl Med Assoc 2019; 111 (06) 665-673
- 108 Weygandt PL, Smylie L, Ordonez E, Jordan J, Chung AS. Factors influencing emergency medicine residency choice: diversity, community, and recruitment red flags. AEM Educ Train 2021; 5 (04) e10638
- 109 Fodje T, Choo E. Applying for residency in the time of COVID-19. Lancet 2020; 396 (10264): 1718
- 110 Tischendorf JS, Filipiak R, Zelenski A, Osman F, Siraj D. Emphasis of diversity, equity, and inclusion on US adult infectious disease fellowship program websites in the era of virtual recruitment. J Infect Dis 2024; 229 (04) 931-935
- 111 Mendiola M, Modest AM, Kisielewski M, Huang GC. Recruitment of underrepresented in medicine applicants to US internal medicine residencies: results of a national survey. Am J Med 2022; 135 (06) 787-794
- 112 Mohile NA, Spector AR, Ebong IM. et al. Developing the neurology diversity officer: a roadmap for academic neurology departments. Neurology 2021; 96 (08) 386-394
- 113 Spector AR, Railey KM. Reducing reliance on test scores reduces racial bias in neurology residency recruitment. J Natl Med Assoc 2019; 111 (05) 471-474
- 114 Yemane L, Omoruyi E. Underrepresented in medicine in graduate medical education: historical trends, bias, and recruitment practices. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2021; 51 (10) 101088
- 115 Tiyyagura G, Weiss J, Goldman MP, Crawley DM, Langhan ML. Selection and recruitment strategies among competitive pediatric training programs and the impact of diversity. Acad Pediatr 2024; 24 (02) 338-346
- 116 Grimm LJ, Redmond RA, Campbell JC, Rosette AS. Gender and racial bias in radiology residency letters of recommendation. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17 (1 Pt A): 64-71
- 117 Burkhart RJ, Lavu MS, Hecht Ii CJ, Ina JG, Gillespie RJ, Liu RW. How prominent are gender bias, racial bias, and score inflation in orthopaedic surgery residency recommendation letters? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2024; 482 (06) 916-928
- 118 Girgis MY, Qazi S, Patel A, Yu D, Lu X, Sewards J. Gender and racial bias in letters of recommendation for orthopedic surgery residency positions. J Surg Educ 2023; 80 (01) 127-134
- 119 Go C, Sachdev U. Letters of recommendation: nuanced bias or useful affirmation?. J Vasc Surg 2021; 74 (2S): 29S-32S
- 120 Kobayashi AN, Sterling RS, Tackett SA, Chee BW, Laporte DM, Humbyrd CJ. Are there gender-based differences in language in letters of recommendation to an orthopaedic surgery residency program?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478 (07) 1400-1408
- 121 Rana A, Malerba S, Shanker V. Linguistic analysis of racial and gender biases in letters of recommendation of neurology residency applicants (S33.003). Neurology 2024; 102 (7 suppl 1): 4004
- 122 Ellis J, Otugo O, Landry A, Landry A. Interviewed while Black. N Engl J Med 2020; 383 (25) 2401-2404
- 123 Bergelson I, Tracy C, Takacs E. Best practices for reducing bias in the interview process. Curr Urol Rep 2022; 23 (11) 319-325
- 124 Hamilton RH, Hamilton K, Jackson B, Dahodwala N. Teaching: residents in the hospital, mentors in the community: the educational pipeline program at Penn. Neurology 2007; 68 (19) E25-E28
- 125 Lall MD, Backster A, White MH, Heron SL, Siegelman JN. Recruitment of a diverse emergency medicine residency program: creating and maintaining a culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion. AEM Educ Train 2021; 5 (Suppl. 01) S112-S115
- 126 Chi B, Krull C, Akamagwuna U, Huang D. Incorporating holistic review in recruitment in a physical medicine and rehabilitation residency program. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2022; 101 (09) 859-863
- 127 Vaccarello A, Thomas KM, Mazmudar RS, McCormick TS, Cooper KD, Sharma TR. Holistic review increases inclusion of underrepresented-in-medicine applicants in dermatology residency recruitment. Arch Dermatol Res 2024; 316 (09) 657
- 128 DeBenedectis CM, Heitkamp DE, England E. et al. A program director's guide to cultivating diversity and inclusion in radiology residency recruitment. Acad Radiol 2020; 27 (06) 864-867
- 129 Black C, Budner H, Motta AL. Enhancing the residency interview process with the inclusion of standardised questions. Postgrad Med J 2018; 94 (1110): 244-246
- 130 Haag J, Sanders BE, Walker Keach J, Lefkowits C, Sheeder J, Behbakht K. Impact of blinding interviewers to written applications on ranking of Gynecologic Oncology fellowship applicants from groups underrepresented in medicine. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2022; 39: 100935
- 131 Boysen-Osborn M, Wray A, Hoonpongsimanont W. et al. A multiple-mini interview (MMI) for emergency medicine residency admissions: a brief report and qualitative analysis. J Adv Med Educ Prof 2018; 6 (04) 176-180
- 132 Garber AM, Kwan B, Williams CM. et al. Use of filters for residency application review: results from the internal medicine in-training examination program director survey. J Grad Med Educ 2019; 11 (06) 704-707
- 133 White BAA, Sadoski M, Thomas S, Shabahang M. Is the evaluation of the personal statement a reliable component of the general surgery residency application?. J Surg Educ 2012; 69 (03) 340-343
- 134 Patino GA, Amiel JM, Brown M, Lypson ML, Chan TM. The promise and perils of artificial intelligence in health professions education practice and scholarship. Acad Med 2024; 99 (05) 477-481
- 135 Patel V, Deleonibus A, Wells MW, Bernard SL, Schwarz GS. Distinguishing authentic voices in the age of ChatGPT: comparing AI-generated and applicant-written personal statements for plastic surgery residency application. Ann Plast Surg 2023; 91 (03) 324-325
- 136 Chen J, Tao BK, Park S, Bovill E. Can ChatGPT fool the match? Artificial intelligence personal statements for plastic surgery residency applications: a comparative study. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2024 22925503241264832.
- 137 Gordon EB, Maxfield CM, French R. et al. Large language model use in radiology residency applications: unwelcomed but inevitable. J Am Coll Radiol 2025; 22 (01) 33-40
- 138 Johnstone RE, Neely G, Sizemore DC. Artificial intelligence software can generate residency application personal statements that program directors find acceptable and difficult to distinguish from applicant compositions. J Clin Anesth 2023; 89: 111185
- 139 Koleilat I, Bongu A, Chang S, Nieman D, Priolo S, Patel NM. Residency application selection committee discriminatory ability in identifying artificial intelligence-generated personal statements. J Surg Educ 2024; 81 (06) 780-785
- 140 Smith B, Ramadoss T, D'Amario V, Shoja MM, Rajput V, Cervantes J. Utilization and perception of generative artificial intelligence by medical students in residency applications. J Investig Med 2025; 73 (04) 338-344
- 141 Mangold S, Ream M. Artificial intelligence in graduate medical education applications. J Grad Med Educ 2024; 16 (02) 115-118
- 142 Chen JX, Bowe S, Deng F. Residency applications in the era of generative artificial intelligence. J Grad Med Educ 2024; 16 (03) 254-256
- 143 Sehgal RR, Sarva H, Safdieh JE, Robbins MS. Pearls and pitfalls in letters of recommendation for neurology residency applications. J Neurol Sci 2024; 459: 122951
- 144 Elias J. Tech Meet the 21-year-old helping coders use AI to cheat in Google and other tech job interviews. CNBC. March 10, 2025. Accessed June 30, 2025, at: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/09/google-ai-interview-coder-cheat.html
- 145 Burk-Rafel J, Reinstein I, Feng J. et al. Development and validation of a machine learning-based decision support tool for residency applicant screening and review. Acad Med 2021; 96 (11S): S54-S61
- 146 Rees CA, Ryder HF. Machine learning for the prediction of ranked applicants and matriculants to an internal medicine residency program. Teach Learn Med 2023; 35 (03) 277-286
- 147 Tulshian P. Artificial intelligence: reflections on its use to promote DEIA principles for residency recruitment. Fam Med 2024; 56 (06) 344-345
- 148 Drum B, Shi J, Peterson B, Lamb S, Hurdle JF, Gradick C. Using natural language processing and machine learning to identify internal medicine-pediatrics residency values in applications. Acad Med 2023; 98 (11) 1278-1282
- 149 Markow M, Jebbia M, Hasjim BJ. et al. Artificial intelligence: reducing inconsistency in the surgical residency application review process. Am J Surg 2024; 238: 115816
- 150 Mahtani AU, Reinstein I, Marin M, Burk-Rafel J. A new tool for holistic residency application review: using natural language processing of applicant experiences to predict interview invitation. Acad Med 2023; 98 (09) 1018-1021
- 151 Microsoft Word - FAQs Only_08–06–2025. Accessed December 1, 2025, at: https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/vol-rol-faqs-only_08-06-2025.pdf