Reduction of Major Amputations after Starting a Multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot Care Team: Single Centre Experience from Turkey

Abstract

Introduction: It is widely recognized that a multidisciplinary team is effective in the management diabetic foot ulcers. Contrary to developed countries, multidisciplinary diabetic foot care teams and/or clinics have not been constructed in most centres in developing countries. The aim of this study was to present our data regarding amputation rates and profiles before and after starting the Dokuz Eylul University multidisciplinary diabetic foot care team.

Methods: This study includes data from diabetic foot ulcer episodes which were managed in Dokuz Eylul University Hospital between January 1999 and January 2008. The data was collected prospectively during a minimum follow-up of 6 months in all ulcers. After January 2002, management of ulcers was coordinated by the diabetic foot care team (n=437). Amputation rates were compared to those who were admitted before January 2002 (n=137).

Results: Overall amputation and minor amputation rates were similar for both periods. However, major amputations were observed to be decreased after starting the Dokuz Eylul University multidisciplinary diabetic foot care team (20.4% vs. 12.6%, p=0.026).

Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that major amputation rates can be reduced by team work. Formation of multidisciplinary diabetic foot care teams and clinics should be encouraged in Turkey.

diabetes - foot ulcer - amputation - multidisciplinary team

References

• 1 Jeffcoate WJ, Harding KG. Diabetic foot ulcers.  Lancet. 2003;  361 1545-1551
• 2 ▪ ▪. American Diabetes Association. Consensus Development Conference on Diabetic Foot Wound Care: 7–8 April 1999, Boston, Massachusetts. American Diabetes Association.  Diabetes Care. 1999;  22 1354-1360
• 3 Ragnarson Tennvall G, Apelqvist J. Health-economic consequences of diabetic foot lesions.  Clin Infect Dis. 2004;  39 ((Suppl. 2)) S132-S139
• 4  . American Diabetes Association. Consensus Development Conference on Diabetic Foot Wound Care. 7–8 April 1999, Boston, MA. American Diabetes Association.  Adv Wound Care. 1999;  12 353-361
• 5 Apelqvist J, Bakker K, van Houtum WH. et al . Practical guidelines on the management and prevention of the diabetic foot: based upon the International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot (2007) Prepared by the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot.  Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008;  24 ((Suppl. 1)) S181-S187
• 6 Edmonds M. The multidisciplinary diabetic-foot clinic.  Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2008;  7 66-67
• 7 Knowles EA, Gem J, Boulton AJ. The diabetic foot and the role of a multidisciplinary clinic.  J Wound Care. 1996;  5 452-454
• 8 Ghirlanda G, Mancini L, Castagneto M. et al . The foot clinic. Multidisciplinary management of the patient with diabetic foot.  Rays. 1997;  22 638-643
• 9 Ragnarson Tennvall G, Apelqvist J. Health-related quality of life in patients with diabetes mellitus and foot ulcers.  J Diabetes Complications. 2000;  14 235-241
• 10 Larsson J, Apelqvist J, Agardh CD. et al . Decreasing incidence of major amputation in diabetic patients: a consequence of a multidisciplinary foot care team approach?.  Diabet Med. 1995;  12 770-776
• 11 Holstein P, Ellitsgaard N, Olsen BB. et al . Decreasing incidence of major amputations in people with diabetes.  Diabetologia. 2000;  43 844-847
• 12 Unwin N. The diabetic foot in the developing world.  Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008;  24 ((Suppl. 1)) S31-S33
• 13 Ramachandran A. Specific problems of the diabetic foot in developing countries.  Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004;  20 ((Suppl. 1)) S19-S22
• 14 Batista F, Pinzur MS. Disease knowledge in patients attending a diabetic foot clinic.  Foot Ankle Int. 2005;  26 38-41
• 15 Parisi M, Zantut-Wittmann D, Pavin E. et al . Comparison of three systems of classification in predicting outcome of diabetic foot ulcers in a Brazilian population.  Eur J Endocrinol. 2008;  159 417-422
• 16 Karakoc A, Ersoy RU, Arslan M. et al . Change in amputation rate in a Turkish diabetic foot population.  J Diabetes Complications. 2004;  18 169-172
• 17 Aksoy DY, Gurlek A, Cetinkaya Y. et al . Change in the amputation profile in diabetic foot in a tertiary reference center: efficacy of team working.  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2004;  112 526-530
• 18 Gurlek A, Bayraktar M, Savas C. et al . Amputation rate in 147 Turkish patients with diabetic foot: the Hacettepe University Hospital experience.  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 1998;  106 404-409
• 19 Reiber GE, Pecoraro RE, Koepsell TD. Risk factors for amputation in patients with diabetes mellitus.  A case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 1992;  117 97-105
• 20 Mayfield JA, Reiber GE, Nelson RG. et al . A foot risk classification system to predict diabetic amputation in Pima Indians.  Diabetes Care. 1996;  19 704-709
• 21 Flores Rivera AR. Risk factors for amputation in diabetic patients: a case-control study.  Arch Med Res. 1998;  29 179-184
• 22 Eneroth M, Apelqvist J, Stenstrom A. Clinical characteristics and outcome in 223 diabetic patients with deep foot infections.  Foot Ankle Int. 1997;  18 716-722
• 23 Winkley K, Stahl D, Chalder T. et al . Risk factors associated with adverse outcomes in a population-based prospective cohort study of people with their first diabetic foot ulcer.  J Diabetes Complications. 2007;  21 341-349
• 24 Faglia E, Clerici G, Clerissi J. et al . Early and five-year amputation and survival rate of diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia: data of a cohort study of 564 patients.  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;  32 484-490

Correspondence