Aktuelle Desinfektionsmöglichkeiten in der Endodontie – Konzepte zur Spülung des Wurzelkanals

Lernziele

Der Leser sollte nach dem Durcharbeiten des Artikels

• aktuelle Desinfektionsmittel in der endodontischen Therapie kennen,

• Vor– und Nachteile der verschiedenen Spüllösungen reflektiert haben,

• effiziente Spülprotokolle in den Praxisalltag integrieren können.

Literatur

• 1 Alderson P, Green S, Higgins J.. Cochrane Reviewerys Handbook. The Cochrane Library, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2004
• 2 Basrani BR, Manek S, Sodhi RN. et al. . Interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate.  J Endod. 2007;  33 966-969
• 3 Byström A, Sundqvist G.. Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy.  Scand J Dent Res. 1981;  89 321-328
• 4 Clarkson RM, Moule AJ.. Sodium hypochlorite and its use as an endodontic irrigant.  Aust Dent J. 1998;  43 250-256
• 5 Davies GE, Francis J, Martin AR. et al. . 1:6–Di–4'–chlorophenyldiguanidohexane („Hibitane”*). Laboratory investigation of a new antibacterial agent of high potency.  Br J Pharmacol. 1954;  9 192-196
• 6 el Moug T, Rogers DT, Furr JR. et al. . Antiseptic–induced changes in the cell surface of a chlorhexidine–sensitive and a chlorhexidine–resistant strain of Providencia stuartii.  J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985;  16 685-689
• 7 Evanov C, Liewehr F, Buxton TB. et al. . Antibacterial efficacy of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine gluconate irrigants at 37 degrees C and 46 degrees C.  J Endod. 2004;  30 653
• 8 Ferraz CCR. et al. . In Vitro Assessment of the Antimicrobial Action and the Mechanical Ability of Chlorhexidine Gel as an Endodontic Irrigant.  JOE. 2001;  27 452-455
• 9 Garcez AS, Ribeiro MS, Tegos GP. et al. . Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy combined with conventional endodontic treatment to eliminate root canal biofilm infection.  Lasers Surg Med. 2007;  39 59-66
• 10 Goodall RR, Goldmann J, Woods J.. Stability of chlorhexidine solutions.  Pharm J. 1968;  200 33-34
• 11 Grande. et al. . Interaction between EDTA and Sodium Hypochlorite: A Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Analysis.  JOE. 2006;  32 5
• 12 Gu LA. et al. . Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices.  JOE. 2009;  6 791-804
• 13 Hofer W, Hofer V, Städtler P.. Antimikrobieller Effekt von Wurzelkanaleinlagen gegen Enterococcus faecalis – Eine In–vitro–Studie.  Endodontie. 2005;  14 391-397
• 14 Kamburis JJ, Barker TH, Barfield RD. et al. . Removal of organic debris from bovine dentin shavings.  J Endod. 2003;  29 559
• 15 Kampf G, Kramer A.. Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.  Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;  17 863-893
• 16 Kuroda T.. Zur Pharmakologie des o = m = p = Chlorphenols sowie des Phenols und Chlorphenolkampfers.  Vierteljahresschrift für Zahnheilkunde. 1926;  66 566-586
• 17 Leonardo MR, Tanomaru M Filho, Silva LAB. et al. . In vivo antimicrobial activity of 2 % chlorhexidine used as a root canal irrigating solution.  J Endod. 1999;  25 167
• 18 McDonnell G, Russell AD.. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance.  Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;  12 147-179
• 19 Orstavik D, Haapasalo M.. Disinfection by endodontic irrigants and dressings of experimentally infected dentinal tubules.  Endod Dent Traumatol. 1990;  6 142-149
• 20 Peters OA, Laib A, Göhring TN. et al. . Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high–resolution computed tomography.  J Endod. 2001;  27 1-6
• 21 Regan JD, Fleury AA.. Irrigants in non–surgical endodontic treatment.  J Ir Dent Assoc. 2006;  52 84-92
• 22 Russell AD, Day MJ.. Antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine.  J Hosp Infect. 1993;  25 229-238
• 23 Sedgley CM, Nagel AC, Hall D. et al. . Influence of irrigant needle depth in removing bioluminescent bacteria inoculated into instrumented root canals using real–time imaging in vitro.  Int Endod J. 2005;  38 97-104
• 24 Sen BH, Wesselink PR, Türkün M.. The smear layer: a phenomenon in root canal therapy.  Int Endod J. 1995;  28 141-148
• 25 Shaker A L, Russell AD, Furr JR.. Aspects of the action of chlorhexidine on bacterial spores.  Int J Pharm. 1986;  34 51-56
• 26 Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S. et al. . Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis.  Int Endod J. 1997;  30 297-306
• 27 Solovyeva AM, Dummer PMH.. Cleaning effectiveness of root canal irrigation with electrochemically activated anolyte and catholyte solutions: a pilot study.  Int Endod J. 2000;  33 494
• 28 Spratt AJ, Pratten M, Wilson K.. Gulabivala: An in vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of irrigants on biofilms of root canal isolates.  Int Endod J. 2001;  34 300
• 29 Sundqvist G.. Bacteriological studies of necrotic dental pulps. Umeå 1976: Umeå University, Sweden
• 30 Takeda FH, Harashima T, Kimura Y. et al. . A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser.  Int Endod J. 1999;  32 32-39
• 31 Treanor HF, Goldman M.. Bactericidal efficiency of intracanal medications.  Oral Surg. 1972;  33 791
• 32 Versümer J, Hülsmann M.. Die Anwendung von Chlorphenol–Präparaten als medikamentöse Einlage.  Endodontie. 2003;  12 165-178
• 33 Virtej A, MacKenzie CR, Raab WH. et al. . Determination of the performance of various root canal disinfection methods after in situ carriage.  J Endod. 2007;  33 926-929
• 34 Walters TH, Furr JR, Russell AD.. Antifungal action of chlorhexidine.  Microbios. 1983;  38 195-204
• 35 Wang QQ, Zhang CF, Yin XZ.. Evaluation of the bactericidal effect of Er,Cr:YSGG, and Nd:YAG lasers in experimentally infected root canals.  J Endod. 2007;  33 830-832
• 36 Zehnder M, Lehnert B, Schönenberger K. et al. . Spüllösungen und medikamentöse Einlage in der Endodontie.  Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2003;  113 756
• 37 Zehnder M.. Root Canal Irrigants.  JOE. 2006;  32 389-398

Korrespondenzadresse