Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund: Seit wenigen Jahren wird zunehmend Bevacizumab und Triamcinolonazetat (TA) zur Behandlung
des diabetischen Makulaödems intravitreal eingesetzt. Es ist jedoch ungeklärt, welche
Patienten davon profitieren. In dieser Studie untersuchen wir Faktoren, die das Visuslangzeitergebnis
nach intravitrealen Injektionen bei DMÖ beeinflussen. Methoden: Es wurden 50 Augen (37 Patienten) analysiert, die bei diabetischem Makulaödem mit
intravitrealem Bevacizumab, Triamcinolon oder beidem behandelt wurden und eine Mindest-Nachbeobachtungszeit
von 6 Monaten hatten. Ausgewertet wurden klinische, angiografische und OCT-Befunde.
Ergebnisse: Nach einer mittleren Beobachtungszeit von 14,6 ± 6 Monaten stieg der Visus bei 22 Augen
signifikant an und fiel bei 28 Augen ab. Das Vorliegen eines, im OCT sichtbaren zystoiden
Makulaödems korrelierte mit einem ungünstigen Visuslangzeitergebnis (p < 0,001), wohingegen
ein frühes Ansprechen (nach 5 Wochen) auf die Therapie mit einer Visusverbesserung
(p = 0,016) verbunden war. Die initiale zentrale Makuladicke im OCT, die Art des Wirkstoffs
bei Monotherapie, Alter und Geschlecht hatten keinen Einfluss auf das Visuslangzeitergebnis.
Schlussfolgerung: Bei initialem zystoidem diabetischem Makulaödem ist die Visusprognose ungünstig.
Eine intravitreale Behandlung sollte vor Entwicklung eines zystoiden Makulaödems begonnen
werden, da dann ein Ansprechen auf die Therapie schon bei einer niedrigen Zahl von
Injektionen wahrscheinlich ist. Ein frühes Ansprechen auf die Therapie ist ein guter
Vorhersageparameter für einen guten Endvisus.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide (TA) have been
widely used to treat diabetic macular oedema (DMO). However, the indication criteria
are not clear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors which are decisive
for long-term visual outcome after intravitreal drug treatment for eyes with DMO.
Materials and Methods: Fifty eyes (37 patients) treated with intravitreal bevacizumab, TA, or sequentially
with both for DMO with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months were analysed retrospectively.
The eyes with an increase of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the last visit
were classified as gainers, and eyes with stable or decreased BCVA as non-gainers.
Clinical and imaging findings were evaluated. Results: BCVA significantly increased in 22 eyes and decreased in 28 eyes after a mean follow-up
period of 14.6 ± 6 months after initial intravitreal intervention. Unfavourable for
the long-term visual outcome was the presence of cystoid macular oedema (CMO, p <
0.001), whereas an early response at 5 weeks into therapy indicated a positive outcome
(p = 0.016). The initial central macular thickness measured by OCT, the type of agent
used in monotherapy, age and gender were without influence on long-term visual acuity.
Conclusions: An initial CMO is unfavourable for the prognosis of long-term visual outcome of DMO.
Hence, benefit from intravitreal treatment with bevacizumab and/or TA is more likely
in the early stages of chronic DMO before CMO has evolved. In eyes without CMO even
a low number of injections is beneficial. An early response following intravitreal
bevacizumab or TA is a predictor of long-term benefit.
Schlüsselwörter
Bevacizumab - Triamcinolonazetat - zystoides Makulaödem - diabetisches Makulaödem
- Prognose
Key words
bevacizumab - triamcinolone acetate - cystoid macular oedema - diabetic macular oedema
- prognosis
Literatur
1
Klein R, Klein B E, Moss S E et al.
The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. IV. Diabetic macular edema.
Ophthalmology.
1984;
91
1464-1474
2
Sander B, Hamann P, Larsen M.
A 5-year follow-up of photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema: the prognostic value
of vascular leakage for visual loss.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
2008;
246
1535-1539
3
Beck R W, Edwards A R, Aiello L P et al.
Three-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing focal/grid photocoagulation and
intravitreal triamcinolone for diabetic macular edema.
Arch Ophthalmol.
2009;
127
245-251
4
Cantrill H L.
The diabetic retinopathy study and the early treatment diabetic retinopathy study.
Int Ophthalmol Clin.
1984;
24
13-29
5
Lovestam-Adrian M, Agardh E.
Photocoagulation of diabetic macular oedema – complications and visual outcome.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand.
2000;
78
667-671
6
Williams B, Gallacher B, Patel H et al.
Glucose-induced protein kinase C activation regulates vascular permeability factor
mRNA expression and peptide production by human vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro.
Diabetes.
1997;
46
1497-1503
7
Lam D S, Lai T Y, Lee V Y et al.
Efficacy of 1.25 MG versus 2.5 MG intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema:
six-month results of a randomized controlled trial.
Retina.
2009;
29
292-299
8
Gillies M C, Sutter F K, Simpson J M et al.
Intravitreal triamcinolone for refractory diabetic macular edema: two-year results
of a double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial.
Ophthalmology.
2006;
113
1533-1538
9
Paccola L, Costa R A, Folgosa M S et al.
Intravitreal triamcinolone versus bevacizumab for treatment of refractory diabetic
macular oedema (IBEME study).
Br J Ophthalmol.
2008;
92
76-80
10
Shimura M, Nakazawa T, Yasuda K et al.
Comparative therapy evaluation of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide
on persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema.
Am J Ophthalmol.
2008;
145
854-861
11
Soheilian M, Ramezani A, Obudi A et al.
Randomized trial of intravitreal bevacizumab alone or combined with triamcinolone
versus macular photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema.
Ophthalmology.
2009;
116
1142-1150
12
Arevalo J F, Sanchez J G, Fromow-Guerra J et al.
Comparison of two doses of primary intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) for diffuse
diabetic macular edema: results from the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group
(PACORES) at 12-month follow-up.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
2009;
247
735-743
13
Kook D, Wolf A, Kreutzer T et al.
Long-term effect of intravitreal bevacizumab (avastin) in patients with chronic diffuse
diabetic macular edema.
Retina.
2008;
28
1053-1060
14
Soliman W, Sander B, Jorgensen T M.
Enhanced optical coherence patterns of diabetic macular oedema and their correlation
with the pathophysiology.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand.
2007;
85
613-617
15
Kang S W, Park C Y, Ham D I.
The correlation between fluorescein angiographic and optical coherence tomographic
features in clinically significant diabetic macular edema.
Am J Ophthalmol.
2004;
137
313-322
16
Jaissle G B, Szurman P, Bartz-Schmidt K U.
Recommendation for the implementation of intravitreal injections – statement of the
German Retina Society, the German Society of Ophthalmology (DOG) and the German Professional
Association of Ophthalmologists (BVA).
Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd.
2005;
222
390-395
17
Yanoff M, Fine B S, Brucker A J et al.
Pathology of human cystoid macular edema.
Surv Ophthalmol.
1984;
28 Suppl
505-511
18
Bringmann A, Reichenbach A, Wiedemann P.
Pathomechanisms of cystoid macular edema.
Ophthalmic Res.
2004;
36
241-249
19
Lardenoye C W, Probst K, DeLint P J et al.
Photoreceptor function in eyes with macular edema.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
2000;
41
4048-4053
20
Coscas G, Gaudric A.
Natural course of nonaphakic cystoid macular edema.
Surv Ophthalmol.
1984;
28 Suppl
471-484
21
Audren F, Erginay A, Haouchine B et al.
Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diffuse diabetic macular oedema: 6-month
results of a prospective controlled trial.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand.
2006;
84
624-630
22
Soliman W, Sander B, Soliman K A et al.
The predictive value of optical coherence tomography after grid laser photocoagulation
for diffuse diabetic macular oedema.
Acta Ophthalmol.
2008;
86
284-291
23
Brasil O F, Smith S D, Galor A et al.
Predictive factors for short-term visual outcome after intravitreal triamcinolone
acetonide injection for diabetic macular oedema: an optical coherence tomography study.
Br J Ophthalmol.
2007;
91
761-765
24
Avitabile T, Longo A, Reibaldi A.
Intravitreal triamcinolone compared with macular laser grid photocoagulation for the
treatment of cystoid macular edema.
Am J Ophthalmol.
2005;
140
695-702
25
Kim J E, Pollack J S, Miller D G et al.
ISIS-DME: a prospective, randomized, dose-escalation intravitreal steroid injection
study for refractory diabetic macular edema.
Retina.
2008;
28
735-740
26
Pournaras J A, Erginay A, Lazrak Z et al.
Spectral domain optical coherence tomography in diabetic macular edema.
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging.
2009;
40
548-553
27
Rosenfeld P J, Moshfeghi A A, Puliafito C A.
Optical coherence tomography findings after an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab
(avastin) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging.
2005;
36
331-335
Dr. Rainer Guthoff
Augenklinik, Universität Würzburg
Josef-Schneider-Str. 11
97080 Würzburg
Phone: ++ 49/9 31/20 12 03 51
Fax: ++ 49/9 31/20 12 04 91
Email: r.guthoff@uni-wuerzburg.de