Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund: Wir führten eine Studie an anatomischen Präparaten durch, um die Genauigkeit der
Messungen des Nervus opticus und der Optikusnervenscheide im hochauflösenden Ultraschall
(HRUS) und in der Magnetresonanztomografie (MRT) zu evaluieren. Material und Methoden: Fünf nach Thiel fixierte anatomische Präparate des Nervus opticus wurden mit dem
HRUS und der MRT untersucht. Der Durchmesser des Nervus opticus und der ONSD wurden
vor und nach Auffüllen der Optikusnervenscheide mit Kochsalzlösung bestimmt. Die statistische
Auswertung umfasste Berechnungen zur Bestimmung der Übereinstimmung der Messmethoden
und zur Beurteilung der Intra- und Inter-Observer Variabilität. Ergebnisse: Es zeigt sich eine gute Übereinstimmung der Messwerte beim Vergleich von HRUS und
MRT (mittlere Differenz: 0,02 – 0,97 mm). Die Werte für den repeatability Koeffizienten
(RC) und den concordance correlation Koeffizienten (CCC) zeigten eine gute bis sehr
gute Übereinstimmung bei den meisten Akquisitionen (RC: 0,2 – 1,11 mm; CCC: 0,684 – 0,949).
Die höchsten Abweichungen der Messwerte fanden sich für die transbulbäre Sonografie
(RC: 0,58 – 1,83 mm; CCC: 0,615 / 0,608). Schlussfolgerung: Bei klarer Darstellung der relevanten anatomischen Strukturen und korrekter Positionierung
der Messpunkte lässt sich eine gute Korrelation zwischen HRUS- und MRT-Messungen des
N. opticus und des ONSD erreichen. Dies gilt auch für die transbulbäre Sonografie.
Da die meisten der bisher für den Ultraschall publizierten Norm- und Grenzwerte deutlich
niedriger lagen als die mit der MRT gemessenen, ist eine Reevaluation der sonografischen
ONSD-Messung unter Berücksichtigung MR-tomografischer Vergleichsuntersuchungen notwendig.
Abstract
Purpose: We performed a cadaver study to evaluate the accuracy of measurements of the optic
nerve and the optic nerve sheath for high resolution US (HRUS) and magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: Five Thiel-fixated cadaver specimens of the optic nerve were examined with HRUS and
MRI. Measurements of the optic nerve and the ONSD were performed before and after
the filling of the optic nerve sheath with saline solution. Statistical analysis included
the calculation of the agreement of measurements and the evaluation of the intraobserver
and interobserver variation. Results: Overall a good correlation of measurement values between HRUS and MRI can be found
(mean difference: 0.02 – 0.97 mm). The repeatability coefficient (RC) and concordance
correlation coefficient (CCC) values were good to excellent for most acquisitions
(RC 0.2 – 1.11 mm; CCC 0.684 – 0.949). The highest variation of measurement values
was found for transbulbar sonography (RC 0.58 – 1.83 mm; CCC 0.615 / 0.608). Conclusion: If decisive anatomic structures are clearly depicted and the measuring points are
set correctly, there is a good correlation between HRUS and MRI measurements of the
optic nerve and the ONSD even on transbulbar sonography. As most of the standard and
cut-off values that have been published for ultrasound are significantly lower than
the results obtained with MRI, a reevaluation of sonographic ONSD measurement with
correlation to MRI is necessary.
Key words
eye - MR imaging - ultrasound - anatomy
References
1
Schwalbe G.
Untersuchungen über die Lymphbahnen des Auges und ihre Begrenzungen.
Arch. Mikr. Anat.
1870;
6
1-61
2
Hayreh S S.
Pathogenesis of oedema of the optic disc (papilloedema). A preliminary report.
Br J Ophthalmol.
1964;
48
522-543
3
Skalka H W.
Neural and dural optic nerve measurements with A-scan ultrasonography.
South Med J.
1978;
71
399-400
4 Guthoff R, Triebel G, Schröder W. et al .Evaluation of the subarachnoid space-comparisons
between ultrasound and high resolution NMR-techniques. In: Sampolesi R, (ed) Ultrasonography
in ophthalmology. 12 Dordrecht: Kluwer; 55-62
5
Helmke K, Hansen H C.
Fundamentals of transorbital sonographic evaluation of optic nerve sheath expansion
under intracranial hypertension; I. Experimental study.
Pediatr Radiol.
1996;
26
701-705
6
Helmke K, Hansen H C.
Fundamentals of transorbital sonographic evaluation of optic nerve sheath expansion
under intracranial hypertension; II. Patient study.
Pediatr Radiol.
1996;
26
706-710
7
Hansen H C, Helmke K.
The subarachnoid space surrounding the optic nerves. An ultrasound study of the optic
nerve sheath.
Surg Radiol Anat.
1996;
18
323-328
8
Hansen H C, Helmke K.
Validation of the optic nerve sheath response to changing cerebrospinal fluid pressure:
ultrasound findings during intrathecal infusion tests.
J Neurosurg.
1997;
87
34-40
9
Brzezinska R, Schumacher R.
Diagnosis of Elevated Intracranial Pressure in Children with Shunt under Special Consideration
of Transglobe Sonography of the Optic Nerve.
Ultraschall in Med.
2002;
23
325-332
10
Körber F, Scharf M, Moritz J et al.
Sonography of the Optical Nerve-Experience in 483 Children.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2005;
177
229-235
11
Mc A uley D, Paterson A, Sweeney L.
Optic nerve sheath ultrasound in the assessment of paediatric hydrocephalus.
Childs Nerv Syst.
2009;
25
87-90
12
Geeraerts T, Launey Y, Martin L et al.
Ultrasonography of the optic nerve sheath may be useful for detecting raised intracranial
pressure after severe brain injury.
Intensive Care Med.
2007;
33
1704-1711
13
Newman W D, Hollman A S, Dutton G N et al.
Measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter by ultrasound: a means of detecting acute
raised intracranial pressure in hydrozephalus.
Br J Ophthalmol.
2002;
86
1109-1113
14
Tsung J W, Blaivas M, Cooper A et al.
A Rapid Noninvasive Method of Detecting Elevated Intracranial Pressure Using Bedside
Ocular Ultrasound.
Pediatric Emergency Care.
2005;
21
94-98
15
Lagreze W A, Lazzaro A, Weigel M et al.
Morphometry of the Retrobulbar Human Optic Nerve: Comparison between Conventional
Sonography and Ultrafast Magnetic Resonance Sequences.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
2007;
48
1913-1917
16
Weigel M, Lagreze W A, Lazzaro A et al.
Fast and Quantitative High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Optic Nerve
at 3.0 Tesla.
Invest Radiol.
2006;
41
83-86
17
Seitz J, Held P, Strotzer M et al.
Magnetic resonance imaging in patients diagnosed with papilledema: a comparison of
6 different high-resolution T 1- and T 2(*)-weighted 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional
sequences.
J Neuroimaging.
2002;
12
164-171
18
Rohr A, Riedel C, Reimann G et al.
Pseudotumor cerebri: Quantitative In-Vivo Measurements of Markers of Intracranial
Hypertension.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2008;
180
884-890
19 Schumacher R, Brzezinska R, Peters H. Orbita und Bulbus oculi. In: Sonographische
Untersuchungstechnik bei Kindern und Jugendlichen.. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York:
Springer-Verlag; 2003: 45-50
20
Ballantyne S A, O’Neill G, Hamilton R et al.
Observer variation in the sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter in
normal adults.
European Journal of Ultrasound.
2002;
15
145-149
21 Chen C-C, Barnhart H X. Comparison of ICC and CCC for assessing agreement for data
without and with replications. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 53: 554-564
http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2008:i:2:p:554–564
22
Garcia J PS, Garcia P T, Rosen R B et al.
A 3-dimensional Ultrasound C-Scan Imaging Technique for Optic Nerve Measurements.
Ophthalmology.
2004;
111
1238-1243
23
Agid R, Farb R I, Willinsky R A et al.
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the validity of cross-sectional neuroimaging
signs.
Neuroradiology.
2006;
48
521-527
24
Hickman S J, Miszkiel K A, Plant G T et al.
The optic nerve sheath on MRI in acute optic neuritis.
Neuroradiology.
2005;
47
51-55
25
Yazizi Z, Yazizi B, Tuncel E.
Findings of Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Optic Nerve Sheath Decompression in Patients
with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
Am J Ophthalmol.
2007;
144
429-435
26 Guthoff R. Ultrasound in Ophthalmologic Diagnosis. Stuttgart, New York: Georg Thieme
Verlag; 1991
27
Lüdemann W, Rautenfeld v DB, Samii M et al.
Ultrastructure of the cerebrospinal fluid outflow along the optic nerve into the lymphatic
system.
Childs Nerv Syst.
2005;
21
96-103
Marc Steinborn
Department of Pediatric Radiology, Städtisches Klinikum Munich Schwabing
Kölner Platz 1
80804 Munich
Telefon: ++ 49/89/30 68 22 70
Fax: ++ 49/89/30 68 38 18
eMail: steinborn@lrz.tum.de