Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49(4): 436-442
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1246011
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Klatskin Tumour: Meticulous Preoperative Work-Up and Resection Rate

Klatskin-Tumor: Detaillierte präoperative Diagnostik und ResektionsrateG. Otto1 , M. Hoppe-Lotichius1 , F. Bittinger2 , M. Schuchmann3 , C. Düber4
  • 1Departments of Transplantation and Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany
  • 2Institute of Pathology of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany
  • 3Department of Internal Medicine I of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany
  • 4Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology of the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

manuscript received: 26.2.2010

manuscript accepted: 28.12.2010

Publication Date:
07 April 2011 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Operatives Vorgehen stellt die einzige potenziell kurative Therapie des hilären Cholangiokarzinoms (hilCC) dar. Höhere Resektionsraten in asiatischen Ländern lassen die Vermutung aufkommen, dass dies durch minutiöse präoperative Diagnostik bedingt ist. Methode: Alle Patienten, die sich zwischen 1998 und 2008 mit hilCC (n = 182) in unserer Einrichtung vorstellten, wurden unserer prospektiv geführten Datenbasis entnommen und in die Studie eingeschlossen. In 75 % dieser Patienten wurde eine präoperative perkutane transhepatische Cholangiografie durchgeführt. Ergebnisse: 123 (68 %) Patienten wurden reseziert. 91 % der Patienten hatten Bismuth-III- und -IV-Tumoren. En-bloc-Resektion von Tumor und entsprechendem Leberlappen war das Standardvorgehen (n = 109). Eine hiläre Resektion erfolgte bei 14 Patienten. Die Resektionsrate betrug 77 % bezogen auf explorierte Patienten. Die Hospitalletalität lag bei 5,7 %. Das 5-Jahres-Überleben nicht operierter Patienten war 0 %, nach Resektion 26 %. Patienten mit R 1-Resektion überlebten signifikant länger als nicht operierte Patienten (p < 0,001). Rechts- und Links-Resektionen wurden mit gleicher Häufigkeit und mit gleichem Überleben durchgeführt. Lymphknotenbefall war der einzige prognostische Prädiktor (p = 0,006). Schlussfolgerung: Eine Resektion sollte wann immer möglich erfolgen, da selbst nach palliativer Resektion eine substanzielle Lebensverlängerung im Vergleich zu nicht operierten Patienten zu erwarten ist. Eine detaillierte präoperative Diagnostik kann offenbar dazu beitragen, eine hohe Resektionsrate bei hilCC zu erreichen, indem zusätzliche Informationen gewonnen werden, die dem Chirurgen ein aggressiveres Vorgehen ermöglichen.

Abstract

Background: Surgery represents the only potentially curative treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hilCC). It may be suggested that meticulous preoperative work-up in Asian countries leads to higher resection rates. Method: One hundred and eighty-two patients treated in our department between 1998 and 2008 were included in an analysis based on our prospectively recorded database. Among them, 75 % had a percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography as part of their diagnostic work-up. A total of 160 patients underwent explorative surgery and 123 patients were resected (77 % of patients undergoing exploration, 68 % of all patients). Results: Ninety-one percent of the patients were diagnosed to have Bismuth III and IV tumours. En-bloc resection of the tumour and the adjacent liver including segment 1 was the standard procedure in 109 of these patients, while hilar resection was performed in 14 patients. Upon tumour resection, hospital mortality was 5.7 %. Five-year survival in patients without surgery or with mere exploration was 0 %, after resection it reached 26 %. Patients with R 1 resection experienced longer survival than patients without resection (p < 0.001). Right and left hemihepatectomies were performed with identical frequency resulting in identical survival. Lymph node involvement proved to be the only significant predictor of prognosis (p = 0.006). Conclusion: Resection should be performed whenever possible since even after palliative resection survival is substantially increased compared to patients without resection. Meticulous preoperative work-up may contribute to a high resection rate in patients with hilCC by providing additional information allowing the surgeon to perform more aggressive approaches.

References

  • 1 Khan S A, Thomas H C, Davidson B R et al. Cholangiocarcinoma.  Lancet. 2005;  366 1303-1314
  • 2 Igami T, Nishio H, Ebata T et al. Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the ”new era”: the Nagoya University experience.  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2010;  17 449-454
  • 3 Kloek J J, Ten Kate F J, Busch O R et al. Surgery for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: predictors of survival.  HPB. 2008;  10 190-195
  • 4 Launois B, Reding R, Lebeau G et al. Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: French experience in a collective survey of 552 extrahepatic bile duct cancers.  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;  7 128-134
  • 5 Lee S G, Song G W, Hwang S et al. Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the new era: the Asan experience.  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2010;  17 476-489
  • 6 Rocha F G, Matsuo K, Blumgart L H et al. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience.  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2010;  17 490-496
  • 7 Zhang B H, Cheng Q B, Luo X J et al. Surgical therapy for hiliar cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of 198 cases.  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2006;  5 278-282
  • 8 Ortner M E, Caca K, Berr F et al. Successful photodynamic therapy for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized prospective study.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  125 1355-1363
  • 9 Zoepf T. Photodynamic therapy of cholangiocarcinoma.  HPB. 2008;  10 161-163
  • 10 Dumoulin F L, Horst E, Sauerbruch T et al. Palliative locoregional therapy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: photodynamic therapy and brachytherapy.  Zentralbl Chir. 2007;  132 336-341
  • 11 Golfieri R, Giampalma E, Fusco F et al. Unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: multimodality treatment with percutaneous and intraluminal plus external radiotherapy.  J Chemother. 2004;  16 (Suppl 5) 55-57
  • 12 Baton O, Azoulay D, Adam D V et al. Major hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma type 3 and 4: prognostic factors and longterm outcomes.  J Am Coll Surg. 2007;  204 250-260
  • 13 Dinant S, Gerhards M F, Rauws E A et al. Improved outcome of resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor).  Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;  13 872-880
  • 14 Jarnagin W R, Fong Y, DeMatteo R P et al. Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.  Ann Surg. 2001;  234 507-517 ; discussion 517 – 509
  • 15 Witzigmann H, Berr F, Ringel U et al. Surgical and palliative management and outcome in 184 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: palliative photodynamic therapy plus stenting is comparable to r1 /r2 resection.  Ann Surg. 2006;  244 230-239
  • 16 Nimura Y. Preoperative biliary drainage before resection for cholangiocarcinoma (Pro).  HPB. 2008;  10 130-133
  • 17 Tsao J I, Nimura Y, Kamiya J et al. Management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparison of an American and a Japanese experience.  Ann Surg. 2000;  232 166-174
  • 18 Romaneehsen B, Otto G, Lohse A W et al. Diagnostic imaging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: preoperative evaluation of ERC, MRC and PTC in comparison with histopathology.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2004;  176 1750-1758
  • 19 Miyakawa S, Ishihara S, Takada T et al. Flowcharts for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas.  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;  15 7-14
  • 20 Nagino M. Surgical strategy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparison between Japan and Europe.  Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2008;  109 349-354
  • 21 Slattery J M, Sahani D V. What is the current state-of-the-art imaging for detection and staging of cholangiocarcinoma?.  Oncologist. 2006;  11 913-922
  • 22 Tsukada K, Takada T, Miyazaki M et al. Diagnosis of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas.  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;  15 31-40
  • 23 Chen H W, Lai E C, Pan A Z et al. Preoperative assessment and staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with 16-multidetector computed tomography cholangiography and angiography.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;  56 578-583
  • 24 Cho E S, Park M S, Yu J S et al. Biliary ductal involvement of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: multidetector computed tomography versus magnetic resonance cholangiography.  J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;  31 72-78
  • 25 Park H S, Lee J M, Choi J Y et al. Preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer: MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography versus MDCT with direct cholangiography.  Am J Roentgenol. 2008;  190 396-405
  • 26 Unno M, Okumoto T, Katayose Y et al. Preoperative assessment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma by multidetector row computed tomography.  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;  14 434-440
  • 27 Ito F, Agni R, Rettammel R J et al. Resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: concomitant liver resection decreases hepatic recurrence.  Ann Surg. 2008;  248 273-279
  • 28 Nimura Y. Radical surgery of left-sided klatskin tumors.  HPB. 2008;  10 168-170
  • 29 Shimizu H, Kimura F, Yoshidome H et al. Aggressive surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma of the left-side predominance: radicality and safety of left-sided hepatectomy.  Ann. Surg;  251 281-286
  • 30 Mizumoto R, Kawarada Y, Suzuki H. Surgical treatment of hilar carcinoma of the bile duct.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986;  162 153-158
  • 31 Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J et al. Hepatic segmentectomy with caudate lobe resection for bile duct carcinoma of the hepatic hilus.  World J Surg. 1990;  14 535-543 ; discussion 544
  • 32 Dinant S, Gerhards M F, Busch O R et al. The importance of complete excision of the caudate lobe in resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.  HPB. 2005;  7 263-267
  • 33 Ebata T, Nagino M, Kamiya J et al. Hepatectomy with portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 52 consecutive cases.  Ann Surg. 2003;  238 720-727
  • 34 Han F, Zhou J X, Zhang L et al. Hepatectomy with portal vein resection and reconstruction in the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.  Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007;  45 763-765
  • 35 Miyazaki M, Kato A, Ito H et al. Combined vascular resection in operative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does it work or not?.  Surgery. 2007;  141 581-588
  • 36 Munoz L, Roayaie S, Maman D et al. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma involving the portal vein bifurcation: long-term results after resection.  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;  9 237-241
  • 37 Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Settmacher U et al. Surgical management of proximal bile duct cancer: extended right lobe resection increases resectability and radicality.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2003;  388 194-200
  • 38 Hirano S, Kondo S, Tanaka E et al. No-touch resection of hilar malignancies with right hepatectomy and routine portal reconstruction.  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;  16 502-507
  • 39 Endo I, House M G, Klimstra D S et al. Clinical significance of intraoperative bile duct margin assessment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;  15 2104-2112
  • 40 Sasaki R, Takeda Y, Funato O et al. Significance of ductal margin status in patients undergoing surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.  World J Surg. 2007;  31 1788-1796
  • 41 Hidalgo E, Asthana S, Nishio H et al. Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: the Leeds experience.  Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;  34 787-794

Prof. Dr. Gerd Otto

Department of Transplantation and Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

Langenbeckstr. 1

55101 Mainz

Germany

Phone: ++ 49/61 31/17 36 13

Fax: ++ 49/61 31/17 55 54

Email: otto@transplantation.klinik.uni-mainz.de

    >