Surgical Management of Congenital Heart Disease: Correlation between Hospital Costs and the Aristotle Complexity Score

Abstract

Background: Hospital costs are expected to correlate with clinical complexity. Do costs for congenital heart surgery correlate with Aristotle complexity scores? Methods: 442 inpatient stays in 2008 were evaluated. Aristotle scores and levels were determined. Costs were estimated according to the German Institute for Hospital Reimbursement system. Pearson and Spearman r correlation coefficients and corresponding goodness-of-fit regression coefficients r² were calculated. Results: Mean basic and comprehensive Aristotle scores were 7.60 ± 2.74 and 9.23 ± 2.94 points, respectively. Mean expenses per hospital stay amounted to 29 369 ± 30 823 Euros. Aristotle basic and comprehensive scores and levels were positively correlated with hospital costs. With a Spearman r of 1 and related r² of 0.9436, scores of the 6 Aristotle comprehensive levels correlated best. Mean hospital reimbursement was 26 412 ± 17 962 Euros. Compensation was higher than expenses for patients in comprehensive levels 1 to 3, but much lower for those in levels 4 to 6. Conclusions: Aristotle comprehensive complexity scores were highly correlated with hospital costs. The Aristotle score could be used as a scale to establish the correct reimbursement after congenital heart surgery.

cardiovascular surgery - heart defects - congenital - risk scores - health economy

References

• 1 Lacour-Gayet F, Clarke D, Jacobs J The Aristotle Committee et al. The Aristotle score: a complexity-adjusted method to evaluate surgical results.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;  25 911-924
• 2 Jacobs J P, Lacour-Gayet F G, Jacobs M L et al. Initial application in the STS congenital database of complexity adjustment to evaluate surgical case mix and results.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;  79 1635-1649
• 3 O'Brien S M, Jacobs J P, Clarke D R, Maruszewski B et al. Accuracy of the Aristotle basic complexity score for classifying the mortality and morbidity potential of congenital heart surgery operations.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;  84 2027-2037
• 4 Clarke D R, Lacour-Gayet F, Jacobs J P et al. The assessment of complexity in congenital cardiac surgery based on objective data.  Cardiol Young. 2008;  18 (Suppl. 2) 169-176
• 5 Heinrichs J, Sinzobahamvya N, Arenz C et al. Surgical management of congenital heart disease: evaluation according to Aristotle score.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;  37 210-217
• 6 Jenkins K J, Gauvreau K, Newburger J W, Spray T L, Moller J H, Iezzoni L I. Consensus-based method for risk adjustment for surgery for congenital heart disease.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;  123 110-118
• 7 O'Brien S M, Clarke D R, Jacobs J P et al. An empirically based tool for analyzing mortality associated with congenital heart surgery.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;  138 1139-1153
• 8 Munoz E, Josephson J, Tenenbaum N, Goldstein J, Shears A M, Wise L. Diagnosis-related groups, costs, and outcome for patients in the intensive care unit.  Heart Lung. 1989;  18 627-633
• 9 Antioch K M, Walsh M K. The risk-adjusted vision beyond case mix (DRG) funding in Australia. International lessons in high complexity and capitation.  Eur J Health Econ. 2004;  5 95-109
• 10 Benavidez O J, Connor J A, Gauvreau K, Jenkins K J. The contribution of complications to high resource utilization during congenital heart surgery admissions.  Congenit Heart Dis. 2007;  2 319-326