Download PDF
Semin Reprod Med 2010; 28(3): 235-241
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1251480
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Uterine Artery Embolization for Fibroids: A Review of Current Outcomes

Max M. Freed1 , James B. Spies1
  • 1Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 April 2010 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Since its introduction in 1995, uterine artery embolization (UAE) for fibroids has been extensively investigated. Particularly in the last 3 to 4 years, several high-quality studies assessing its outcome have been completed. Randomized trials and long-term observational studies have demonstrated that when successful, UAE can provide symptom control similar to that obtained after surgery. Although hysterectomy remains more effective in symptom control and durability, many women are seeking uterine-sparing alternatives. UAE has emerged as the leading minimally invasive treatment for fibroids: Morbidity is low and recovery rapid; serious complications are quite rare. With a few anatomical exceptions, UAE is appropriate for most patients with symptomatic fibroids who have completed childbearing. Although pregnancy is certainly possible after embolization, existing data suggest better reproductive outcomes for myomectomy in the first 2 years after treatment. The current recommendation is for myomectomy as a first choice for patients seeking to become pregnant.

KEYWORDS

Leiomyomas - uterine artery embolization - outcomes

REFERENCES

  • 1 Ravina J H, Herbreteau D, Ciraru-Vigneron N et al.. Arterial embolisation to treat uterine myomata.  Lancet. 1995;  346(8976) 671-672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Goodwin S C, Vedantham S, McLucas B, Forno A E, Perrella R. Preliminary experience with uterine artery embolization for uterine fibroids.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997;  8(4) 517-526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Greenwood L H, Glickman M G, Schwartz P E, Morse S S, Denny D F. Obstetric and nonmalignant gynecologic bleeding: treatment with angiographic embolization.  Radiology. 1987;  164(1) 155-159
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Mueller G C, Gemmete J J, Carlos R C. Diagnostic imaging and vascular embolization for uterine leiomyomas.  Semin Reprod Med. 2004;  22(2) 131-142
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists . ACOG practice bulletin. Alternatives to hysterectomy in the management of leiomyomas.  Obstet Gynecol. 2008;  112(2 Pt 1) 387-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Chrisman H B, Rajeswaran S, Dhand S et al.. Effect of postprocedural pelvic MR imaging on medical decision-making in women who have undergone uterine artery embolization.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;  20(7) 977-980
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ghai S, Rajan D K, Benjamin M S, Asch M R, Ghai S. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas: pre- and postprocedural evaluation with US.  Radiographics. 2005;  25(5) 1159-1172, discussion 1173–1176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Myers E R, Goodwin S, Landow W FIBROID Investigators et al. Prospective data collection of a new procedure by a specialty society: the FIBROID registry.  Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  106(1) 44-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Radeleff B, Eiers M, Bellemann N, Ramsauer S, Rimbach S, Kauczor H U et al.. Expulsion of dominant submucosal fibroids after uterine artery embolization.  Eur J Radiol. 2009;  , August 17 (Epub ahead of print)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Smeets A J, Nijenhuis R J, Boekkooi P F et al.. Safety and effectiveness of uterine artery embolization in patients with pedunculated fibroids.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;  20(9) 1172-1175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bratby M J, Ramachandran N, Sheppard N, Kyriou J, Munneke G M, Belli A M. Prospective study of elective bilateral versus unilateral femoral arterial puncture for uterine artery embolization.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;  30(6) 1139-1143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bruno J, Sterbis K, Flick P et al.. Recovery after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas: a detailed analysis of its duration and severity.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;  15(8) 801-807
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hutchins Jr F L, Worthington-Kirsch R, Berkowitz R P. Selective uterine artery embolization as primary treatment for symptomatic leiomyomata uteri.  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1999;  6(3) 279-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Spies J B, Ascher S A, Roth A R, Kim J, Levy E B, Gomez-Jorge J. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata.  Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  98(1) 29-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Walker W J, Pelage J. Uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic fibroids: clinical results in 400 women with imaging follow up.  BJOG. 2002;  109 1262-1272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Pron G, Bennett J, Common A, Wall J, Asch M, Sniderman K. Ontario Uterine Fibroid Embolization Collaboration Group . The Ontario Uterine Fibroid Embolization Trial. Part 2. Uterine fibroid reduction and symptom relief after uterine artery embolization for fibroids.  Fertil Steril. 2003;  79(1) 120-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Spies J B, Myers E R, Worthington-Kirsch R, Mulgund J, Goodwin S, Mauro M. FIBROID Registry Investigators . The FIBROID Registry: symptom and quality-of-life status 1 year after therapy.  Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  106(6) 1309-1318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Worthington-Kirsch R, Spies J B, Myers E R FIBROID Investigators et al. The Fibroid Registry for outcomes data (FIBROID) for uterine embolization: short-term outcomes.  Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  106(1) 52-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hehenkamp W J, Volkers N A, Birnie E, Reekers J A, Ankum W M. Symptomatic uterine fibroids: treatment with uterine artery embolization or hysterectomy—results from the randomized clinical Embolisation versus Hysterectomy (EMMY) Trial.  Radiology. 2008;  246(3) 823-832
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Hehenkamp W J, Volkers N A, Donderwinkel P F et al.. Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (EMMY trial): peri- and postprocedural results from a randomized controlled trial.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  193(5) 1618-1629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Edwards R D, Moss J G, Lumsden M A Committee of the Randomized Trial of Embolization versus Surgical Treatment for Fibroids et al. Uterine-artery embolization versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids.  N Engl J Med. 2007;  356(4) 360-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Broder M S, Goodwin S, Chen G et al.. Comparison of long-term outcomes of myomectomy and uterine artery embolization.  Obstet Gynecol. 2002;  100(5 Pt 1) 864-868
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bucek R A, Puchner S, Lammer J. Mid- and long-term quality-of-life assessment in patients undergoing uterine fibroid embolization.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;  186(3) 877-882
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Katsumori T, Kasahara T, Akazawa K. Long-term outcomes of uterine artery embolization using gelatin sponge particles alone for symptomatic fibroids.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;  186 848-854
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Spies J B, Cornell C, Worthington-Kirsch R, Lipman J C, Benenati J F. Long-term outcome from uterine fibroid embolization with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres: results of a multicenter study.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;  18(2) 203-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Gabriel-Cox K, Jacobson G F, Armstrong M A, Hung Y Y, Learman L A. Predictors of hysterectomy after uterine artery embolization for leiomyoma.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  196 588.e1-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lohle P N, Voogt M J, De Vries J et al.. Long-term outcome of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine leiomyomas.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;  19(3) 319-326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Spies J B, Bruno J, Czeyda-Pommersheim F, Magee S T, Ascher S A, Jha R C. Long-term outcome of uterine artery embolization of leiomyomata.  Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  106(5 Pt 1) 933-939
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Walker W J, Barton-Smith P. Long-term follow up of uterine artery embolisation—an effective alternative in the treatment of fibroids.  BJOG. 2006;  113(4) 464-468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Reed S D, Newton K M, Thompson L B, McCrummen B A, Warolin A K. The incidence of repeat uterine surgery following myomectomy.  J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006;  15(9) 1046-1052
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Spies J B, Roth A R, Jha R C, Gomez-Jorge J et al.. Leiomyomata treated with uterine artery embolization: factors associated with successful symptomatic and imaging outcome.  Radiology. 2002;  222 45-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Spies J B, Spector A, Roth A R, Baker C M, Mauro L, Murphy-Skrynarz K. Complications after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas.  Obstet Gynecol. 2002;  100(5 Pt 1) 873-880
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 de Blok S, de Vries C, Prinssen H M, Blaauwgeers H L, Jorna-Meijer L B. Fatal sepsis after uterine artery embolization with microspheres.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;  14(6) 779-783
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Vashisht A, Studd J, Carey A, Burn P. Fatal septicaemia after fibroid embolisation.  Lancet. 1999;  354(9175) 307-308
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Czeyda-Pommersheim F, Magee S T, Cooper C, Hahn W Y, Spies J B. Venous thromboembolism after uterine fibroid embolization.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;  29(6) 1136-1140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Nikolic B, Kessler C M, Jacobs H M et al.. Changes in blood coagulation markers associated with uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;  14(9 Pt 1) 1147-1153
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Chrisman H B, Saker M B, Ryu R K et al.. The impact of uterine fibroid embolization on resumption of menses and ovarian function.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;  11(6) 699-703
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Healey S, Buzaglo K, Seti L, Valenti D, Tulandi T. Ovarian function after uterine artery embolization and hysterectomy.  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;  11(3) 348-352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Spies J B, Roth A R, Gonsalves S M, Murphy-Skrzyniarz K M. Ovarian function after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: assessment with use of serum follicle stimulating hormone assay.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;  12(4) 437-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Tropeano G, Di Stasi C, Litwicka K, Romano D, Draisci G, Mancuso S. Uterine artery embolization for fibroids does not have adverse effects on ovarian reserve in regularly cycling women younger than 40 years.  Fertil Steril. 2004;  81 1055-1061
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Mara M, Fucikova Z, Maskova J, Kuzel D, Haakova L. Uterine fibroid embolization versus myomectomy in women wishing to preserve fertility: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial.  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;  126(2) 226-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Mara M, Maskova J, Fucikova Z, Kuzel D, Belsan T, Sosna O. Midterm clinical and first reproductive results of a randomized controlled trial comparing uterine fibroid embolization and myomectomy.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008;  31(1) 73-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Homer H, Saridogan E. Uterine artery embolization for fibroids is associated with an increased risk of miscarriage.  Fertil Steril. 2009;  , April 8 (Epub ahead of print)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

James B SpiesM.D. M.P.H. 

Department of Radiology, CG 201, 3800 Reservoir Rd. NW

Washington, DC 20007-2113

Email: spiesj@gunet.georgetown.edu

      >