Background and study aims
In many patients, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) can be limited by digestive
tract stenosis. PEG placement using an introducer is the safest alternative for this
group of patients, but the available devices are difficult to implement and require
smaller-caliber tubes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the modification of an
introducer technique device for PEG placement with regard to the following: procedure
feasibility, possibility of using a 20-Fr balloon gastrostomy tube, tube-related function
and problems, complications, procedure safety, and mortality.
Patients and methods
Between March 2007 and February 2008, 30 consecutive patients with head and neck malignancies
underwent introducer PEG placement with the modified device and gastropexy. Each patient
was evaluated for 60 days after the procedure for the success of the procedure, infection,
pain, complications, mortality, and problems with the procedure.
Results
The procedure was successful in all cases with no perioperative complications. No
signs of stomal infection were observed using the combined infection score. The majority
of patients experienced mild-to-moderate pain both in the immediate postoperative
period and at 72 hours. One major early complication (3.3 %) and two minor complications
(6.7 %) were observed. No procedure-related deaths occurred during the first 60 days
after the procedure.
Conclusion
The device modification for PEG using the introducer technique is feasible, safe,
and efficient in outpatients with obstructive head and neck cancer. In this series,
it allowed the use of a larger-caliber tube with low complication rates and no procedure-related
mortality.
References
1
Tucker A T, Gourin C G et al.
“Push” versus “pull” percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients
with advance head and neck cancer.
Laringoscope.
2003;
113
1898-1902
2
Foster J M, Filocamo P, Nava H et al.
The introducer technique is the optimal method for placing percutaneous endoscopic
gastrostomy tubes in head and neck cancer patients.
Surg Endosc.
2007;
21
897-901
3
Baredes S, Behin D, Deitch E.
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube feeding in patients with head and neck cancer.
Ear Nose Throat J.
2004;
83
417-419
4
Nicholson F B, Korman M G, Richardson M A.
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a review of indications, complications and outcome.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2000;
15
21-25
5
Hunter J G, Lauretano L, Shellito P C.
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients.
Ann Surg.
1989;
210
42-46
6
Riley D A, Strauss M.
Airway and other complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and
neck cancer patients.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol.
1992;
101
310-313
7
Sabnis A, Liu R, Chand B, Ponsky J.
SLiC technique. A novel approach to percutaneous gastrostomy.
Surg Endosc.
2006;
20
256-262
8
Bhama J K, Haas M K, Fisher W E.
Spread of pharyngeal cancer to the abdominal wall after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech.
2001;
11
375-378
9
Dormann A J, Glosemeyer R, Leistner U et al.
Modified percutaneous endoscopic (PEG) with gastropexy – early experience with a new
introducer technique.
Z Gastroenterol.
2000;
38
933-938
10
Dormann A J, Wejda B, Kahl S et al.
Long-term result with a new introducer method with gastropexy for percutaneous endoscopic
gastrostomy.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2006;
101
1229-1234
11
Potochny J D, Sataloff D M, Spiegel J R et al.
Head and neck cancer implantation at the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy exit
site. A case report and a review.
Surg Endosc.
1998;
12
1361-1365
12
Russell T R, Brotman M, Norris F.
Percutaneous gastrostomy: a new simplified and cost-effective technique.
Am J Surg.
1984;
148
132-137
13
Lin H S, Ibrahim H Z, Kheng J W et al.
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: strategies for prevention and management of complications.
Laryngoscope.
2001;
111
1847-1852
14
Cappell M S.
Risk factors and risk reduction of malignant seeding of the percutaneous endoscopic
gastrostomy track from pharyngoesophageal malignancy: a review of all 44 known reported
cases.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2007;
102
1307-1311
15
Miller R E, Kummer B A, Kotler D P, Tiszenkel H I.
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Procedure of choice.
Ann Surg.
1986;
204
543-545
16
Kozarek R A, Ball T J, Ryan J A.
When push comes to shove: a comparison between two methods of percutaneous endoscopic
gastrostomy.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1986;
81
642-646
17
Cosentini E P, Sautner T, Gnant M et al.
Outcomes of surgical, percutaneous endoscopic, and percutaneous radiologic gastrostomies.
Arch Surg.
1998;
133
1076-1083
18
Simon T, Fink A S.
Recent experience with percutaneous endoscopic gastro/jejunostomy (PEG/J) for enteral
nutrition.
Surg Endosc.
2000;
14
436-438
19
Sobreira R S, Lo Turco C M, Patrício C E et al.
Gastrostomia endoscópica: indicações, técnicas e complicações.
GED.
2006;
25
37-41
20
Giordano-Nappi J H, Ishioka S, Maluf-Filho F et al.
A new device for the introducer technique for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
placement.
Endoscopy.
2007;
39 (Suppl 1)
274-275
21
Jain N K, Larson D E, Schroeder K W et al.
Antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. A prospective, randomized,
double – blind clinical trial.
Ann Intern Med.
1987;
107
824-828
22
Ehrsson Y T, Langius-Eklöf A, Bark T, Laurell G.
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) – a long-term follow-up study in head and
neck cancer patients.
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci.
2004;
29
740-746
23
Gauderer M WL, Ponsky J L, Izant R J.
Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique.
J Pediatr Surg.
1980;
15
872-875
24
Gibson S E, Wenig B L, Watkins J L.
Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol.
1992;
101
46-50
25
Adler D G, Baron T H, Geels W et al.
Placement of PEG tubes through previously placed self-expanding esophageal metal stents.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
54
237-241
26
Stockeld D, Fagerberg J, Granström L, Backman L.
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for nutrition in patients with oesophageal cancer.
Eur J Surg.
2001;
167
839-844
27
Shastri Y M, Hoepffner N, Tessmer A et al.
New introducer PEG gastropexy does not require prophylactic antibiotics: multicenter
prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
620-628
28
Toyama Y, Usuba T, Son K et al.
Successful new method of extracorporeal percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (E-PEG).
Surg Endosc.
2007;
21
2034-2038
29
Taller A, Horvath E, Iliás L et al.
Technical modifications for improving the success rate of PEG tube placement in patients
with head and neck cancer.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
54
633-636
30
Pisano G, Calò P G, Tatti A et al.
Surgical gastrostomy when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is not feasible: indications,
results and comparison between the two procedures.
Chir Ital.
2008;
60
261-266
31
Petersen T I, Kruse A.
Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.
Eur J Surg.
1997;
163
351-356
32
Löser C, Wolters S, Fölsch U R.
Enteral long-term nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 210 patients:
a four-year prospective study.
Dig Dis Sci.
1998;
43
2549-2557
33
Tsai J K, Schattner M.
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy site metastasis.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am.
2007;
17
777-786
34
Cruz I, Mamel J J, Brady P G, Cass-Garcia M.
Incidence of abdominal wall metastasis complicating PEG tube placement in untreated
head and neck cancer.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2005;
62
708-711
35
Schneider A M, Loggie B W.
Metastatic head and neck cancer to the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy exit site:
a case report and review of the literature.
Am Surg.
1997;
63
481-486
36
Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Tanaka N et al.
Prospective randomized trial comparing the direct method using a 24 Fr bumper-button-type
device with the pull method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.
Endoscopy.
2008;
40
722-726
37
Campoli P MO, Ejima F H, Cardoso D MM et al.
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in advanced head and neck cancer.
ABCD Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestive (ILMA Index).
2007;
20
97-101
38
Wiesen A J, Sideridis K, Fernandes A et al.
True incidence and clinical significance of pneumoperitoneum after PEG placement:
a prospective study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
64
886-889
39
Blum C A, Selander C, Ruddy J M, Leon S.
The incidence and clinical significance of pneumoperitoneum after percutaneous endoscopic
gastrostomy: a review of 722 cases.
Am Surg.
2009;
75
39-43
40
Wojtowycz M M, Arata J A, Micklos T J, Miller F J.
CT findings after uncomplicated percutaneous gastrostomy.
AJR Am J Roentgenol.
1988;
151
307-309
41
Miller R E, Castlemain B, Lacqua F J, Kotler D P.
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Results in 316 patients and review of literature.
Surg Endosc.
1989;
3
186-190
42
Terry N E, Boswell W C, Carney D E et al.
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with T-bar fixation in children and infants.
Surg Endosc.
2008;
22
167-170
43
Pofahl W E, Ringold F.
Management of early dislodgment of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech.
1999;
9
253-256
44
Grant D G, Bradley P T, Pothier D D et al.
Complications following gastrostomy tube insertion in patients with head and neck
cancer: a prospective multi-institution study, systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clin Otolaryngol.
2009;
34
103-112
J. H. Giordano-NappiMD, PhD
Department of Gastroenterology Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit Hospital das Clínicas Medical School of São Paulo University
Av. Dr Eneas Carvalho de Aguiar 255 6 ° Andar, Bloco C São Paulo Brazil
Fax: 55-11-30697579
eMail: drgiordano@hotmail.com