Welche Parameter sind bei der 3-D-Implantatplanung für eine erfolgreiche Therapie relevant?

Lernziele

Der Leser sollte nach dem Durcharbeiten des Artikels

• die Indikation für die verschiedenen minimal-invasiven Techniken stellen können,

• die Risiken für Fehler bei der Anwendung der 3-D-Schablonen benennen und

• die verschiedenen Simulationsmöglichkeiten des prothetischen Ergebnisses den jeweiligen Indikationen zuordnen können.

Literatur

• 1 Azari A, Nikzad S.. Computer-assisted implantology: historical background and potential outcomes – a review.  Int J Med Robot. 2008;  4 95-104
• 2 De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR.. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;  38 609-625
• 3 Dreiseidler T, Mischkowski RA, Neugebauer J et al.. Comparison of cone-beam imaging with orthopantomography and computerized tomography for assessment in presurgical implant dentistry.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;  24 216-225
• 4 Dreiseidler T, Neugebauer J, Ritter L et al.. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;  20 1191-1199
• 5 Fuster-Torres MA, Albalat-Estela S, Alcaniz-Raya M et al.. CAD/CAM dental systems in implant dentistry: update.  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;  14 141-145
• 6 Ganz SD.. Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors.  Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008;  29 278
• 7 Israelson H, Plemons JM, Watkins P et al.. Barium-coated surgical stents and computer-assisted tomography in the preoperative assessment of dental implant patients.  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992;  12 52-61
• 8 Kalt G, Gehrke P.. Transfer precision of three-dimensional implant planning with CT assisted offline navigation.  Int J Comput Dent. 2008;  11 213-225
• 9 Komiyama A, Klinge B, Hultin M.. Treatment outcome of immediately loaded implants installed in edentulous jaws following computer-assisted virtual treatment planning and flapless surgery.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;  19 677-685
• 10 Neugebauer J, Stachulla G, Ritter L et al.. Computer-aided manufacturing technologies for guided implant placement.  Expert Rev Med Devices. 2010;  7 113-129
• 11 Nickenig HJ, Eitner S.. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.  J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007;  35 207-211
• 12 Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE et al.. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;  67 394-401
• 13 Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Dreiseidler T et al.. 3D X-ray meets CAD/CAM dentistry: a novel procedure for virtual dental implant planning.  Int J Comput Dent. 2009;  12 29-40
• 14 Rugani P, Kirnbauer B, Arnetzl GV et al.. Cone beam computerized tomography: basics for digital planning in oral surgery and implantology.  Int J Comput Dent. 2009;  12 131-145
• 15 Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M et al.. A systematic review on the accurancy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;  20 73-86
• 16 Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME et al.. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study.  J Clin Periodontol. 2007;  34 816-821
• 17 van Steenberghe D, Glauser R, Blomback U et al.. A computed tomographic scan-derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study.  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;  7 111-120
• 18 Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Martens K et al.. An image-guided planning system for endosseous oral implants.  IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;  17 842-852

Korrespondenzadresse>