Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 31(4): 404-408
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262207
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Diagnostic Modalities in Sarcoidosis: BAL, EBUS, and PET

Ulrich Costabel1 , Francesco Bonella1 , Shinichiro Ohshimo1 , Josune Guzman2
  • 1Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Department of Pneumology/Allergy, Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany
  • 2General and Experimental Pathology, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 July 2010 (online)

Preview

ABSTRACT

Advances have been made in minimally invasive diagnostic procedures in sarcoidosis, including bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), and positron emission tomography (PET). Several independent groups found almost identical predictive values of the CD4:CD8 ratio in BAL for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. A CD4:CD8 ratio greater than 3.5 shows a high specificity of 93 to 96% for sarcoidosis, but the sensitivity is low (53 to 59%). EBUS-TBNA is a safe and useful tool for diagnosing sarcoidosis stage I and II with a sensitivity of 83 to 93% and a specificity of 100%. Novel imaging techniques have been explored, such as PET using L-[3-18F] fluoro-α–methyltyrosine (18F-F MT), which is more specific for malignancy than 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)-PET. The combined modality of FMT-PET with FDG-PET could successfully discriminate sarcoidosis from malignancy. These recent developments including novel biopsy procedures and novel imaging techniques could be of value to diagnosing sarcoidosis.

REFERENCES

Ulrich CostabelM.D. 

Ruhrlandklinik, Tueschener Weg 40

D-45239 Essen, Germany

Email: ulrich.costabel@ruhrlandklinik.uk-essen.de