Download PDF
Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49(7): 845-870
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1273362
Übersicht

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Normwerte in der Abdomensonografie – biliopankreatisches System und Milz

Reference Values in Abdominal Ultrasound – Biliopancreatic System and SpleenM. Sienz1 , A. Ignee1 , C. F. Dietrich1
  • 1Innere Medizin 2, Caritas Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim
Further Information

Publication History

Manuskript eingetroffen: 16.2.2011

Manuskript akzeptiert: 6.4.2011

Publication Date:
15 July 2011 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Normwerte in der B-Bild-Sonografie des Abdomens werden aufgrund der begrenzten Datenlage in der Literatur kontrovers diskutiert. Es erfolgt eine systematische Zusammenstellung bislang publizierter Daten bezüglich des biliopankreatischen Systems und der Milz. Methoden: Literatur-Recherche bez. Normwerten im Abdomen von 1970 – 2010 an gesunden Probanden. In Anlehnung an die Bestimmung von Referenzintervallen für Laborwerte werden Normwerte in der Regel mithilfe von 95 %-Referenzintervallen und den zugehörigen 90 %-Konfidenzintervallen bestimmt. Evaluiert wurden die Gallenblase, die Gallenblasenwand, die Gallengänge, das Pankreas und die Milz. Ergebnisse: 70 Studien konnten ausgewertet werden. Die Vergleichbarkeit der Daten ist eingeschränkt, da unterschiedliche Kollektive untersucht und verschiedene Messmethoden angewendet wurden. Insbesondere für das Gallenblasenvolumen unterscheiden sich die in der Literatur angegebenen Messwerte quantitativ erheblich. Zur Gallenblasengröße ist die Datenlage unzureichend. Für die Wanddicke der Gallenblase kann als Normwert ca. 3 mm angesehen werden. Die für den Ductus hepaticus communis bzw. Ductus hepatocholedochus ableitbaren Normwerte liegen in Abhängigkeit vom Messort und den untersuchten Kollektiven zwischen 5 und 9 mm. Die publizierten Messwerte für die Pankreasgröße differieren ebenfalls erheblich. Als obere Normgrenze für die Milzlänge ergibt sich aus den meisten Publikationen um 12 cm, bei jungen, großen athlethischen Männern bis 15 cm. Diskussion: Normwerte sind hilfreich für die Abgrenzung zahlreicher pathologischer Prozesse in den jeweiligen Organen.

Abstract

Objective: Reference values for B-mode abdominal ultrasound are controversially discussed due to the limited data in the literature. A systematic survey of the data published so far is presented for the biliopancreatic system and the spleen. Methods: A literature review of reference values in the abdomen from 1970 to 2010 in healthy subjects 18 years of age and older was carried out. According to the determination of reference intervals for laboratory values, reference values are generally determined using 95 %-reference intervals and their associated 90 %-confidence intervals. The gallbladder, gallbladder wall, bile ducts, pancreas and the spleen were evaluated. Results: 70 studies were analysed. The comparability of the data is limited, because different collectives were studied and diverse measuring techniques were used. In particular, gallbladder volume measurements reported in the literature differ substantially. Data for the size of the gallbladder are insufficient. Deducible reference values for the common hepatic duct or, respectively, the common bile duct lie between 5 and 9 mm in dependency on the measuring position and the collective analysed. The published measurement values for the size of the pancreas also vary considerably. In most of the publications the upper limit of normal for the length of the spleen amounts to around 12 cm, in young, athletic men up to 15 cm. Discussion: Normal values are helpful in delimiting numerous pathological changes in the respective organs.

Schlüsselwörter

Normwerte - Pankreas - Milz

Key words

reference values - pancreas - spleen

Literatur

  • 1 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ultraschall in der Medizin (DEGUM), Österreichische Gesellschaft für Ultraschall in der Medizin (ÖGUM) .Befundung und Nomenklatur bei Ultraschalluntersuchungen innerer Organe. Empfehlungen der Nomenklaturkommission der Sektion Innere Medizin der DEGUM und der ÖGUM. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Sienz M, Ignee A, Dietrich C F. Reference values in abdominal ultrasound – liver and liver vessels.  Z Gastroenterol. 2010;  48 (9) 1141-1152
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Solberg H E. A guide to IFCC recommendations on reference values.  J Int Fed Clin Chem. 1993;  5 (4) 162-165
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Solberg H E. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry. Scientific committee, Clinical Section. Expert Panel on Theory of Reference Values and International Committee for Standardization in Haematology Standing Committee on Reference Values. Approved recommendation (1986) on the theory of reference values. Part 1. The concept of reference values.  Clin Chim Acta. 1987;  165 (1) 111-118
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Solberg H E. The theory of reference values Part 5. Statistical treatment of collected reference values. Determination of reference limits.  J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1983;  21 (11) 749-760
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Dietrich C F, Chichakli M, Hirche T O et al. Sonographic findings of the hepatobiliary-pancreatic system in adult patients with cystic fibrosis.  J Ultrasound Med. 2002;  21 (4) 409-416
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Capaccioli L, Stecco A, Vanzi E et al. Ultrasonographic study on the growth and dimensions of healthy children and adults organs.  Ital J Anat Embryol. 2000;  105 (1) 1-50
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Festi D, Frabboni R, Bazzoli F et al. Gallbladder motility in cholesterol gallstone disease. Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid administration and gallstone dissolution.  Gastroenterology. 1990;  99 (6) 1779-1785
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Saibene A, Pellicciotta G, Balconi G et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of gallbladder volume and contractility in diabetic patients of different ages.  Diabete Metab. 1991;  17 (6) 530-533
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Palasciano G, Serio G, Portincasa P et al. Gallbladder volume in adults, and relationship to age, sex, body mass index, and gallstones: a sonographic population study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;  87 (4) 493-497
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Chen J J, Changchien C S, Tai D I et al. Gallbladder volume in patients with common hepatic duct dilatation. An evaluation of Courvoisier’s sign using ultrasonography.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994;  29 (3) 284-288
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Portincasa P, Di Ciaula A, Baldassarre G et al. Gallbladder motor function in gallstone patients: sonographic and in vitro studies on the role of gallstones, smooth muscle function and gallbladder wall inflammation.  J Hepatol. 1994;  21 (3) 430-440
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Gourtsoyiannis N C, Damilakis J E, Charoulakis N Z et al. Relationship of gallbladder contour, fasting volume and emptying to body size indices in normal subjects and patients with gallstones.  Digestion. 1995;  56 (5) 395-399
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Chapman B A, Chapman T M, Frampton C M et al. Gallbladder volume: comparison of diabetics and controls.  Dig Dis Sci. 1998;  43 (2) 344-348
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Caroli-Bosc F X, Pugliese P, Peten E P et al. Gallbladder volume in adults and its relationship to age, sex, body mass index, body surface area and gallstones. An epidemiologic study in a nonselected population in France.  Digestion. 1999;  60 (4) 344-348
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Lock G, Kammerl M, Schlottmann K et al. Gallbladder motility in healthy volunteers: effects of age, gender, body mass index, and hair color.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;  50 (53) 1232-1235
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Guliter S, Yilmaz S, Karakan T. Evaluation of gallbladder volume and motility in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients using real-time ultrasonography.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;  37 (4) 288-291
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Kamerling I M, Van Haarst A D, De Kam M L et al. Gallbladder volume as a biomarker for the motilin effect in healthy volunteers and patients with functional dyspepsia.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;  19 (7) 797-804
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Nazaroglu H, Akgul C, Bukte Y et al. Volume changes in the gallbladder in association with various radiologic examinations.  J Clin Ultrasound. 2005;  33 (5) 214-217
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Sari R, Balci M K, Coban E et al. Sonographic evaluation of gallbladder volume and ejection fraction in obese women without gallstones.  J Clin Ultrasound. 2003;  31 (7) 352-357
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Finberg H J, Birnholz J C. Ultrasound evaluation of the gallbladder wall.  Radiology. 1979;  133 (3 Pt 1) 693-698
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Sanders R C. The significance of sonographic gallbladder wall thickening.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1980;  8 (2) 143-146
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Deitch E A. Utility and accuracy of ultrasonically measured gallbladder wall as a diagnostic criteria in biliary tract disease.  Dig Dis Sci. 1981;  26 (8) 686-693
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Alekse R. Diffuse thickening of the gallbladder wall detected by ultrasonography.  Mater Med Pol. 1991;  23 (3) 229-232
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Uggowitzer M, Kugler C, Schramayer G et al. Sonography of acute cholecystitis: comparison of color and power Doppler sonography in detecting a hypervascularized gallbladder wall.  Am J Roentgenol. 1997;  168 (3) 707-712
    Google Scholar
  • 26 El S E, Faris R, Grumbach K et al. Ultra sonographic measurements of the normal liver and spleen among Egyptians 10 – 50 years old.  J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 1997;  72 (3 – 4) 257-283
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Cooperberg P L. High-resolution real-time ultrasound in the evaluation of the normal and obstructed biliary tract.  Radiology. 1978;  129 (2) 477-480
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Parulekar S G. Ultrasound evaluation of common bile duct size.  Radiology. 1979;  133 (3 Pt 1) 703-707
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Graham M F, Cooperberg P L, Cohen M M et al. The size of the normal common hepatic duct following cholecystectomy: an ultrasonographic study.  Radiology. 1980;  135 (1) 137-139
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Dewbury K C. Visualization of normal biliary ducts with ultrasound.  Br J Radiol. 1980;  53 (632) 774-780
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Mueller P R, Ferrucci Jr J T, Simeone J F et al. Postcholecystectomy bile duct dilatation: myth or reality?.  Am J Roentgenol. 1981;  136 (2) 355-358
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Bruneton J N, Roux P, Fenart D et al. Ultrasound evaluation of common bile duct size in normal adult patients and following cholecystectomy. A report of 750 cases.  Eur J Radiol. 1981;  1 (2) 171-172
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Niederau C, Muller J, Sonnenberg A et al. Extrahepatic bile ducts in healthy subjects, in patients with cholelithiasis, and in postcholecystectomy patients: a prospective ultrasonic study.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1983;  11 (1) 23-27
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Kaude J V. The width of the common bile duct in relation to age and stone disease. An ultrasonographic study.  Eur J Radiol. 1983;  3 (2) 115-117
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Wu C C, Ho Y H, Chen C Y. Effect of aging on common bile duct diameter: a real-time ultrasonographic study.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1984;  12 (8) 473-478
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Wedmann B, Borsch G, Coenen C et al. Effect of cholecystectomy on common bile duct diameters: a longitudinal prospective ultrasonographic study.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1988;  16 (9) 619-624
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Heistermann P, Buchholz J, Strosche H et al. Changes of the ductus hepatocholedochus after gastric stimulant. Results of early functional sonography.  Surg Endosc. 1989;  3 (3) 134-136
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Brogna A, Bucceri A M, Catalano F et al. Common bile duct and sex, age and body mass index in normal humans: an ultrasonographic study.  Ital J Gastroenterol. 1991;  23 (3) 136-137
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Watkin D S, Haworth J M, Leaper D J et al. Assessment of the common bile duct before cholecystectomy using ultrasound and biochemical measurements: validation based on follow-up.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;  76 (5) 317-319
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Feng B, Song Q. Does the common bile duct dilate after cholecystectomy? Sonographic evaluation in 234 patients.  Am J Roentgenol. 1995;  165 (4) 859-861
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Kaim A, Steinke K, Frank M et al. Diameter of the common bile duct in the elderly patient: measurement by ultrasound.  Eur Radiol. 1998;  8 (8) 1413-1415
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Majeed A W, Ross B, Johnson A G. The preoperatively normal bile duct does not dilate after cholecystectomy: results of a five year study.  Gut. 1999;  45 (5) 741-743
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Perret R S, Sloop G D, Borne J A. Common bile duct measurements in an elderly population.  J Ultrasound Med. 2000;  19 (11) 727-730
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Horrow M M, Horrow J C, Niakosari A et al. Is age associated with size of adult extrahepatic bile duct: sonographic study.  Radiology. 2001;  221 (2) 411-414
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Bachar G N, Cohen M, Belenky A et al. Effect of aging on the adult extrahepatic bile duct: a sonographic study.  J Ultrasound Med. 2003;  22 (9) 879-882
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Daradkeh S, Tarawneh E, Al-Hadidy A. Factors affecting common bile duct diameter.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;  52 (66) 1659-1661
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Prpic G L, Babic N, Marjan D et al. MR assessment of bile duct size in healthy individuals: comparison with US measurements.  Coll Antropol. 2007;  31 (2) 567-571
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Admassie D. Ultrasound assessment of common bile duct diameter in Tikur Anbessa Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.  Ethiop Med J. 2008;  46 (4) 391-395
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Haber K, Freimanis A K, Asher W M. Demonstration and dimensional analysis of the normal pancreas with gray-scale echography.  Am J Roentgenol. 1976;  126 (3) 624-628
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Graaff C S, Taylor K J, simonds B D et al. Gray-scale echography of the pancreas. Re-evaluation of normal size.  Radiology. 1978;  129 (1) 157-161
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Afschrift de M, Mets T, Verdonk G. Real-time ultrasonography of the normal pancreas in young adults: advantage of the erect position.  Acta Clin Belg. 1979;  34 (1) 32-35
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Zimmermann W, Frank N, Weiss-Simon C et al. The normal pancreas. Demonstration in the sonogram in relation to age.  Fortschr Med. 1981;  99 (30) 1178-1182
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Kolmannskog F, Vatn M H, Swensen T et al. Computer tomography of the abdomen in patients with uncharacteristic abdominal disturbances.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1983;  18 (2) 225-227
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Niederau C, Sonnenberg A, Muller J E et al. Sonographic measurements of the normal liver, spleen, pancreas, and portal vein.  Radiology. 1983;  149 (2) 537-540
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Pochhammer K F, Szekessy T, Frentzel-Beyme B et al. Craniocaudad extension of the head of the pancreas.  Digitale Bilddiagn. 1984;  4 (3) 118-120
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Ker C G, Tabata M, Sheen P C et al. Echographic measurement of normal Chinese pancreas.  Taiwan Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi. 1984;  83 (11) 1094-1104
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Silva M E, Vezozzo D P, Ursich M J et al. Ultrasonographic abnormalities of the pancreas in IDDM and NIDDM patients.  Diabetes Care. 1993;  16 (9) 1296-1297
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Weill F, Schraub A, Eisenscher A et al. Ultrasonography of the normal pancreas. Success rate and criteria for normality.  Radiology. 1977;  123 (2) 417-423
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Vossen C H. Ultrasonographic measurement of the pancreatic body. Its significance in measuring the normal pancreas.  Diagn Imaging Clin Med. 1986;  55 (6) 327-329
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Frank K, Linhart P, Kortsik C et al. Sonographic determination of spleen size: normal dimensions in adults with a healthy spleen.  Ultraschall in Med. 1986;  7 (3) 134-137
    Google Scholar
  • 61 Wermke W. Sonomorphometrische und Dopplersonographische Untersuchungen bei Chronischen Leberkrankheiten. Habilitation 1990
    Google Scholar
  • 62 Loftus W K, Chow L T, Metreweli C. Sonographic measurement of splenic length: correlation with measurement at autopsy.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1999;  27 (2) 71-74
    Google Scholar
  • 63 Messinezy M, Macdonald L M, Nunan T O et al. Spleen sizing by ultrasound in polycythaemia and thrombocythaemia: comparison with SPECT.  Br J Haematol. 1997;  98 (1) 103-107
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Yazdanpanah Y, Thomas A K, Kardorff R et al. Organometric investigations of the spleen and liver by ultrasound in Schistosoma mansoni endemic and nonendemic villages in Senegal.  Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997;  57 (2) 245-249
    Google Scholar
  • 65 Dietrich C F, Zeuzem S, Caspary W F et al. Ultrasound lymph node imaging in the abdomen and retroperitoneum of healthy probands.  Ultraschall in Med. 1998;  19 (6) 265-269
    Google Scholar
  • 66 De Odorico I, Spaulding K A, Pretorius D H et al. Normal splenic volumes estimated using three-dimensional ultrasonography.  J Ultrasound Med. 1999;  18 (3) 231-236
    Google Scholar
  • 67 Li Y S, Kardorff R, Richter J et al. Ultrasound organometry: the importance of body height adjusted normal ranges in assessing liver and spleen parameters among Chinese subjects with Schistosoma japonicum infection.  Acta Trop. 2004;  92 (2) 133-138
    Google Scholar
  • 68 Spielmann A L, DeLong D M, Kliewer M A. Sonographic evaluation of spleen size in tall healthy athletes.  Am J Roentgenol. 2005;  184 (1) 45-49
    Google Scholar
  • 69 Hosey R G, Mattacola C G, Kriss V et al. Ultrasound assessment of spleen size in collegiate athletes.  Br J Sports Med. 2006;  40 (3) 251-254
    Google Scholar
  • 70 Mustapha Z, Tahir A, Tukur M et al. Sonographic determination of normal spleen size in an adult African population.  Eur J Radiol. 2010;  75 (1) e133-e135
    Google Scholar
  • 71 Koga T, Morikawa Y. Ultrasonographic determination of the splenic size and its clinical usefulness in various liver diseases.  Radiology. 1975;  115 (1) 157-161
    Google Scholar
  • 72 Pietri H, Boscaini M. Determination of a splenic volumetric index by ultrasonic scanning.  J Ultrasound Med. 1984;  3 (1) 19-23
    Google Scholar
  • 73 Ishibashi H, Higuchi N, Shimamura R et al. Sonographic assessment and grading of spleen size.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1991;  19 (1) 21-25
    Google Scholar
  • 74 Sheth S G, Mani S, Tamhankar H et al. Spleen size in health and disease: a sonographic assessment.  J Assoc Physicians India. 1995;  43 (3) 182-184
    Google Scholar
  • 75 Sonmez G, Ozturk E, Basekim C C et al. Effects of altitude on spleen volume: sonographic assessment.  J Clin Ultrasound. 2007;  35 (4) 182-185
    Google Scholar
  • 76 Stiff P J, Bensinger W, Abidi M H et al. Clinical and ultrasonic evaluation of spleen size during peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization by filgrastim: results of an open-label trial in normal donors.  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;  15 (7) 827-834
    Google Scholar
  • 77 Festi D, Frabboni R, Bazzoli F et al. Gallbladder motility in cholesterol gallstone disease. Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid administration and gallstone dissolution.  Gastroenterology. 1990;  99 (6) 1779-1785
    Google Scholar
  • 78 Caroli-Bosc F X, Pugliese P, Peten E P et al. Gallbladder volume in adults and its relationship to age, sex, body mass index, body surface area and gallstones. An epidemiologic study in a nonselected population in France.  Digestion. 1999;  60 (4) 344-348
    Google Scholar
  • 79 Everson G T, Braverman D Z, Johnson M L et al. A critical evaluation of real-time ultrasonography for the study of gallbladder volume and contraction.  Gastroenterology. 1980;  79 (1) 40-46
    Google Scholar
  • 80 Rajan M, Wali J P, Sharma M P et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of gall bladder kinetics in the elderly.  Indian J Gastroenterol. 2000;  19 (4) 158-160
    Google Scholar
  • 81 Hansen W E, Maurer H. (A simple grid for measurement of gallbladder size by real-time ultrasound (author’s transl)).  Z Gastroenterol. 1981;  19 (10) 663-666
    Google Scholar
  • 82 Wedmann B, Schmidt G, Wegener M et al. Effects of age and gender on fat-induced gallbladder contraction and gastric emptying of a caloric liquid meal: a sonographic study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;  86 (12) 1765-1770
    Google Scholar
  • 83 Vezina W C, Paradis R L, Grace D M et al. Increased volume and decreased emptying of the gallbladder in large (morbidly obese, tall normal, and muscular normal) people.  Gastroenterology. 1990;  98 (4) 1000-1007
    Google Scholar
  • 84 Xynos E, Haroulakis N, Petrakis I et al. Effect of the menstrual cycle on gallbladder fasting volume and postprandial emptying in nulliparous young females.  Invest Radiol. 1997;  32 (6) 330-334
    Google Scholar
  • 85 Pansini F, Campobasso C, Giorgetti L et al. Influence of oral contraceptives on fasting gallbladder volume.  Gynecol Endocrinol. 1993;  7 (4) 267-271
    Google Scholar
  • 86 Everson G T, McKinley C, Lawson M et al. Gallbladder function in the human female: effect of the ovulatory cycle, pregnancy, and contraceptive steroids.  Gastroenterology. 1982;  82 (4) 711-719
    Google Scholar
  • 87 Braverman D Z, Johnson M L, Kern Jr F. Effects of pregnancy and contraceptive steroids on gallbladder function.  N Engl J Med. 1980;  302 (7) 362-364
    Google Scholar
  • 88 Dodds W J, Groh W J, Darweesh R M et al. Sonographic measurement of gallbladder volume.  Am J Roentgenol. 1985;  145 (5) 1009-1011
    Google Scholar
  • 89 Stolk M F, Erpecum K J, Berge Henegouwen van G P et al. Gallbladder volume and contraction measured by sum-of-cylinders method compared with ellipsoid and area-length methods.  Acta Radiol. 1990;  31 (6) 591-596
    Google Scholar
  • 90 Damiao A O, Sipahi A M, Vezozzo D P et al. Reproducibility of the ultrasound method for measurement of gallbladder volume.  Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 1996;  51 (5) 151-153
    Google Scholar
  • 91 Yoon H J, Kim P N, Kim A Y et al. Three-dimensional sonographic evaluation of gallbladder contractility: comparison with cholescintigraphy.  J Clin Ultrasound. 2006;  34 (3) 123-127
    Google Scholar
  • 92 Hashimoto van S, Goto H, Hirooka Y et al. An evaluation of three-dimensional ultrasonography for the measurement of gallbladder volume.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 (12) 3492-3496
    Google Scholar
  • 93 Dietrich C F, Braden B. Sonographic assessments of gastrointestinal and biliary functions.  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;  23 (3) 353-367
    Google Scholar
  • 94 Kratzer W, Walcher T, Arnold F et al. Gallstone prevalence and risk factors for gallstone disease in an urban population of children and adolescents.  Z Gastroenterol. 2010;  48 (6) 683-687
    Google Scholar
  • 95 Kratzer W, Haenle M M, Mason R A et al. Prevalence of cholelithiasis in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease.  World J Gastroenterol. 2005;  11 (39) 6170-6175
    Google Scholar
  • 96 Kratzer W, Fritz V, Mason R A et al. Factors affecting liver size: a sonographic survey of 2080 subjects.  J Ultrasound Med. 2003;  22 (11) 1155-1161
    Google Scholar
  • 97 Kratzer W, Kron M, Hay B et al. (Prevalence of cholecystolithiasis in South Germany – an ultrasound study of 2,498 persons of a rural population).  Z Gastroenterol. 1999;  37 (12) 1157-1162
    Google Scholar
  • 98 Kratzer W, Mason R A, Kachele V. Prevalence of gallstones in sonographic surveys worldwide.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1999;  27 (1) 1-7
    Google Scholar
  • 99 Kim M Y, Baik S K, Choi Y J et al. Endoscopic sonographic evaluation of the thickened gallbladder wall in patients with acute hepatitis.  J Clin Ultrasound. 2003;  31 (5) 245-249
    Google Scholar
  • 100 Zissin R, Osadchy A, Shapiro-Feinberg M et al. CT of a thickened-wall gall bladder.  Br J Radiol. 2003;  76 (902) 137-143
    Google Scholar
  • 101 Hunt D R, Scott A J. Changes in bile duct diameter after cholecystectomy: a 5-year prospective study.  Gastroenterology. 1989;  97 (6) 1485-1488
    Google Scholar
  • 102 Wachsberg R H. Respiratory variation of extrahepatic bile duct diameter during ultrasonography.  J Ultrasound Med. 1994;  13 (8) 617-621
    Google Scholar
  • 103 Yarmenitis S D. Ultrasound of the gallbladder and the biliary tree.  Eur Radiol. 2002;  12 (2) 270-282
    Google Scholar
  • 104 Glaser J, Stienecker K. Pancreas and aging: a study using ultrasonography.  Gerontology. 2000;  46 (2) 93-96
    Google Scholar
  • 105 Rajan E, Clain J E, Levy M J et al. Age-related changes in the pancreas identified by EUS: a prospective evaluation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 (3) 401-406
    Google Scholar
  • 106 Loftus W K, Metreweli C. Normal splenic size in a Chinese population.  J Ultrasound Med. 1997;  16 (5) 345-347
    Google Scholar
  • 107 Wermke W. Sonomorphometrische und Dopplersonographische Untersuchungen bei Chronischen Leberkrankheiten. 1990
    Google Scholar
  • 108 Maymon R, Strauss S, Vaknin Z et al. Normal sonographic values of maternal spleen size throughout pregnancy.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006;  32 (12) 1827-1831
    Google Scholar
  • 109 Nakanishi T, Ogawa H, Kawamura T et al. Comparison of convex and linear transducers for sonographic assessment of the liver, spleen, and pancreas.  Am J Roentgenol. 1984;  143 (5) 1110-1112
    Google Scholar
  • 110 Kaneko J, Sugawara Y, Matsui Y et al. Spleen size of live donors for liver transplantation.  Surg Radiol Anat. 2008;  30 (6) 515-518
    Google Scholar
  • 111 Nuernberg D, Ignee A, Dietrich C F. Ultrasound in gastroenterology – liver and spleen.  Z Gastroenterol. 2006;  44 (9) 991-1000
    Google Scholar
  • 112 Wedemeyer J, Gratz K F, Soudah B et al. Splenosis – important differential diagnosis in splenectomized patients presenting with abdominal masses of unknown origin.  Z Gastroenterol. 2005;  43 (11) 1225-1229
    Google Scholar
  • 113 Nuernberg D, Braden B, Ignee A et al. Functional ultrasound in gastroenterology.  Z Gastroenterol. 2008;  46 (9) 883-896
    Google Scholar
  • 114 Olokoba A B, Bojuwoye B J, Olokoba L B et al. The relationship between gallstone disease and gall bladder volume.  Niger J Clin Pract. 2008;  11 (2) 89-93
    Google Scholar
  • 115 Pauletzki J, Cicala M, Holl J et al. Correlation between gall bladder fasting volume and postprandial emptying in patients with gall stones and healthy controls.  Gut. 1993;  34 (10) 1443-1447
    Google Scholar
  • 116 Kishk S M, Darweesh R M, Dodds W J et al. Sonographic evaluation of resting gallbladder volume and postprandial emptying in patients with gallstones.  Am J Roentgenol. 1987;  148 (5) 875-879
    Google Scholar
  • 117 Jazrawi R P, Pazzi P, Petroni M L et al. Postprandial gallbladder motor function: refilling and turnover of bile in health and in cholelithiasis.  Gastroenterology. 1995;  109 (2) 582-591
    Google Scholar
  • 118 Erpecum K J, Berge Henegouwen van G P, Stolk M F et al. Fasting gallbladder volume, postprandial emptying and cholecystokinin release in gallstone patients and normal subjects.  J Hepatol. 1992;  14 (2 – 3) 194-202
    Google Scholar
  • 119 Cicala van M, Guarino M P, Vavassori P et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of gallbladder bile exchanges in healthy subjects and in gallstone patients.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001;  27 (11) 1445-1450
    Google Scholar
  • 120 Eberle F, Pfeilsticker D, Rettenmaier G. The size of the gallbladder in acute viral hepatitis.  Ultraschall in Med. 1984;  5 (3) 108-110
    Google Scholar
  • 121 Toni R, Bolondi L, Gaiani S et al. Accessory ultrasonographic findings in chronic liver disease: diameter of splenic and hepatic arteries, fasting gallbladder volume, and course of left portal vein.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1985;  13 (9) 611-618
    Google Scholar
  • 122 Agarwal A K, Miglani S, Singla S et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of gallbladder volume in diabetics.  J Assoc Physicians India. 2004;  52 962-965
    Google Scholar
  • 123 Keshavarzian A, Dunne M, Iber F L. Gallbladder volume and emptying in insulin-requiring male diabetics.  Dig Dis Sci. 1987;  32 (8) 824-828
    Google Scholar
  • 124 Crade M, Taylor K J, Viscomi G N. Need for care in assessing gallbladder wall thickening.  Am J Roentgenol. 1980;  135 (2) 423-424
    Google Scholar
  • 125 Summers S M, Scruggs W, Menchine M D et al. A prospective evaluation of emergency department bedside ultrasonography for the detection of acute cholecystitis.  Ann Emerg Med. 2010;  56 (2) 114-122
    Google Scholar
  • 126 Ralls P W, Colletti P M, Lapin S A et al. Real-time sonography in suspected acute cholecystitis. Prospective evaluation of primary and secondary signs.  Radiology. 1985;  155 (3) 767-771
    Google Scholar
  • 127 Breda Vriesman A C, Engelbrecht M R, Smithuis R H et al. Diffuse gallbladder wall thickening: differential diagnosis.  Am J Roentgenol. 2007;  188 (2) 495-501
    Google Scholar
  • 128 Suk K T, Kim C H, Baik S K et al. Gallbladder wall thickening in patients with acute hepatitis.  J Clin Ultrasound. 2009;  37 (3) 144-148
    Google Scholar
  • 129 Ralls P W, Quinn M F, Juttner H U et al. Gallbladder wall thickening: patients without intrinsic gallbladder disease.  Am J Roentgenol. 1981;  137 (1) 65-68
    Google Scholar
  • 130 Kelbel van C, Borner N, Weilemann L S. (Ultrasound scanning of thickening of the gallbladder wall and its diagnostic significance in critical care patients).  Ultraschall in Med. 1988;  9 (3) 106-110
    Google Scholar
  • 131 Laudanna A A, Ferreyra N P, Cerri G G et al. Thickening of the gallbladder wall in alcoholic hepatitis verified by ultrasonographic examination. Its clinical implications.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1987;  22 (5) 521-524
    Google Scholar
  • 132 Wegener M, Borsch G, Schneider J et al. Gallbladder wall thickening: a frequent finding in various nonbiliary disorders – a prospective ultrasonographic study.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1987;  15 (5) 307-312
    Google Scholar
  • 133 Talarico H P, Rubens D. Gallbladder wall thickening in acute pyelonephritis.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1990;  18 (8) 653-657
    Google Scholar
  • 134 Kim Y O, Chun K A, Choi J Y et al. Sonographic evaluation of gallbladder-wall thickening in hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: prediction of disease severity.  J Clin Ultrasound. 2001;  29 (5) 286-289
    Google Scholar
  • 135 Yamada K, Yamada H. Gallbladder wall thickening in mononucleosis syndromes.  J Clin Ultrasound. 2001;  29 (6) 322-325
    Google Scholar
  • 136 Donovan J E, Leech S L, Zucker R A et al. Really underage drinkers: alcohol use among elementary students.  Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004;  28 (2) 341-349
    Google Scholar
  • 137 Brogna A, Bucceri A M, Catalano F et al. Ultrasound demonstration of gallbladder wall thickening as a method to differentiate cirrhotic ascites from other ascites.  Invest Radiol. 1996;  31 (2) 80-83
    Google Scholar
  • 138 Hunt D R, Reiter L, Scott A J. Pre-operative ultrasound measurement of bile duct diameter: basis for selective cholangiography.  Aust N Z J Surg. 1990;  60 (3) 189-192
    Google Scholar
  • 139 Prat F, Meduri B, Ducot B et al. Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests.  Ann Surg. 1999;  229 (3) 362-368
    Google Scholar
  • 140 Welbourn C R, Haworth J M, Leaper D J et al. Prospective evaluation of ultrasonography and liver function tests for preoperative assessment of the bile duct.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 (10) 1371-1373
    Google Scholar
  • 141 Trondsen E, Edwin B, Reiertsen O et al. Prediction of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a prospective validation of a discriminant analysis function.  Arch Surg. 1998;  133 (2) 162-166
    Google Scholar
  • 142 Sgourakis G, Dedemadi G, Stamatelopoulos A et al. Predictors of common bile duct lithiasis in laparoscopic era.  World J Gastroenterol. 2005;  11 (21) 3267-3272
    Google Scholar
  • 143 Ortega D, Burns P N, Hope S D et al. Tissue harmonic imaging: is it a benefit for bile duct sonography?.  Am J Roentgenol. 2001;  176 (3) 653-659
    Google Scholar
  • 144 Ripolles T, Ramirez-Fuentes C, Martinez-Perez M J et al. Tissue harmonic sonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: a comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.  J Clin Ultrasound. 2009;  37 (9) 501-506
    Google Scholar
  • 145 Simeone J F, Butch R J, Mueller P R et al. The bile ducts after a fatty meal: further sonographic observations.  Radiology. 1985;  154 (3) 763-768
    Google Scholar
  • 146 Jones T B, Dubuisson R L, Hughes J J et al. Abrupt termination of the common bile duct: a sign of malignancy identified by high-resolution real-time sonography.  J Ultrasound Med. 1983;  2 (8) 345-348
    Google Scholar
  • 147 Niederau C, Sonnenberg A, Mueller J. Comparison of the extrahepatic bile duct size measured by ultrasound and by different radiographic methods.  Gastroenterology. 1984;  87 (3) 615-621
    Google Scholar
  • 148 Wachsberg R H, Kim K H, Sundaram K. Sonographic versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiographic measurements of the bile duct revisited: importance of the transverse diameter.  Am J Roentgenol. 1998;  170 (3) 669-674
    Google Scholar
  • 149 Alzaid A, Aideyan O, Nawaz S. The size of the pancreas in diabetes mellitus.  Diabet Med. 1993;  10 (8) 759-763
    Google Scholar
  • 150 El-Hodhod M A, Nassar M F, Hetta O A et al. Pancreatic size in protein energy malnutrition: a predictor of nutritional recovery.  Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;  59 (4) 467-473
    Google Scholar
  • 151 Cuntz U, Frank G, Lehnert P et al. Interrelationships between the size of the pancreas and the weight of patients with eating disorders.  Int J Eat Disord. 2000;  27 (3) 297-303
    Google Scholar
  • 152 Feigelson J, Pecau Y, Poquet M et al. Imaging changes in the pancreas in cystic fibrosis: a retrospective evaluation of 55 cases seen over a period of 9 years.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;  30 (2) 145-151
    Google Scholar
  • 153 Schneider K, Harms K, Fendel H. The increased echogenicity of the pancreas in infants and children: the white pancreas.  Eur J Pediatr. 1987;  146 (5) 508-511
    Google Scholar
  • 154 Jenssen C, Dietrich C F. Endoscopic ultrasound in chronic pancreatitis.  Z Gastroenterol. 2005;  43 (8) 737-749
    Google Scholar
  • 155 Lee J S, Kim S H, Jun D W et al. Clinical implications of fatty pancreas: correlations between fatty pancreas and metabolic syndrome.  World J Gastroenterol. 2009;  15 (15) 1869-1875
    Google Scholar
  • 156 Picardi M, Martinelli V, Ciancia R et al. Measurement of spleen volume by ultrasound scanning in patients with thrombocytosis: a prospective study.  Blood. 2002;  99 (11) 4228-4230
    Google Scholar
  • 157 Tassiopoulos T, Rombos Y, Konstantopoulos K et al. Spleen size in beta-thalassaemia heterozygotes.  Haematologia. 1995;  26 (4) 205-209
    Google Scholar
  • 158 Siniluoto T, Paivansalo M, Alavaikko M. Ultrasonography of spleen and liver in staging Hodgkin’s disease.  Eur J Radiol. 1991;  13 (3) 181-186
    Google Scholar
  • 159 Goerg C, Schwerk W B, Goerg K et al. Sonographic patterns of the affected spleen in malignant lymphoma.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1990;  18 (7) 569-574
    Google Scholar
  • 160 Siler J, Hunter T B, Weiss J et al. Increased echogenicity of the spleen in benign and malignant disease.  Am J Roentgenol. 1980;  134 (5) 1011-1014
    Google Scholar
  • 161 Tarantino G, Conca P, Tarantino M et al. Does spleen volume play a role in patients with HCV-related chronic hepatitis?.  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2009;  22 (4) 1009-1017
    Google Scholar
  • 162 Ditchfield M R, Gibson R N, Donlan J D et al. Duplex Doppler ultrasound signs of portal hypertension: relative diagnostic value of examination of paraumbilical vein, portal vein and spleen.  Australas Radiol. 1992;  36 (2) 102-105
    Google Scholar
  • 163 Strohm W D, Uher B. Correlation between hepatic vein pressure and diameter of portal vein and spleen as determined by ultrasound tomography in patients with liver disease (author’s transl).  Z Gastroenterol. 1979;  17 (10) 695-703
    Google Scholar
  • 164 O’Donohue J, Ng C, Catnach S et al. Diagnostic value of Doppler assessment of the hepatic and portal vessels and ultrasound of the spleen in liver disease.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;  16 (2) 147-155
    Google Scholar
  • 165 Berzigotti A, Zappoli P, Magalotti D et al. Spleen enlargement on follow-up evaluation: a noninvasive predictor of complications of portal hypertension in cirrhosis.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;  6 (10) 1129-1134
    Google Scholar
  • 166 Testa R, Testa E, Giannini E et al. Noninvasive ratio indexes to evaluate fibrosis staging in chronic hepatitis C: role of platelet count/spleen diameter ratio index.  J Intern Med. 2006;  260 (2) 142-150
    Google Scholar
  • 167 Barrera F, Riquelme A, Soza A et al. Platelet count/spleen diameter ratio for non-invasive prediction of high risk esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.  Ann Hepatol. 2009;  8 (4) 325-330
    Google Scholar
  • 168 Barikbin R, Hekmatnia A, Omidifar N et al. Prediction severity of esophageal varices: a new cutoff point for Platelet count/ spleen diameter ratio.  Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2010;  56 (1) 1-6
    Google Scholar
  • 169 Cioni G, Tincani E, D’Alimonte P et al. Relevance of reduced portal flow velocity, low platelet count and enlarged spleen diameter in the non-invasive diagnosis of compensated liver cirrhosis.  Eur J Med. 1993;  2 (7) 408-410
    Google Scholar
  • 170 Ishibashi H, Okumura Y, Higuchi N et al. Differentiation of mononucleosis from hepatitis by sonographic measurement of spleen size.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1987;  15 (5) 313-316
    Google Scholar
  • 171 Chauhan R, Kapoor V, Vohra P A et al. The ‘small spleen’ in malaria.  J Assoc Physicians India. 1996;  44 (7) 483-485
    Google Scholar
  • 172 Dietrich C F, Brunner V, Seifert H et al. Intestinal B-mode sonography in patients with endemic sprue. Intestinal sonography in endemic sprue.  Ultraschall in Med. 1999;  20 (6) 242-247
    Google Scholar
  • 173 Gorg C, Eichkorn M, Zugmaier G. The small spleen: sonographic patterns of functional hyposplenia or asplenia.  J Clin Ultrasound. 2003;  31 (3) 152-155
    Google Scholar

Prof. Christoph F. Dietrich

Innere Medizin 2, Caritas Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim

Uhlandstr. 7

97980 Bad Mergentheim

Phone:  ++ 49/79 31/58 22 01

Fax:  ++ 49/79 31/58 22 90

Email: christoph.dietrich@ckbm.de

      >