Key words
insulin resistance - lipid metabolism - adipose tissue - metabolic syndrome - adipokines
- atherosclerosis
Introduction
Retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4), a transport protein for vitamin A, is synthesized mainly by the hepatocyte and
secreted into the circulation bound to vitamin A and transthyretin [1]. Although hepatocytes are regarded as the principal source of circulating RBP4 under normal conditions, adipose tissue has the second highest expression level [2]. The only known role of RBP4 was that of retinol transport, until 2005, when Yang et al. [3] reported that RBP4 is a novel adipocyte-secreted hormone that is upregulated in insulin resistant states
associated with obesity, and also RBP4 provokes insulin resistance. Since then, RBP4 has been regarded as an adipokine, which constitutes a hormone that signals changes
in fatty-tissue mass and energy status in order to control fuel usage [3]. Even more, RBP4 has been recently proposed as an emerging cardiometabolic risk factor [4].
Although, there is a considerable number of studies focusing on the various metabolic
roles of RBP4, the results of these studies are in some cases conflicting resulting in a discrepancy
regarding some of the possible metabolic roles of RBP4. From this point of view, there is a need for a critical review of these studies.
To the best of our knowledge, there are no reviews investigating thoroughly all the
metabolic effects of RBP4. In this context, this article reviews the major aspects of the possible metabolic
actions of RBP4 and attempts to elucidate any resting confusion on this matter. The literature search
was based on PubMed listings up to 1 August 2011.
Type 2 Diabetes and Insulin Resistance
Type 2 Diabetes and Insulin Resistance
Relationship between RBP4 and clinical and laboratory parameters of insulin resistance
Circulating RBP4 and expression of RBP4mRNA in abdominal adipose tissue are increased in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus
(T2DM) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), compared to subjects with normal glucose
tolerance (NGT) [5]
[6]
[7]. However, circulating RBP4 and synthesis rates of RBP4 appear to be lower in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) compared to normal, nondiabetic
individuals [8]
[9]
[10]
[11]. Furthermore, circulating RBP4 is higher in women with gestational diabetes mellitus compared to healthy pregnant
women [12]
[13]. Moreover, in nonobese, normoglycemic subjects with at least one first-degree relative
with T2DM, serum RBP4 levels correlate inversely with the glucose disposal rate (GDR), which is a strong
predictor of future development of diabetes in such persons, indicating that circulating
RBP4 could serve as an early prognostic marker of the future development of T2DM in such
individuals [6].
Additionally, a relationship between circulating RBP4 and biochemical markers of carbohydrate metabolism has been reported. Specifically,
circulating RBP4 has been found to be positively correlated with fasting serum glucose levels (Glc),
fasting serum insulin levels (Ins), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) [6], and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA)-index [14], and negatively correlated with GDR [6]
[14]
[15]. Furthermore, circulating RBP4 has been reported to be positively associated with plasma glucose levels at 2 h during
oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and negatively correlated with insulin sensitivity,
as estimated by the formula of Matsuda and DeFronzo during OGTT [14]
[16]. Plasma RBP4 levels are negatively correlated with peripheral insulin sensitivity, as estimated
by the insulin-stimulated rates of glucose and fat oxidation, and with hepatic insulin
sensitivity, as assessed by the difference in hepatic glucose production between the
basal state and upon insulin infusion [16]. Notably, circulating RBP4 has been reported to be negatively correlated with β-cell function, as estimated
by the first-phase disposition index (Di1) during an intravenous glucose tolerance test [16]. Thus, RBP4 appears to be associated not only with insulin resistance but with β-cell function
as well.
Mechanisms of RBP4-induced insulin resistance
It is known that skeletal muscle is the principal site of insulin-stimulated glucose
uptake, whereas adipose tissue takes up much less glucose under normal conditions
[17]. Moreover, mice with markedly reduced GLUT4 expression in adipose tissue, but normal
GLUT4 expression in muscle, are insulin resistant [18]. Adipose-specific deletion of GLUT4 leads to secondary defects in insulin action
in muscle and liver [18]. Yang et al. showed that RBP4 causes insulin resistance in these mice [3]. From this point of view, RBP4 appears to constitute a factor, which is secreted by the GLUT4–/– adipocytes to induce insulin resistance in skeletal muscles [3].
The mechanism by which RBP4 induces insulin resistance in mice was investigated by Yang et al. [3]. Specifically, it was found that RBP4 causes a reduction in insulin-stimulated phosphoinositide 3-kinase [PI(3)K] activity
in muscle and in insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1
(IRS1) at tyrosine residue 612, an important docking site for the p85 subunit of PI(3)K.
In the same study, it was shown that RBP4 can act directly to increase the expression of the gluconeogenic enzyme phosphoenolpyruvate
kinase (Pepck) in hepatocytes and the basal glucose production and can impair the
suppression of hepatic glucose production in response to insulin.
Ost and Danielsson et al. gave a new insight in the mechanism of inducement of insulin
resistance by RBP4, using subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue from nondiabetic subjects [19]. In that study, incubation of the adipocytes with RBP4 for 24 h reduced the insulin-induced phosphorylation of IRS1 on tyrosine and on serine
307 (phosphorylation of serine 307 by insulin results in an increased steady-state
level of tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS1 in response to physiological concentrations
of insulin). In adipocytes, IRS1 transmits the insulin signal further downstream via
a number of signaling mediators. These mediators include protein kinase B, eventually
regulating glucose uptake and other metabolic effects, and MAP kinase regulating the
mitogenic signaling of insulin [20]. Ost and Danielsson et al. reported that the insulin-desensitizing effects of RBP4 was not transmitted further downstream to reduce insulin-sensitivity for protein
kinase B phosphorylation. The fact that RBP4 treatment did not influence the metabolic signaling of insulin via protein kinase
B phosphorylation was attributed to the relatively short incubation period of 24 h,
which may have not been long enough to elicit full-blown insulin resistance. Interestingly,
RBP4 treatment reduced the insulin sensitivity for downstream signaling to MAP kinases
ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Furthermore, in this study, the incubation of isolated adipocytes
from patients with T2DM with antibodies against RBP4 restored the ability of insulin to elicit the phosphorylation of IRS1 at serine 307
and enhanced the insulin-induced phosphorylation of the MAP kinases ERK1/2. This finding
is indicative of the ability of RBP4 to induce insulin resistance in an autocrine or paracrine fashion, in the adipose
tissue of patients with T2DM.
It is noteworthy that the studies, which were performed until today, have found an
inverse relationship between the expression of RBP4mRNA and GLUT4mRNA in visceral adipose tissue [3]
[7]. A possible explanation is that, in states of insulin resistance, where exists a
downregulation of GLUT4 expression in visceral adipose tissue, there is an increased
expression of RBP4, which may cause the insulin resistance. However, a positive relationship between
RBP4mRNA and GLUT4mRNA in subcutaneous adipose tissue has been reported [16]
[21]
[22] or no association between them [7]. A plausible explanation for these findings is that subcutaneous adipose tissue
may be less important than visceral adipose tissue in determining the plasma RBP4 levels and thus the status of insulin resistance. Furthermore, circulating RBP4 possibly causes a compensatory upregulation of the expression of GLUT4mRNA in subcutaneous
adipose tissue, as indicated by one study [19]. Therefore, RBP4 appears to induce insulin resistance in skeletal muscle, in liver and in adipose
tissue, as well.
Relationship between RBP4 and low-grade inflammation
It is well known that obesity is associated with low-grade inflammation, which is
causally involved in the development of insulin resistance [23]. Although there are some conflicting data, RBP4 appears to be related with some markers of low-grade inflammation and by this mechanism
may cause, at least in part, insulin resistance. Specifically, a positive correlation
between the expression of RBP4 and the markers of the macrophages CD68 and MCP1 in subcutaneous abdominal adipose
tissue has been reported, indicating a relationship between RBP4 and macrophage infiltration of adipose tissue [22]. Furthermore, serum RBP4 levels are positively correlated with circulating inflammatory factors, such as high-sensitivity
CRP (hsCRP) and IL-6 [24]. However, the positive relationship between circulating RBP4 and markers of low grade inflammation should be discriminated from the negative correlation
between circulating RBP4 and factors of clinical inflammation. The latter negative correlation is attributed
to the property of RBP4 to be a negative acute phase reactant and thus circulating RBP4 is downregulated in illness- or injury-related inflammation [25]. These conditions are fundamentally different from obesity-related low-grade inflammation.
The effects of antidiabetic drugs on RBP4 ([Table 1])
Table 1 The impact of medical interventions on plasma RBP4 levels.
Medical interventions
|
Plasma RBP4 levels
|
Comments
|
T1DM: Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus; T2DM: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; RBP4: Retinol binding protein 4
|
Symbols: ↑: Increase; ↓: Decrease; ↔: No change
|
Insulin
|
↑
|
Insufficient data
|
Thiazolidinediones
|
↓
|
Mainly in patients with T2DM
|
Metformin
|
↔
|
Insufficient data
|
Sulfonylureas
|
↑
|
Insufficient data
|
Exenatide
|
↓
|
Insufficient data
|
Acarbose
|
↓
|
Insufficient data
|
Diet
|
↓
|
Well established. Negative energy balance is possibly more important than body weight
per se
|
Exercise
|
↓
|
Resistance exercise is possibly more effective in reducing circulating RBP4, than aerobic exercise
|
Orlistat
|
↓
|
Unknown if there is an impact of orlistat on circulating RBP4 independently from the applied diet
|
Sibutramine
|
↓
|
Unknown if there is an impact of sibutramine on circulating RBP4 independently from the applied diet
|
Rimonabant
|
↓
|
The decrease in circulating RBP4 is possibly due to the rimonabant-induced reduction in production of RBP4 by adipose tissue
|
Bariatric Surgery
|
↓
|
Well established. Negative energy balance is possibly more important than body weight
per se
|
Statins
|
↓ or ↔
|
Conflicting data
|
Fibrates
|
Early↑and late ↓
|
The metabolic action of fibrates reduces circulating RBP4. The fenofibrate-induced change in renal function increases circulating RBP4
|
Cholestyramine
|
↓
|
Insufficient data
|
Ezetimibe
|
↔
|
Insufficient data
|
Regarding the impact of insulin on plasma RBP4 levels, it can be claimed that insulin is important for protein synthesis and in
this aspect the insulin deficit, which occurs in T1DM patients may explain the decrease
in circulating RBP4 in T1DM individuals compared to normal subjects [8]
[9]
[10]
[11]. Consistently, untreated streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats had decreased circulating
RBP4 compared to controls, whereas insulin treated diabetic rats had increased circulating
RBP4 compared to untreated diabetic rats and lower circulating RBP4 than controls [26]. Moreover, when visceral adipose tissue explants were cultured with recombinant
insulin, there was not any change in RBP4 secretion [27]. A plausible explanation for the above mentioned data is that, when there is not
insulin deficit, insulin treatment may not have any significant impact on plasma RBP4 levels, whereas the deprivation of the physiological actions of insulin can cause
a decrease in circulating RBP4.
Although there are some studies mentioning no change in circulating RBP4 during thiazolidinedione treatment, circulating RBP4 appears to decrease during thiazolidinedione treatment. Specifically, Yang et al.
reported that rosiglitazone treatment of adipose GLUT4–/– mice completely normalized the elevated serum RBP4 levels and reduced the elevated RBP4mRNA levels in adipose tissue [3]. Moreover, thiazolidinedione treatment of subjects with T2DM reduces circulating
RBP4 [28]
[29]
[30]. However, thiazolidinedione treatment of IGT or nondiabetic subjects does not cause
any change in circulating RBP4 [22]
[31]. These results may be attributed to the fact that the study subjects did not have
overt diabetes and thus the insulin sensitizing effects of thiazolidinediones did
not fully appear. Similarly, in another study, when in the oral antidiabetic medication
of subjects with T2DM 15 mg pioglitazone was added per day for 8 months, no change
was found in circulating RBP4 compared to baseline values [32]. Given the relatively low pioglitazone dose used and the fact that the patients
had already been receiving antidiabetic medication, the results of this study should
be interpreted with the appropriate caution.
Additionally, metformin treatment has been found to cause no significant change in
circulating RBP4 [22]
[29]. Furthermore, sulfonylurea treatment appears to increase plasma RBP4 levels [30]
[33]. Moreover, circulating RBP4 is reduced after treatment with exenatide [33] or acarbose [34]. It should be noticed that the main drawback of the majority of the above-mentioned
studies is that the addition of the new antidiabetic drug was performed on patients
already receiving antidiabetic medication. Thus, by this way the impact of the studied
antidiabetic drug per se on RBP4 metabolism cannot be concluded accurately.
Obesity
Relationship between RBP4 and adipose tissue
Circulating RBP4 is elevated in obese subjects compared to lean ones [3]
[6]
[24] and in morbidly obese patients compared to lean individuals [35]. Consistently, circulating RBP4 has been found to be positively correlated with body mass index (BMI) [6]
[7]
[36], waist circumference (WC) [7]
[36], and waist to hip ratio [37]
[38], indicating that RBP4 is related with abdominal obesity. Additionally, RBP4mRNA in visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue has been shown to increase
in obese patients compared to lean ones [7].
RBP4mRNA is elevated in visceral compared to subcutaneous adipose tissue and circulating
RBP4 is correlated more strongly with RBP4mRNA in visceral adipose tissue than RBP4mRNA in subcutaneous adipose tissue [7]. Furthermore, circulating RBP4 is positively correlated with visceral fat area, but not with abdominal subcutaneous
fat area [28], and even more the change in circulating RBP4 after weight loss is significantly associated with the change in visceral fat area,
but not with the change in subcutaneous fat area [39]. Consistently, circulating RBP4 and RBP4mRNA in both visceral and subcutaneous adipose depots have been found to be increased
in subjects with visceral obesity compared to subjects with nonvisceral obesity [7]
[28]
[40]. The majority of the relevant studies have found that circulating RBP4 is positively correlated with percent trunk fat (trunk fat divided by the total body
fat), rather than the absolute amount of trunk fat, the total body fat or the percent
body fat [14]
[15]
[41]. From all the above-mentioned data, it can be concluded that visceral adipose tissue
is possibly more important than the subcutaneous one in determining plasma RBP4 levels and even more the ratio of the visceral to the subcutaneous adipose mass appears
to be more crucial than the absolute amount of these stores.
Additionally, plasma RBP4 levels are positively correlated with liver fat [14]. Consistently, circulating RBP4 has been found to be increased in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
(NAFLD) compared to subjects who do not have NAFLD and are matched for age and gender
with the patients with NAFLD [42]
[43]
[44]. It should be underlined that, until today, a causal link between elevated serum
RBP4 and NAFLD beyond simple association could not be convincingly established. Thus,
given the fact that the presence of NAFLD is an indicator of insulin resistance, which
is associated with elevated plasma RBP4 levels, it remains to be elucidated whether RBP4 causes or simply reflects NAFLD. Furthermore, circulating RBP4 appears not to be associated with ectopic fat deposition in muscles [14]
[22]
[45].
Although many studies have shown an inverse relationship between the circulating RBP4 and adiponectin [24]
[28]
[37]
[46]
[47]
[48]
[49]
[50]
[51], some other studies failed to find any association between these adipokines [14]
[27]
[52]
[53]
[54]
[55]. Notably, the major relevant studies, which included above 1 000 Asians, reported
a weak negative association [28]
[37]
[49]. Apart from the above-mentioned studies, which were performed in a steady metabolic
state, an inverse relationship between the induced changes of the circulating RBP4 and adiponectin during aerobic exercise has been shown [56]. Moreover, one study reported that when isolated adipocytes from mammary adipose
tissue were incubated with adiponectin, there was no significant change in RBP4 production, which may be attributed to the fact that mammary adipose tissue is more
similar to subcutaneous adipose tissue than the visceral one [57]. Similarly, regarding high molecular weight (HMW) adiponectin, which is considered
the most active form of the adiponectin and with the greatest clinical significance
[58], an inverse relationship between the serum levels of RBP4 and HMW adiponectin has been reported [50]. However, this relationship was not found in a population of nondiabetic subjects
[55], indicating that this association exists mainly in diabetics. It should be noticed
that, given the well known causal link between adiponectin and insulin sensitivity
[58], the prevalent notion of the inducement of insulin resistance by RBP4 is compatible with an inverse relationship between circulating RBP4 and adiponectin. Further studies are needed to confirm the existence of this association
and to investigate whether it is causal or not.
Although the studies examining nonobese subjects in a steady metabolic state did not
find any relationship between circulating RBP4 and leptin [14]
[46]
[53], a positive association between the decrease in circulating RBP4 and the increase in circulating leptin during a carbohydrate-restricted diet has
been reported [59]. Furthermore, leptin administration to ob/ob mice reduces the expression of RBP4mRNA in adipose tissue [60]. On the contrary, when visceral adipose tissue explants from 10 nonobese women were
cultured with recombinant leptin, there was an increase in RBP4 secretion [27]. Notably, the studies mentioning an absence of negative association between RBP4 and leptin included mostly nonobese subjects [14]
[27]
[46]
[53], indicating that this relationship may exist mainly in obese subjects.
Moreover, any significant association between RBP4 and resistin does not appear to exist, because the relevant studies found a very
weak association between these adipokines [61] or no significant association [46]. As for visfatin, a positive relationship between circulating RBP4 and visfatin has been found in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) [62].
Given the fact that the expression of the above-mentioned adipokines by the adipose
tissue is known to be influenced by the presence of obesity and insulin resistance
[63], the above-mentioned relationships between RBP4 and the rest of adipokines are possible to reflect an indirect association between
these adipokines, and not a causal link between them. Therefore, further studies are
needed to investigate this topic.
RBP4 during weight loss treatment
Dietary treatment
With regard to dietary interventions, the majority of the relevant studies showed
a decrease in circulating RBP4 during hypocaloric diets [14]
[24]
[59]
[64]
[65]
[66]
[67]
[68]
[69]
[70], whereas few studies did not find any change in circulating RBP4 during such interventions [21] ([Table 1]). Importantly, when obese women followed a dietary intervention consisted of a 4
week very low-calorie diet (VLCD), a 2 month low-calorie diet and 3–4 months of a
weight maintenance (WM) phase, plasma RBP4 levels decreased during VLCD and subsequently gradually increased during LCD and
WM phases [71]. Thus, at the end of the whole dietary intervention plasma RBP4 levels were higher than the ones at the end of the VLCD, but lower than baseline
values. A possible explanation for these results is that circulating RBP4 is mainly influenced by the energy balance at a given time point, and not by the
body weight per se.
It is well known that weight loss treatment causes an improvement of various metabolic
parameters [72]. Therefore, the changes in circulating RBP4 during dietary interventions that result in weight loss have been associated with
the improvement of various metabolic parameters, such as BMI [64]
[68], liver fat [14], Ins [24]
[68], HOMA-index [68], hsCRP, IL-6 [24], quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) [68], insulin sensitivity index of Matsuda and DeFronzo during OGTT [14], and fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of LDL ApoB-100 [67].
The magnitude of the diet-induced decrease in circulating RBP4 depended not only on the amount of weight loss, but also on the qualitative characteristics
of the applied diet [59]
[70]. Specifically, carbohydrate-restricted diet results in greater reduction in serum
RBP4 levels compared to low-fat diet [59]. Moreover, during an application of a hypocaloric Mediterranean diet, the reduction
in RBP4 is significantly greater in individuals with a higher adherence to Mediterranean
dietary pattern than individuals with lower adherence, independently of the magnitude
of caloric restriction or weight loss [70].
Exercise
Regarding the exercise-induced changes in RBP4, most of the relevant studies have shown that exercise reduces circulating RBP4 [6]
[56]
[73]
[74], whereas some of them did not find any change in RBP4 [[75]
[76] ([Table 1]). There have been some reports of the influence of RBP4 by the quantitative, as well as the qualitative characteristics of the physical activity
[73]
[74]. Specifically, the vigorous-intensity activity is associated with lower circulating
RBP4, but moderate-intensity activity, low-intensity activity, or walking does not have
any significant impact on RBP4
[ 73]. Furthermore, circulating RBP4 has been shown to decrease only during a resistance exercise program, but not during
aerobic exercise [74]. Although the existing studies have shown that the improvement in insulin sensitivity
after resistance exercise is similar with that after aerobic exercise [77], resistance exercise possibly has more favorable effects in the insulin sensitivity
of skeletal muscles, as indicated by the above-mentioned more pronounced decrease
in circulating RBP4 during resistance exercise. Additionally, the exercise-induced change in RBP4 is associated with the improvement in various metabolic parameters, such as GDR [6], WC, TRG, Glc, Ins, HOMA-index and the area under the curve of glucose during OGTT
(AUCglucose) [56].
Pharmacotherapy ([Table 1])
Plasma RBP4 levels decrease after the application of a weight loss program including caloric
restriction with the concomitant administration of orlistat [78]. Similar results have been found concerning sibutramine [39]
[79]. However, in the studies with orlistat and sibutramine, the noticed reduction in
circulating RBP4 may has been caused due to the caloric restriction per se. Thus, it cannot be concluded
whether the administration of orlistat or sibutramine has any additive impact on the
reduction of circulating RBP4 apart from the caloric restriction. As for the impact of CB1 blockers on RBP4, there is only one study in humans, which was performed by our group [64]. In this study, it was found that rimonabant treatment along with a dietary intervention
of obese subjects with hypertriglyceridemia for 3 months resulted in reduction of
circulating RBP4 and circulating RBP4 was positively correlated with the percentage change of HOMA-index [64]. A possible mechanism for the rimonabant-induced reduction in circulating RBP4 is the decrease in excretion of RBP4 from adipose tissue, as indicated by a study showing that rimonabant treatment reduced
RBP4mRNA expression in visceral adipose tissue of ob/ob mice [80].
Surgical management
Most of the studies investigating the impact of bariatric surgery (gastric bypass
or gastric banding) on circulating RBP4 reported a decrease in circulating RBP4 ([Table 1]), which was associated with concomitant improvements in various metabolic parameters
[35]
[69]
[81]
[82]
[83]
[84]. Furthermore, the reduction in circulating RBP4 after bariatric surgery occurs mainly during periods of active weight loss, whereas
the decrease in circulating RBP4 is minimal during periods of stabilized weight loss [81]
[83]. In this aspect, these results are in agreement with the above-mentioned results
in dietary intervention studies. Therefore, these results imply that RBP4 may be considered as a dynamic marker of negative energy balance, being reduced during
weight loss when a negative energy balance threshold is reached, independently of
the BMI of the individuals at a given time point. Moreover, there was no difference
in the induced changes in circulating RBP4 between patients undergoing gastric banding and gastric bypass [84].
Metabolic Syndrome
All the previous studies have shown that circulating RBP4 is higher in patients with metabolic syndrome (MS) than in subjects without MS [36]
[37]
[48]
[49]
[85]. Moreover, circulating RBP4 has been associated with the number of the factors of MS [36]
[37] and also with the value of each individual constituent of MS. Specifically, circulating
RBP4 has been found to increase in the following states: hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL-C,
hypertension, increased WC, and hyperglycemia. Among these factors, the strongest
and more steady association with RBP4 has been noticed for hypertriglyceridemia [36]
[37], whereas the weakest and the least frequent association with RBP4 has been found for hyperglycemia [37]
[85].
Lipoprotein Metabolism
Relationship between RBP4 and lipid parameters
Circulating RBP4 is positively correlated with total cholesterol (TC) [36]
[52], low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) [7]
[52]
[67]
[86], triglycerides (TRG) [6]
[7]
[28]
[36]
[86], apolipoprotein B (ApoB) [87], small dense LDL cholesterol (sdLDL-C) [52] and negatively correlated with high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) [7]
[86]. It should be noticed that the above-mentioned associations were found in a steady
metabolic state (without any significant recent change in nutrient intake and body
weight). Importantly, almost all of the relevant studies reported an association of
RBP4 with TRG. Furthermore, a study by our group investigated the relationship between
the changes in circulating RBP4 and the changes in parameters of lipoprotein metabolism, during medical interventions
that alter the lipoprotein profile [64]. Specifically, in this study obese, hypertriglyceridemic patients followed dietary
or fenofibrate treatment for 3 months. It was found that the percentage change of
plasma RBP4 levels during diet was positively correlated with the percentage change of TRG, very
low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (VLDL-C), LDL-C, non-HDL-cholesterol (non-HDL-C),
ApoB, and sdLDL-C. Similar associations were also reported during fenofibrate treatment.
Multiple regression analysis revealed that the percentage change of circulating RBP4 was the best predictor of the diet-induced percentage change of ApoB. As the possible
mechanism of the relationship between RBP4 and the ApoB-containing lipoproteins was suggested the regulation of the fractional
catabolic rate (FCR) of LDL ApoB100, as indicated by another study [67]. In this aspect, RBP4 appears to be linked with the metabolic pathway, which is responsible for the diet-induced
changes in ApoB-containing lipoproteins. This link may be causal or not. To our knowledge,
this matter has not been elucidated yet. Moreover, among all the associations of RBP4 with the ApoB-containing lipoprotein subspecies, the strongest of them was the one
referring to sdLDL-C. Furthermore, it was found that the percentage change of circulating
RBP4 was the best predictor of the diet-induced percentage change of sdLDL-C. The same
study proposed that the mechanism linking RBP4 with sdLDL may include not only the overproduction of sdLDL due to the increased
VLDL-C, but also the regulation of delipidation cascade of triglyceride-rich LDL particles.
Specifically, this regulation may be attributed to hepatic lipase activity, since
a positive association between circulating RBP4 and hepatic lipase activity has been previously reported [88].
Importantly, the majority of the RBP4-related studies have reported strong and persistent associations with the ApoB-containing
lipoproteins, whereas there are much fewer studies mentioning an association of RBP4 with the ApoAI-containing HDL-C. Possibly, the inverse relationship between RBP4 and HDL-C can be attributed to the positive association between RBP4 and TRG and the well known inverse relationship between TRG and HDL-C [89]. From this point of view, the relationship between RBP4 and HDL-C may reflect the previously reported strong association between RBP4 and TRG. Notably, most of the studies investigating the relationship between RBP4 and LDL-C assessed LDL-C by its indirect calculation using the Friedewald equation
[LDL-C=TC − (HDL-C + TRG/5)], which is more inaccurate than the direct measurement
of LDL-C, especially in subjects with considerable hypertriglyceridemia [90]
[91]. Moreover, studies assessing LDL-C by its direct measurement with lipoprotein electrophoresis
found quite steady and strong associations between RBP4 and LDL-C [52]
[64]
[86]. Thus, the absence or the weakness of the association between RBP4 and LDL-C, which has been reported in some studies, may not be true. Furthermore,
to the best of our knowledge, there is only one study investigating the association
of circulating RBP4 with sdLDL-C, in a steady metabolic state [52]. This study found a positive relationship between circulating RBP4 and sdLDL-C, in a population of young women. Notably, all these women had normal
TRG. Given the fact that small dense LDL particles predominate in states of hypertriglyceridemia
[92], the positive relationship between circulating RBP4 and sdLDL-C needs to be confirmed in hypertriglyceridemic subjects, as well.
Although, there are some clinical studies mentioning no association between circulating
RBP4 and serum free fatty acids (FFAs) levels [14]
[45], RBP4
+/– and RBP4
–/– mice have decreased circulating FFAs compared to wild type mice [3]. A possible explanation is that RBP4 may be involved in the regulation of FFA metabolism, but RBP4 alone does not appear to be significant enough to determine serum FFA levels, at
least in normal states.
RBP4 levels and hypolipidemic agents ([Table 1])
Statins cause a significant reduction of circulating RBP4 [93] or not change [31] or a nonsignificant trend for decrease [94]
[95], which may be attributed either to the not long enough period of statin administration
to induce changes in circulating RBP4 [94] or to the relative low statin dose used [95]. The mechanism underlying the potential statin-induced reduction of circulating
RBP4 may involve the statin-LDL lowering effect, given the previously reported relationship
between RBP4 and LDL metabolism [64]
[67].
Fibrates decrease RBP4 levels [64]
[93]
[96], possibly due to the fenofibrate-induced suppression of RBP4mRNA levels, in adipose tissue [96]. Furthermore, a study by our group [64] investigated the impact of 3-month fenofibrate treatment on plasma RBP4 levels, in obese hypertriglyceridemic patients. Specifically, this study elucidated
that fenofibrate caused an increase in serum creatinine and a decrease in renal excretion
of proteins. Given the fact that, RBP4 belongs to low molecular weight proteins that are traced in urine samples [97], the early rise in circulating RBP4 during the first month of fenofibrate treatment was attributed to the fenofibrate-induced
decrease in renal clearance of RBP4. Subsequently, the fall in circulating RBP4 during the following 2 months resulted from the metabolic action of fenofibrate.
Circulating RBP4 decreases after combination treatment of diet and cholestyramine [93]. However, in this case, it can not be excluded that the diet caused the decrease
in circulating RBP4, whereas the cholestyramine per se did not have any significant impact on circulating
RBP4. It has been reported that ezetimibe treatment does not influence plasma RBP4 levels [98].
Cardiovascular Disease
Circulating RBP4 has been found to be associated with some measures of subclinical cardiovascular
disease (CVD). Specifically, plasma RBP4 levels have been shown to be positively correlated with the echocardiographically
measured left ventricular wall thickness and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT)
and negatively correlated with the flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), as a measure of
endothelial function, and with the gray scale median in IMT (GSM-IMT) (a lower value
of GSM-IMT corresponds to a higher fat content of the carotid vessel wall) [53]
[99]
[100]
[101]. Consistently, the presence of clinical arteriosclerosis (defined as the presence
of at least one of the following: coronary heart disease, stroke, or peripheral vascular
disease) is associated with higher circulating RBP4 and this is also observed when every vascular disease category is considered separately
[4]. Similarly, circulating RBP4 has been associated with any prior cerebrovascular disease and with any prior hospitalization
for CVD [36]. Moreover, the circulating RBP4 of patients who had fatal or nonfatal coronary artery disease during follow-up is
higher compared to that of the individuals who remained free of cardiovascular disease
during follow-up [87]. Furthermore, acute or subacute cerebral infarction has been associated with elevated
circulating RBP4 [50]. Although a well-documented relationship exists between RBP4 and CVD, it remains to be elucidated whether RBP4 is causally involved in the development of CVD.
Regarding the possible mechanism underlying the association of RBP4 with CVD, in subjects with T2DM, circulating RBP4 is positively associated with the soluble adhesion molecules sICAM-1 and sE-selectin,
indicating that circulating RBP4 may be responsible for the development of vascular complications in T2DM [53]. Moreover, given the well known strong association of RBP4 with the atherogenic ApoB-containing lipoproteins and especially with triglycerides,
this relationship appears to be a plausible mechanism linking at least in part RBP4 with CVD. Indeed, the association between circulating RBP4 and CVD becomes insignificant after adjustment for TRG [36]
[87]. Furthermore, the negative association between mean IMT and retinol/RBP4 ratio persists even after adjustment for established cardiovascular risk factors
[101]. Thus, given that the retinol/RBP4 ratio indicates the saturation of RBP4 with retinol, retinol-free RBP4 (apo-RBP4) may have a specific role in the development of atherosclerosis.
The Impact of Renal Function on Circulating RBP4
It is well known that RBP4 is filtered through the glomerulus and subsequently is reabsorbed into the proximal
tubular cells [102]
[103]. Moreover, RBP4 belongs to low molecular weight proteins that are traced in urine samples [97]. From this point of view, plasma RBP4 levels are positively correlated with serum creatinine and degree of albuminuria,
negatively correlated with Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) and they generally increase
in renal dysfunction [104]
[105].
Measurement of RBP4
Regarding the procedure of measurement circulating RBP4, the majority of the relevant studies have used the ELISA method and the rest have
implied quantitative Western blotting or nephelometry. ELISA method has been reported
to underestimate circulating RBP4 in diabetic subjects, due to assay saturation, and quantitative Western blotting
has been proposed as the most reliable method for assaying circulating RBP4 [106]. However, the procedure of quantitative Western blotting is too laborious, time-consuming
and it needs the appropriate experience. Thus, it is not practical for studies using
a big number of samples. Furthermore, ELISA results are similar and are strongly associated
with Western blotting results [22]
[83]
[107]
[108] and ELISA method is much easier and more quicker than Western blotting. From this
point of view, ELISA method appears to be a practical and respectable enough choice
in measuring circulating RBP4. Another aspect, which should be taken into account in the measurement of circulating
RBP4, is whether there have been used plasma or serum samples, because plasma anticoagulants
may cause spurious results [106]. However, manufacturers usually advocate the use of either serum or plasma samples.
Conclusions
RBP4 appears to be an adipokine, which induces insulin resistance and is possibly involved
in the pathogenesis of the metabolic complications of obesity. Importantly, the existence
of a close association of the RBP4 both with the atherogenic ApoB-containing lipoproteins and CVD has been reported.
Notably, an important limitation of some of the RBP4-related studies is that they included patients who received drugs, known to influence
circulating RBP4, such as oral antidiabetic drugs and hypolipidemic agents, or patients in conditions
influencing circulating RBP4, such as renal or hepatic damage. Furthermore, regarding the associations of RBP4 with some metabolic parameters, there are no studies investigating the aspect of
causality. In other words, the establishment of the various potential metabolic roles
of RBP4 demands the demonstration that RBP4 is causally linked with the above-mentioned metabolic parameters. Therefore, further
carefully planned studies are needed, focusing on the investigation of whether RBP4 constitutes a causal metabolic factor and on the molecular mechanism of action of
RBP4.