Key words
hormone replacement therapy (HRT) - postmenopausal - phytoestrogens - soy - red clover
- serum lipids
Schlüsselwörter
Hormonsubstitution - Phytoöstrogene - Postmenopause - Soja - Rotklee - Serumlipide
Introduction
Menopause is associated with changes in metabolic profile [1]. Although hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has been shown to have beneficial effects
on lipid metabolism, its adverse effects have indicated a need for alternative estrogen-based
treatments [2]. This has led to the discovery of a class of estrogenic molecules produced by plants:
phytoestrogens which are structurally and functionally similar to 17b-estradiol. Although
phytoestrogens bind to the estrogen receptor at low levels compared with endogenous
estrogen, they are still capable of producing estrogenic effects [3]. Soy is a popular food additive because it is free from cholesterol and lactose
and rich in vegetable proteins, unsaturated fats, and fiber. It also has abundant
amounts of daidzein and genistein, the two most well-known and most potent isoflavones.
On the other hand, one of the most extensively studied food supplements
has been a phytoestrogen preparation containing red clover-derived isoflavones, as
red clover contains the four most important isoflavones [4]. Several investigations have evaluated the effects of isoflavones on serum lipid
levels in postmenopausal women, but the results were ambiguous [5], [6], [7], [8]. Moreover, there are few comparisons between different phytoestrogen outcomes in
literature. Assuming that both soy and red clover contain high amounts of isoflavones,
the aim of the present study was to compare the effects of soy and red clover-derived
isoflavones on serum lipid levels in postmenopausal women and contrast these effects
to lipid levels in healthy postmenopausal women without phytoestrogen supplementation.
Materials and Methods
This prospective randomized clinical trial was carried out in the Ultramedica Clinic,
American Medical Academy in Belgrade, and in the Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Clinical Center of Serbia, from September 2008 to June 2010.
Study inclusion criteria were: good general health, no medication that could influence
the study results (i.e., anti-osteoporotic, lipid-lowering, anti-hypertensive or hormone-based
medication) and postmenopausal status (last menstrual cycle at least 12 months prior
to entering the study). Health status was confirmed by a check-up that included detailed
anamnesis, examination of gynecological, respiratory and cardiovascular systems (blood
pressure, heart rate and ECG), as well as hematological, biochemical, and urine analysis.
Women with lipid levels outside the referral range (under, above) and in the referral
range were all eligible for the study. Study exclusion criteria were: not fulfilling
the inclusion criteria at any time during the study, allergies or severe adverse reactions
to the administered drugs, changes to regular dietary habits, interruption of the
study protocol, and the patientʼs wish to withdraw from the study. A clinical sample
was constructed.
Informed consent was obtained from all women, and the study was approved by the local
Research Ethics Committee.
A total of 117 consecutive postmenopausal women who came to us over a period of four
months for postmenopausal symptoms (hot flushes, sleep disturbance, mood swings, vaginal
dryness) were enlisted into the study. Of these, 74 fulfilled the inclusion criteria
and were randomized. Randomization was done by simple manual selection whereby every
woman with an odd randomization number received soy supplements while women with an
even randomization number received red clover-derived isoflavones. During the study
neither the doctors nor the patients knew which group the patient was in or the type
of medication administered to the patient.
Women in the control group did not receive any medication and were only used for comparison.
Women in this group were randomly selected from a different population consisting
of healthy postmenopausal women who had regular colposcopic follow-ups during the
same period. Out of a total of 186 such women, 111 fulfilled the inclusion criteria.
Simple manual randomization was done whereby every third eligible woman was recruited
into the control group of the study.
Thus all women in the study were randomized into one of three groups (soy – S, red
clover – RC, control – C) with 37 women in each group. However, 6 women had to be
excluded from the soy group and 5 from the red clover group, as they did not take
their supplements on a regular basis. Moreover, 7 women from the soy group, 6 from
the red clover group and 9 from the control group were excluded because of emerging
health problems (hypertension in 11 cases, uterine bleeding in 8 cases and H-SIL in
3 cases). One woman from the soy group wanted to start hormone replacement therapy.
Three women decided to drop out from the control group. In the end, 23 women from
the soy group, 26 from the red clover group and 25 from the control group completed
the study.
A protocol for phytoestrogen administration was compiled by the authors prior to the
start of the study. According to this protocol, women were required to take one capsule
per day of either soy or red clover-derived phytoestrogens early in the morning before
their first meal, continuously over a period of 18 months. The daily soy dose contained
2 isoflavones, genistein (39 mg) and daidzein (1 mg), and the red clover capsule contained
4 isoflavones, biokain A (23 mg), daidzein (1 mg), formononetin (15 mg) and genistein
(1 mg). Each patient kept a daily diary listing supplement intake, symptoms and adverse
reactions.
We investigated total cholesterol, cholesterol fractions (LDL, HDL) and triglycerides
in blood from patients drawn from the cubital vein, and recorded the body height and
weight of each subject which were used to calculate the body mass index (BMI) for
each patient according to the standard formula. Data were recorded at the beginning
of the study and at 6, 12 and 18 months after commencing treatment. We compared both
randomization arms to a control cohort and to one another. Standard tests for lipid
level evaluation were carried out using an Olympus AU 400 automatic analyzer with
referral rates for triglycerides (0.61–2.10 mmol/l), total cholesterol (3.63–6.46 mmol/l),
HDL (0.75–1.99 mmol/l), and LDL (1.60–4.78 mmol/l).
Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 15 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Differences
between groups were evaluated by descriptive (mean, SD) and analytical statistics.
One-sample Kolmogorov Smirnov test (KSZ) and one way ANOVA (Fx, LSD) were used to
compare serum lipid levels in patient groups and between group pairs.
Results
Both prior to and at all three measurement time points (at 6, 12, and 18 months) the
levels of all assessed serum lipids (cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL and HDL) were
normally distributed in each (S, RC, C) patient group (triglycerides: S group at 6
months: KSZ = 0.397, pmax = 0.997; HDL control at 18 months: KSZ = 1.261, pmin = 0.083).
Differences in mean values of evaluated descriptive parameters (age, age at menopause,
BMI at the start of the study, BMI at the end of the study) were not significant for
any combinations (S-RC, S-C, RC-C) of patient groups (tmin = 0.248 for BMI at 18 months for the S and RC groups; tmax = 1.074 for age at menopause in the S and RC groups) ([Table 1]).
Table 1 Patient age and body mass index (mean ± SD) in investigated and control groups.
Investigated groups
|
Age at menopause (years)
|
Patient age (years)
|
BMI at start
|
BMI at 18 months
|
No. of patients
|
Phytoestrogen group
|
Soy
|
48.0 ± 3.6
|
55.7 ± 4.0
|
27.3 ± 6.6
|
26.0 ± 5.2
|
23
|
|
Red clover
|
46.6 ± 5.1
|
56.1 ± 3.9
|
25.9 ± 7.0
|
26.4 ± 5.8
|
26
|
Control group
|
47.7 ± 4.5
|
55.2 ± 5.6
|
26.7 ± 5.4
|
27.5 ± 4.6
|
25
|
The average reduction in cholesterol levels was 23.84 % in the S group and 23.4 %
in the RC group compared to an average increase in the control group of 3.84 %. The
average reduction in triglyceride levels was 43.92 % in the S group and 45.33 % in
the RC group, compared to an average increase of 4.1 % in the C group. Average HDL
levels were increased by 3.38 times in the S group and by 3.59 times in the RC group
while the average decrease in the control group was 15.49 %. The average reduction
in cholesterol levels was 23.69 % in the S group and 23.33 % in the RC group while
the average increase in the control group was 3.99 % ([Table 2]).
Table 2 Average (mean ± SD) levels of serum lipids in investigated and control groups.
|
Investigated groups
|
Prior to study
|
At 6 months
|
At 12 months
|
At 18 months
|
Cholesterol (mmol/l)
|
Phytoestrogen group
|
Soy
|
6.89 ± 0.47
|
6.41 ± 0.41
|
5.68 ± 0.36
|
5.25 ± 0.41
|
|
|
Red clover
|
6.92 ± 0.47
|
6.38 ± 0.44
|
5.73 ± 0.43
|
5.30 ± 0.42
|
|
Control group
|
6.87 ± 0.51
|
6.95 ± 0.47
|
7.04 ± 0.48
|
7.13 ± 0.49
|
|
p values
|
0.940
|
< 0.001
|
< 0.001
|
< 0.001
|
Triglycerides (mmol/l)
|
Phytoestrogen group
|
Soy
|
3.01 ± 0.39
|
2.63 ± 0.38
|
2.08 ± 0.36
|
1.69 ± 0.41
|
|
|
Red clover
|
3.07 ± 0.44
|
2.71 ± 0.42
|
2.17 ± 0.50
|
1.71 ± 0.59
|
|
Control group
|
3.10 ± 0.39
|
3.15 ± 0.40
|
3.20 ± 0.41
|
3.22 ± 0.39
|
|
p values
|
0.743
|
< 0.001
|
< 0.001
|
< 0.001
|
LDL (mmol/l)
|
Phytoestrogen group
|
Soy
|
5.18 ± 0.23
|
4.80 ± 0.23
|
4.40 ± 0.26
|
3.95 ± 0.30
|
|
|
Red clover
|
4.97 ± 0.23
|
4.72 ± 0.25
|
4.33 ± 0.27
|
3.80 ± 0.31
|
|
Control group
|
5.20 ± 0.28
|
5.29 ± 0.27
|
5.36 ± 0.30
|
5.39 ± 0.39
|
|
p values
|
0.002
|
< 0.001
|
< 0.001
|
< 0.001
|
HDL (mmol/l)
|
Phytoestrogen group
|
Soy
|
0.54 ± 0.10
|
0.97 ± 0.19
|
1.41 ± 0.29
|
1.73 ± 0.25
|
|
|
Red clover
|
0.49 ± 0.09
|
0.85 ± 0.13
|
1.35 ± 0.15
|
1.68 ± 0.16
|
|
Control group
|
0.56 ± 0.09
|
0.53 ± 0.08
|
0.49 ± 0.05
|
0.45 ± 0.10
|
|
p values
|
0.027
|
< 0.001
|
< 0.001
|
< 0.001
|
The differences in cholesterol levels between patient groups were not significant
prior to treatment (p = 0.062) but were highly significant (p < 0.001) at all three
measurement time points (6 months: Fx6 = 13.897; 12 months: Fx12 = 86.770; 18 months: Fx18 = 155.379; [Table 2]). At all three measurement time points the mean cholesterol level of patients in
the control group was significantly higher than those of both the soy and red clover
groups (p < 0.001), while mean cholesterol values did not differ significantly between
soy and red clover groups ([Table 3]).
Table 3 Statistically significant differences in serum lipid levels in investigated group
pairs.
Serum lipids
|
Time point
|
Groups
|
Mean difference
|
p value
|
C: control, S: soy, RC: red clover
|
Cholesterol
|
6 months
|
C-S
|
0.538
|
< 0.001
|
|
|
C-RC
|
0.572
|
< 0.001
|
|
12 months
|
C-S
|
1.358
|
< 0.001
|
|
|
C-RC
|
1.310
|
< 0.001
|
|
18 months
|
C-S
|
1.880
|
< 0.001
|
|
|
C-RC
|
1.828
|
< 0.001
|
Triglycerides
|
6 months
|
C-S
|
0.520
|
< 0.001
|
|
|
C-RC
|
0.447
|
< 0.001
|
|
12 months
|
C-S
|
1.114
|
< 0.001
|
|
|
C-RC
|
1.031
|
< 0.001
|
|
18 months
|
C-S
|
1.527
|
< 0.001
|
|
|
C-RC
|
1.512
|
< 0.001
|
LDL
|
6 months
|
C-S
|
0.493
|
< 0.001
|
|
|
C-RC
|
0.579
|
< 0.001
|
|
12 months
|
C-S
|
0.957
|
< 0.001
|
|
|
C-RC
|
1.028
|
< 0.001
|
|
18 months
|
C-S
|
1.442
|
< 0.001
|
|
|
C-RC
|
1.589
|
< 0.001
|
HDL
|
6 months
|
C-S
|
− 0.443
|
< 0.001
|
|
|
C-RC
|
− 0.329
|
< 0.001
|
|
|
S-RC
|
− 0.114
|
0.008
|
|
12 months
|
C-S
|
− 0.919
|
< 0.001
|
|
|
C-RC
|
− 0.860
|
< 0.001
|
|
18 months
|
C-S
|
− 1.275
|
< 0.001
|
|
|
C-RC
|
− 1.231
|
< 0.001
|
Differences in triglyceride levels between patient groups were not significant (p = 0.743)
before starting treatment but were highly significant (p < 0.001) at all three measurement
time points during treatment (Fx6 = 12.838; Fx12 = 54.094; Fx18 = 90.110; [Table 2]). At all three measurement time points the mean triglyceride level of patients in
the control group was significantly higher than in both the S and RC groups (p < 0.001),
while there was no significant difference in mean values between the S and the RC
group ([Table 3]).
The difference between LDL levels in patient groups at the start of the study and
at all three time points was highly significant (p < 0.001; Fx0 = 7.041; Fx6 = 39.271; Fx12 = 97.513; Fx18 = 157.239; [Table 2]). At the beginning of the study the mean LDL levels of women in the control group
were not significantly different from those in the soy group (p = 0.780) but highly
significantly higher than those of the women in the RC group (p = 0.001). The mean
LDL level was significantly higher in the S group compared to the RC group (p = 0.003).
At all three time points during the study the mean LDL level of patients in the control
group was significantly higher than in both the soy and the red clover group (p < 0.001),
while the mean values in the soy and red clover groups did not significantly differ
from each other ([Table 3]).
The differences in HDL levels between patient groups were significant (p = 0.027)
before starting treatment and were highly significant at all three time points (Fx6 = 61.267; Fx12 = 156.476; Fx18 = 359.167; [Table 2]). Before treatment, the mean HDL levels of women in the control and the soy groups
and in the soy and the red clover groups did not differ significantly, while the mean
HDL level in the control group was highly significantly higher than in the RC group
(p = 0.001). At all three measurement time points the mean HDL level of patients in
the control group was significantly lower than in both the soy and the red clover
groups (p < 0.001). The mean HDL level in the soy group was only highly significantly
higher than in the red clover group after 6 months of treatment ([Table 3]).
Discussion
We found that phytoestrogens derived from both soy and red clover have a positive
metabolic effect on serum lipids of postmenopausal women. Both soy and red clover
supplement were found to have an almost equal impact on serum lipid levels.
In postmenopausal women, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels
are increased and HDL cholesterol is decreased compared with premenopausal women of
the same age and BMI [1], [9]. Hormone replacement therapy has known to lower total and LDL cholesterol and to
slightly increase HDL cholesterol, thus lowering the risk of cardiovascular disease
in the postmenopausal period. But since HRT therapy can have numerous adverse effects
and consequences and, most importantly, carries a higher risk of breast cancer and
endometrial malignancy, phytoestrogens were introduced into clinical practice [10], [11], [12].
The efficacy of these substances can be explained by their specific binding to the
estrogen receptor. There are two types of estrogen receptors (ER): ERα and ERβ [3], [13]. Phytoestrogens bind weakly to ERα receptors and more strongly to ERβ receptors
and possess organ-specific estrogenic and antiestrogenic effects, acting as partial
agonists in some tissues and as antagonists in others. ERβ receptors are located in
vascular walls and bone cells, while ERα receptors are found in the endometrium and
breast tissue. Therefore, women receiving phytoestrogen medication experience two
benefits: (1) an increase of HDL cholesterol and (2) a down-regulation of ERα receptor
caused by phytoestrogens binding to ERβ receptors [13], [14].
Phytoestrogens can be derived from numerous plants but are predominantly obtained
from soy and red clover. Both plants are safe and nontoxic, and also contain other
beneficial substances, such as polifenoles, which are potent antioxidants [2]. Recent studies have confirmed that phytoestrogens have a favorable impact on serum
lipid levels [15], [16], [17], [18].
Red clover is considered to have an advantage compared to other plants containing
phytoestrogens as red clover is the only plant from which four of the most important
isoflavones (biokain A, daidzein, formononetin and genistein) can be derived [19]. Soy contains only two isoflavones, but they are particularly potent: daidzein and
genistein. Moreover, some studies have shown that the displayed benefits attributable
to isoflavones are mainly due to the effects of daidzein and genistein [19], [20]. The results of our study also appear to support this viewpoint as the impact of
therapy using soy supplements that contained daidzein and genistein were similar to
the effects achieved by the administration of all 4 isoflavones in the red clover
supplement. On the other hand, other isoflavones in red clover also might have an
impact on serum lipid levels, as red clover has low levels of genistein.
Some authors have pointed out that different isoflavones have different mechanisms
of action and, therefore, a different influence on serum lipid levels [5]. Additional studies like ours comparing the sources of different types of isoflavones
should be undertaken in order to fully understand the relevance of specific isoflavone
types.
Mean cholesterol and triglyceride levels before commencing therapy were lower in the
control group, but after only 6 months of treatment these levels were significantly
higher than in patients from both the soy and the red clover groups. Supplementation
with soy and red clover had similar effects on cholesterol and triglyceride serum
levels. Mean LDL level in the control group before treatment was insignificantly higher
than in the soy group and significantly higher than in the red clover group. After
6 months of treatment the mean LDL level in the control group was highly significantly
higher compared to both groups of women who received phytoestrogens. The mean HDL
level in the control group at the beginning of the study was somewhat higher than
in the soy group and significantly higher than in the red clover group. Just 6 months
after starting therapy, the mean HDL level in the control group was significantly
lower than in either the soy or the red clover groups.
Supplementation with soy or red clover had similar effects on LDL and HDL levels.
All of the results with regard to the effects on total cholesterol and LDL levels
obtained in our study are consistent with most of the data in the literature [15], [16], [17], [18]. As for HDL levels, the results of some studies support our findings [5], [15], [17], [18], while other studies could not confirm our data [8], [16]. The extent of the impact of red clover and soya-derived phytoestrogens on HDL levels
in other investigations was similar to that in our study (3–4 %). The decrease in
HDL levels in the control group (15.5 %) could be explained by their continuing their
established nutritional patterns throughout the
18-month period.
According to current advice, dietary supplements should contain at least 40 mg of
isoflavones per day [21], [22]. Although our patients received pills with different concentrations of specific
isoflavones, their overall effect on serum lipid levels did not differ. This might
be due to the fact that both pills consisted of the same overall amount of phytoestrogens
(40 mg), as advised. But whether changes in dosages of specific isoflavones will result
in diverse outcomes should be investigated in further studies. All patients investigated
in our study were similar with regard to factors that could have an influence on the
therapy, i.e., BMI at the beginning and at the end of the study, age, and age at menopause.
Further studies could investigate whether differences in age and BMI and appropriate
adjustments for age and BMI could affect results.
Numerous studies have shown that isoflavone supplementation, taken over a period of
a couple of months, is safe, with no side-effects [12]. Because no side-effects were detected in our study which had a follow-up period
of 18 months, it can be concluded that isoflavone supplementation may be safe to use
for even longer periods. Moreover, according to the results of our study, to achieve
a positive impact on serum lipids, phytoestrogen supplementation should be administered
for at least 6 months. Patients from both investigated groups were highly motivated
to take the medication and therefore the dropout rate was generally low. One of the
reasons for this motivation could be that high serum lipid levels were found in the
majority of patients at the beginning of the study.
There are almost no studies in the literature that have investigated the possible
differential effects of supplementation by red clover or soy. Therefore, our findings
offer new insights for the introduction of phytoestrogen supplementation in postmenopausal
women. We have shown that there is no difference in the metabolic effects of soy and
red clover-derived isoflavones on serum lipid levels, so both sources of phytoestrogens
can be used equally.
Finally, our study had its limitations. The clinical sample was relatively small.
However, the study groups were comparable to those of other studies in the field of
postmenopausal therapies. Moreover, the arbitrary order of the patientsʼ visits and
the randomized patient distribution to the investigated groups provided a patient
selection which was free of bias. Another problem with our study was that it was not
designed as a completely double-blinded investigation, but we will leave that for
future trials. We wished to avoid a placebo effect in the control group and, therefore,
patients in the control group were not given any form of medication. A placebo-controlled
study might be undertaken in further investigations. The fact that the control cohort
was not part of the randomization population could be considered as the biggest drawback
of this study. However, we considered it proper to treat (either with soy or red clover
phytoestrogens) all women who came to us
complaining of menopausal symptoms (the randomization population). Furthermore, we
wanted to have a control group that did not have any menopause-related health problems.
All three groups fulfilled the same inclusion criteria and were randomized, which
diminishes selection bias.
Conclusions
In this study, phytoestrogen supplementation derived either from soy or red clover
was found to have a favorable metabolic impact on serum lipids in postmenopausal women.
Both soy and red clover supplements showed an almost equal impact on serum lipid levels.
Phytoestrogen supplementation had no side-effects, so this approach could be considered
safe. All patients were satisfied with the result of the administered medications.