Der Klinikarzt 2012; 41(1): 39-41
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1304532
Schwerpunkt
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Kontrastmittel-Sonographie der Leber in der Onkologie – Primäre Methode zum Staging und zur Verlaufskontrolle

Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of the liver in cancer patients
Axel Stang
1   Abteilung für Hämatologie, Onkologie, und Palliativmedizin, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg
,
Cay-Uwe von Seydewitz
1   Abteilung für Hämatologie, Onkologie, und Palliativmedizin, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 January 2012 (online)

Die Qualität der diagnostischen und interventionellen Sonographie der Leber wird für onkologische Patienten durch den Einsatz von Ultraschallkontrastmitteln erheblich gesteigert. Die Diagnose von Leberherden, der Nachweis von Lebermetastasen und die Präzision von ultraschallgezielten Interventionen (Punktion, Radiofrequenzablation) werden deutlich verbessert. Die Kontrastmittel-Sonographie ist die primäre Methode zum Staging und zur Verlaufskontrolle für überwiegend hepatisch metastasierende Malignome (z.B. gastrointestinale Tumore). Ohne Kontrastmittelsonographie ist der sonographische Ausschluß von Lebermetastasen bei differentialtherapeutischer Konsequenz nicht mehr vertretbar (z. B. kolorektale Lebermetastasen). Die notwendige Ausbildung und Qualität der Untersucher wird durch das Mehrstufenmodell der DEGUM (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ultraschall in der Medizin) gewährleistet.

In patients with known cancer, the correct detection and characterization of focal liver lesions has important therapeutic consequences. Conventional ultrasonography (US) is the most frequently used modality for liver imaging in cancer patients. However, US has limited accuracy for the diagnosis of liver tumors and/or liver staging. Therefore, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are often used in cancer patients. The introduction of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) has dramatically improved the ability of US to characterize focal liver lesions and/or to detect liver metastases, with comparable accuracy to that of contrast-enhanced CT and/or MR imaging. CEUS is easy to use, poses no risk of nephrotoxicity and/or ionizing radiation, reduces patients anxiety from unclear US diagnoses, and reduces the need for further CT and/or MR imaging.

In view of the oncologist, CEUS represents an important step forward in the management and care of cancer patients. CEUS particularly improves the staging and follow-up of cancer patients for whom the liver is the dominant site of metastases, such as gastrointestinal tumors, and patients with known or suspected hepatocellular carcinomas.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Stang A, Keles H, von Seydewitz C, Hentschke S, Braumann D. Kontrastmittel in der Abdomensonographie: aktueller Stand und Perspektiven. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2006; 131: 1813-1818
  • 2 Wilson SR, Burns PN. Microbubble-enhanced US in body imaging: what role?. Radiology 2010; 257: 24-39
  • 3 Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T et al. Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) – Update 2008. Ultraschall in Med 2008; 29: 28-443
  • 4 Quaia E, Callida F, Bertolotto M et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast specific US modes and a sulfur hexafluorid-filled microbubble contrast agent: diagnostic performance and confidence. Radiology 2004; 232: 420-430
  • 5 Bryant TH, Blomley MJ, Albrecht T et al. Liver phase uptake of a liver specific microbubble improves characterisation of liver lesions: a prospective multicenter study. Radiology 2004; 232: 799-809
  • 6 Strobel D, Seitz K, Blank W et al. Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for the Characterization of focal Liver Lesions – Diagnostic Accuracy in Clinical Practice (DEGUM Multicenter Trial). Ultraschall in Med 2008; 29: 499-505
  • 7 Seitz K, Strobel D, Bernatik T et al. Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for the Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions – Prospective Comparison in Clinical Practice: CEUS vs. CT (DEGUM Multicenter Trial). Ultraschall in Med 2009; 30: 383-389
  • 8 Seitz K, Bernatik T, Strobel D et al. Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for the Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions (DEGUM Multicenter Trial) – CEUS vs. MRI – a prospective Comparison in 269 Patients. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 492-499
  • 9 Strobel D, Seitz K, Blank W et al. Tumor-Specific Vascularisation Pattern of Liver Metastasis, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Hemangioma, Focal Nodular Hyperplasia in the Differential Diagnosis of 1349 Liver Lesion in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS). Ultraschall in Med 2009; 30: 376-382
  • 10 Konopke R, Kersting S, Saeger HD, Bunk A. Kontrastmittelsonographie in der Detektion von Leberraumforderungen – Vergleich zum intraoperativen Befund. Ultraschall in Med 2005; 26: 107-113
  • 11 Oldenburg A, Hohmann J, Foert E. Detection of hepatic metastases with low MI real time contrast enhanced sonography and sonovue. Ultraschall in Med 2005; 26: 277-284
  • 12 Stang A, Keles H, Hentschke S et al. Real-time Ultrasonography-Computed Tomography Fusion imaging for Staging of Hepatic Metastatic Involvement in Patient with Colorectal Cancer: Initial Results from Comparison to US seeing CT images and to Multidetector-Row CT alone. Invest Radiol 2010; 45-45