Int J Sports Med 2012; 33(11): 917-925
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1311649
Orthopedics & Biomechanics
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Lower Limb Loading in Step Aerobic Dance

H.-W. Wu
1   Department of Physical Education, National Taiwan University of Physical Education and Sport, Taichung, Taiwan
,
H.-M. Hsieh
2   Institute of Physical Education, Health & Leisure Studies, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
,
Y.-W. Chang
3   Department of Exercise and Health Science, National Taiwan University of Physical Education and Sport, Taichung, Taiwan
,
L.-H. WANG
2   Institute of Physical Education, Health & Leisure Studies, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 14 March 2012

Publication Date:
15 June 2012 (online)

Abstract

Participation in aerobic dance is associated with a number of lower extremity injuries, and abnormal joint loading seems to be a factor in these. However, information on joint loading is limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate the kinetics of the lower extremity in step aerobic dance and to compare the differences of high-impact and low-impact step aerobic dance in 4 aerobic movements (mambo, kick, L step and leg curl). 18 subjects were recruited for this study. High-impact aerobic dance requires a significantly greater range of motion, joint force and joint moment than low-impact step aerobic dance. The peak joint forces and moments in high-impact step aerobic dance were found to be 1.4 times higher than in low-impact step aerobic dance. Understanding the nature of joint loading may help choreographers develop dance combinations that are less injury-prone. Furthermore, increased knowledge about joint loading may be helpful in lowering the risk of injuries in aerobic dance instructors and students.

 
  • References

  • 1 Beck BR. Tibial stress injuries: an aetiological review for the purposes of guiding management. Sports Med 1998; 26: 265-279
  • 2 Belt CR. Injury associated with aerobic dance. Am Fam Physician 1990; 41: 1769-1772
  • 3 Beynnon BD, Renström PA, Alosa DM, Baumhauer JF, Vacek PM. Ankle ligament injury risk factors: a prospective study of college athletes. J Orthop Res 2001; 19: 213-220
  • 4 Bouché RT, Johnson CH. Medial tibial stress syndrome (tibial fasciitis): a proposed pathomechanical model involving fascial traction. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2007; 97: 31-36
  • 5 Brukner P. Exercise-related lower leg pain: an overview. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32 (3 Suppl) S1-S3
  • 6 Costigan PA, Deluzio KJ, Wyss UP. Knee and hip kinetics during normal stair climbing. Gait Posture 2002; 16: 31-37
  • 7 Craig DI. Medial tibial stress syndrome: evidence-based prevention. J Athl Train 2008; 43: 316-318
  • 8 De Angelis M, Vinciguerra G, Gasbarri A, Pacitti C. Oxygen uptake, heart rate and blood lactate concentration during a normal training session of an aerobic dance class. Eur J Appl Physiol 1998; 18: 121-127
  • 9 Du Toit V, Smith R. Survey of the effects of aerobic dance on the lower extremity in aerobic instructors. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2001; 91: 528-532
  • 10 Flores R. Dance for health: Improving fitness in African American and Hispanic adolescents. Public Health Rep 1995; 110: 189-193
  • 11 Francis LL, Francis PP, Welshons-Smith K. Aerobic dance injuries: A survey of instructors. Phys Sportsmed 1985; 14: 105-111
  • 12 Harnischfeger HC, Raymond C, Hagerman C. Incidence of injury following high and low impact aerobics versus running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1988; 20: S88
  • 13 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
  • 14 Haug EJ. (ed). Intermediate Dynamics. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1992: 198-206
  • 15 Janis LR. Aerobic dance survey. A study of high-impact versus low impact injuries. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1990; 80: 419-442
  • 16 Kadel NJ. Foot and ankle injuries in dance. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2006; 17: 813-826
  • 17 Kaufman KR, Brodine SK, Shaffer RA, Johnson CW, Cullison TR. The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27: 585-593
  • 18 Michaud TJ, Rodrigues-Zayas J, Armstrong C, Hartnig M. Ground reaction forces in high impact and low impact aerobic dance. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1993; 33: 359-366
  • 19 Mayers L, Bronner S, Agraharasamakulam S, Ojofeitimi S. Lower extremity kinetics in tap dance. J Dance Med Sci 2010; 14: 3-10
  • 20 Murphy DF, Connolly DAJ, Beynnon BD. Risk factors for lower extremity injury: a review of the literature. Br J Sports Med 2003; 37: 13-29
  • 21 Mutoh Y, Sawai S, Takanashi Y, Skurko L. Aerobic dance injuries among instructors and students. Phys Sportsmed 1988; 16: 81-88
  • 22 Nadeau S, McFadyen BJ, Malouin F. Frontal and sagittal plane analyses of the stair climbing task in healthy adults aged over 40 years: what are the challenges compared to level walking?. Clin Biomech 2003; 18: 950-959
  • 23 Pecina MM, Bojanic I. (eds.). Overuse Injuries of the Musculoskeletal System. Boca Raton: CRC; 2004: 3
  • 24 Pelclová K, Frömel K, Skalik K, Stratton G. Dance and aerobic dance in physical education lessons: The influence of the student’s role on physical activity in girls. Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc, Gymn 2008; 38: 85-92
  • 25 Prentice WE. (ed.). Arnheim’s Principles of Athletic Training: A Competency-Based Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2009: 604-644
  • 26 Ricard MD, Veatch S. Comparison of impact forces in high and low impact aerobic dance movements. Int J Sports Biomech 1990; 6: 67-77
  • 27 Ricard MD, Veatch S. Effect of running speed and aerobic dance jump height on vertical ground reaction forces. J Appl Biomech 1994; 10: 14-27
  • 28 Richie DH, Kelso SF, Bellucci PA. Aerobic dance injuries: A retrospective study of instructors and participants. Phys Sportsmed 1985; 13: 130-140
  • 29 Riener R, Rabuffetti M, Frigo C. Stair ascent and descent at different inclinations. Gait Posture 2002; 15: 32-44
  • 30 Rothenberger LA, Chang JI, Cable TA. Prevalence and types of injuries in aerobic dancers. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16: 403-407
  • 31 Rousanoglou EN, Boudolos KD. Ground reaction forces and heart rate profile of aerobic dance instructors during a low and high impact exercise programme. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2005; 45: 162-170
  • 32 Telhan G, Franz J, Dicharry J, Kerrigan D. Lower limb joint kinetics during moderately sloped running. J Athl Train 2010; 45: 16-21
  • 33 Tseng YK. Analysis of Ground Reaction Force and EMG Activity of Lower Extremity in Step Aerobics. Thesis: National Taiwan Sport University, Taiwan 2001
  • 34 Vetter WL, Helfet DL, Sear K, Matthews LS. Aerobic dance injuries. Phys Sportsmed 1985; 13: 114-120
  • 35 Whiting WC, Zernicke RF. (eds.). Biomechanics of musculoskeletal injury. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2004: 159
  • 36 Winter DA. (ed.). Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2009: 176-198
  • 37 Witvrouw E, Werner S, Mikkelsen C, Van Tiggelen D, Vanden Berghe L, Cerulli G. Clinical classification of patellofemoral pain syndrome: guidelines for non-operative treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005; 13: 122-130
  • 38 Woltring HJ. A Fortran package for generalized cross-validation spline smoothing and differentiation. Adv Eng Softw 1986; 8: 104-113
  • 39 Wu WL, Huang PJ, Lin CJ, Chen WY, Huang KF, Cheng YM. Lower extremity kinematics and kinetics during level walking and stair climbing in subjects with triple arthrodesis or subtalar fusion. Gait Posture 2005; 21: 263-270