Aktuelle Kardiologie 2012; 1(04/05): 305-308
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1315036
Übersichtsarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Prognose von ICD-Patienten – Rolle der Komorbiditäten

Prognosis of ICD Carriers – Role of Comorbidities
C. Sticherling
1   Kardiologie, Universitätsspital Basel, Schweiz
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 October 2012 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Der implantierbare Kardioverter-Defibrillator ist eine der großen Errungenschaften der kardiovaskulären Medizin der letzten 3 Jahrzehnte. In mehreren großen randomisierten Studien konnte belegt werden, dass er bei ausgewählten Patienten sowohl in der Sekundär- als auch in der Primärprophylaxe Leben rettet. Die Evidenz ist besonders stark bei Patienten mit chronisch eingeschränkter Pumpfunktion ≤ 35 % auf dem Boden einer ischämischen Herzerkrankung. Technische Fortschritte mit deutlicher Reduktion der Aggregatgröße und Verbesserungen der Wahrnehmungsalgorithmen haben den chirurgischen Teil der Implantation deutlich vereinfacht und standardisiert. Es handelt sich jedoch immer noch um eine deutlich komplexere und damit auch nebenwirkungsbehaftetere Therapie als etwa die Schrittmachertherapie. Hierbei gilt: Je geringer das Risiko für den plötzlichen Herztod ist, desto ungünstiger wird das Verhältnis adäquater zu inadäquaten Therapien. Wegen Veränderungen der Komorbiditäten und der zugrundeliegenden strukturellen Herzerkrankung sollte die Therapieindikation differenziert gestellt und auch im Verlauf, vor allem zum Zeitpunkt eines anstehenden ICD-Wechsels, kritisch überprüft werden [23].

Abstract

Implantable defibrillators have revolutionized the therapy of patients with survived sudden cardiac death or a high risk thereof. Improvements in device technology allow for easy and standardized implantation. One has to bear in mind, however, that ICD therapy is associated with specific risks that are different and higher than in the pacemaker population. The lower the absolute arrhythmogenic risk, the higher is the risk of untoward side effects without benefiting from the ICD therapy. Moreover, the presence of certain comorbidities and competing risks preclude an appropriate ICD therapy before death of another cause in many patients. Due to the changes in competing risk factors but also a possible decrease of the arrhythmogenic risk, the ICD indication should be reassessed, especially at the time of generator replacement [23].

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 AVID-Investigators. A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. The antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (avid) investigators. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1576-1583
  • 2 Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ et al. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 877-883
  • 3 Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB et al. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 225-237
  • 4 Kadish A, Dyer A, Daubert JP et al. Prophylactic defibrillator implantation in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2151-2158
  • 5 Viskin S, Rosso R. The top 10 reasons to avoid defibrillation threshold testing during icd implantation. Heart Rhythm 2008; 5: 391-393
  • 6 Sticherling C, Schaer B, Kuhne M et al. A plea for delivery of high-voltage shocks during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator replacement or system upgrade. Can J Cardiol 2012; April 11 [Epub ahead of print]
  • 7 Reichlin T, Kuhne M, Sticherling C et al. Characterization and financial impact of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients without interventions 5 years after implantation. QJM 2011; 104: 849-857
  • 8 Tzeis S, Andrikopoulos G, Kolb C et al. Tools and strategies for the reduction of inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks. Europace 2008; 10: 1256-1265
  • 9 Ladwig KH, Deisenhofer I, Simon H et al. Characteristics associated with low treatment satisfaction in patients with implanted cardioverter defibrillators: Results from the licad study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005; 28: 506-513
  • 10 Wilkoff BL, Williamson BD, Stern RS et al. Strategic programming of detection and therapy parameters in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators reduces shocks in primary prevention patients: Results from the prepare (primary prevention parameters evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 541-550
  • 11 Daubert JP, Zareba W, Cannom DS et al. Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in madit ii: Frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 1357-1365
  • 12 Liu J, Brumberg G, Rattan R et al. Class i recall of defibrillator leads: A comparison of the sprint fidelis and riata families. Heart Rhythm 2012; April 3 [Epub ahead of print]
  • 13 Schaer BA, Koller MT, Sticherling C et al. Longevity of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, influencing factors, and comparison to industry-projected longevity. Heart Rhythm 2009; 6: 1737-1743
  • 14 Gandhi T, Crawford T, Riddell JT. Cardiovascular implantable electronic device associated infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2012; 26: 57-76
  • 15 Eckstein J, Koller MT, Zabel M et al. Necessity for surgical revision of defibrillator leads implanted long-term: Causes and management. Circulation 2008; 117: 2727-2733
  • 16 Kleemann T, Becker T, Doenges K et al. Annual rate of transvenous defibrillation lead defects in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators over a period of > 10 years. Circulation 2007; 115: 2474-2480
  • 17 Wilkoff BL, Love CJ, Byrd CL et al. Transvenous lead extraction: Heart rhythm society expert consensus on facilities, training, indications, and patient management: This document was endorsed by the american heart association (aha). Heart Rhythm 2009; 6: 1085-1104
  • 18 Schaer B, Theuns DA, Sticherling C et al. Effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator on left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2010; 106: 1640-1645
  • 19 Theuns DA, Schaer BA, Soliman OI. The prognosis of implantable defibrillator patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy: Comorbidity burden as predictor of mortality. Europace 2011; 13: 62-69
  • 20 Smith T, Levy WC, Schaer BA et al. Performance of the seattle heart failure model in implantable defibrillator patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol 2012; April 18 [Epub ahead of print]
  • 21 Goldenberg I, Vyas AK, Hall WJ et al. Risk stratification for primary implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 288-296
  • 22 Koller MT, Schaer B, Wolbers M et al. Death without prior appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: A competing risk study. Circulation 2008; 117: 1918-1926
  • 23 Kramer DB, Buxton AE, Zimetbaum PJ. Time for a change – a new approach to icd replacement. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 291-293