Int J Sports Med 2012; 33(12): 1010-1015
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1316362
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Different V˙O2max Time-Averaging Intervals in Swimming

R. J. Fernandes
1   Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Portugal
2   Porto Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Porto, Portugal
,
K. de Jesus
1   Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Portugal
,
C. Baldari
3   Department of Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Rome, Italy
,
K. de Jesus
1   Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Portugal
,
A. C. Sousa
1   Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Portugal
,
J. P. Vilas-Boas
1   Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Portugal
2   Porto Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Porto, Portugal
,
L. Guidetti
3   Department of Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Rome, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 17 May 2012

Publication Date:
12 July 2012 (online)

Preview

Abstract

We aimed to determine the effect of sampling interval strategy on V˙O2max assessment to establish a standard time averaging method that allows a better identification of the V˙O2 plateau incidence in swimming. To this end, 3 incremental protocols utilizing different step lengths for each sampling interval were used to compare V˙O2max measurements. 11 trained male swimmers performed 3 repetitions of a front crawl intermittent incremental protocol until exhaustion (increments of 0.05 m.s − 1, with 30 s and 24–48 h intervals between steps and tests, respectively) with 200, 300 and 400-m step lengths. V˙O2 was directly measured, and 6 sampling intervals were compared: bxb and averages of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 s. Shorter sampling intervals (≤15 s) allowed the highest incidence of the V˙O2 plateau, independent of the step lengths used; the 200 and 300-m step protocols accounted for higher percentage of V˙O2 plateau incidence, and higher V˙O2max values, compared to the 400-m step protocol. As an optimal sampling interval should be used for the validation of the research findings, and considering that swimmers and coaches prefer less time-consuming protocols, the use of the 10 s time-average interval (once bxb and 5 s samplings present high variability) in a 200-m step incremental protocol for V˙O2max assessment in swimming is suggested.