Kofferdam in der Kieferorthopädie

Frage
In welchen Situationen ist die ­Verwendung von Kofferdam in der ­Kieferorthopädie sinnvoll?

Antwort

 

Scroll to top

• Literatur

• 1 Winkler R. Sanford Christie Barnum – Der Erfinder des Kofferdam. Quintessenz 1991; 42: 483-486
• 2 Barbakow A. The rubber dam: a 100 year history. J Am Acad Gold Foil Oper 1965; 8: 1
• 3 Betz W. Kofferdam. In: Heidemann D. (eds.). Endodontie Praxis der Zahnheilkunde. Urban und Fischer; München Jena: 2001: 43-55
• 4 Der Große Brockhaus Verlag F. A. Brockhaus, Leipzig 1929
• 5 Simonsen R. The rubber dam – dentistry’s ugly duckling. Quintessence Int 1984; 15: 1101
• 6 Buonocore M. Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 849-853
• 7 Baumann M. Kofferdam. In: Baumann M, Beer R. (eds.). Farbatlanten der Zahnmedizin – Endodontologie. Georg Thieme Verlag; Stuttgart New York: 2008: 99-108
• 8 Kamann W. Kofferdam – Wandel von Indikation und Technik. Schweiz MSchr Zahnmed 1998; 108: 771-777
• 9 Knierim R. Invisisible Lower Cuspid to Cuspid Retainer. Angle Orthod 1973; 43: 218-220
• 10 Liebenberg W. Rubber dam isolation of the working field in orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 1993; 27
• 11 Clark S, Gordon P, McCabe J. An ex vivo investigation to compare orthodontic bonding using a 4-META-based adhesive or a composite adhesive to acid-etched and sandblasted enamel. J Orthod 2003; 30: 51-58
• 12 Toroglu M, Bayramoglu O, Yarkin F et al. Possibility of Blood and Hepatitis B Contamination Through Aerosols Generated During Debonding Procedures. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 571-578
• 13 Stern R, Berkowitz R, Shurin S et al. Multiple microaerophilic streptococcal lung abscesses after orthodontic treatment. Pediatrics 1982; 70: 722-724
• 14 Chate R. Safer orthodontic debonding with rubber dam. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 103: 171-174
• 15 Arnone R. Bonding orthodontic lower 3 to 3 retainers with a rubber dam: a second generation step-by-step procedure. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116: 432-434
• 16 Reis A, dos Santos J, Dourado Loguercio A et al. Eighteen-month bracket survival rate: conventional versus self-etch adhesive. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30: 94-99
• 17 Heringer M, Almeida M, Miguel J. Direct bond brackets: cotton roll versus rubber dam isolation. Angle Orthod 1993; 63: 231-234
• 18 Becker A, Shapira J, Chaushu S. Orthodontic treatment for disabled children – a survey of patient and appliance management. J Orthod 2001; 28: 39-44
• 19 Becker A, Shapira J, Chaushu S. Orthodontic Treatment for the Special Needs Child. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 2009; 41: 63-73
• 20 Chaushu S, Gozal D, Becker A. Intravenous sedation: an adjunct to enable orthodontic treatment for children with disabilities. Eur J Orthod 2002; 24: 81-89
• 21 Chaushu S, Zeltser R, Becker A. Safe orthodontic bonding for children with disabilities during general anaesthesia. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22: 225-228
• 22 Tacken M, Cosyn J, de Wilde P et al. Glass fibre reinforced versus multistranded bonded orthodontic retainers: a 2 year prospective multi-centre study. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32: 117-123
• 23 Mavrommatis M. Zuverlässigkeit der Retention mit Cuspidretainer im Unterkiefer. 2006 Med Diss, Giessen, Giessen
• 24 Stick Tech Ltd. Turku Finnland. Instructions for use – everStick^®ORTHO. www.Sticktech.com accessed Feb 12 – 2012
• 25 Störmann I, Ehmer U. A Prospective Randomized Study of Different Retainer Types. J Orofac Orthop 2002; 63: 42-50
• 26 Kern M, Eschbach S. Kleben – Neue Wege in der Prothetik. Zahnärztl Mitt 2008; 98: 44-50
• 27 Hain M, Longman L, Field E et al. Natural rubber latex allergy: implications for the orthodontist. J Orthod 2007; 34: 6-11
• 28 Patel A, Burden D, Sandler P. Medical Disorders and Orthodontics. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 2009; 41: 23-41