Endoscopy, Table of Contents Endoscopy 2013; 45(02): 155DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326180 Letters to the editor © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New YorkReply to Peng & Chow Authors Y. N. Lee J. H. Moon H. J. Choi Recommend Article Abstract Buy Article(opens in new window) Full Text References References 1 Lee YN, Moon JH, Choi HJ et al. Direct peroral cholangioscopy using an ultraslim upper endoscope for management of residual stones after mechanical lithotripsy for retained common bile duct stones. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 819-824 2 Cheon YK, Lehman GA. Identification of risk factors for stone recurrence after endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 18: 461-464 3 Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F et al. Evaluation of residual bile duct stones by peroral cholangioscopy in comparison with balloon-cholangiography. Dig Endosc 2010; 22: S85-S89 4 Tsuchiya S, Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Y et al. Clinical utility of intraductal US to decrease early recurrence rate of common bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23: 1590-1595 5 Ang TL, Teo EK, Fock KM, Lyn TanJY. Are there roles for intraductal US and saline solution irrigation in ensuring complete clearance of common bile duct stones?. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1276-1281 6 Kim HI, Moon JH, Choi HJ et al. Holmium laser lithotripsy under direct peroral cholangioscopy by using an ultra-slim upper endoscope for patients with retained bile duct stones (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1127-1132 7 Itoi T, Moon JH, Waxman I. Current status of direct peroral cholangioscopy. Dig Endosc 2011; 23 Suppl 1: 154-157 8 Moon JH, Ko BM, Choi HJ et al. Direct peroral cholangioscopy using an ultra-slim upper endoscope for the treatment of retained bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2729-2733 9 Choi HJ, Moon JH, Ko BM et al. Clinical feasibility of direct peroral cholangioscopy-guided photodynamic therapy for inoperable cholangiocarcinoma performed by using an ultra-slim upper endoscope (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 808-813