Semin intervent Radiol 2012; 29(03): 192-196
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326928
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Bullet Embolization: Multidisciplinary Approach by Interventional Radiology and Surgery

Timothy Nolan
1   Department of Diagnostic Radiology
,
Ho Phan
2   Department of Surgery, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
,
Andrew Hal Hardy
1   Department of Diagnostic Radiology
,
Pavan Khanna
1   Department of Diagnostic Radiology
,
Paul Dong
1   Department of Diagnostic Radiology
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 October 2012 (online)

Abstract

Bullet embolization after penetrating trauma is an infrequent but important phenomenon. It presents an unexpected sequelae to the otherwise predictable injury pattern of penetrating missile injury mechanism and poses a challenging diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. Bullets from penetrating wounds can gain access to the vasculature and migrate to nearly every large vascular bed. Patients can be asymptomatic, but the potential complications can be devastating including limb-threatening ischemia, sepsis, endocarditis, cardiac valvular incompetence, pulmonary embolism, stroke, and even death. The exact incidence of bullet embolization is unknown, but it was estimated to be 0.3% during the Vietnam War and 1.1% in the recent conflict in Afghanistan and Iraq. The scarcity of the condition and the lack of concentrated experience at any single institution contribute to the controversies pertaining to the management approach. Traditionally, surgical extraction of embolized bullets may involve difficult and invasive surgical exposures. Recent advancement in endovascular techniques provides an additional option in this treatment algorithm. In this article, we describe a case of venous bullet embolization from the left iliac vein treated by a combined endovascular and surgical approach.

 
  • References

  • 1 Bertoldo U, Enrichens F, Comba A, Ghiselli G, Vaccarisi S, Ferraris M. Retrograde venous bullet embolism: a rare occurrence-case report and literature review. J Trauma 2004; 57 (1) 187-192
  • 2 Aidinian G, Fox CJ, Rasmussen TE, Gillespie DL. Varied presentations of missile emboli in military combat. J Vasc Surg 2010; 51 (1) 214-217
  • 3 Rich NM, Collins Jr GJ, Andersen CA, McDonald PT, Kozloff L, Ricotta JJ. Missile emboli. J Trauma 1978; 18 (4) 236-239
  • 4 Schurr M, McCord S, Croce M. Paradoxical bullet embolism: case report and literature review. J Trauma 1996; 40 (6) 1034-1036
  • 5 Corbett H, Paulsen EK, Smith RS, Carman CG. Paradoxical bullet embolus from the vena cava: a case report. J Trauma 2003; 55 (5) 979-981
  • 6 Michelassi F, Pietrabissa A, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Vargish T, Moosa HH. Bullet emboli to the systemic and venous circulation. Surgery 1990; 107 (3) 239-245
  • 7 Miller KR, Benns MV, Sciarretta JD , et al. The evolving management of venous bullet emboli: a case series and literature review. Injury 2011; 42 (5) 441-446
  • 8 Mattox KL, Beall Jr AC, Ennix CL, DeBakey ME. Intravascular migratory bullets. Am J Surg 1979; 137 (2) 192-195
  • 9 Lundy JB, Johnson EK, Seery JM, Pham T, Frizzi JD, Chasen AB. Conservative management of retained cardiac missiles: case report and literature review. J Surg Educ 2009; 66 (4) 228-235
  • 10 Shannon FL, McCroskey BL, Moore EE, Moore FA. Venous bullet embolism: rationale for mandatory extraction. J Trauma 1987; 27 (10) 1118-1122
  • 11 Kortbeek JB, Clark JA, Carraway RC. Conservative management of a pulmonary artery bullet embolism: case report and review of the literature. J Trauma 1992; 33 (6) 906-908