Intraoperative Computed Tomography Guidance to Confirm Decompression Following Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Cervicomedullary Compression

Abstract

Introduction Cervicomedullary compression often requires an anterior approach to address the compressive vector. In certain cases an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is ideal for decompression. It is essential that an adequate decompression be achieved and verified before the patient leaves the operating room. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use intraoperative computed tomography (IO-CT) in assessing the adequacy of decompression.

Methods A retrospective chart review revealed 11 cases of EEA odontoid resection IO-CT verification of decompression. Operative reports and review of imaging was used to determine if further decompression was performed following the intraoperative scan.

Results Out of 11 EEA cases, 4 (36%) patients showed evidence of residual compression following an initial IO-CT. Further operative decompression was undertaken following the first scan in all cases. A second intraoperative scan was then used to confirm complete decompression. No patient left the operating room with residual compression.

Discussion IO-CT provided valuable utility in 36% of the cases after the initial resection was incomplete. The standard fluoroscopic guidance may not provide adequate resolution and enhanced utility like IO-CT.

Keywords

endoscopy - endonasal - odontoid - rheumatoid disease

• References

• 1 Menezes AH, VanGilder JC. Transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the anterior craniocervical junction. Ten-year experience with 72 patients. J Neurosurg 1988; 69: 895-903
• 2 Crockard HA. Transoral surgery: some lessons learned. Br J Neurosurg 1995; 9: 283-293
• 3 Cavallo LM, de Divitiis O, Solari D. Transnasal and transoral approaches to the craniocervical junction: two routes for a variable destination. World Neurosurg 2011; 76: 74-75
• 4 Gempt J, Lehmberg J, Grams AE, Berends L, Meyer B, Stoffel M. Endoscopic transnasal resection of the odontoid: case series and clinical course. Eur Spine J 2011; 20: 661-666
• 5 Kassam AB, Gardner P, Snyderman C, Mintz A, Carrau R. Expanded endonasal approach: fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19: E6
• 6 Holly LT, Foley KT. Intraoperative spinal navigation. Spine 2003; 28 (15, Suppl) S54-S61
• 7 Lekovic GP, Potts EA, Karahalios DG, Hall G. A comparison of two techniques in image-guided thoracic pedicle screw placement: a retrospective study of 37 patients and 277 pedicle screws. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 7: 393-398
• 8 Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD. Intraoperative navigation during resection of brain metastases. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1996; 7: 267-277
• 9 Shalit MN, Israeli Y, Matz S, Cohen ML. Intra-operative computerized axial tomography. Surg Neurol 1979; 11: 382-384
• 10 Hum B, Feigenbaum F, Cleary K, Henderson FC. Intraoperative computed tomography for complex craniocervical operations and spinal tumor resections. Neurosurgery 2000; 47: 374-380 , discussion 380–381
• 11 Pillai P, Baig MN, Karas CS, Ammirati M. Endoscopic image-guided transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction: an anatomic study comparing surgical exposure and surgical freedom obtained with the endoscope and the operating microscope. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (5) (Suppl. 02) 437-442 , discussion 442–444
• 12 Petrik V, Apok V, Britton JA, Bell BA, Papadopoulos MC. Godfrey Hounsfield and the dawn of computed tomography. Neurosurgery 2006; 58: 780-787 , discussion 780–787
• 13 Nakamura M, Tamaki N, Tamura S. Image-guided navigational microsurgery for skull base and brainstem diseases. Neurosurg Q 2002; 12: 100-107
• 14 Uhl E, Zausinger S, Morhard D , et al. Intraoperative computed tomography with integrated navigation system in a multidisciplinary operating suite. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (5) (Suppl. 02) 231-239 , discussion 239–240
• 15 Kotecha R, Toledo-Pereyra LH. Advanced imaging technology in surgical innovation. J Invest Surg 2011; 24: 243-249
• 16 McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler Jr JM. CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics 2006; 26: 503-512
• 17 Moon L, McHugh K. Advances in paediatric tumour imaging. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90: 608-611
• 18 Tormenti MJ, Kostov DB, Gardner PA, Kanter AS, Spiro RM, Okonkwo DO. Intraoperative computed tomography image-guided navigation for posterior thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation in spinal deformity surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2010; 28: E11
• 19 Greess H, Lutze J, Nömayr A , et al. Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 995-999
• 20 Naderi S , et al. Odontoid Fractures. Turk Neurosurg 2006; 16: 81-84
• 21 Mahnken AH, Wildberger JE, Gehbauer G , et al. Multidetector CT of the spine in multiple myeloma: comparison with MR imaging and radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 1429-1436
• 22 Nuñez Jr DB, Zuluaga A, Fuentes-Bernardo DA, Rivas LA, Becerra JL. Cervical spine trauma: how much more do we learn by routinely using helical CT?. Radiographics 1996; 16: 1307-1318 , discussion 1318–1321
• 23 Hott JS, Papadopoulos SM, Theodore N, Dickman CA, Sonntag VK. Intraoperative Iso-C C-arm navigation in cervical spinal surgery: review of the first 52 cases. Spine 2004; 29: 2856-2860
• 24 Pamir MN, Seifert V, Kiris T. Intraoperative imaging. 2011. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99651-5
• 25 Makary M, Chiocca EA, Erminy N , et al. Clinical and economic outcomes of low-field intraoperative MRI-guided tumor resection neurosurgery. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 34: 1022-1030
• 26 Mushlin AI, Mooney C, Holloway RG, Detsky AS, Mattson DH, Phelps CE. The cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging for patients with equivocal neurological symptoms. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1997; 13: 21-34