Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2013; 29(02): 121-126
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1341586
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

An Interactive Three-dimensional Nose Model for Rhinosurgery

Werner Johannes Heppt
1   Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital, Staedtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Germany
,
Heinrich Godbersen
2   Department of Applied Sciences, Beuth University, Berlin, Germany
,
Thomas Hildebrandt
3   Private practice of otorhinolaryngology in association with the Limmatklinik, Zurich, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 April 2013 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The motivation behind the development of a new interactive three-dimensional (3D) model of the cartilaginous and bony framework of the nose originated from the significant demand for sophisticated patient communication and for accurate documentation of the surgical steps in rhinoplasty. Basically, the model consists of three features—the viewer function, the freehand function, and default applications—enabling the surgeon to replicate fundamental compilations of findings and to graphically document operative measures easily. The user is able to save all graphics in two-dimensional format and allocate them to patient files. Because the application was designed to be sufficiently universal without being too complex, the 3D model provides a well-balanced mix between freehand and default functions, representing the consistent development of currently available tools.

Keywords

rhinoplasty - 3D model - nose - plastic surgery - simulation
 

  • References

  • 1 Constantinides M. The rhinoplasty consultation and the business of rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2009; 17: 1-5 , v
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Khan HA. Rhinoplasty: initial consultation and examination. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2012; 24: 11-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Steiger JD. The rhinoplasty consult. Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27: 393-396
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Tardy Jr ME. Rhinoplasty: The Art and the Science. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Sheen JH, Sheen AP , Eds. Aesthetic Rhinoplasty. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 1998. (reprint of 1987 ed.)
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Andretto Amodeo C. The central role of the nose in the face and the psyche: review of the nose and the psyche. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2007; 31: 406-410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ende KH, Lewis DL, Kabaker SS. Body dysmorphic disorder. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2008; 16: 217-223 , vii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Tasman AJ. The psychological aspects of rhinoplasty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 18: 290-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gorney M, Martello J. Patient selection criteria. Clin Plast Surg 1999; 26: 37-40 , vi
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rohrich RJ. Streamlining cosmetic surgery patient selection—just say no!. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 220-221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gunter rhinoplasty diagrams. Available at: http://www.canfieldsci.com/imaging_systems/imaging_software/Mirror_software/Gunter_Rhinoplasty_Diagrams.html . Accessed March 18, 2013
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Godbersen HP, Pieper J. Erschwingliche Visualisierung. TFH-Presse Nr. 2004; 1: 7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tombu S, Daele J, Lefebvre P. Rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry in rhinoplasty. B-ENT 2010; 6 (Suppl. 15) 3-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bloom JD, Sridharan S, Hagiwara M, Babb JS, White WM, Constantinides M. Reformatted computed tomography to assess the internal nasal valve and association with physical examination. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2012; 14: 331-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Citardi MJ, Hardeman S, Hollenbeak C, Kokoska M. Computer-aided assessment of bony nasal pyramid dimensions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 126: 979-984
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hamilton III GS. Morphing images to demonstrate potential surgical outcomes. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2010; 18: 267-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Moscatiello F, Herrero Jover J, González Ballester MA, Carreño Hernández E, Piombino P, Califano L. Preoperative digital three-dimensional planning for rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010; 34: 232-238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Punthakee X, Rival R, Solomon P. Digital imaging in rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009; 33: 635-638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Farkas LG, Bryson W, Klotz J. Is photogrammetry of the face reliable?. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 66: 346-355
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lübbers HT, Medinger L, Kruse A, Grätz KW, Matthews F. Precision and accuracy of the 3dMD photogrammetric system in craniomaxillofacial application. J Craniofac Surg 2010; 21: 763-767
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Toriumi DM, Dixon TK. Assessment of rhinoplasty techniques by overlay of before-and-after 3D images. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2011; 19: 711-723 , ix
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kovacs L, Zimmermann A, Brockmann G , et al. Three-dimensional recording of the human face with a 3D laser scanner. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59: 1193-1202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Zachow S, Steinmann A, Hildebrandt T, Heppt W. Understanding nasal airflow via CFD simulation and visualization. In: Proc Computer Aided Surgery around the Head. Berlin: Pro Business Verlag; 2007: 173-176
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams WP , Eds. Dallas Rhinoplasty: Nasal Surgery by the Masters. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Nolst Trenité GJ , ed. Rhinoplasty; A Practical Guide to Functional and Aesthetic Surgery of the Nose. The Hague, Netherlands: Kugler; 2005
    Google Scholar